Connect with us

Alberta

Top baby names of 2022 revealed

Published

5 minute read

Olivia and Noah continue their streak as the most popular baby names in Alberta in 2022.

The births have been registered and the results are in: Olivia is once again the most popular name for baby girls born in Alberta last year, holding the top spot since 2013.

As Olivia’s momentum continued, Noah was working on a streak of his own as the most popular name for boys four years in a row.

“Congratulations to everyone who brought a child into this world in 2022. Alberta is a great place to live, and I see a positive future for all parents choosing to raise a family here. To those expecting a baby in 2023, or to those who are just plain curious, I encourage you to check out the baby names lists from years past.”

Dale Nally, Minister of Service Alberta and Red Tape Reduction

As Olivia and Noah continued their popularity streak, there was some movement in the rest of the field as names moved up and down in the lists.

Sophia, Emma, Amelia and Harper rounded out the top five for girls’ names. Harper moved up six spots after placing 11th the previous year. The comeback kid, Lily, moved up eight spots to get back into the top 10 after missing out in 2021.

Liam, Theodore, Oliver and Jack joined Noah as the top five boys’ names in the province. After a three-year absence, James returned to the top 10. Lucas also returned to the top 10, after missing out in 2021.

There were 48,225 births registered in Alberta in 2022. Of these, 24,781 were boys and 23,437 were girls. In seven births, the sex of the baby was not indicated at time of the initial registration. There were 12,966 different names registered in 2022.

Parents have one year to register their child’s birth. As a result, the 2022 baby names and birth statistics lists may change slightly.

Notable names

Parents have many motives for their name choices and often the names they choose reflect what is important to them.

Some of the names chosen seem to reflect places (Brooklyn, Georgia, London); animals (Wren, Bear, Fox); religious figures (Muhammad, Adam, Noah); mythology (Penelope, Apollo, Phoenix); plants and flowers (Juniper, Daisy, Violet, Lily, Willow, Hazel, Ivy); literature (Huxley); musicians (Prince, Lennon, Presley); seasons (Winter, Spring, Summer, Autumn); sports (Beckham, Evander); actors (Leonardo); and other figures from pop culture (Casey, Maverick).

Quick facts

  • Historically, girls’ names that held the No. 1 spot for the longest consecutive time period include:
    • Olivia: 10 years (2013-2022)
    • Jessica: six years (1990-1995)
    • Emily: five years (1998-2002)
  • Historically, boys’ names that held the No. 1 spot for the longest consecutive time period include:
    • Ethan: nine years (2001-2009)
    • Liam: seven years (2010-2016)
    • Matthew: five years (1995-1999)

Boys’ names and frequency – top 10 names 2017-22

(In brackets is the number of babies with each name)

Place Boy Names

(2022)

Boy Names (2021) Boy Names (2020) Boy Names (2019) Boy Names (2018) Boy Names (2017)
1 Noah (229) Noah (274) Noah (239) Noah (275) Liam (225) Noah (250)
2 Liam (176) Jack (219) Oliver (229) Liam (234) Oliver (212) Liam (244)
3 Theodore (173) Oliver (208) Liam (206) Oliver (225) Noah (199) Benjamin (229)
4 Oliver (172) Liam (197) Benjamin (182) Ethan (213) Ethan (188) Logan (226)
5 Jack (159) Theodore (191) William (178) Jack (198) Logan (182)

Lucas (182)

Lucas (216)
6 William (146) William (174) Jack (169) William (185) Jacob (181) William (213)
7 Benjamin (138)

James (138)

Ethan (162) Lucas (163) Lucas (174) William (178) Ethan (192)
8 Henry (136) Levi (148) Theodore (159) Owen (167) Benjamin (176) Oliver (190)
9 Lucas (135) Benjamin (147)

Henry (147)

Levi (153) Benjamin (163) Jack (167) Jack (189)
10 Ethan (130) Jackson (142) Owen (152) Jacob (162) Alexander (158)

James (158)

Jacob (178)

Girls’ names and frequency – top 10 names 2017-2022

(In brackets is the number of babies with each name)

Place Girl Names

(2022)

Girl Names (2021) Girl Names (2020) Girl Names (2019) Girl Names (2018) Girl Names (2017)
1 Olivia (192) Olivia (210) Olivia (236) Olivia (229) Olivia (235) Olivia (236)
2 Sophia (151) Charlotte (166) Emma (184) Charlotte (188) Emma (230) Emma (215)
3 Emma (149) Ava (165) Charlotte (161) Sophia (181) Charlotte (175) Charlotte (187)
4 Amelia (133) Emma (164) Ava (159) Emma (178) Emily (164) Ava (184)

Sophia (184)

5 Harper (125) Amelia (161) Sophia (151) Ava (161) Ava (161) Emily (159)
6 Charlotte (117) Sophia (137) Amelia (145) Amelia (159) Abigail (153) Abigail (154)
7 Ava (115) Isla (135) Isla (133) Emily (150) Harper (150) Amelia (149)
8 Isla (101) Abigail (120)

Chloe (120)

Emily (127) Abigail (141) Sophia (146) Isabella (141)
9 Lily (100) Evelyn (119) Lily (123) Hannah (137) Amelia (145) Aria (129)

Chloe (129)

10 Chloe (92) Aria (112) Abigail (114) Elizabeth (124) Elizabeth (130) Lily (127)

This is a news release from the Government of Alberta.

