Connect with us

COVID-19

Bombshell long-term study of Pfizer, Moderna COVID shots shows ‘self-assembling nanostructures’

Published

9 months ago

13 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Emily Mangiaracina

Researchers have observed with a microscope the self-assembly of nanostructures in the mRNA COVID shots, as well as toxic effects on blood cells from all of the COVID shots, and potential detox mechanisms.

Researchers in Korea have observed what appear to be “self-assembling,” “synthetic” nanostructures such as spirals and tubes that form within the contents of the COVID Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots over the course of months.

Dr. Young Mi Lee and Dr. Daniel Broudy, co-authors of the recently published study of these “artificial constructions,” suggested that their main findings were the direct observation of both “self-assembling entities… of many different shapes,” and of “cellular toxicity” triggered by the COVID shots, “especially” on blood and sperm cells. 

In a Korean laboratory, using flu vaccine and normal saline as controls, the researchers incubated Pfizer and Moderna COVID injectables in various fluids, including distilled water, saline, blood plasma, and semen. AstraZeneca and Novavax COVID vaccines were also studied, but they did not develop the “self-assembled” structures seen in the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots.

While no floating particles were observed in the saline control, and only a few floating particles were observed in the flu, Novavax, and AstraZeneca vaccines, “many” entities were seen in “all residual and new” Pfizer injectables. About 30% of these reportedly had a “worm-like shape,” and these combined with “rods, discs, and crystal-like mixtures.” When incubated at body temperature for up to two days, these entities developed into other shapes, including “spheres” and “elongated tube-like objects.”

Each of the Moderna shot contents, by contrast, had “a greater number of particles” and “more artificial moving structures,” including coils and beaded chains.

Over the course of a few weeks, “2 dimensional rectangular shaped structures” appeared at the bottom of the dish in which the COVID Pfizer and Moderna shots were incubated, from which three-dimensional structures seemed to emerge, and then were “dislodged” from the bottom of the dish and rose into the upper fluid layer.

“Amazing self-assembling structures of great diversity became visible by about the fifth week of incubation. They consisted ultimately of ribbons, coils and filament-like structures,” Lee and Broudy wrote.

These remarkable nanostructures, which were studied under a microscope at up to 400x magnification for over a year, have not been precisely identified but resemble objects within the COVID shots found by other doctors.

For example, in 2022, Australian Dr. David Nixon found “self-assembling” angular structures within the COVID shots, as well as “wires” with frayed edges, around which apparent “chips” often appeared. He observed similar “wires” in the blood of the vaccinated, and interestingly, one of these “frayed wires,” around which blood cells clumped, resembles the shape of what Lee and Broudy described as a “tripod-like, striated filament” found in the Pfizer shot incubated in normal saline.

Lee and Broudy speculated that the filament structures they observed could be linked to the white clots being found by embalmers in the bodies of the vaccinated, noting, “In analysis of blood clots from vaccinated persons, a few filament-like structures were found attached to brownish homogeneous cloudy white clots extracted from the middle layer of whole blood sediment.”

Remarkably, Dr. Carrie Madej also found in 2021 what she described as “self-assembling” and “synthetic”-looking objects in different COVID injections, including “fibers,” some of which “had a little cube structure on them,” and the emergence of brilliant colors in the Moderna jab after a couple of hours.

Interestingly, while the COVID shot manufacturers have not publicly discussed the presence of self-assembling technology in the mRNA shots, “Self-assembled mRNA vaccines” have been discussed in studies published in 2021, which note that self-assembled structures can be used to deliver COVID proteins, and that protein nanoparticles themselves can be self-assembled. A study was also published last year to the science journal Nature discussing the potential that “immunogenic self-assembling” COVID spike nanoparticles have as a “genetic vaccine candidate against SARS-CoV-2.

According to Lee and Broudy, the “various kinds of transparent ribbons, films, coils, and spirals” that appeared in the Pfizer shot when incubated in distilled water “were very similar in structure to the micro- and magnetic- nanorobots already presented in numerous scholarly papers.”

Toxic effects on blood 

In addition to showing the self-assembly of what appear to be synthetic nanoparticles, Lee and Broudy’s experiments have demonstrated the effect the COVID shots have on blood: Each injectable showed “toxic effects on blood cells,” with Novavax showing particularly rapid cytotoxicity. The researchers found that each shot had a distinct effect on blood cells, with Pfizer triggering “cellular collapse of white blood cells and damaged platelets”; Moderna triggering rouleaux (stacking) of red blood cells; Novavax causing the disintegration of the nucleus of white blood cells and some rouleaux of red blood cells, and AstraZeneca triggering “prominent rouleaux.”

