COVID-19
Bill Gates to stand trial in Netherlands COVID vaccine injury lawsuit

From LifeSiteNews
By Michael Nevradakis Ph. D., The Defender
A Netherlands court last week ruled that Bill Gates can stand trial in the Netherlands, in a case involving seven people injured by COVID-19 vaccines. Other defendants include Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer, and the Dutch state.
A Netherlands court last week ruled thatĀ Bill Gates can stand trialĀ in the Netherlands, in a case involving seven people injured by COVID-19Ā vaccines.
According to Dutch newspaperĀ De Telegraaf, the seven ācorona skepticsāĀ sued GatesĀ last year, along with former Dutch prime minister and newly appointedĀ NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, and āseveral membersā of the Dutch governmentās COVID-19 āOutbreak Management Team.ā
Other defendants includeĀ Albert Bourla, Ph.D., CEO of Pfizer, and the Dutch state.
āBecause Bill Gatesā foundation was involved in combating the corona pandemic, he has also been summoned,āĀ De TelegraafĀ reported.
According to Dutch independent news outletĀ Zebra Inspiratie, the plaintiffs allege that Gates, through his representatives, deliberately misled them about the safety of theĀ COVID-19Ā shots, despite knowing āthat these injections wereĀ not safe and effective.ā
Dutch independent journalist Erica Krikke told The Defender that the seven plaintiffs ā whose names are redacted in the lawsuitās publicly available documents ā āare ordinary Dutch people, and they have been jabbed and after the jabs they got sick.ā
Krikke said that of the seven original plaintiffs, one has since died, leaving the other six plaintiffs to continue the lawsuit.
The lawsuit was filed in theĀ District Court of Leeuwarden. According toĀ De Telegraaf, āGates had objected because, according to him, the judges did not have jurisdiction.ā Accordingly, the court first āhad to rule in the so-called incident procedure,āĀ De Andere KrantĀ reported.
Zebra InspiratieĀ reported that the hearing in this āincident procedureā took place on Sept. 18 and that Gatesā representatives disputed jurisdiction, but not the claim.
According toĀ De Andere Krant, Gates was represented by theĀ Pels RijckenĀ law firm, based in The Hague, described as ātheĀ largest and the premier litigation law firmĀ in the Netherlands.ā Gates did not appear at the Sept. 18 hearing, but attorneys for Gates argued that the court āhad no jurisdiction over him because he lives in the United States.ā
However, in itsĀ Oct. 16 ruling, the Leeuwarden court ruled it does have jurisdiction over Gates.Ā De Andere KrantĀ reported that the court found āsufficient evidenceā that the claims against Gates and the other defendants are āconnectedā and based on the same ācomplex of facts.ā
Other defendants who reside outside of the Netherlands, including Bourla, did not challenge the courtās jurisdiction.
The court ruled Gates must pay attorneysā fees and additional legal costs totaling 1,406 euros (approximately $1,520). A hearing is scheduled for Nov. 27.
āEven if ⦠your name is Bill Gates, you still have to go to courtā
In remarks shared withĀ De Andere Krant, Arno van Kessel, one of the plaintiffsā attorneys, welcomed the ruling. āIn its verdict, the court has clearly recorded the basis of our conclusions of claim,ā van Kessel said.
Dutch attorney Meike Terhorst told The Defender it is āquite interestingā that the plaintiffs filed the lawsuit in Leeuwarden instead of The Hague, where normally, all cases against the government related to COVID-19 are filed.
āIn general, COVID-19 court cases have been very unsuccessful in the Netherlands,ā Terhorst said. āThere is a slim chance it will be successful.ā
She added:
I think most judges support the COVID-19 vaccination agenda and will find it hard to believe the vaccinations have caused injuries. So, we have a long way to go, regardless of the case.
Krikke shared a more optimistic outlook, saying that the court sent a message that āeven if you are rich and your name is Bill Gates, you still have to go to court.ā
New Zealand-based independent journalistĀ Penny Marie, who has closely followed the proceedings in this case, told The Defender she hopes the Oct. 16 ruling āwill hopefully set a precedent and help plaintiffs in similar cases around the world regarding jurisdiction,ā in cases āwhere the defendant does not reside in the country of the plaintiff.ā
āFor parties who make claims against those involved in the implementation of theĀ Great ResetĀ and other international actions, such as the COVID-19 emergency response initiated by the WEF [World Economic Forum] and imposed on all U.N. member nations, I hope that this ruling provides an opportunity for others to follow suit,ā Marie added.
