Does the government have a recovery plan?

This is post is from Terry Loewen, a local community builder and Vice President of Abbey Platinum Master Built. Terry was recognized as Red Deer Citizen of the Year in 2018 and in 2014 he received the Red Deer Rotary Club’s Paul Harris Fellowship Award.

With permission it has been very slightly edited for some strong language.

WHAT IS THE PLAN!!!! WHAT IS THE PLAN!!!! WHAT IS THE PLAN!!!!

Through this entire Covid19 experience I keep thinking to myself, “what is the plan???”.

I do believe that the decision of self-isolation, social distancing, closing of restaurants and public spaces, etc., etc., was the right decision.

BUT, what is the plan moving forward?

I listen to the news and the public news conferences and all I hear is a bunch of statistics and we are doing this and we are doing that! That’s fine but what is the plan for reopening the economy, helping businesses, helping people driven into poverty, helping people with loss of love ones and all of the other issues this has caused? A pipeline is great but we need a hell of a lot more than one pipeline!

I do believe our Premier is trying and working very hard, but I and the public need to see a plan. Even some framework of a plan. If everyone in Canada hasn’t figured it out yet, our Prime Minister isn’t going to come up with one, then they have their head in the sand! His plan is not “speaking moistly on one another”! Not even funny actually!!

The one person when a crisis hits that everyone looks to is the Leader, whether it’s a family, work situation, sports team, city, provincial, national or world crisis!! They look for leadership and guidance! Our Prime Minister (I refuse to call him a leader) has been self-isolating for weeks and weeks on end! Hiding in his home for crying out loud! Absolutely the worse display of leadership I have or will ever see in my lifetime! I truly believe that!! I’m trying to be somewhat respectful writing this but its very difficult because of the lack of competence this man has shown this country for the past 5 years. It’s time the other 3 Parties of Canada kick him to the curb side!!

The point of me writing this blog, letter or whatever you want to call it, is that its fine that our Governments have got us at home doing nothing so that we can flatten the curve and beat this virus! BUT what is the plan going forward? I mean a solid (and I understand there will be details missing) plan on how the economy will go forward, how the health care system will be mended, how the businesses are going to have some protection from bankruptcy’s, how are some people going to be fed, etc., etc..???

Yes the governments have come up with these programs where they are sending people money so they can eat and hopefully pay some bills. But then they are going to punish them next year by taxing that money! Driving them closer to bankruptcy and poverty.

Most of the programs I’ve seen are an absolute joke. Very few people and companies will actually qualify for the relief and when they do, they will pay for it down the road after they’ve already been decimated! Does this make any sense what so ever??

Our Federal Government has given away Billions of dollars to other Countries and Charities over the last few years and now when the people that worked and paid taxes so these idiots can just give OUR money away, needs help, the Federal Government wants to give you a loan or tax you on the relief! IDIOTIC!! Seriously get ready in the future for the same answer our great military personnel got a couple years back when they needed money, “we can’t afford it”!

Regardless of all this, the Government can ask people to stay at home and slowly go broke for a while but if you don’t show some leadership and present somewhat of a plan going forward, it will not be sustainable. People will get fed up and say screw this, I’m going out. Not just a few, thousands will!! You read the comments on Facebook and you can see the attitude already changing and ramping up! What are the Police going to do? Throw everyone in jail or fine the crap out of people? That won’t go over well and our Police should not be put in that position in the first place.

Bottomline, can the Leaders get off their rear ends and come up with at least the framework of a plan on how all the issues (and there are far more) I brought up are going to be addressed! The people of Canada deserve this as I’m sure you are going to tax the heck out of us to pay for it after!! Personally I would like to have an idea what the future looks like!

PS. I do appreciate the hard work of the Leaders (Trudeau definitely not included) that are actually doing what they can, but people deserve to know that there is a proper and well thought out plan being worked on that gives people the hope they need at this time!

Alberta needs to fill agriculture jobs, amid a Covid- 19 created foreign worker shortage

Duane Rolheiser

After 15 years as a TV reporter with Global and CBC and as news director of RDTV in Red Deer, Duane set out on his own 2008 as a visual storyteller. During this period, he became fascinated with a burgeoning online world and how it could better serve local communities. This fascination led to Todayville, launched in 2016.

