Opinion
Reminder to the Mayor and City Council; 97,216 residents do not live downtown.

This situation about relocating the homeless shelter has become revealing of the inner workings at city council. Like most political arenas appeasing the corporate sector takes precedent over assisting the least fortunate.
Sure 3,628 residents call downtown home, but 97,216 residents donāt.
After months of discussions, rash decisions, even reprioritizing the matrix in seeking to legitimize a bad motion, all the city council had to do was satisfy a handful of outside bureaucrats and provincial politicians. They could not. But 100,844 Red Deer residents are expected to just accept it.
My first thought was our city council needed to look beyond their small circle of influence, think bigger but they did not.
Rather than working so hard to justify a plan that was acceptable to but a few business owners, in a designated sector, why not work at a plan acceptable to the many, in all sectors?
My sense for the delay is because the city wanted to build the homeless shelter in an undeveloped plot north of the river, which would appease the downtown people but, would be unacceptable to the many. There are over 30,000 residents living north of the river more than 8 times the number calling downtown home.
When will city council realize that they are beating a dead horse, and every decision will be unacceptable to some, every decision will have unintended and intended consequences. They need to look beyond their personal ambitions and their comfort zone and look at the destination then plan the route. Destination being what is the best solution for everyone.
What do the experts say? Provincial experts are giving a pass to our councilās shenanigans.
Council needs to expand their inner circle before this happens again.
Just saying.
Garfield Marks
2025 Federal Election
Post election…the chips fell where they fell

From Williamās Substack
William Lacey
I put a lot of personal energy into this election, trying to understand why it was that Canadians so wholeheartedly endorsed Mark Carney as their new leader, despite the fact that it was the same party who caused irreparable economic harm to the economy, and he has a similar philosophical outlook to the core outlook of the party. I truly believe that we have moved to a phase in our electoral process where, until something breaks, left leaning ideology will trump the day (pun intended).
Coming out of this election I have three questions.
1.Ā What of Pierre Poilievre?Ā The question for Conservatives is whether the wolves feed on the carcass of Poilievre (in my opinion the worst enemy of a Conservative is a Conservative) and initiate the hunt for a new leader (if they do, I believe the future should be led by a woman – Melissa Lantsman or possibly Caroline Mulroney), or does Poilievre move to Alberta and run for a āsafeā seat to get back into the House of Commons, change his tone, and show people he too can be Prime Ministerial? His concession speech gives clues to this.
2.Ā What of Mark Carney?Ā Maybe (hopefully) Carney will see the light and try to bring the nation together, as there is an obvious east-west split in the country in terms of politics. Time will tell, and minority governments need to be cautious. Will we have a Supply and Confidence 2.0 or will we see olive branches extended?
3.Ā What of the House of Commons?Ā As I have mentioned previously, there has been discussion that the House of Commons may not sit until after the summer break, meaning that the House of Commons really will not have conducted any business in almost a year by the time it reconveens. If indeed āwe are in the worst crisis of our livesā as Prime Minister Carney campaigned on, then should we not have the House of Commons sit through the summer? After all, the summer break usually is for politicians to go back to their ridings and connect with their constituents, but if an election campaign doesnāt constitute connecting, what does?
Regardless, as the election is behind us, we now need to see what comes. I will try to be hopeful, but remain cautious. May Canada have better days ahead.
Thanks for reading Williamās Substack!
Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
Banks
TD Bank Account Closures Expose Chinese Hybrid Warfare Threat

