Business
Do Minimum Wage Laws Accomplish Anything?

David Clinton
All the smart people tell us that, one way or another, increasing the minimum wage will change society. Proponents claim raising pay at the low end of the economy will help low-income working families survive in hyper-expensive communities. Opponents claim that artificially increasing employment costs will either drive employers towards adopting innovative automation integrations or to shut down their businesses altogether. Either way, goes the anti-intervention narrative, there will be fewer jobs available.
Well, whatāll it be? Canadian provinces have been experimenting with minimum wage laws for many years. And since 2021, the federal government has imposed its own rate for employees of allĀ federally regulated industries. There should be plenty of good data out there by now indicating who was right.
The Audit is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Historical records on provincial rates going back decades isĀ available from Statistics Canada. For this research, I used data starting in 2011. Since new rates often come into effect mid-year, I only applied a yearās latest rate to the start of the following year. 2022 itself, for simplicity, was measured by the new federal rate, with the exception of British Columbia whoās rate was $0.10 higher than the federal rate.
My goal was to look for evidence that increasing statutory wage rates impacted these areas:
- Earnings among workers in full-service restaurants
- Operating profit margins for full-service restaurants
- Total numbers of active businesses in the accommodation and food services industries
I chose to focus on the food service industry because itās particularly dependent on low-wage workers and particularly sensitive to labour costs. Outcomes here should tell us a lot about the impact such government policies are having.
Restaurant worker incomeĀ is reported as total numbers. In other words, we can see how much all of, say, Manitobaās workers combined took home in a given year. For those numbers to make sense, I adjusted them using overall provincial populations.
Income in British Columbia and PEI showed a strong correlation to increasing minimum wages. Interestingly, BC has consistently had the highest of all provincesā minimum wage while PEIās has mostly hung around the middle of the pack. Besides a weak negative correlation in Saskatchewan, there was no indication that income in other provinces either dropped or grew in sync with increases to the minimum wage.
Nation-wide, by weighting results by population numbers, we got a Pearson coefficient 0.30. That means itās unlikely that wage rate changes had any impact on take-home income.
Did increases harm restaurants? It doesnāt look like it. I usedĀ data measuring active employer businessesĀ in the accommodation and food services industries. No provinces showed any impact on business startups and exits that could be connected to minimum wage laws. Overall, Canadaās coefficient value was 0.29 – again a very weak positive relationship.
So restaurants havenāt been collapsing at epic, extinction-level rates. But do government minimums cause a reduction in theirĀ operating profit margins? Apparently not. If anything, theyāve becomeĀ moreĀ profitable!
The nation-wide coefficient between minimum wages and restaurant profitability was 0.88 – suggesting a strong correlation. But how could that be happening? Donāt labour costs make up a major chunk of food service operating expenses? Here are a few possible explanations:
- Perhaps many restaurants respond to rising costs by increasing their menu prices. This can work out well if market demand turns out to be relatively inelastic and people continue eating out despite higher prices.
- Higher wages might lead to lower employee turnover, reducing hiring and training costs.
- A higher minimum wage boosts worker incomes, leading to more disposable income in the economy. Although the flip-side is that we canāt see strong evidence of higher worker income.
- Higher wages can force unprofitable, inefficient restaurants to close, leaving stronger businesses with higher market share.
In any case, my big-picture verdict on government intervention into private sector wage rates is: thanks but donāt bother. All that effort doesnāt seem to have improved actual incomes on a population scale. At the same time, it also hasnāt driven industries with workers at the low-end of the pay scale to devastating collapse.
But Iām sure it has taken up enormous amounts of public service time and resources that could undoubtedly have been more gainfully spent elsewhere. More important, as theĀ economist Alex Tabarrok recently pointed out, minimum wage laws have been shown to reduce employment for the disabled and measurably increase both consumer prices and workplace injuries.
Alberta
COWBOY UP! Pierre Poilievre Promises to Fight for Oil and Gas, a Stronger Military and the Interests of Western Canada

Fr0m Energy Now
ByĀ Maureen McCall
As Calgarians take a break from the incessant news of tariff threat deadlines and global economic challenges to celebrate the annual Stampede, Conservative party leader Pierre Poilievre gave them even more to celebrate.
