Alberta
Risk or Reward: The Alberta Pension Plan according to the UCP and the NDP

Submitted by The Free Alberta Strategy Team
A Positive Pension Plan
There’s been a lot of misinformation swirling around Alberta politics in the last few months, and with the election now underway, it’s only ramped up even further.
Perhaps no issue, though, has been as misrepresented as the idea of an Alberta Pension Plan.
As of right now, the UCP says they are still studying the issue, and that any actual implementation of an Alberta Pensions Plan would be conditional on the holding of a referendum after all the research has been done and the reports that have been commissioned have been received and publicised.
The NDP, meanwhile, has completely dismissed the idea entirely, before the research has even been finished, and has spread some pretty crazy ideas around about what a provincial pension plan would mean.
We’ve heard that the provincial government is trying to “steal” Albertans’ pensions.
We’ve heard that the government would gamble all our pensions away.
We’ve heard that they’d take the money and give it to their friends.
We’ve also heard a bizarre theory that if you had an Alberta Pension Plan, you wouldn’t then be able to go and work or retire in any other province.
And all of that is, of course, simply nonsense.
No one is suggesting doing any of those things.
No one has ever suggested doing any of those things.
And, perhaps clearest of all, none of those things happen in Quebec – who already have their own pension plan, remember!
Instead, the plan is actually quite simple.
Right now, the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) is administered by an arm’s-length agency of the federal government.
The idea would be to replace that arm’s-length agency of the federal government with an arm’s-length agency of the Alberta government.
But, if the idea isn’t to bring the money back to Alberta in order for the Alberta government to “steal” your pension, why exactly would we want to do it?
The main reason to switch to an Alberta Pension Plan is actually fairness for Albertans.
The fact is that the Canada Pension Plan, as it is currently structured, is essentially just another massive wealth transfer from Alberta to the rest of Canada.
Remember, the “Canada Pension Plan” isn’t actually a personalized pension with your name on it.
The federal government doesn’t keep each Canadian’s money in an individual account and then pay you back with your own money when you retire.
Rather, it’s just another tax that you pay, all the money gets lumped in together, and then when you retire you get a maximum of about $15,000 back each year.
So, Alberta’s young, talented, and hard-working population ends up subsidizing the pensions of workers in the rest of the country.
And it isn’t a small subsidy either – the total subsidy between 2008 and 2017 adds up to $27.9 billion.
As of 2017, Albertans were contributing 16.5% of all pension contributions, while our retirees only accounted for 10.8% of pension payments.
And remember, that was in the middle of Alberta’s biggest economic downturn in a generation.
When we get more updated figures, the subsidy is likely to be even more significant.
Albertans are paying not only for their own pension, but also for a large share of the pensions of everyone in the rest of the country.
Creating an Alberta Pension Plan would instantly remove this subsidy, and Albertans would only pay for their own pensions, instead of for everyone else’s.
And with the subsidy gone, the Alberta government could immediately reduce pension contributions while retaining the exact same benefits retirees receive right now.
Or, they could keep the same contribution levels, while increasing the benefit payments retirees receive, or do something in between the two.
All without the Alberta government interfering in the administration of the pension plan itself.
Certainly, the concept of an Alberta Pension Plan needs much more detailed research before it can be implemented.
A significant amount of work will need to be done to ensure proper risk management and governance practices will be implemented.
And this is all work that the UCP has committed to do before making any final decisions.
But given the significant financial benefits, the fact that the NDP is willing to completely rule out the idea before even seeing the details is incredibly short-sighted.
Their opposition seems entirely based on the idea that the Alberta government would somehow “take over” and “steal” people’s pensions – without any explanation of why that would be possible with an arm’s-length provincial organization in a way that isn’t currently possible with an arm’s-length federal organization managing the money.
It’s also incredibly ironic given that, when the NDP were in power in Alberta, their government did interfere in the administration of the various government employee pensions that are currently managed by AIMCO.
(That’s a whole other story for a whole other email, but the short version is that they took away the requirement for AIMCO directors to be experienced investors, they appointed a bunch of NDP allies to the board, and then set about forcing those directors to invest the money in a bunch of environmental projects that the NDP favoured, until the UCP reversed those changes and restored the independence of AIMCO.)
An Alberta Pension Plan is one of the many proposals in the Free Alberta Strategy that can be used to protect the financial future of Albertans.
But, like any policy proposal, it requires robust research to ensure it is implemented properly.
We have a small team of researchers, funded entirely by grassroots donors like yourself, and we need your help to continue developing and promoting detailed solutions.
If you’re in a position to do so, please consider making a donation:
Alberta
Pierre Poilievre will run to represent Camrose, Stettler, Hanna, and Drumheller in Central Alberta by-election

