Connect with us

Community

City Releases Full Report On 2016 Point In Time Homeless Count

Published

7 minute read

Background

On October 19, 2016, The City of Red Deer worked with community partners to conduct the third Point-inTime Homeless Count. The City of Red Deer coordinates the Homeless Count as part of its work supporting EveryOne’s Home: Red Deer’s 10 Year Plan to End Homelessness. Approximately 300 volunteers and 15 organizations participated in the local count. It was also the second provincially-coordinated Point-in-Time Count with Alberta’s 7 Cities on Housing & Homelessness. In 2014, Alberta was the first jurisdiction in Canada to implement measures toward a standardized Point-in-Time count methodology.

A Point-in-time count is a snapshot of sheltered and unsheltered homeless people in a community on a single night. The count captures numbers and demographic information of individuals experiencing homelessness at a single point in time. This count serves two important functions: it provides a current snapshot of our overall homeless population and enables us to examine how this population changes over time. It also helps to measure progress towards ending homelessness and inform system planning and program development to support the goal of ending homelessness by 2018 in Red Deer.

PiT Count Scope, Approach and Design

Definitions & Scope of the Count

The scope of this count is focused on those experiencing homelessness that are sheltered and unsheltered. The scope of Red Deer’s Count does not include the count of hidden homelessness (e.g., people who are “couchsurfing”). Homelessness describes the situation of an individual or family without stable, permanent, appropriate housing, or the immediate prospect, means and ability of acquiring it. For the purposes of this count homelessness was broadly defined and categorized into two major typologies in terms of the scope of the count.

Sheltered Homeless:

This includes individuals and families in the count who were identified as homeless and who stayed overnight in an emergency shelter, safe house, detox centre, or remand centre on the night of the count. It also includes those who stayed in hotels and motels paid for by the non-profit agencies and various levels of government.

Unsheltered Homeless:

This includes all homeless individuals in the count who completed a street survey, meaning that they were encountered in parks, on the streets or sidewalks, at drop-in centres, or participating in meal programs the next day after the count.

Methodology

The City of Red Deer adopted a census approach to the 2016 PiT Count through the sheltered and unsheltered methodology. Occupancy totals were obtained from shelter providers, transitional housing and public systems. A comprehensive outdoor enumeration was conducted with full coverage of the community and known locations. Red Deer was street zoned into 108 neighbourhoods and canvassed by 219 volunteers. As well, 42 known locations were covered by 16 ‘specialized teams’, consisting of pairs of outreach workers, to capture the most accurate number of homeless persons possible. A next day survey was also conducted at two locations to increase the coverage.

Survey coverage in 2016 was expanded to include all units of the Red Deer Regional Hospital, Correctional Facilities (Remand Centre), and Transitional Housing with less than 2-year term (John Howard Society). There was no change in the methodology or the number of shelters covered compared to the previous count in 2014. This methodology change to expand site coverage for transitional housing and public system data resulted in an increased scope of surveying individuals who may be experiencing homelessness. With this expanded site coverage in 2016, the number of people counted as experiencing homelessness in Red Deer is 149 (increase of 8.8% from 2014 to 2016). Additionally, the plant-capture method was used for quality assurance.

Summary of Key Findings

  • 149 – The number of people counted as experiencing homelessness in Red Deer was 149. This is an increase of 8.8% from 2014 to 2016.
  • 37 – 37 of the people experiencing homelessness were unsheltered – meaning they spent the night on the street or in parks, up from 22 in the previous count of 2014.
  • 77 – 77 people were staying in an emergency shelter on the night of the count. The numbers from the emergency shelters in 2016 dropped by 19.5% from the previous count of in 2014.
  • 17 – 17 people were staying in transitional housing on the night of the count.
  • 18 – An additional 18 people were provisionally accommodated in public systems were counted.
  • 3/4 – Three quarters of people experiencing homelessness in Red Deer are male.
  • 23% – 23% of respondents were homeless youth under the age of 25.
  • 5% – Seniors above the age of 65 accounted for almost 5% of Red Deer’s homeless population.
  • 5% – Out of the total population surveyed, 5% indicated they belong to the LGBTQ2S community.
  • 33% – Up to a quarter of individuals surveyed lived in Red Deer less than three months before the count and overall 33% lived in Red Deer less than a year.
  • 43% – 43% were chronically homeless individuals and families compared to 35.4% in 2014.
  • 50% – 50% of respondents indicated this was their first time homeless.
  • 8% – 8% of respondents reported full time employment income – meaning that some of those experiencing homelessness were working but could not make ends meet to afford housing.
  • 71% – 71% of respondents who were unsheltered self-identified as having some form of addiction. The disproportionate number of homeless persons with addictive disorders is significant in terms of service provision and supports.
  • 7% – Veterans accounted for 7% of Red Deer’s homeless population. The data revealed a slight increase in the veteran homelessness between the 2014 and 2016.
  • 40% – Aboriginal people make up 40% of Red Deer’s homeless population, despite constituting only 5.2% of Red Deer’s residents as per Statistics Canada Census Data.

Follow Author

Community

SPARC Red Deer – Caring Adult Nominations open now!