The researchers noted that white blood cell damage can be related to immune suppression, fatigue can be linked to Rouleaux blood formation, and blood clot formations can be related to platelet damage. Their findings are especially significant considering that all of these symptoms have been frequently reported after COVID injections.

For example, a study published earlier this year shows that the COVID shots pose a risk of blood clots to the brain that is 200 times greater than that posed by other vaccines over the past three decades. In addition, increasing evidence is emerging linking the COVID shots to a spike in cancer rates, with studies and doctors finding that the jabs cause immunosuppression. Long-term fatigue is also a commonly reported symptom of the shots. One German doctor, Jörg-Heiner Möller, has described a “PostVac” syndrome he says 120 of his patients have suffered after their COVID shots, which often involves a “severe fatigue syndrome.”

EMFs

Another remarkable observation by Lee and Broudy was that of the effect of electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs) on the self-assembly of the COVID shot contents. For example, when the Moderna vial contents were placed on a cell phone in 5G streaming mode over a wireless recharger, “the floating materials abruptly became larger and more numerous with sharper and more rectangular edges.”

According to the researchers, Pfizer’s shot did not demonstrate an immediate effect under the same conditions, but a “delayed effect” of proliferating “filaments” after a month of exposure.

By contrast, while Moderna’s shot showed “no noticeable effects” after exposure to an external hard drive, which emits magnetic fields, the Pfizer shot showed “modest” degradation of its contents. The researchers concluded, “it could be postulated that some kind of electric current can stimulate the nanostructure’s activity, while some conditioned magnetic current can hamper their activity.”

It is noteworthy that Lee and Broudy are not the first to observe that EMFs have an impact on the contents of the COVID shots. Dr. David Nixon found that the formation of “crystalline structures” in the Pfizer COVID shots appeared to depend on their exposure to electromagnetic frequencies. When he put the slide of Pfizer shot fluid “inside a faraday bag” blocking EMFs he said came from his wireless router, he only saw black, round “dots” form within its contents, as opposed to the boxy shapes with sharp right angles that otherwise formed.

In addition, Ecuador-based electrical engineer Matt Taylor has observed striking effects of EMFs on the self-assembly of unidentified objects within the COVID shots. He testified in 2022 that when he put a drop of the COVID jab on a microscope slide and placed that slide on an internet router, he observed the self-assembly of what he believes “look like integrated circuits.”

According to Taylor, when he turned the router off, the objects “immediately” began to break apart. He repeated the experiment three times and “begg[ed]” people to reproduce his investigation to see if his findings can be replicated. In fact, Nixon had indicated that Taylor had inspired his own test with the faraday bag.

“If someone can repeat this, the implications are so incredibly wonderful. We can start to explain clots, we can start to explain detox processes,” said Taylor.

Detox

While EMF-triggered self-assembly of “vaccine” nanomaterials suggests one potential “detox” avenue, Lee and Broudy found what seem to be other ways the mRNA shots’ synthetic-looking contents can be disintegrated, if not excreted from the body.

Lee and Broudy wrote that in the “later stage” following injection, at least three weeks afterward, “colloidal gold or silver (3-5 nm in diameter and 10-20 ppm) has been observed to attach to, disrupt, actively degrade, and ultimately dissolve various nanostructures.” They added that ongoing experiments are examining the longer-term results of such protocols, and postulated that gold or silver could help in the recovery of damaged organs and normal blood flow.

The researchers also speculated that “routine exposure to heat saunas” may cause the shots’ nanomaterials to “dislodge from tissues and escape through sweat gland pores.” Reduction or even elimination of the use of personal electronics was also recommended, although Lee and Broudy did not mention the potential helpful effects of wearing EMF shielding devices after vaccination.

They concluded by calling for a worldwide moratorium on the COVID shots: “until the components can be verified and their long-term effects understood, a necessity flouted by calls for Emergency Use Authorization, an immediate global ban is needed.”