From LifeSiteNews
Conservative MP-elect Damien Kurek announced Friday he would be willing to give up his seat as an MP so Pierre Poilievre, who lost his seat Monday, could attempt to re-join Parliament.
Conservative MP-elect Damien Kurek announced Friday he would be willing to give up his seat in a riding that saw the Conservatives easily defeat the Liberals by 46,020 votes in this past Monday’s election. Poilievre had lost his seat to his Liberal rival, a seat which he held for decades, which many saw as putting his role as leader of the party in jeopardy.
Kurek has represented the riding since 2019 and said about his decision, “It has been a tremendous honor to serve the good people of Battle River—Crowfoot.”
“After much discussion with my wife Danielle, I have decided to step aside for this Parliamentary session to allow our Conservative Party Leader to run here in a by-election,” he added.
Newly elected Prime Minister of Canada Mark Carney used his first post-election press conference to say his government will unleash a “new economy” that will further “deepen” the nation’s ties to the world.
He also promised that he would “trigger” a by-election at once, saying there would be “no games” trying to prohibit Poilievre to run and win a seat in a safe Conservative riding.
Poilievre, in a statement posted to X Friday, said that it was with “humility and appreciation that I have accepted Damien Kurek’s offer to resign his seat in Battle River-Crowfoot so that I can work to earn the support of citizens there to serve them in Parliament.”
“Damien’s selfless act to step aside temporarily as a Member of Parliament shows his commitment to change and restoring Canada’s promise,” he noted.
“I will work to earn the trust of the good people of Battle River-Crowfoot and I will continue to hold the Liberal minority government to account until the next federal election, when we will bring real change to all Canadians.”
Carney said a new cabinet will be sworn in on May 12.
Alberta
‘Existing oil sands projects deliver some of the lowest-breakeven oil in North America’

From the Canadian Energy Centre
By Will Gibson
Alberta oil sands projects poised to grow on lower costs, strong reserves
As geopolitical uncertainty ripples through global energy markets, a new report says Alberta’s oil sands sector is positioned to grow thanks to its lower costs.
Enverus Intelligence Research’s annual Oil Sands Play Fundamentals forecasts producers will boost output by 400,000 barrels per day (bbls/d) by the end of this decade through expansions of current operations.
“Existing oil sands projects deliver some of the lowest-breakeven oil in North America at WTI prices lower than $50 U.S. dollars,” said Trevor Rix, a director with the Calgary-based research firm, a subsidiary of Enverus which is headquartered in Texas with operations in Europe and Asia.
Alberta’s oil sands currently produce about 3.4 million bbls/d. Individual companies have disclosed combined proven reserves of about 30 billion barrels, or more than 20 years of current production.
A recent sector-wide reserves analysis by McDaniel & Associates found the oil sands holds about 167 billion barrels of reserves, compared to about 20 billion barrels in Texas.
While trade tensions and sustained oil price declines may marginally slow oil sands growth in the short term, most projects have already had significant capital invested and can withstand some volatility.
“While it takes a large amount of out-of-pocket capital to start an oil sands operation, they are very cost effective after that initial investment,” said veteran S&P Global analyst Kevin Birn.
“Optimization,” where companies tweak existing operations for more efficient output, has dominated oil sands growth for the past eight years, he said. These efforts have also resulted in lower cost structures.
“That’s largely shielded the oil sands from some of the inflationary costs we’ve seen in other upstream production,” Birn said.
Added pipeline capacity through expansion of the Trans Mountain system and Enbridge’s Mainline have added an incentive to expand production, Rix said.
The increased production will also spur growth in regions of western Canada, including the Montney and Duvernay, which Enverus analysts previously highlighted as increasingly crucial to meet rising worldwide energy demand.
“Increased oil sands production will see demand increase for condensate, which is used as diluent to ship bitumen by pipeline, which has positive implications for growth in drilling in liquids-rich regions such as the Montney and Duvernay,” Rix said.
-
Business1 day ago
Canada urgently needs a watchdog for government waste
-
2025 Federal Election1 day ago
The Last Of Us: Canada’s Chaos Election
-
2025 Federal Election4 hours ago
Mark Carney vows to ‘deepen’ Canada’s ties with the world, usher in ‘new economy’
-
Business1 day ago
Overregulation is choking Canadian businesses, says the MEI
-
Business12 hours ago
Top Canadian bank ditches UN-backed ‘net zero’ climate goals it helped create
-
Health4 hours ago
RFK Jr. orders placebo safety trials for all new vaccines in major policy decision
-
Business2 days ago
Trump says he expects ‘great relationship’ with Carney, who ‘hated’ him less than Poilievre
-
Alberta1 day ago
‘Existing oil sands projects deliver some of the lowest-breakeven oil in North America’