Poilievre returned to Calgary, his hometown, to outline his plan to amplify the legitimate demands of Western Canada and not only fight for oil and gas, but also fight for the interests of farmers, for low taxes, for decentralization, a stronger military and a smaller federal government.
Speaking at the annual Conservative party BBQ at Heritage Park in Calgary (a place Poilievre often visited on school trips growing up), he was reminded of the challenges his family experienced during the years when Trudeau senior was Prime Minister and the disastrous effect of his economic policies.
āI was born in ā79,ā Poilievre said. āand only a few years later, Pierre Elliott Trudeau would attack our province with the National Energy Program. There are still a few that remember it. At the same time, he hammered the entire country with money printing deficits that gave us the worst inflation and interest rates in our history. Our family actually lost our home, and we had to scrimp and save and get help from extended family in order to get our little place in Shaughnessy, which my mother still lives in.ā
This very personal story resonated with many in the crowd who are now experiencing an affordability crisis that leaves families struggling and young adults unable to afford their first house or condo. Poilievre said that the experience was a powerful motivator for his entry into politics. He wasted no time in proposing a solution ā build alliances with other provinces with mutual interests, and he emphasized the importance of advocating for provincial needs.
āLetās build an alliance with British Columbians who want to ship liquefied natural gas out of the Pacific Coast to Asia, and with Saskatchewanians, Newfoundlanders and Labradorians who want to develop their oil and gas and arenāt interested in having anyone in Ottawa cap how much they can produce. Letās build alliances with Manitobans who want to ship oil in the port of Churchill⦠with Quebec and other provinces that want to decentralize our country and get Ottawa out of our business so that provinces and people can make their own decisions.ā
Poilievre heavily criticized the federal governmentās spending and policies of the last decade, including the increase in government costs, and he highlighted the negative impact of those policies on economic stability and warned of the dangers of high inflation and debt. He advocated strongly for a free-market economy, advocating for less government intervention, where businesses compete to impress customers rather than impress politicians. He also addressed the decade-long practice of blocking and then subsidizing certain industries. Poilievre referred to a famous quote from Ronald Reagan as the modus operandi of the current federal regime.
āThe Governmentās view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases. If anything moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.ā
The practice of blocking and then subsidizing is merely a ploy to grab power, according to Poilievre, making industry far too reliant on government control.
āBy blocking you from doing something and then making you ask the government to help you do it, it makes you reliant. It puts them at the center of all power, and that is their missionā¦a full government takeover of our economy. Thereās a core difference between an economy controlled by the government and one controlled by the free market. Businesses have to clamour to please politicians and bureaucrats. In a free market (which we favour), businesses clamour to impress customers. The idea is to put people in charge of their economic lives by letting them have free exchange of work for wages, product for payment and investment for interest.ā
Poilievre also said he plans to oppose any ban on gas-powered vehicles, saying, āYou should be in the driverās seat and have the freedom to decide.ā This is in reference to the Trudeau-era plan to ban the sale of gas-powered cars by 2035, which the Carney government hasĀ saidĀ they have no intention to change, even though automakers areĀ indicatingĀ that the targets cannot be met. He also intends to oppose the Industrial Carbon tax, Bill C-69 the Impact Assessment Act, Bill C-48 the Oil tanker ban, the proposed emissions cap which will cap energy production, as well as the single-use plastics ban and Bill C-11, also known as the Online Streaming Act and the proposed āOnline Harms Act,ā also known as Bill C-63. Poilievre closed with rallying thoughts that had a distinctive Western flavour.
āFighting for these values is never easy. Change, as weāve seen, is not easy. Nothing worth doing is easy⦠Making Alberta was hard. Making Canada, the country we love, was even harder. But we donāt back down, and we donāt run away. When things get hard, we dust ourselves off, we get back in the saddle, and we gallop forward to the fight.ā
Cowboy up, Mr. Poilievre.
Maureen McCall is an energy professional who writes on issues affecting the energy industry.
Business
Carneyās new agenda faces old Canadian problems

From the Fraser Institute
In his June speechĀ announcingĀ a major buildup of Canadaās military, Prime Minister Mark Carney repeated his belief that this country faces a āhinge momentā of the sort the allied countries confronted after the Second World War.