Follow Author

Alberta

Alberta official reveals ‘almost all’ wildfires in province this year have been started by humans

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Clare Marie Merkowsky

Alberta Minister of Forestry and Parks Todd Loewen said his department estimates that most of the province’s wildfires this year are man-made and not caused by ‘climate change.’

Alberta officials have announced that almost all fires in 2024 are believed to have been caused by humans despite ongoing claims that “climate change” is to blame.

On April 24, Alberta Minister of Forestry and Parks Todd Loewen revealed that his department estimates that most of the province’s wildfires this year are man-made and not caused by “climate change” as claimed by mainstream media and politicians.

“We expect that almost all of the wildfires we’ve experienced so far this year are human caused, given the point we’re at in the season and the types of weather we’re seeing,” Loewen stated.

 Already, Alberta has put out 172 wildfires this year, and 63 are actively burning. However, Loewen did not seem overly alarmed, instead warning Albertans to watch their local fire bans and restrictions to reduce the high number of man-made wildfires.  

“I urge you to assess your property for wildfire danger and take any preventive action you can to address these risks,” he said.

“This includes breaking up fuel sources that could ignite a structure, removing trees in close proximity to your home, and properly maintaining your gutters and roofs to rid the materials that could easily ignite such as leaves and dry needles,” Loewen added.

Loewen’s announcement comes just weeks after Alberta Premier Danielle Smith promised that arsonists who ignite wildfires in Alberta will be held accountable for their crimes.

“As we approach the wildfire season, it is important to understand that 67% of wildfires in Alberta are started by people,” she explained.

“If you start a wildfire, you can be charged, fined, and held liable for all costs associated with fighting the wildfire,” Smith added.

“All I know is in my province we have 650 fires and 500 of them were human caused,” she said, “so we have to make sure that when people know that when it’s dry out there and we get into forest fire season that they’re being a lot more careful because anytime you end up with an ignition that happens it can have devastating consequences.”

The Alberta government has also created an ad campaign highlighting the fact that most fires are caused by humans and not “climate change,” as many left-leaning politicians claim.

As reported by LifeSiteNews last year, Smith ordered arson investigators to look into why some of the wildfires that raged across the vast expanse of the province had “no known cause” shortly after they spread.

Indeed, despite claims that wildfires have drastically increased due to “climate change,” 2023 research revealed that wildfires have decreased globally while media coverage has spiked 400 percent.

Furthermore, many of the fires last spring and summer were discovered to be caused by arsonists and not “climate change.”

Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) have arrested arsonists who have been charged with lighting fires across the country, including in the YukonBritish Columbia, and Alberta.

In Quebec, satellite footage also showed the mysterious simultaneous eruption of several blazes across the province, sparking concerns that the fires were a coordinated effort by arsonists.

Despite the overwhelming evidence, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and mainstream media continue to claim that the fires are unprecedentedly dangerous and caused by “climate change” in an attempt to pass further regulations on natural resources.

The reduction and eventual elimination of the use of so-called “fossil fuels” and a transition to unreliable “green” energy has also been pushed by the World Economic Forum (WEF) – the globalist group behind the socialist “Great Reset” agenda – an organization with which Trudeau and some in his cabinet are involved.

Continue Reading

Alberta

Alberta rejects unconstitutional cap on plastic production

Published on

Minister of Environment and Protected Areas Rebecca Schulz issued the following statement:

“Every modern convenience and necessity is either made from or contains plastic, from surgical gloves to your iPhone. Despite this, Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada Steven Guilbeault has announced that he intends to cap the production of plastics in Canada.

“This unilateral announcement is a slap in the face to Alberta and our province’s petrochemical industry, and the thousands of Albertans who work in it.

“Plastics production is a growing part of Alberta’s economy, and we are positioned to lead the world for decades to come in the production of carbon neutral plastics.

“Minister Guilbeault’s proposal would throw all of that into jeopardy and risk billions of dollars in investments. This includes projects like Dow Chemical’s net-zero petrochemical plant in Fort Saskatchewan, a $9-billion dollar project that will create thousands of jobs.

“His proposal will also fail to reduce plastic production. If the federal government limits plastic production in Canada, other counties like China will just produce more. The only outcome that this federal government will achieve will be fewer jobs in Canada.

“Last year, the Federal Court ruled that Minister Guilbeault’s decision to classify plastics as ‘toxic’ was both ‘unconstitutional and unreasonable’.

“Minister Guilbeault’s decision to cap production is even more egregious and is equally unconstitutional. Under no circumstances will Alberta permit any limit on our ability to produce and export plastic products.

“Instead of wasting everyone’s time, the federal government would be better served by taking a page out of Alberta’s plan, which diverts plastics from landfills and turns used plastics into new products. This is the promise of Alberta’s plan to create a Plastics Circular Economy, a modern miracle in which, through chemistry, we can have all of life’s conveniences and necessities while protecting our environment and reducing plastic waste.

“If the federal government refuses to abide by the constitution, we will take them to court again to defend our jurisdiction and the thousands of Albertans who work in the petrochemical sector.”

Continue Reading

Trending

X