Related Topics:

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

More from this author
Health / 8 hours ago

RFK Jr. purges CDC vaccine panel, citing decades of ‘skewed science’

Immigration / 9 hours ago

Mass immigration can cause enormous shifts in local culture, national identity, and community cohesion

Health / 10 hours ago

Police are charging parents with felonies for not placing infants who died in sleep on their backs

International

Pentagon agency to simulate lockdowns, mass vaccinations, public compliance messaging

Published on June 12, 2025

By

From LifeSiteNews

By Tim Hinchliffe

With lockdowns, mass vaccination campaigns, and social distancing still on the table from the last around, it appears that AI and Machine Learning will play a much bigger role in the next.

DARPA is getting into the business of simulating disease outbreaks, including modeling interventions such as mass vaccination campaigns, lockdowns, and communication strategies.

At the end of May, the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) put out a Request for Information (RFI) seeking information regarding “state-of-the-art capabilities in the simulation of disease outbreaks.”

The Pentagon’s research and development funding arm wants to hear from academic, industry, commercial, and startup communities on how to develop “advanced capabilities that drive technical innovation and identify critical gaps in bio-surveillance, diagnostics, and medical countermeasures” in order to “improve preparedness for future public health emergencies.”

As if masks, social distancing, lockdowns, and vaccination mandates under the unscientific guise of slowing the spread and preventing the transmission of COVID weren’t harmful enough, the U.S. military wants to model the effects of these exact same countermeasures for future outbreaks.

The RFI also asks participants “Fatality Rate & Immune Status: How are fatality rates and varying levels of population immunity (natural or vaccine-induced) incorporated into your simulations?“

Does “natural or vaccine-induced” relate to “population immunity” or “fatality rates” or both?

Moving on, the RFI gets into modeling lockdowns, social distancing, and mass vaccination campaigns, along with communication strategies:

Intervention Strategies: Detail the range of intervention strategies that can be modeled, including (but not limited to) vaccination campaigns, social distancing measures, quarantine protocols, treatments, and public health communication strategies. Specifically, describe the ability to model early intervention and its impact on outbreak trajectory.

The fact that DARPA wants to model these so-called intervention strategies just after the entire world experienced them suggests that these exact same measures will most likely be used again in the future:

“We are committed to developing advanced modeling capabilities to optimize response strategies and inform the next generation of (bio)technology innovations to protect the population from biological threats. We are particularly focused on understanding the complex interplay of factors that drive outbreak spread and evaluating the effectiveness of potential interventions.” — DARPA, Advanced Disease Outbreak Simulation Capabilities RFI, May 2025.

“Identification of optimal timelines and capabilities to detect, identify, attribute, and respond to disease outbreaks, including but not limited to biosensor density deployment achieving optimal detection timelines, are of interest.” ­— DARPA, Advanced Disease Outbreak Simulation Capabilities RFI, May 2025.

With lockdowns, mass vaccination campaigns, and social distancing still on the table from the last around, it appears that AI and Machine Learning will play a much bigger role in the next.

For future innovation, the DARPA RFI asks applicants to: “Please describe any novel technical approaches – or applications of diverse technical fields (e.g., machine learning, artificial intelligence, complex systems theory, behavioral science) – that you believe would significantly enhance the state-of-the-art capabilities in this field or simulation of biological systems wholistically.”

Instead of putting a Dr. Fauci, a Dr. Birx, a replaceable CDC director, a TV doctor, a big pharma CEO, or a Cuomo brother out there to lie to your face about how they were all just following The ScienceTM, why not use AI and ML and combine them with behavioral sciences in order to concoct your “public health communications strategies?”

When you look at recently announced DARPA programs like Kallisti and MAGICS, which are aimed at creating an algorithmic Theory of Mind to model, predict, and influence collective human behavior, you start to get a sense of how all these programs can interweave:

“The MAGICS ARC calls for paradigm-shifting approaches for modeling complex, dynamic systems for predicting collective human behaviour.” — DARPA, MAGICS ARC, April 2025

On April 8, DARPA issued an Advanced Research Concepts (ARC) opportunity for a new program called “Methodological Advancements for Generalizable Insights into Complex Systems (MAGICS)” that seeks “new methods and paradigms for modeling collective human behavior.”

Nowhere in the MAGICS description does it mention modeling or predicting the behavior of “adversaries,” as is DARPA’s custom.

Instead, it talks at length about “modeling human systems,” along with anticipating, predicting, understanding, and forecasting “collective human behavior” and “complex social phenomena” derived from “sociotechnical data sets.”

Could DARPA’s MAGICS program be applied to simulating collective human behavior when it comes to the next public health emergency, be it real or perceived?