From the Frontier Centre for Public Policy
Scott McGregor warns that Chinese hybrid warfare is no longer hypotheticalāitās unfolding in Canada now. TD Bankās closure of CCP-linked accounts highlights the rising infiltration of financial interests. From cyberattacks to guanxi-driven influence, Canadaās institutions face a systemic threat. As banks sound the alarm, Ottawa dithers. McGregor calls for urgent, whole-of-society action before foreign interference further erodes our sovereignty.
Chinese hybrid warfare isnāt coming. Itās here. And Canadaās response has been dangerously complacent
The recent revelation byĀ The Globe and MailĀ that TD Bank has closed accounts linked to pro-China groupsāincluding those associated with former Liberal MP Han Dongāshould not be dismissed as routine risk management. Rather, it is a visible sign of a much deeper and more insidious campaign: a hybrid war being waged by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) across Canadaās political, economic and digital spheres.
TD Bankās moveāreportedly driven by āreputational riskā and concerns over foreign interferenceāmarks a rare, public signal from the private sector. Politically exposed persons (PEPs), a term used in banking and intelligence circles to denote individuals vulnerable to corruption or manipulation, were reportedly among those flagged. When a leading Canadian bank takes action while the government remains hesitant, it suggests the threat is no longer theoretical. It is here.
Hybrid warfare refers to the use of non-military toolsāsuch as cyberattacks, financial manipulation, political influence and disinformationāto erode a nationās sovereignty and resilience from within. InĀ The Mosaic Effect: How the Chinese Communist Party Started a Hybrid War in Americaās Backyard, co-authored with Ina Mitchell, we detailed how the CCP has developed a complex and opaque architecture of influence within Canadian institutions. What weāre seeing now is the slow unravelling of that system, one bank record at a time.
Financial manipulation is a key component of this strategy. CCP-linked actors often use opaque payment systemsāsuch as WeChat Pay, UnionPay or cryptocurrencyāto move money outside traditional compliance structures. These platforms facilitate the unchecked flow of funds into Canadian sectors like real estate, academia and infrastructure, many of which are tied to national security and economic competitiveness.
Layered into this is Chinaās corporate-social credit system. While framed as a financial scoring tool, it also functions as a mechanism of political control, compelling Chinese firms and individualsāeven abroadāto align with party objectives. In this context, there is no such thing as a genuinely independent Chinese company.
Complementing these structural tools isĀ guanxiāa Chinese system of interpersonal networks and mutual obligations. Though rooted in trust,Ā guanxiĀ can be repurposed to quietly influence decision-makers, bypass oversight and secure insider deals. In the wrong hands, it becomes an informal channel of foreign control.
Meanwhile, Canada continues to face escalating cyberattacks linked to the Chinese state. These operations have targeted government agencies and private firms, stealing sensitive data, compromising infrastructure and undermining public confidence. These are not isolated intrusionsāthey are part of a broader effort to weaken Canadaās digital, economic and democratic institutions.
The TD Bank decision should be seen as a bellwether. Financial institutions are increasingly on the front lines of this undeclared conflict. Their actions raise an urgent question: if private-sector actors recognize the risk, why hasnāt the federal government acted more decisively?
The issue of Chinese interference has made headlines in recent years, from allegations of election meddling to intimidation of diaspora communities. TDās decision adds a new financial layer to this growing concern.
Canada cannot afford to respond with fragmented, reactive policies. Whatās needed is a whole-of-society response: new legislation to address foreign interference, strengthened compliance frameworks in finance and technology, and a clear-eyed recognition that hybrid warfare is already being waged on Canadian soil.
The CCPās strategy is long-term, multidimensional and calculated. It blends political leverage, economic subversion, transnational organized crime and cyber operations. Canada must respond with equal sophistication, coordination and resolve.
The mosaic of influence isnāt forming. Itās already here. Recognizing the full picture is no longer optional. Canadians must demand transparency, accountability and action before more of our institutions fall under foreign control.
Scott McGregorĀ is a defence and intelligence veteran, co-author of The Mosaic Effect: How the Chinese Communist Party Started a Hybrid War in Americaās Backyard, and the managing partner of Close Hold Intelligence Consulting Ltd. He is a senior security adviser to the Council on Countering Hybrid Warfare and a former intelligence adviser to the RCMP and the B.C. Attorney General. He writes for the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.
-
Alberta23 hours ago
Premier Danielle Smith responds to election of Liberal government
-
Business2 days ago
Net Zero by 2050: There is no realistic path to affordable and reliable electricity
-
Business2 days ago
Ottawaās Plastics Registry A Waste Of Time And Money
-
Addictions2 days ago
Four new studies show link between heavy cannabis use, serious health risks
-
COVID-192 days ago
Former Australian state premier accused of lying about justification for COVID lockdowns
-
Also Interesting2 days ago
Top Used Ford SUVs for Families and Adventurers
-
Automotive2 days ago
Major automakers push congress to block Californiaās 2035 EV mandate
-
Bruce Dowbiggin2 days ago
Mistrial Declared in Junior Hockey Assault Trial. What Now?