Father of vaccine-injured plaintiff made āemotional pleaā to the court
At the Sept. 18 hearing, plaintiffs also delivered statements. According toĀ Zebra Inspiratie, āOne of the victims, who is very ill, was also given the opportunity to make a plea. She was no longer able to speak and was represented by her father. It was anĀ emotional plea.ā
Krikke said the plaintiffās father told the court that his daughter, who was previously healthy, fell ill after getting the COVID-19 vaccine and could no longer speak, telling the judge that he āwould really like to speak to Bill Gates directlyā to ask him what happened to his daughter.
āAfter that, the judge was really quiet,ā Krikke said.
The Oct. 18 ruling also addressed the plaintiffsā claims aboutĀ Gatesā roleĀ in the WEFās āGreat Resetā project.
āThe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is also affiliated with the World Economic Forum ⦠an international organization whose statutory objective is to unite āleaders from business, governments, academia and society at large into a global community committed to improving the state of the world,āāĀ the rulingĀ states, adding:
This is a project aimed at the total reorganization of societies in all countries that are members of the United Nations ⦠as described by [WEF founder and executive chairmanĀ Klaus Schwab] in his bookĀ Covid-19: The Great Reset. ā¦
Characteristic of this political ideology is that this forced and planned change is presented as justified by pretending that the world is suffering from major crises that can only be solved by centralized, hardĀ global intervention. One of these pretended major crises concerns the Covid-19 pandemic.
The ruling also states, āTheĀ Bill & Melinda Gates FoundationĀ isĀ affiliated with āGavi, the Vaccine Allianceā ⦠an international partnership in the field of vaccinations between various public and private entities.ā
This article was originally published byĀ The DefenderĀ ā Childrenās Health Defenseās News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please considerĀ subscribing to The DefenderĀ orĀ donating to Childrenās Health Defense.
COVID-19
Freedom Convoy leader Tamara Lich to face sentencing July 23

From LifeSiteNews
Freedom Convoy leader Tamara Lich is slated to be sentenced on July 23.
In a recent update by The Democracy Fund, the groupĀ noted that āSentencing for Ms. Lich is scheduled for July 23rd and 24th before Justice Perkins-McVey in Ottawa.ā
In April of this year, Lich and Chris Barber wereĀ found guiltyĀ of mischief for their roles as leaders of the 2022 protest and as social media influencers. The conviction came despite the non-violent nature of the popular movement.
TDF also noted that the full 108 page judgment of Justice Perkins-McVeyās ruling is now available online.
According to TDF, the āCourt determined that both Ms. Lich and Mr. Barber were leaders of the Freedom Convoy 2022 movement and were involved in organizing and leading trucks and other vehicles from western Canada.ā
āWhile there was no evidence that Ms. Lich owned a vehicle emitting fumes or honking, or that she blocked access to buildings, the Court noted her creation of the Freedom Convoy 2022 Facebook page, which gained a large following, and her involvement in setting up the GoFundMe and later GiveSendGo fundraising pages,ā noted TDF.
As for Barber, his sentencing has been furtherĀ delayed. The delay in his case follows an update he gave earlier this month in which heĀ announcedĀ that the Crown wants to jail him for two years in addition to seizing the truck he used in the protest. As such, his legal team has asked for a stay of proceedings for the time being.
The Lich and Barber trial concluded in September of 2024, more than a year after it began. It was only originally scheduled to last 16 days.
Lich and Barber were initiallyāÆarrestedĀ onāÆFebruary 17, 2022, meaning their legal battle has lasted longer than three years.
Despite the peaceful nature of the Freedom Convoy, then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his Liberal government invoked the Emergencies Act to clear-out protesters, an action a federal judge has since said was ānot justified.ā During the clear-out, an elderly lady wasāÆtrampled by a police horse and many who donated to the cause had their bank accounts frozen.
The actions taken by the Trudeau government were publicly supported by Mark Carney at the time, who won re-election on April 28 and is slated to form a minority government.
