From LifeSiteNews

By Joseph Quinn

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger explained how Wikipedia systematically blacklists and “deprecates” conservative sources. Wikipedia remains one of the most heavily used information sources online and is integrated with Google search results.

Elon Musk has announced plans to build “Grokipedia,” a new open-source online encyclopedia under his artificial intelligence company xAI.

“Will be a massive improvement over Wikipedia,” Musk wrote on X. “Frankly, it is a necessary step towards the xAI goal of understanding the Universe.”

We are building Grokipedia @xAI.

Will be a massive improvement over Wikipedia.

Frankly, it is a necessary step towards the xAI goal of understanding the Universe. https://t.co/xvSeWkpALy

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 30, 2025

The announcement came days after Tucker Carlson’s interview with Larry Sanger, a co-founder of Wikipedia and a vocal critic of the organization since his departure in 2002.

Larry Sanger built Wikipedia as an unbiased repository of the world’s knowledge, and then stood helplessly by as activists and intel agencies turned it into the most comprehensive propaganda op in human history. There’s nothing more corrupt.

(0:00) The Origins of Wikipedia… pic.twitter.com/J59oEejCG2

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) September 29, 2025

Sanger explained how Wikipedia systematically blacklists and “deprecates” conservative sources. Seeing LifeSiteNews on the list, Carlson said that the platform has become “a weapon of ideological, theological war.”

Musk echoed Sanger’s criticisms, affirming Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton’s claim that “Wikipedia is a smear machine for the Left.”

💯

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 30, 2025

Musk later amplified memes promoting Grokipedia, calling it “an open source knowledge repository that is vastly better than Wikipedia.”

Join @xAI and help build Grokipedia, an open source knowledge repository that is vastly better than Wikipedia!

This will be available to the public with no limits on use. https://t.co/3CnfrvNIpI

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 30, 2025

He also affirmed Sanger’s “Nine Theses,” which call for dismantling Wikipedia’s centralized editorial control.

Some good suggestions from the co-founder of Wikipedia https://t.co/bgwBmi6uXN

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 30, 2025

Musk has not released technical details of the Grokipedia project but said that Grok AI will be independent of Wikipedia “by the end of the year.”

Images of a potential logo were also shared on his X account.

Wikipedia should have just taken that $1 billion offer from Elon Musk, it’s too late, the rival is coming: Grokipedia! pic.twitter.com/cLBKfPRgyO

— SMX 🇺🇸 (@iam_smx) September 30, 2025

Wikipedia remains one of the most heavily used information sources online and is integrated with Google search results. Critics argue that its governance model allows biased editors – described as “ideologically-driven thought police” – to shape content and suppress dissenting viewpoints, particularly on political, cultural, and religious topics.

A similar initiative called “Infogalactic” was launched in 2016. A “fork” of Wikipedia, it was designed to decentralize control and allow multiple perspectives. While Infogalactic never reached Wikipedia’s scale, it established a model for alternative knowledge repositories.

Attracting a critical mass of editors and establishing credibility remain significant challenges facing such alternatives. Musk’s involvement signals a higher-profile challenge to Wikipedia’s dominance, combining xAI’s technological resources with his public platform on X.

Musk has not provided a clear timeline, but the announcement positions xAI to mount a direct challenge to Wikipedia’s dominance of the information ecosystem.

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms president John Carpay said that Bill C-9 in effect seeks to make it the law to ‘punish the emotion of hate.’

One of Canada’s leading constitutional law experts blasted a new Liberal “hate crime” bill as something that would “empower police” and the government to go after those it deems have violated a person’s “feelings” in a “hateful” way.

In a recent commentary piece posted by The Epoch Times, Canadian legal expert and lawyer John Carpay, founder and president of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), observed that the Liberals’ Bill C-9, or Combating Hate Act, is dangerous.

“Canada’s Criminal Code should punish bad behaviour, not bad feelings. Canadians need protection from crime, not from offensive opinions that might be considered ‘hateful’ by some but not by others,” Carpay wrote.

Carpay said that it seems the Liberals are “fixated on further criminalizing feelings of hatred that criminals may have had when carrying out their crimes.”