Follow Author

Carney Wins: What now Alberta?

2025 Federal Election / 5 days ago

Polls say Canadians will give Trump what he wants, a Carney victory.

Also Interesting / 1 week ago

If You Frequently Travel, A Second Phone Number Can Be A Cost Effective Solution

Business

Overregulation is choking Canadian businesses, says the MEI

Published on May 2, 2025

Todayville

From the Montreal Economic Institute

The federal government’s growing regulatory burden on businesses is holding Canada back and must be urgently reviewed, argues a new publication from the MEI released this morning.

“Regulation creep is a real thing, and Ottawa has been fuelling it for decades,” says Krystle Wittevrongel, director of research at the MEI and coauthor of the Viewpoint. “Regulations are passed but rarely reviewed, making it burdensome to run a business, or even too costly to get started.”

Between 2006 and 2021, the number of federal regulatory requirements in Canada rose by 37 per cent, from 234,200 to 320,900. This is estimated to have reduced real GDP growth by 1.7 percentage points, employment growth by 1.3 percentage points, and labour productivity by 0.4 percentage points, according to recent Statistics Canada data.

Small businesses are disproportionately impacted by the proliferation of new regulations.

In 2024, firms with fewer than five employees pay over $10,200 per employee in regulatory and red tape compliance costs, compared to roughly $1,400 per employee for businesses with 100 or more employees, according to data from the Canadian Federation of Independent Business.

Overall, Canadian businesses spend 768 million hours a year on compliance, which is equivalent to almost 394,000 full-time jobs. The costs to the economy in 2024 alone were over $51.5 billion.

It is hardly surprising in this context that entrepreneurship in Canada is on the decline. In the year 2000, 3 out of every 1,000 Canadians started a business. By 2022, that rate had fallen to just 1.3, representing a nearly 57 per cent drop since 2000.

The impact of regulation in particular is real: had Ottawa maintained the number of regulations at 2006 levels, Canada would have seen about 10 per cent more business start-ups in 2021, according to Statistics Canada.

The MEI researcher proposes a practical way to reevaluate the necessity of these regulations, applying a model based on the Chrétien government’s 1995 Program Review.

In the 1990s, the federal government launched a review process aimed at reducing federal spending. Over the course of two years, it successfully eliminated $12 billion in federal spending, a reduction of 9.7 per cent, and restored fiscal balance.

A similar approach applied to regulations could help identify rules that are outdated, duplicative, or unjustified.

The publication outlines six key questions to evaluate existing or proposed regulations:

What is the purpose of the regulation?
Does it serve the public interest?
What is the role of the federal government and is its intervention necessary?
What is the expected economic cost of the regulation?
Is there a less costly or intrusive way to solve the problem the regulation seeks to address?
Is there a net benefit?

According to OECD projections, Canada is expected to experience the lowest GDP per capita growth among advanced economies through 2060.

“Canada has just lived through a decade marked by weak growth, stagnant wages, and declining prosperity,” says Ms. Wittevrongel. “If policymakers are serious about reversing this trend, they must start by asking whether existing regulations are doing more harm than good.”

The MEI Viewpoint is available here.

* * *

The MEI is an independent public policy think tank with offices in Montreal, Ottawa, and Calgary. Through its publications, media appearances, and advisory services to policymakers, the MEI stimulates public policy debate and reforms based on sound economics and entrepreneurship.

2025 Federal Election

The Last Of Us: Canada’s Chaos Election

Published on May 2, 2025

Bruce Dowbiggin

Show me good loser and I’ll show you a loser— Leo Durocher

There’s an expression that goes, you’re not allowed to die until all the people in your life have disappointed you. That trenchant observation is particularly relevant to those who woke up on April 29 to discover that their neighbours and friends in Canada have opted to give the federal Liberals (under new leader Mark Carney) another four years to continue Canada’s descent into irrelevance.

These are the same Liberals sans Carney who were polling in the low 20s six months earlier. Their cabinet members were quitting in droves. In the finest Wag The Dog tradition, a sure victory for Canada’s Conservatives was then transformed into a humiliating defeat that saw the Tories leader Pierre Poilievre lose the seat he’d represented for 20 years. The debate in the chattering classes now is how much was Poilievre’s fault?

