Health
Health Foundation supporters responsible for state-of-the-art prostate proceedure at Red Deer Regional Hospital
Registered Nurse Franz Caponpon (left) and Dr. Trevor Haines (right) display new surgical instrumentation funded by the Foundation’s donors.
RDRHF Continues to Help Pave the Way for Cutting-Edge Urology Care
Red Deer Regional Health Foundation donors continue to enhance healthcare for Central Alberta residents, recently playing a key role in bringing an innovative urological procedure to the Red Deer Regional Hospital. The Foundation’s ongoing support has enabled the introduction of the Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) procedure, a state-of-the-art technique for treating patients with enlarged prostates.
Previously, patients needing this specialized care had to travel to Calgary or Edmonton. With the Foundation’s funding of essential equipment, including complex instrumentation, Red Deer is now one of only three locations in the province capable of performing the HoLEP procedure. This not only keeps patients close to home but also enhances the quality of care in the Central Zone by offering a less invasive, safer alternative for prostate surgery.
“This procedure has been a significant development for surgical care in Red Deer,” said Dr. Haines, the surgeon who performed the first HoLEP procedure in the Central Zone on
September 9th (pictured above, right). “We’re able to offer patients cutting-edge treatment that aligns with the standards of care in larger centers like Calgary and Edmonton. The equipment funded by the Foundation is making a real difference in patient outcomes.”
HoLEP offers numerous benefits, including reduced postoperative bleeding, shorter recovery times, and a less invasive surgical approach. Thanks to donor support, the hospital now has the resources to perform multiple procedures each day, improving access for patients and streamlining care.
“This technology represents a remarkable leap forward,” added Dr. Haines. “Being able to offer such complex surgeries on an outpatient level is revolutionary. Patients can now undergo significant surgery with minimal incisions, reduced pain, and the possibility of next-day or even potentially same-day discharge very soon.”
The Foundation’s investment, which amounted to nearly $300,000, demonstrates its supporters’ commitment to enhancing the healthcare experience for the community. The funds not only covered the purchase of the HoLEP equipment but also ensured the hospital had sufficient resources to maintain consistent patient care.
“The Red Deer Regional Health Foundation has made this possible,” Dr. Haines emphasized. “Without their financial support, we wouldn’t be able to offer this advanced procedure to our patients. It’s a perfect example of how our donors directly impact the quality of care in the Central Zone.”
Thanks to the generosity of our donors and the expertise of local healthcare providers, Red Deer Hospital is establishing itself as a leader in urological care, offering patients top-tier treatment closer to home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
COVID-19
Will We Fall For The Same Old PCR Tricks Again?
From the Frontier Centre for Public Policy
By John Carpay
As with the number of COVID-19 “cases,” the number of “Covid deaths” proclaimed by politicians, government health officials and government-funded media is also based on highly unreliable PCR testing, using an undisclosed number of cycles.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. How long will Canadians continue falling for the same media tricks that they fell for during the years of lockdowns and vaccine passports?
“Alberta’s COVID-19 death toll more than 4 times higher than flu over past year,” exclaimed the CBC on September 9. This was followed two days later by Global News exclaiming: “New Alberta COVID data highlights value of getting newly formulated vaccine once available: expert.”
These media stories claim there were 23,933 COVID-19 “cases” in the past year, with 6,070 people hospitalized “for COVID.” Media claim that 732 Albertans died of COVID-19 during the past year, compared to 177 from the flu. University of Calgary professor Craig Jenne describes this as “continual evidence that COVID-19 is not just another flu” and laments that viruses “continue to take lives at a really unacceptable rate.”
It’s the same narrative that we were fed in 2020 and the years that followed: creating and then maintaining unfounded fear of COVID-19. This unnecessarily high level of fear, in turn, generated support for the violations of our Charter freedoms of association, expression, religion, conscience, mobility, and peaceful assembly, and the right to choose freely what will or will not be injected into our bodies.
