Law prohibiting replacement workers will worsen Canadian services, says MEI

From the Montreal Economic Institute

Without replacement workers, CPKC and CN strike could impact commuter rail in large Canadian cities.

Ottawa’s proposed ban on the use of temporary replacement workers during work stoppages will significantly disrupt vital services, asserts the Montreal Economic Institute in a study released this morning.

“Banning the use of replacement workers for federally regulated industries will enable small groups of unionized employees to stop key transportation infrastructure from working,” explains Gabriel Giguère, public policy analyst at the MEI and author of the study. “Our trains, airports, and seaports could effectively be at risk of shutting down whenever a union needs to settle a wage dispute.”

On May 27, the House of Commons adopted Bill C-58, which will prohibit the use of temporary replacement workers during labour disputes between employees and employers in federally regulated sectors once it takes effect, 12 months after receiving royal assent.

Unionized workers will continue to be able to seek temporary employment elsewhere, whereas federally regulated employers will be unable to continue operations, which would impact the entire Canadian economy.

This announcement comes just as unionized employees of Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited (CPKC) and Canadian National (CN) prepare to strike simultaneously.

The adoption of Bill C-58 ensures that work stoppages in sectors including banking, telecommunications, and rail and air travel will be even more detrimental to the Canadian economy than under the current regulatory framework.

Quebec and British Columbia have similar laws in place provincially, and these tend to make work stoppages longer and more frequent there than in provinces without such legislation.

In the context of upcoming rail strikes, the banning of replacement workers means that thousands of Canadians who use commuter rail to get to work would be stranded or would add to road congestion.

The researcher gives the example of CPKC’s 80 Calgary-based rail traffic controllers which, if they go on strike after the law goes into effect, would prevent commuter rail traffic on a number of important transit lines.

“Trains can’t move on a railroad unless you have rail traffic controllers, and a number of key transit lines use CPKC’s infrastructure,” explains Giguère. “In the absence of replacement workers, any strike action on their part could shut down TransLink’s West Coast Express, GO Transit’s Milton Line, and Exo’s Candiac, Saint-Jérôme, and Vaudreuil/Hudson lines.

“That’s a whole lot of power to put in the hands of 80 or so unionized staff.”

The MEI study is available here.

* * *

The MEI is an independent public policy think tank with offices in Montreal and Calgary. Through its publications, media appearances, and advisory services to policy-makers, the MEI stimulates public policy debate and reforms based on sound economics and entrepreneurship.

Related Topics:#CNStrike #CPKC #MontrealEconomicInstitute #ReplacementWorkers

Up Next

WEF report calls on governments to push fake meat products to meet Paris Climate goals

Don't Miss

The Enduring Legacy of Canada on D-Day

Todayville

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Nestlé boycott begins as activists target DEI rollbacks

Daily Caller / 30 mins ago

CIA Agents Posing As State Department Officials Outnumbered Real Ones, JFK Doc Shows

International / 6 hours ago

Trump says Carney would be ‘easier’ to deal with than Poilievre as Canada’s prime minister

Business

Nestlé boycott begins as activists target DEI rollbacks

Published on March 19, 2025

Todayville

MxM News

Quick Hit:

The latest corporate boycott targeting companies rolling back their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives is set to begin this week, with Nestlé in the crosshairs. Unlike previous boycotts of Amazon and Target, which focused on avoiding specific retailers, this campaign urges consumers to boycott hundreds of household products from March 21 to March 28. Other major companies, including Walmart, McDonald’s, and General Mills, are also slated for boycotts in the coming months.

Key Details:

The Nestlé boycott runs from March 21 to March 28 and encourages avoiding products like Cheerios, KitKat, Purina pet food, and DiGiorno frozen pizza.
The movement follows the rollback of DEI policies by several major corporations after President Donald Trump’s call to eliminate DEI at the federal level.
Additional boycotts are planned for Walmart, McDonald’s, and Amazon, with an “economic blackout” scheduled for April 18.

