Social Media
Elon Musk reinstates Alex Jones on X after five-year ban

From LifeSiteNews
70% of participants in an X poll voted in favor of bringing the eccentric political commentator back to the platform.
Alex Jones has been reinstated on X, formerly Twitter.Ā
On Sunday, December 10, Jonesā X accountĀ was reinstated after Elon Musk ran a poll in which 70% voted in favor of bringing the eccentric political commentator back to the platform.Ā
Reinstate Alex Jones on this platform?
Vox Populi, Vox Dei.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 9, 2023
Muskās decision came shortly after Tucker Carlson published an interview with Jones that garnered over 15 million views on X. In the conversation with Carlson, Jones warned about a globalist plan of ādesigned global collapse.ā Musk has frequently watched and commented on Carlsonās showĀ Tucker on XĀ before.Ā Ā
I want to thank Tucker Carlson for the below interview. It enabled me to escape the phantom zone and let the world know what I really stand for! Tucker broke the Matrix!! https://t.co/Pee9JPuH2w
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) December 11, 2023
On Monday, X also reinstated the account of JonesāĀ showĀ InfoWars,Ā as well asĀ Jonathan Owen Shroyer, the host of the War Room show onĀ InfoWars.Ā
Jones was banned from Twitter in September 2018, shortly after being de-platformed in aĀ coordinated effortĀ by several other big tech platforms, including his YouTube channel with around 2.5 million subscribers, due to āhate speech.āĀ
On Sunday, Mario Nawfal hosted a liveĀ discussionĀ (āXTownHallā) on X that featured Jones, Musk, and many other prominent figures, such as influencer Andrew Tate, GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, and political commentator Jack Posobiec.Ā
The discussion, which lasted over two hours and was viewed by more than eight million users, covered a wide range of issues, including online censorship, globalism, de-population, and the World Economic Forum (WEF).Ā
Musk and Jones agreed that there is a globalist plan to de-populate the world and that it is crucial to counter this agenda by having more children.Ā
When asked by Jones what his plan is to counter the globalists, Musk replied: āWe should expand humanityā¦we should have more kids, the population should increase, and we should become a multi-planet species.āĀ
During the discussion, Jones praised Musk for standing up for free speech by acquiring Twitter and reinstating banned accounts. āYou are literally changing the entire paradigmā¦you definitely got the system scared,ā Jones told the tech billionaire.Ā
Later in the discussion, Posobiec asked Musk what he would do if intelligence agencies like the FBI or Department of Homeland Security (DHS) approached X with censorship requests as they did in the past before Musk acquired the platform.Ā Ā
Musk affirmed his commitment to free speech, saying he plans to allow legal content to remain on the platform. He furthermore stated that he would be willing to go to jail if he thought a government agency was breaking the law with their censorship requests.Ā
EXCLUSIVE: @elonmusk just confirmed to Human Events' @JackPosobiec that he would be willing to go to jail rather than illegally censor users on X on behalf of the federal government. pic.twitter.com/VDZqks37nO
— Human Events (@HumanEvents) December 10, 2023
āWe will be as transparent as possibleā¦and frankly if I think that a government agency is breaking the law in their demands on the platform, I would be prepared to go to prison personally if I think they are the ones breaking the law.āĀ
Addressing the globalist WEF meeting in Davos, MuskĀ saidĀ that some video clips he had seen from the events were āconcerning,ā and referred to the WEF as an āunelected world government.āĀ Ā
āI donāt think we should have an unelected, quasi-governmental organization deciding our future,ā he said.Ā
āIām not okay with some organization that I didnāt vote for controlling my destiny or that of other people.āĀ Ā
āI think an unelected world government is not a good idea,ā the tech mogul concluded.Ā
Censorship Industrial Complex
UK Could Weaken Online Censorship Law To Avoid US Trade Battle