What is missing from these stories by government-funded media is significant and relevant.
Firstly, government-funded media make no mention of the number of cycles used in the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) testing that was used to generate these 23,933 so-called “cases” of COVID-19.
The percentage of people testing “positive” for COVID-19 by way of the PCR test depends on the number of times that a viral remnant in a person’s nose or throat is doubled (amplified). If a COVID-19 viral remnant is amplified 40 times, almost everyone will test positive for COVID-19. Conversely, if that very same viral remnant is amplified only 20 times, very few people will test positive for COVID-19. The PCR test does not and cannot determine whether someone is sick with COVID-19, or a spreader of COVID-19.
As explained by expert witness Dr. Joel Kettner in Gateway v. Manitoba:[1] “the outcome of a PCR test depends on Cycle thresholds (Ct), which is the number of cycles of amplification needed to strengthen a weak signal, so as to enable the identification of the amino acid sequence of the virus being tested for. The higher the Ct to obtain a positive signal, the lower the volume of genetic material in the sample.”[2]
In the same court case, expert witness Dr. Jay Bhattacharya explained that the unavoidable errors in PCR testing render the PCR test unfit for public health decision-making: “A reliance on a test that is run up to 40 cycles, (or any number of cycles higher than 30) — is certain to produce a very large proportion of false positive outcomes. Lockdowns that are imposed on the basis of ‘case’ counts derived from PCR tests will be only marginally related to the threat posed by the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”
Neither Alberta Health Services nor the media will inform the public about how many times a viral remnant was doubled to generate these 23,933 “cases” of COVID-19. A large but willfully undisclosed number of these COVID-19 “cases” pertain to people who are not sick with COVID-19 and not spreading COVID-19. This includes large numbers of people who have had COVID-19 and who have fully recovered, acquiring natural immunity along the way. Governments which claim to love science should freely and readily disclose this information to the public, as well as to each individual receiving her or his PCR test result. And yet, since 2020, Canada’s federal and provincial governments have kept this information a state secret, typically divulged only under duress in court, when governments get sued by Justice Centre lawyers who defend Charter freedoms.
In Gateway v. Manitoba, for example, government officials admitted under oath that at least 40% of their “Covid cases” were people who were not sick with COVID-19 and not spreading it. Governments and their health authorities can easily generate high numbers of “Covid cases” simply by running PCR tests at 40 (or more) cycles, and encouraging (or requiring) large numbers of people to take the PCR test.
As with the number of COVID-19 “cases,” the number of “Covid deaths” proclaimed by politicians, government health officials and government-funded media is also based on highly unreliable PCR testing, using an undisclosed number of cycles.
The second glaring omission from government-funded media reports is the relevant context. Over 33,000 Albertans die each year, which is what you might expect in a province of 4.8 million people. The leading causes of death in Canada are cancer, heart diseases, lung diseases and strokes. This fact did not change with the arrival of COVID-19 and lockdowns in 2020. If it’s true that 732 Albertans died of COVID-19 (and thanks to PCR testing we really don’t know) that would be just over 2% of deaths in Alberta, with 87% of these deaths among people 70 and over. Compare this 2% with the more than 10% of deaths in Alberta from “ill-defined and unknown” causes in 2021. Professor Craig Jenne states that viruses “continue to take lives at a really unacceptable rate.” The same could be said of cancer, heart diseases, lung diseases and strokes, not to mention suicides, alcoholism, obesity and car accidents.
The omission of relevant facts, combined with a blind and erroneous faith in the accuracy of PCR testing, is what government-funded media used in 2020 to spread unfounded fear. They are trying to do the same thing now. Will we fall for it again?
First published in the Western Standard here.
John Carpay, B.A., LL.B. is president of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms.