Published on

Red Deer community let’s give a round of applause to the incredible adults shaping the future of our kids. Whether they’re a coach, neighbour, teacher, mentor, instructor, or someone special, we want to know about them!

Tell us the inspiring story of how your nominee is helping kids grow up great. We will honour the first 100 local nominees for their outstanding contributions to youth development. It’s time to highlight those who consistently go above and beyond!

To nominate, visit Events (sparcreddeer.ca)

Continue Reading

Addictions

‘Harm Reduction’ is killing B.C.’s addicts. There’s got to be a better way

Published on

From the Frontier Centre for Public Policy

By Susan Martinuk 

B.C. recently decriminalized the possession of small amounts of illicit drugs. The resulting explosion of addicts using drugs in public spaces, including parks and playgrounds, recently led the province’s NDP government to attempt to backtrack on this policy

Since 2016, more than 40,000 Canadians have died from opioid drug overdoses — almost as many as died during the Second World War.
Governments, health care professionals and addiction experts all acknowledge that widespread use of opioids has created a public health crisis in Canada. Yet they agree on virtually nothing else about this crisis, including its causes, possible remedies and whether addicts should be regarded as passive victims or accountable moral agents.

Fuelled by the deadly manufactured opioid fentanyl, Canada’s national drug overdose rate stood at 19.3 people per 100,000 in 2022, a shockingly high number when compared to the European Union’s rate of just 1.8. But national statistics hide considerable geographic variation. British Columbia and Alberta together account for only a quarter of Canada’s population yet nearly half of all opioid deaths. B.C.’s 2022 death rate of 45.2/100,000 is more than double the national average, with Alberta close behind at 33.3/100,00.

In response to the drug crisis, Canada’s two western-most provinces have taken markedly divergent approaches, and in doing so have created a natural experiment with national implications.

B.C. has emphasized harm reduction, which seeks to eliminate the damaging effects of illicit drugs without actually removing them from the equation. The strategy focuses on creating access to clean drugs and includes such measures as “safe” injection sites, needle exchange programs, crack-pipe giveaways and even drug-dispensing vending machines. The approach goes so far as to distribute drugs like heroin and cocaine free of charge in the hope addicts will no longer be tempted by potentially tainted street drugs and may eventually seek help.

But safe-supply policies create many unexpected consequences. A National Post investigation found, for example, that government-supplied hydromorphone pills handed out to addicts in Vancouver are often re-sold on the street to other addicts. The sellers then use the money to purchase a street drug that provides a better high — namely, fentanyl.

Doubling down on safe supply, B.C. recently decriminalized the possession of small amounts of illicit drugs. The resulting explosion of addicts using drugs in public spaces, including parks and playgrounds, recently led the province’s NDP government to attempt to backtrack on this policy — though for now that effort has been stymied by the courts.

According to Vancouver city councillor Brian Montague, “The stats tell us that harm reduction isn’t working.” In an interview, he calls decriminalization “a disaster” and proposes a policy shift that recognizes the connection between mental illness and addiction. The province, he says, needs “massive numbers of beds in treatment facilities that deal with both addictions and long-term mental health problems (plus) access to free counselling and housing.”

In fact, Montague’s wish is coming true — one province east, in Alberta. Since the United Conservative Party was elected in 2019, Alberta has been transforming its drug addiction policy away from harm reduction and towards publicly-funded treatment and recovery efforts.

Instead of offering safe-injection sites and free drugs, Alberta is building a network of 10 therapeutic communities across the province where patients can stay for up to a year, receiving therapy and medical treatment and developing skills that will enable them to build a life outside the drug culture. All for free. The province’s first two new recovery centres opened last year in Lethbridge and Red Deer. There are currently over 29,000 addiction treatment spaces in the province.

This treatment-based strategy is in large part the work of Marshall Smith, current chief of staff to Alberta’s premier and a former addict himself, whose life story is a testament to the importance of treatment and recovery.

The sharply contrasting policies of B.C. and Alberta allow a comparison of what works and what doesn’t. A first, tentative report card on this natural experiment was produced last year in a study from Stanford University’s network on addiction policy (SNAP). Noting “a lack of policy innovation in B.C.,” where harm reduction has become the dominant policy approach, the report argues that in fact “Alberta is currently experiencing a reduction in key addiction-related harms.” But it concludes that “Canada overall, and B.C. in particular, is not yet showing the progress that the public and those impacted by drug addiction deserve.”

The report is admittedly an early analysis of these two contrasting approaches. Most of Alberta’s recovery homes are still under construction, and B.C.’s decriminalization policy is only a year old. And since the report was published, opioid death rates have inched higher in both provinces.

Still, the early returns do seem to favour Alberta’s approach. That should be regarded as good news. Society certainly has an obligation to try to help drug users. But that duty must involve more than offering addicts free drugs. Addicted people need treatment so they can kick their potentially deadly habit and go on to live healthy, meaningful lives. Dignity comes from a life of purpose and self-control, not a government-funded fix.

Susan Martinuk is a senior fellow at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy and author of the 2021 book Patients at Risk: Exposing Canada’s Health Care Crisis. A longer version of this article recently appeared at C2CJournal.ca.

Continue Reading

Trending

X