In a minor vindication the Liberals were seemingly denied a majority by three seats (169-144) . How they balance that equation to advance their pet projects on trade, climate, gender, free speech, native rights and Donald Trump was unknowable Which is why the Grits have turned to dumpster diving MPs like Elizabeth May and keffiyeh-clad NDP to achieve a workable majority..

Suffice to say that neophyte Carney, without any support system within the Liberals, is being highly influenced by the Justin Trudeau faculty lounge left behind after the disgraced three-term PM slunk off into the night.

It’s not all beer and skittles. No sooner had the Liberal pixie dust settled than Carney was hit with Bloc leader Yves-Francois Blanchet announced unequivocally that energy pipelines were still a no-go in electrified Quebec. Alberta premier Danielle Smith lowered the requirement for a separation referendum from 600 K signatures to around 170 K— a very doable mark in pissed-off Alberta.

Saskatchewan premier Scott Moe outlined his demands on Carney if his province is not to join Alberta. And former British PM Tony Blair, who’d worked with Carney in the UK, announced that Carney’s pet project Net Zero was a loser for nations. Finally RBC revealed it was moving beyond diversity toward “inclusion” by removing “unconscious bias” among its upper ranks.

Such is the backwash from April 28. If you listened to the state-supported media on election night you might think that Trump had picked on poor, innocent friend next door Canada. His outrageous 51st state jest did send the Canadian political apparatus into panic. A Liberal party that proclaimed Canada a postmodern state with no real traditions (lowerering flags to half mast for six months to promote their Rez School genocide hustle) suddenly adopted the flag-waving ultra-patriotic visage of expatriate comedian Mike Myers.

Instead the commentariat was spitballing about how to make the House of Commons function more smoothly or if Carney should depart for Europe immediately or in a month to meet his true constituents in the EU commentariat. China? Wassat’? Urban crime? I can’t hear you. Canada as fentanyl capital of the West? Not interested.

Astonishingly, many people who should know better bought it. It was Boomers waking from a long nap to impose their cozy values one final time on the nation they’d created via Trudeau. Comfy ridings like Oakville, Burlington, North Vancouver, Ottawa Centre and Charlottetown mailed it in for another four years. Academic hotbeds like Western (London), Laurier (Kitchener), Waterloo, UNB (Fredericton), U Calgary (Confederation) Alberta (Strathcona) and UBC (Vancouver) also kept the radical dream alive.

Meanwhile shrieks of “Panic!” over Trump decimated the Bloc (22 seats) and the NDP (7 seats) with their support transferred to a banker-led party that had been poison to them only six months earlier. You could not have written a more supportive script for a party who had neglected the essentials in traditional Canada while pursuing radical policies to please the globalists of the West.

Speaking of time capsules, you’d have been hard-pressed to find a more retro scene than the one produced by the legacy TV networks. With their emphasis on the horse-race story the tone, the panels, the hosts could have easily been teleported from 1990s. While many were interested in the micro of government finance, most listeners were expecting maybe a word or two on the collapsed state exposed by Trump’s aggressive negotiating.

As we’ve mentioned often before, Canada’s allies are appalled by the takeover of the country by malign actors, drugs traffickers, money launderers, real-estate manipulators and Chinese subterfuge. Trump’s generic reference to the border was a catch-all for the corruption swallowing the election process and the finance of the country.

That avoidance was echoed by pollsters who spent the night talking about how the final figures reflected their findings. Except for those that didn’t— Conservatives vote tally over 41 percent and Liberals well under 200 seats. What was avoided was the cumulative effect of highly inflated Liberal polling during the campaign, the “why-bother?” narrative they sold to voters appalled by the Liberals manipulation of the process to switch leaders and hold a micro-campaign of 36 days.

While Donald Trump has announced he’ll work with Carney on tariffs, it’s still highly likely that this was the final Canadian election fought by the old rules where the have-nots (Atlantic Canada) the haves-but-outraged (Quebec) and the indolent (Ontario) control the math for making government. The money pump (Alberta, Saskatchewan) will seek to attract eastern BC and southern Manitoba to their crew. In the worst case Carney may be the nation’s final PM of ten provinces plus territories.

Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster. His new book Deal With It: The Trades That Stunned The NHL And Changed Hockey is now available on Amazon. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his previous book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org. You can see all his books at brucedowbigginbooks.ca.