Addictions
Harm Reduction is a Lie: Red Deer South MLA Jason Stephan
News release from Red Deer South MLA Jason Stephan
Truth is wonderful. We can trust in truth. Truth leads to better choices and more happiness. Yet, there are many lies around us. A failure to comprehend things as they were, as they really are, as they will be, results in bad choices and unhappiness.
Sometimes lies are cloaked in words which distort their true outcomes. One such lie is so called “harm
reduction”. One government program under the heading of harm reduction is “safe supply”. Safe supply is a lie. It is not “safe”.
Another government program under the heading of harm reduction is an “overdose prevention site”. That is a lie also – these sites do not prevent overdoses.
Consider this, if your neighbor was drowning in filthy waters, would you row a boat out, and do nothing,
watching your neighbor flail and choke beside you in filthy waters, and just before he was about to go under, grab his hair as he was about to drown? And then, gasping for air, would you let him go, so that he resumes flailing and choking in filthy waters? What if you kept doing that bizarre thing?
What would be the normal thing to do? Get them out of filthy waters and onto shore, of course. Begin with the end in mind – for men and women drowning in filthy waters of addiction, that means recovery, not drug sites that keep them in those filthy waters.
Supervised consumption / overdose prevention sites are in fact drug sites – where illegal drugs are consumed accompanied with many other bad things.
Albertans did not ask for drug sites in their communities. Government imposed them on Albertans.
As a private citizen, prior to serving as an MLA, I attended packed town hall meetings at Red Deer City
Hall. The vast majority of townhall participants did not want the NDP to impose a drug site in Red Deer. They did anyways.
The drug site in Red Deer has now been in our community for too many years and its impacts are
evident for all to see. Let’s speak plainly and honesty. Drug sites in Alberta are an attraction for individuals seeking to live in drug addictions. Because of drug sites, there are more, not less, individuals living in addictions in communities with drug sites.
There is an exodus of businesses from areas containing drug sites. I have seen it. There is too much stealing, too much vandalizing, too much uncertainty for local businesses, their employees, their customers.
Regardless of good intentions, the truth is that drug sites facilitate a growing lawlessness, including embedding and emboldening criminal elements, which either abuse drug sites or prey on those living in addictions, some of whom support addiction lifestyles through stealing or robbing businesses and families in our communities.
The truth is that “harm reduction” drug sites result in “harm production” to businesses and individuals in our communities seeking to peaceably live their lives, working, and raising their families.
Communities that do not want drug sites should not be forced to have them.
Red Deer City Council, listening to its citizens and businesses, passed a motion to get the drug site out of Red Deer. The Alberta government listened, announcing that the drug site will be removed out of Red Deer. That is good for Red Deer!
Other Alberta municipalities that have suffered with drug sites will follow Red Deer and will seek to get drug sites out of their communities also.
It is good to confront and reject harm reduction lies, get drug consumption sites out of Alberta, and support recovery for those suffering under addiction, blessing themselves, their families, and our communities.
Alberta is the best province in a nation in trouble. Our lives belong to ourselves, not government. The machine is not greater than the creator.
Alberta is a land of freedom and prosperity. We must be vigilant to keep it that way.
-
Aristotle Foundation2 days ago
Canada’s immigration system and Islamist terror threats
-
Fraser Institute2 days ago
Cost of Ottawa’s gun ban fiasco may reach $6 billion
-
International2 days ago
Evacuations urged in Tampa Bay ahead of Hurricane Milton
-
National1 day ago
Retired judge slams Trudeau gov’t for promoting ‘false’ accusation about residential school deaths
-
Bruce Dowbiggin2 days ago
Rose & His Thorns: A Failure Of All Parties
-
Business2 days ago
Toyota to scrap DEI policies following social media exposé
-
Canadian Energy Centre2 days ago
Oil and gas companies are once again the top performers on the TSX. Why do people still listen to the divestment movement?
-
Daily Caller1 day ago
FEMA Doled Out Millions Pushing ‘Equity,’ Prioritizing ‘Underserved Communities’ Leading Up To Hurricane Season