Connect with us

Business

Time to cut government fat(cats)!

Published

6 minute read

News release from the Canadian Taxpayers Federation

You’re not just paying for more government bureaucrats than ever.

You’re also paying for more government executives than ever to oversee those bureaucrats as they fail to deliver for you.

The federal government’s c-suite has ballooned by 42 per cent since Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took power. And those executives are paid up to $255,607 every year, on top of the bonuses and benefits they rake in.

And speaking of overpaid government executives…

CBC President Catherine Tait might take a bonus and severance pay out when she leaves the state broadcaster in the new year.

All that and more in this week’s Taxpayer Waste Watch. Enjoy.

Franco.


Time to cut the fat(cats)!

Forget Springfield, Ohio, we’ve got a problem with cats of a different sort in Ottawa – government fat cats.

Everywhere you look – from the Prime Minister’s Office to the Crown corporations to the departments – the cost and size of the bureaucracy is up.

Take the federal c-suite, which has increased by 42 per cent under the watch of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

There were 6,414 executives in the federal government when Trudeau took power.

Fast forward to today, and that number has jumped to 9,155.

That means Trudeau isn’t just ballooning the size of government in general, he’s also swelling the ranks of its most expensive bureaucrats.

Records obtained by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation reveal growth among every class of executive under Trudeau.

The salaries for those executives range from $134,827 to $255,607 per year, not including benefits or bonuses.

And you better believe those executives are taking bonuses.

About 90 per cent of federal executives get a bonus each year, according to additional records obtained by the CTF.

In fact, Trudeau dished out $202 million in bonuses in 2022, with the average bonus among executives being $18,252.

All told, compensation for federal executives was $1.95 billion that year, which represented a 41 per cent increase over 2015.

The size of the entire federal bureaucracy has also increased by 42 per cent under Trudeau, with more than 108,000 new bureaucrats added to the taxpayer dole.

Spending on federal bureaucrats hit a record high last year, at $67.4 billion, representing a 68 per cent increase since 2016.

Meanwhile, spending on consultants has also reached a record high, with expenditures for 2023 sitting at $21.6 billion.

So let’s get this straight.

Trudeau ballooned the government c-suite by 42 per cent.

He’s added 108,000 new bureaucrats.

He’s spending 68 per cent more on those bureaucrats, while also dropping more money on outside consultants than any prime minister in Canadian history.

And yet, despite all this new staff, all this outside help, and all this spending, government departments still can’t hit 50 per cent of their performance targets each year.

How is that even possible?

Can someone – anyone – explain what the heck is going on?

Because only one thing is for certain: taxpayers are getting screwed.

CBC President Catherine Tait won’t rule out bonus, severance

The president of everyone’s favourite state broadcaster – Catherine Tait – was back in Ottawa this week to answer questions about CBC bonuses.

During her testimony at the House of Commons Heritage Committee, Tait was asked by Conservative MP Damien Kurek if she would commit to not taking a severance pay out or a bonus when her term at the CBC ends in January 2025.

“I consider that to be a personal matter,” Tait said.

Does that sound like a “personal matter” to you? We certainly don’t think so.

Tait taking a taxpayer-funded bonus or severance pay out, on top of her six-figure, taxpayer-funded salary, is the furthest thing in the world from a “personal matter.”

It’s your money, so you have every right to know.

Canada falls behind on tax competitiveness

The results are in and they’re not good…

The Tax Foundation’s 2024 International Tax Competitiveness Index was released this week. The report compares tax systems for the 38 countries that belong to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

And the report shows that Canada has fallen behind many of our peers on tax competitiveness.

Canada ranked 17th on overall tax competitiveness, two spots worse than last year.

Canada ranked 31st on individual tax competitiveness.

Canada ranked 26th on business tax competitiveness.

Canada ranked 25th on property tax competitiveness.

The report also noted that Canada’s capital gain tax is “well above” the OECD average.

VIDEO: Here’s why Trudeau’s carbon tax is a scam

The Trudeau government is running a $7-million ad campaign to try to spin Canadians on the carbon tax.

The CTF is fighting back with a campaign of our own.

In the video below, CTF Federal Director Franco Terrazzano refutes Trudeau’s favourite talking points with cold hard facts and explains why the carbon tax is a scam.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Business

Massive government child-care plan wreaking havoc across Ontario

Published on

From the Fraser Institute

By Matthew Lau

It’s now more than four years since the federal Liberal government pledged $30 billion in spending over five years for $10-per-day national child care, and more than three years since Ontario’s Progressive Conservative government signed a $13.2 billion deal with the federal government to deliver this child-care plan.

Not surprisingly, with massive government funding came massive government control. While demand for child care has increased due to the government subsidies and lower out-of-pocket costs for parents, the plan significantly restricts how child-care centres operate (including what items participating centres may purchase), and crucially, caps the proportion of government funds available to private for-profit providers.

What have families and taxpayers got for this enormous government effort? Widespread child-care shortages across Ontario.

For example, according to the City of Ottawa, the number of children (aged 0 to 5 years) on child-care waitlists has ballooned by more than 300 per cent since 2019, there are significant disparities in affordable child-care access “with nearly half of neighbourhoods underserved, and limited access in suburban and rural areas,” and families face “significantly higher” costs for before-and-after-school care for school-age children.

