Connect with us

Business

Federal budget fails to ‘break the glass’ on Canada’s economic growth crisis

Published

5 minute read

From the Fraser Institute

By Grady Munro and Jake Fuss

“You’ve seen those signs that say, ‘In emergency, break glass.’ Well, it’s time to break the glass,” said Carolyn Rogers, Bank of Canada senior deputy governor, in a speech last month while warning that Canadians may see living standards fall if nothing is done to promote economic growth.

In advance of the Trudeau government’s 2024 budget released on Tuesday, many called for the government to finally address Canada’s stagnant economic growth. But despite the growing consensus that this issue represents a national crisis, the Trudeau government simply continued with the same approach that helped get us to this point in the first place.

“You’ve seen those signs that say, ‘In emergency, break glass.’ Well, it’s time to break the glass,” said Carolyn Rogers, Bank of Canada senior deputy governor, in a speech last month while warning that Canadians may see living standards fall if nothing is done to promote economic growth.

Ten days later in a joint interview, former Quebec premier Jean Charest and former federal finance minister Bill Morneau urged the Trudeau government to focus on economic growth in the budget. Specifically, Morneau suggested Canada needs more business investment “from other sources than the government.”

These are just two examples of the growing consensus that Canada is suffering an economic and productivity growth crisis.

Economic growth generally refers to the increase in gross domestic product (GDP), which measures the total output of the economy and is driven by three factors—the labour supply, the capital stock and the efficiency in which labour and capital are used.

Canada’s GDP growth in recent years has been driven almost entirely by the labour supply, as the country has experienced historically high population growth. However, although GDP in aggregate has been growing, GDP per person (a common indicator of living standards) has been declining at an alarming rate. Since the second quarter of 2022 (when it peaked post-COVID), inflation-adjusted GDP per person has fallen from $60,178 to $58,111 in the fourth quarter of 2023—and has declined during five of those six quarters, and now sits below where it was at the end of 2014.

Labour productivity, which is the amount of output (GDP) produced per hour worked, has seen a similar decline. Statistics Canada recently reported that the fourth quarter of 2023 represented the first time productivity increased since the beginning of 2022, and that for the prior six quarters labour productivity had declined or remained stagnant.

The consequence of both declining GDP per person and lower productivity, as Carolyn Rogers warned, is a lower standard of living for Canadians. To reverse this crisis, the Trudeau government must address the cause of Canada’s weak economic growth—a severe lack of business investment.

Business investment provides the capital needed to equip workers with the technology and equipment to become more efficient and productive. Yet according to a recent study, from 2014 to 2021, inflation-adjusted business investment per worker in Canada fell from $18,363 to $14,687.

This decline in business investment is partly the result of the Trudeau government’s disinterest in encouraging entrepreneurship and private-sector business investment. Indeed, the government’s  approach of high spending, more regulation and significant involvement in the economy has done little to foster widespread economic growth.

And by raising capital gains taxes on individuals and businesses, which the Trudeau government did in this latest budget, in the words of former Bank of Canada governor David Dodge, the government is doing “exactly the wrong thing” to boost productivity. Rather, these measures simply provide more reason for people and businesses to invest elsewhere.

This latest Trudeau budget doubles down on a failed approach. Spending is up, government involvement in the economy is increasing, and increased capital gains taxes will only make our investment challenges more difficult. We need a complete reversal in policy to solve our economic growth crisis.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Business

Bill would prevent congressional members from trading stocks

Published on

From The Center Square

By

U.S. Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Arizona, has co-introduced a bill to prevent members of Congress from trading stocks.

The Ban Congressional Stock Trading Act requires all members of Congress, their spouses and dependent children to put their stocks in a qualified blind trust or divest the holding. In doing so, Kelly’s office said this ensures members and their family members cannot use inside information to influence trades and profit off those transactions.

“As Americans work hard to keep up with rising costs, the last thing they should have to worry about is whether their elected representatives are using inside information to make a quick buck,” said Kelly in a press release. “This isn’t rocket science; the only way to stop insider trading in Congress is to stop members of Congress from trading stocks. Period.”

Kelly said he believes he already has the support of the American people.

Pointing to a survey by the Program for Public Consultation at the University of Maryland’s School of Public Policy, Kelly said 86% of Americans back such a measure. That includes 88% of Democrats, 87% of Republicans and 81% of Independents.

“Fixing this would go a long way toward restoring trust — and fixing what’s broken in Washington,” said Kelly.

U.S. Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Georgia, also introduced the bill. Ossoff said members of congress have “extraordinary access to confidential information” at the same time they are making federal policy. Because of this, Ossoff said members of Congress should not be playing the stock market.

“Stock trading by members of Congress massively erodes public confidence in Congress and creates a serious appearance of impropriety, which is why we should ban stock trading by members of Congress altogether,” said Ossoff.

The bill is co-sponsored by Senators Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, Tammy Duckworth, D-Illinois, Tammy Baldwin, D-Wisconsin, Jeanne Shaheen, D-New Hampshire, Raphael Warnock, D-Georgia, and Michael Bennet, D-Colorado. Bennett, who is The Center Square for governor of Colorado, said it is “common-sense legislation.”

Kelly has already placed his assets in qualified blind trusts, released his official Senate schedule and refused corporate PAC contributions for his campaign.

Continue Reading

Business

Big Pharma company Regeneron buys 23andMe, set to acquire genetic data of millions

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

Regeneron said it will act ethically when it acquires data on 15 million Americans from 23andMe.

A Big Pharma company will acquire genetic data on 15 million people after purchasing DNA testing company 23andMe in a bankruptcy auction.

“Drugmaker Regeneron Pharmaceuticals will buy genetic testing firm 23andMe for $256 million through a bankruptcy auction,” CNN reported.

“Regeneron said it will comply with 23andMe’s privacy policies and applicable laws with respect to the use of customer data and that it is ready to detail its intended use of the data to a court-appointed overseer,” the news outlet reported.

23andMe already suffered a privacy breach of its sensitive genetic information.

While Regeneron said it will protect data, many people may still have concerns.

Users wishing to delete their genetic data can do so, according to California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who issued a “consumer alert” when 23andMe first filed for bankruptcy in March. He explained how people can log into their account and delete their data.

Continue Reading

Trending

X