As European leaders scramble to shield their economies from impending US tariffs, the UKās Labour government appears ready to make significant concessions. Facing the risk of economic fallout, Prime Minister Keir Starmerās administration has reportedly signaled to Washington that it is open to revising the controversial and dangerousĀ Online Safety ActĀ ā legislation critics have described as an aggressive censorship regime.
The Act, which gives UK regulators the power to fine tech companies for failing to remove vaguely defined āharmful content,ā has been a major point of contention between the two allies and has become a major threat to free speech online. The Trump administration has been especially vocal in its opposition, viewing the law as an affront to free speech and a potential financial burden on US tech giants.
According to TheĀ Telegraph:
āDowning Street is willing to renegotiate elements of the Act in order to strike a trade deal, should it be raised by the US, The Telegraph understands. The law has been heavily criticized by free speech advocates and economists, who argue its broad provisions to tackle harmful online content could lead to excessive censorship and deter investment from American tech giants.ā
The Online Safety Act arms UK media regulator Ofcom with sweeping new authority over social media platforms, enabling the imposition of multimillion-pound fines for failing to police content according to government directives. While supporters claim the law is necessary to protect users, critics argue that its vague wording and punitive approach encourage preemptive censorship ā where platforms remove lawful content simply to avoid regulatory punishment.
President Donald Trumpās return to the White House has intensified scrutiny of the law. The president, who has been highly critical of social media censorship, has surrounded himself with influential voices in the tech world, includingĀ Elon Musk, whose platform, X, is already preparing to challenge Ofcomās authority.
āAnother source close to the Trumpās (sic) administration suggested the act was viewed as āOrwellianā in the US and could become a flashpoint in negotiations. āTo many people that are currently in power, they feel the United Kingdom has become a dystopian, Orwellian place where people have to keep silent about things that arenāt fashionable,ā they said. āThe administration hate it [Online Safety Act]. Congress has been saying that [it is a concern] ever since it was enacted. Those in the administration are saying the exact same thing.āā
Musk has publicly condemned the Act, and with Ofcom set to gain new enforcement powers in March, tensions between US tech firms and the UK government are likely to escalate. The entrepreneur recently welcomed Trumpās presidency as a potential counterweight to the UKās regulatory crackdown.
Free speech advocates on both sides of the Atlantic have long warned that Britainās approach to online regulation represents a stark departure from the First Amendment protections enjoyed in the US. The Free Speech Union and groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) argue that the lawās restrictions on “harmful but legal” speech will lead to widespread content suppression, limiting open debate and investigative journalism.
Lord Young of Acton, the founder of the Free Speech Union,Ā underscoredĀ the looming confrontation between UK regulators and US tech leaders:
āIf that happens, Trump will side with his tech bros and tell Sir Keir that if he wants a trade deal, heāll call off his dogs.ā
Labour has previously doubled down on online regulation, with its election manifesto promising additional measures to ākeep everyone safe online.ā However, in the face of potential US trade repercussions, the governmentās stance appears to be softening.
From Washingtonās perspective, the Online Safety Act has become an obstacle to trade negotiations, raising concerns that UK regulatory overreach could deter American investment. Andrew Hale, a trade policy expert at the Heritage Foundation, confirmed that this issue has been a recurring theme in discussions with US officials.
āEvery meeting I have to discuss trade policy with people either in the administration or Congress, they always raise that. They say, āThis is a huge roadblockā.ā
With Ofcomās enforcement powers set to take effect soon, Britain faces a fundamental choice: cling to its stringent online censorship policies or prioritize economic cooperation with the US. The decision could shape the future of free speech in the UK for years to come.
|
|
You subscribe to Reclaim The Net because you value free speech and privacy. Each issue we publish is a commitment to defend these critical rights, providing insights and actionable information to protect and promote liberty in the digital age.
Despite our wide readership, less than 0.2% of our readers contribute financially. With your support, we can do more than just continue; we can amplify voices that are often suppressed and spread the word about the urgent issues of censorship and surveillance. Consider making a modest donation ā just $5, or whatever amount you can afford. Your contribution will empower us to reach more people, educate them about these pressing issues, and engage them in our collective cause. Thank you for considering a contribution. Each donation not only supports our operations but also strengthens our efforts to challenge injustices and advocate for those who cannot speak out. Thank you.
|
Censorship Industrial Complex
Deep State Deconstruction: DOGE and Treasury

Who is Robert Malone
Robert W Malone MD, MS
This is a game changer, and it’s scalable worldwide!
“Follow the moneyā takes on a new meaning when the bloodhound is an algorithm-powered web crawling bot designed to drill through internal government firewalls and map out redundancy, waste, and longstanding hidden internal influence networks established over decades.
What am I talking about?
Algorithmic Corruption Mapping
To the best of my ability, I am describing a key part of the DOGE toolkit based on the fragments of information that have recently been made public. If I understand correctly, what has been developed is almost infinitely scalable and could be readily deployed by allied governments to root out corruption. DOGE appears to be engaged in a truly radical experiment in government spending transparency and accountability by applying modern information technology tools to a problem set long believed to be intractable.
We will probably learn more during the DOGE Super Bowl commercial airing soon.
But before we go further down this particular rabbit hole, please take a moment to listen to Mike Benz describe the USAID disinformation program:
Getting back to DOGE and using algorithmic computational tools to map financial relationships, influence networks, and waste/fraud and abuse within the Federal Government by following the money.
To understand how this works, watch this video:
Source: EKO Loves You

Frankly, my sense is that the video above is at least in part a PsyOp, designed to scare the pants off of DeepState/Administrative State āSenior Executive Serviceā minions within the Treasury Department and across the Federal Bureaucracy.
But it lays out strategy and tactics that could well become transformational, and could not only provide a means to uncover organizational corruption but also to enable a level of transparency that will lead to an unprecedented support by citizens for the US federal government.
This vision looks to me like it could play a big role in Making America Great Again.
For more insight into what this all means, the changes it might bring, and the forces at play,Ā I recommend this final video of a recent interview with internet/web browser pioneer Mark Andreessen:
Marc Andreessen: Trump, Power, Tech, AI, Immigration & Future of America | Lex Fridman PodcastĀ #458
With the election of Donald Trump and his alliance with Elon Musk, there has been a power shift in the Matrix.
I can hardly wait to see what happens when these types of tools are let loose on the NIH, BARDA, FDA, CDC, USDA and the whole Federal Research and Development Enterprise. It will abruptly become much more difficult to build and sustain the types of mafia-like power networks that have sustained the likes of Anthony Fauci and his band.
MAGA/MAHA is bringing a new Sheriff to DC town. Expect the wailing to continue to increase for the foreseeable future.
Letās go Bobby!
Thanks for reading Who is Robert Malone! This post is public so feel free to share it.
Who is Robert Malone is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
-
Crime2 hours ago
Why is Trump threatening Canada? The situation is far worse than you think!
-
COVID-1917 hours ago
āThey lied to usā: Wife of 53-year-old who died hours after receiving Remdesivir speaks out
-
COVID-1918 hours ago
Media failing to cover āpowerful testimonyā of people injured by COVID vaccines
-
COVID-1921 hours ago
USAID directed over $200 million to gain of function research leading up to SARS-CoV outbreak
-
International19 hours ago
Shocking images appear to show FBI agent with gun drawn raiding bedroom of J6 protesterās baby
-
espionage4 hours ago
Head of JFK assassination files task force: āI believe there were two shootersā
-
Business5 hours ago
Mike Benz Exposes How USAID Funds State-Sponsored Hit Pieces to Crush Political Opponents
-
Bruce Dowbiggin55 mins ago
Collision Course: Boomers Love Canada. Millennials Want A Better Offer