COVID-19
Vaccines: Assessing Canada’s COVID Response

Ā
Ā David Clinton
I planned to be āfirst in lineā for the shots as soon as my age cohort became eligible. By early March however, COVID itself dropped by the house, leading to the most uncomfortable (although non life-threatening) week of my life.
Itās been five years since COVID hit and one part of me wants to stuff it all in a closet somewhere and forget about it. But perhaps certain events – and especially government errors and overreach – should be documented. So this post will identify actions at all levels of government from those early days that, given our understanding of the threat available through the benefit hindsight, were both misguided and damaging.
I haven’t completely forgotten the mood through the early months in 2020. Politicians faced near-unanimous public demand for an aggressive response. Much of that sentiment was the result of messaging coming from foreign governments (mostly in the U.S.). But the local sentiment was definitely there.
To be fair, Governments got some things right and, taking into account the chaos and uncertainty of those early months, even some of their mistakes were understandable. But it’s the job of government to lead. And to avoid making choices – even popular choices – that will lead to predictable harms.
Vaccine mandates starting in 2021 were a case in point. Federal authority largely stemmed from the 2005 Quarantine Act and the Contraventions Act that allowed officials to issue tickets for non-compliance with the Quarantine Act. Provincial mandates were based on laws like Ontarioās Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act. The question isnāt whether the mandates and their enforcement were legal, but whether they caused more harm than good.
As the first vaccines started arriving in Canada around February 2021, I planned to be āfirst in lineā for the shots as soon as my age cohort became eligible. By early March however, COVID itself dropped by the house, leading to the most uncomfortable (although non life-threatening) week of my life.
After recovering, my family doctor advised me to wait three months before getting the shots so my body could get back to normal. During those months, I got access to preprint results from theĀ Israeli study into natural immunityĀ which showed that:
Natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity
Those results were later confirmed byĀ CDCĀ andĀ NEJMĀ studies, among others.
Given that context, I didnāt see any justification for exposing myself to even minimal health risks associated with vaccines. Which meant that, despite demonstrably posing no threat to public health, I would (at various times) be unable to:
- Board domestic commercial flights, VIA Rail, Rocky Mountaineer trains, and cruise ships within Canada
- Board international flights or trains departing Canada
- Freely return to Canada through an overland point of entry
- Upon return to Canada, bypass the 14 day quarantine under the Quarantine Act
- Upon return to Canada via air, bypass the three day quarantine in (expensive) government-approved hotels
- Engage in ānon-essentialā activities like restaurants, gyms, events (details varied from province to province)
- Enter Parliament
- Seek employment in federally regulated air, rail, and marine sectors
What should Canadian governments have done? Remove restrictions on individuals with natural immunity, obviously. Which, by the way, would have come with the valuable bonus of entirely avoiding the truckers protest and consequent confrontations.
If authorities were reluctant to take us at our word on immunity, they could have followed the European Unionās lead by emulating their Digital COVID Certificate for proof of recovery. Were they worried about people without immunity creating fake certificates? Hard to take that one seriously. There were more fake vaccine passports littering the streets of Ontario than abandoned Toronto Maple Leafs car window flags in a normal early May.
In the end, my own suffering was negligible. I didnāt really want to visit family in the U.S. all that much anyway. But for millions of other Canadians, the real-world stakes were far higher. And all thatās besides theĀ billions of dollarsĀ wasted during those yearsā government policies.
To be sure, resisting unscientific street-level calls for vaccine mandates would have required courage. But shouldnāt acts of courage be a source of pride for public officials?
Subscribe to The Audit.
For the full experience,Ā upgrade your subscription.
-
International1 day ago
Trump envoy Steve Witkoff calls out neocons pushing for war with Iran
-
Alberta1 day ago
It’s not just Alberta flirting with western separatism now
-
Alberta1 day ago
Canadaās oil sector is built to last, unlike its U.S. counterpart
-
Crime1 day ago
RCMP warns Central Alberta property owners of paving contractor scams
-
Red Deer1 day ago
Red Deer teacher one of 7 in Canada to receive National Award for Teaching Excellence in Physical Education
-
Business2 days ago
U.S., China agree to 90-day tariff reduction after negotiations
-
Alberta1 day ago
Albertaās oil bankrolls Canadaās public services
-
Censorship Industrial Complex2 days ago
In Britain the āThought Crimeā Is Real