“The goal of an upcoming program will be to develop an algorithmic theory of mind to model adversaries’ situational awareness and predict future behaviour.” — DARPA, Theory of Mind Special Notice, December 2024.

In December 2024, DARPA launched a similar program called Theory of Mind, which was renamed Kallisti a month later.

The goal of Theory of Mind is to develop “new capabilities to enable national security decisionmakers to optimize strategies for deterring or incentivizing actions by adversaries,” according to a very brief special announcement.

DARPA never mentions who those “adversaries” are. In the case of a public health emergency, an adversary could be anyone who questions authoritative messaging.

The Theory of Mind program will also:

… seek to combine algorithms with human expertise to explore, in a modeling and simulation environment, potential courses of action in national security scenarios with far greater breadth and efficiency than is currently possible.

This would provide decisionmakers with more options for incentive frameworks while preventing unwanted escalation.

We are interested in a comprehensive overview of current and emerging technologies for disease outbreak simulation, how simulation approaches could be extended beyond standard modeling methods, and to understand how diseases spread within and between individuals including population level dynamics.

They say that all the modeling and simulating across programs is for “national security,” but that is a very broad term.

DARPA is in the business of research and development for national security purposes, so why is the Pentagon modeling disease outbreaks and intervention strategies while simultaneously looking to predict and manipulate collective human behavior?

If and when the next outbreak occurs, the same draconian and Orwellian measures that governments and corporations deployed in the name of combating COVID are still on the table.

And AI, Machine Learning, and the military will play an even bigger role than the last time around.

From analyzing wastewater to learning about disease spread; from developing pharmaceuticals to measuring the effects of lockdowns and vaccine passports, from modeling and predicting human behavior to coming up with messaging strategies to keep everyone in compliance – “improving preparedness for future public health emergencies” is becoming more militaristically algorithmic by the day.

“We are exploring innovative solutions to enhance our understanding of outbreak dynamics and to improve preparedness for future public health emergencies.” — DARPA, Advanced Disease Outbreak Simulation Capabilities RFI, May 2025.

Reprinted with permission from The Sociable.

Continue Reading

Business

Audit report reveals Canada’s controversial COVID travel app violated multiple rules

Published on June 11, 2025

By

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

Canada’s Auditor General found that government procurement rules were not followed in creating the ArriveCAN app.

Canada’s Auditor General revealed that the former Liberal government under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau failed multiple times by violating contract procurement rules to create ArriveCAN, its controversial COVID travel app.

In a report released Tuesday, Auditor General Karen Hogan noted that between April 2015 to March 2024, the Trudeau government gave out 106 professional service contracts to GC Strategies Inc. This is the same company that made the ArriveCAN app.

The contracts were worth $92.7 million, with $64.5 million being paid out.

According to Hogan, Canada’s Border Services Agency gave four contracts to GC Strategies valued at $49.9 million. She noted that only 54 percent of the contracts delivered any goods.

“We concluded that professional services contracts awarded and payments made by federal organizations to GC Strategies and other companies incorporated by its co-founders were not in accordance with applicable policy instruments and that value for money for these contracts was not obtained,” Hogan said.

She continued, “Despite this, federal government officials consistently authorized payments.”

The report concluded that “Federal organizations need to ensure that public funds are spent with due regard for value for money, including in decisions about the procurement of professional services contracts.”

Hogan announced an investigation of ArriveCAN in November 2022 after the House of Commons voted 173-149 for a full audit of the controversial app.

Last year, Hogan published an audit of ArriveCAN and on Tuesday published a larger audit of the 106 contracts awarded to GC Strategies by 31 federal organizations under Trudeau’s watch.

‘Massive scandal,’ says Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre

Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre said Hogan’s report on the audit exposed multiple improprieties.

“This is a massive scandal,” he told reporters Tuesday.

“The facts are extraordinary. There was no evidence of added value. In a case where you see no added value, why are you paying the bill?”

ArriveCAN was introduced in April 2020 by the Trudeau government and made mandatory in November 2020. The app was used by the federal government to track the COVID jab status of those entering the country and enforce quarantines when deemed necessary.

ArriveCAN was supposed to have cost $80,000, but the number quickly ballooned to $54 million, with the latest figures showing it cost $59.5 million.

As for the app itself, it was riddled with technical glitches along with privacy concerns from users.

LifeSiteNews has published a wide variety of reports related to the ArriveCAN travel app.

Continue Reading

Trending

X