Diving Deeper:

The push for boycotts against Nestlé and other corporations stems from a broader activist response to changes in corporate policies following President Donald Trump’s directive to rescind DEI initiatives at the federal level. Many companies, including Amazon, Target, and Walmart, have scaled back or eliminated their DEI programs, prompting backlash from activist groups.

While past boycotts targeted specific retailers—such as avoiding Amazon purchases or skipping Target shopping trips—the Nestlé boycott is structured differently. Consumers are being asked to avoid a wide range of products, from Coffee-Mate creamers to Stouffer’s frozen meals and Perrier sparkling water. This more expansive approach seeks to impact Nestlé’s bottom line across multiple product categories, rather than just limiting consumer spending at a particular store.

This campaign is part of a broader wave of organized economic boycotts. A 40-day boycott of Target was launched last week, intentionally aligning with Lent, a religious period of fasting leading up to Easter. Additionally, Amazon is facing another boycott in May following one that concluded recently.

Nestlé is far from the last target. Activists have mapped out additional boycotts for General Mills (April 21-28), McDonald’s (June 24-30), and an Independence Day boycott on July 4. These efforts appear to be designed for maximum financial pressure, with coordinated economic “blackouts” meant to disrupt revenue streams at key moments throughout the year.

As these corporate boycotts continue, companies may be forced to decide between maintaining DEI initiatives to appease activists or rolling them back to avoid alienating a different segment of their customer base. With President Trump advocating against DEI policies, businesses that comply with his agenda may find themselves the target of an increasingly organized opposition.

Business

Top prosecutor calls Tesla violence ‘domestic terrorism’ amid federal cuts

Published on March 19, 2025

Todayville

From The Center Square

By Brett Rowland

As Tesla boss Elon Musk leads federal cost-cutting efforts, his auto company has drawn the ire of frustrated Americans who have taken things out on his cars, buildings, electric vehicle chargers and everything else that carries a Tesla logo.

President Donald Trump has gone to lengths to protect Musk as the Department of Government Efficiency works to reshape the federal workforce to Trump’s specifications.

This week, the nation’s top prosecutor put vandals and others on notice. Attorney General Pamela Bondi said the Justice Department will investigate the spate of recent attacks on Tesla property. She called the attacks on Tesla “domestic terrorism.”

“The swarm of violent attacks on Tesla property is nothing short of domestic terrorism,” she said. “The Department of Justice has already charged several perpetrators with that in mind, including in cases that involve charges with five-year mandatory minimum sentences.”

Bondi also hinted at organizers behind the attacks.

“We will continue investigations that impose severe consequences on those involved in these attacks, including those operating behind the scenes to coordinate and fund these crimes,” she said.

Since Musk took up the top cost-cutting position in Trump’s government, his Tesla electric vehicles have become a target for vandals of all stripes. Some have graffitied their feelings about Musk on Tesla vehicle chargers. Other have gone after the cars with keys or other forms of vandalism. The same goes for dealerships, car lots and showrooms. No injuries have been reported during the attacks.

Trump is keenly aware of the problem. He recently invited a parade of Tesla vehicles to the White House for some personal car shopping. The president even invited reporters along for the spectacle.

The violence and vandalism come as Trump looks to reduce the footprint of the federal government. Trump, with help from Musk and his team, has virtually shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development. Trump has also taken steps to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education and other agencies that don’t align with his spending plans.

DOGE, with help from Trump’s cabinet, has directed cuts at agencies across the federal government.

Trump has promised to cut “hundreds of billions” in federal spending in 2025 through the reconciliation process. Musk initially suggested DOGE could cut $2 trillion in spending. Musk more recently said the group will aim for $2 trillion, but likely come up with half that amount.

Congress has run a deficit every year since 2001. In the past 50 years, the federal government has ended with a fiscal year-end budget surplus four times, most recently in 2001.