“Defining hate is near-impossible, as can be seen whenever politicians and judges attempt to do so,” he wrote.

Bill C-9 was brought forth in the House of Commons on September 19 by Justice Minister Sean Fraser.

The Liberals have boasted that the bill will make it a crime for people to block the entrance to, or intimidate people from attending, a church or other place of worship, a school, or a community center. The bill would also make it a crime to promote so-called hate symbols and would, in effect, ban the display of certain symbols such as the Nazi flag.

Bill C-9 reads, regarding what is deemed “hateful,” that “For greater certainty, the communication of a statement does not incite or promote hatred … solely because it discredits, humiliates, hurts or offends.”

Carpay said Bill C-9 “allows Canadians to express ‘disdain’ and ‘dislike’ without worrying about facing criminal charges, yet Canadians must be careful not to possess illegal emotions that involve ‘detestation’ or ‘vilification.’ It’s not ‘hate’ to discredit, humiliate, hurt, offend, and dislike people; it is “hate” to detest and vilify people. Are we clear?”

Carpay said that Bill C-9 in effect seeks to make it the law to “punish the emotion of hate,” noting how the reality is this “ignores” the reality that Canada’s judges are already “empowered to impose more severe penalties on hate-fueled criminals.”

The new bill increases the maximum penalty a judge can give to people convicted of crimes.

“If the judge decides that the convicted person’s emotions crossed from the legal territory of ‘disdain’ and ‘dislike’ into the crime of feeling ‘detestation’ or ‘vilification,’” Carpay noted.

This means that for a minor crime, where the maximum penalty is two years, a new “hate” crime offense could land someone in jail for up to five years.

“For the man convicted of a crime with a maximum penalty of five years in jail, if the judge determines that he possessed ‘hate’ in his heart, the judge can lock him up for 10 years instead of five,” Carpay stated.

“For more serious crimes, where the maximum penalty is 14 or more years in jail, if the judge thinks the convicted person was ‘hateful,’ the sentence can be imprisonment for life.”

The Liberals’ Bill C-9 has been blasted by the Canadian Conservative Party as a “dangerous” piece of legislation.

Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis warned it will open the door for authorities to possibly prosecute Canadians’ speech deemed “hateful.”

Carpay: Bill would ‘empower’ police, government

As it stands, Section 319(6) of Canada’s Criminal Code mandates consent of the nation’s attorney general before a person can be charged with a hate crime. Lewis and Carpay warned that Bill C-9 will eliminate this protection.

“Bill C-9 makes existing laws worse by empowering police to use the Criminal Code to impose their own subjective beliefs about what a police officer personally feels is ‘hateful.’ The bill does this by repealing an important safeguard that protects the free speech of all Canadians, namely the requirement that the attorney general consent to any prosecution for hate speech offences,” Carpay said.

He observed that the attorney general consent “safeguard,” as is the case now, has allowed hate speech prosecutions to proceed, “but only after a review by a higher authority.”

Fraser himself said that “by removing this step, law enforcement would be able to act quickly.”

Carpay noted how the bills promise to make it a “crime” to intimidate a church or place of worship, which is “not true.”

“It is already a crime to utter threats, intentionally provoke a state of fear in people, engage in physical contact (even in a minor way), and physically obstruct people from going about their business,” he wrote.

“Bill C-9 creates a duplicative and superfluous criminal offence of impeding access to a house of worship by intentionally provoking a state of fear; this conduct is already criminal under existing laws. By creating a redundant new law, Bill C-9 appears to be an exercise in virtue-signaling.”

Carpay also lamented how the bill mentions “rising antisemitism” but says nothing about the arson attacks on Catholic and Christian churches plaguing Canada.

“Anti-Catholic hate is obviously not on the minister’s radar. If it was, he would have mentioned it when introducing the Combatting Hate Act,” Carpay wrote.

“It goes to show how Bill C-9 is primarily about politics and appearances, even while undermining free expression in Canada.”

Since taking power in 2015, the Liberal government has brought forth many new bills that, in effect, censor internet content as well as go after people’s ability to speak their minds.