In addition, Ottawa families find the system “complex and difficult to navigate” and “fewer child care options exist for children with special needs.” And while 42 per cent of surveyed parents need flexible child care (weekends, evenings, part-time care), only one per cent of child-care centres offer these flexible options. These are clearly not encouraging statistics, and show that a government-knows-best approach does not properly anticipate the diverse needs of diverse families.

Moreover, according to the Peel Region’s 2025 pre-budget submission to the federal government (essentially, a list of asks and recommendations), it “has maximized its for-profit allocation, leaving 1,460 for-profit spaces on a waitlist.” In other words, families can’t access $10-per-day child care—the central promise of the plan—because the government has capped the number of for-profit centres.

Similarly, according to Halton Region’s pre-budget submission to the provincial government, “no additional families can be supported with affordable child care” because, under current provincial rules, government funding can only be used to reduce child-care fees for families already in the program.

And according to a March 2025 Oxford County report, the municipality is experiencing a shortage of child-care staff and access challenges for low-income families and children with special needs. The report includes a grim bureaucratic predication that “provincial expansion targets do not reflect anticipated child care demand.”

Child-care access is also a problem provincewide. In Stratford, which has a population of roughly 33,000, the municipal government reports that more than 1,000 children are on a child-care waitlist. Similarly in Port Colborne (population 20,000), the city’s chief administrative officer told city council in April 2025 there were almost 500 children on daycare waitlists at the beginning of the school term. As of the end of last year, Guelph and Wellington County reportedly had a total of 2,569 full-day child-care spaces for children up to age four, versus a waitlist of 4,559 children—in other words, nearly two times as many children on a waitlist compared to the number of child-care spaces.

More examples. In Prince Edward County, population around 26,000, there are more than 400 children waitlisted for licensed daycare. In Kawartha Lakes and Haliburton County, the child-care waitlist is about 1,500 children long and the average wait time is four years. And in St. Mary’s, there are more than 600 children waitlisted for child care, but in recent years town staff have only been able to move 25 to 30 children off the wait list annually.

The numbers speak for themselves. Massive government spending and control over child care has created havoc for Ontario families and made child-care access worse. This cannot be a surprise. Quebec’s child-care system has been largely government controlled for decades, with poor results. Why would Ontario be any different? And how long will Premier Ford allow this debacle to continue before he asks the new prime minister to rethink the child-care policy of his predecessor?

Matthew Lau

Adjunct Scholar, Fraser Institute
Continue Reading

Business

Canada Caves: Carney ditches digital services tax after criticism from Trump

Published on

From The Center Square

By

Canada caved to President Donald Trump demands by pulling its digital services tax hours before it was to go into effect on Monday.

Trump said Friday that he was ending all trade talks with Canada over the digital services tax, which he called a direct attack on the U.S. and American tech firms. The DST required foreign and domestic businesses to pay taxes on some revenue earned from engaging with online users in Canada.

“Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately,” the president said. “We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period.”

By Sunday, Canada relented in an effort to resume trade talks with the U.S., it’s largest trading partner.

“To support those negotiations, the Minister of Finance and National Revenue, the Honourable François-Philippe Champagne, announced today that Canada would rescind the Digital Services Tax (DST) in anticipation of a mutually beneficial comprehensive trade arrangement with the United States,” according to a statement from Canada’s Department of Finance.

Canada’s Department of Finance said that Prime Minister Mark Carney and Trump agreed to resume negotiations, aiming to reach a deal by July 21.

U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Monday that the digital services tax would hurt the U.S.

“Thank you Canada for removing your Digital Services Tax which was intended to stifle American innovation and would have been a deal breaker for any trade deal with America,” he wrote on X.

Earlier this month, the two nations seemed close to striking a deal.

Trump said he and Carney had different concepts for trade between the two neighboring countries during a meeting at the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, in the Canadian Rockies.

Asked what was holding up a trade deal between the two nations at that time, Trump said they had different concepts for what that would look like.

“It’s not so much holding up, I think we have different concepts, I have a tariff concept, Mark has a different concept, which is something that some people like, but we’re going to see if we can get to the bottom of it today.”

Shortly after taking office in January, Trump hit Canada and Mexico with 25% tariffs for allowing fentanyl and migrants to cross their borders into the U.S. Trump later applied those 25% tariffs only to goods that fall outside the free-trade agreement between the three nations, called the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.

Trump put a 10% tariff on non-USMCA compliant potash and energy products. A 50% tariff on aluminum and steel imports from all countries into the U.S. has been in effect since June 4. Trump also put a 25% tariff on all cars and trucks not built in the U.S.

Economists, businesses and some publicly traded companies have warned that tariffs could raise prices on a wide range of consumer products.

Trump has said he wants to use tariffs to restore manufacturing jobs lost to lower-wage countries in decades past, shift the tax burden away from U.S. families, and pay down the national debt.

A tariff is a tax on imported goods paid by the person or company that imports them. The importer can absorb the cost of the tariffs or try to pass the cost on to consumers through higher prices.

Trump’s tariffs give U.S.-produced goods a price advantage over imported goods, generating revenue for the federal government.

Continue Reading

Trending

X