A better comparison might be with the beginning of the war itself.
Then, the Allies found themselves at war with an autocratic state bent on their defeat and possible destruction. Now, Carney faces an antagonistic American president bent on annexing Canada through economic warfare.
Then, Canada rose to the challenge, creating the worldās third-largest navy and landing an army at Normandy on D-Day. Now, Carney has announced the most aggressive reorienting of Canadaās economic, foreign and defence policies in generations.
PollsĀ showĀ strong supportĀ among Canadians for this new agenda. But the old Canada is still there. It will fight back. It may yet win.
The situation certainly would have been more encouraging had Carney not inherited Justin Trudeauās legacy of severe economic and environmental restrictionsāpicking economic winners and losers rather than letting the market decideāand chronic deficits. The new prime minister would do well to dismantle as much of that legacy as he can.
Some advocate a return to the more laissez-faire approach of Stephen Harperās government. But Harper didnāt confront a belligerent president hoping to annex Canada through the āeconomic forceā of tariff walls.
The prime minister succeeded in gettingĀ Bill C-5, which is intended to weaken at least some of the restrictions on resource development and infrastructure, passed into law. He and the premiers pledge to finally dismantle generations of internal trade and labour mobility barriers. If we must trade less with the Americans, we can at least learn to trade with ourselves.
And the prime minister deserves high praise for reversing decades of military decline through increased spending and efforts to improve procurement. If Carney accomplishes nothing more than restoring Canadaās defences, especially in the Arctic, he will be well remembered.
That said, major challenges confront the Carney agenda.
Thereās much talk about a new national energy corridor. But what does that mean? One KPMG executiveĀ definedĀ it as a ādedicated, streamlined pathway for the energy, electricity, decarbonization, transportation and digital infrastructure.ā
Yes, but what does that mean?
Whatever it means, some First Nations will oppose it tooth-and-nail. Not all of them, mind you. TheĀ First Nations Major Project CoalitionĀ is dedicated to assisting First Nations in working with government and the private sector for the benefit of all. But many First Nations people consider resource development further exploitation of their ancestral lands by a colonizing power. At the first major proposal to which they do not buy in, they will take the government to court.
What investor will be willing to commit to a project that could be blocked for years as First Nations and Ottawa fight it out all the way to the Supreme Court?
The prime minister, formerly a fervent advocate of combatting climate change, nowĀ talksĀ about developing āconventional energy,ā which means oil and gas pipelines. But environmental activists will fiercely oppose those pipelines.
There is so much that could go wrong. Sweep away those internal trade barriers? Some premiers will resist. Accelerate housing development? Some mayors will resist. Expand exports to Europe and Asia? Some businesses and entrepreneurs will say itās not worth the risk.
As for the massive increase in defence spending, where will the money come from? What will be next yearās deficit? What will be the deficitās impact on inflation, interest rates and sovereign creditworthiness? The obstacles are high enough to make anyone wonder how much, if any, of the governmentās platform will be realized. But other factors are at work as well, factors that were also present in 1939.
To execute his mandate, Carney is surrounding himself with what, back in the Second World War, were called ādollar a year menāāexecutives who came to Ottawa from the private sector to mobilize the economy for wartime.
In Carneyās case he has brought inĀ Marc-AndrĆ© BlanchardĀ as chief of staff andĀ Michael SabiaĀ as clerk of the privy council. Both are highly experienced in government and the private sector. Both are taking very large pay cuts because, presumably, they understand the gravity of the times and believe in the prime ministerās plans.
Most important, Carneyās agenda has broad support from a public that fears for the countryās future and will have little patience toward any group seeking to block the prime ministerās agenda.
Millions of Canadians want this governmentās reform efforts to succeed. Those who would put it at risk of failing will have to contend with public anger. That gives Carney a shot at making real change.
-
Alberta2 days ago
Alberta Provincial Police – New chief of Independent Agency Police Service
-
International2 days ago
CBS settles with Trump over doctored 60 Minutes Harris interview
-
Business2 days ago
Why itās time to repeal the oil tanker ban on B.C.ās north coast
-
Energy2 days ago
If Canada Wants to be the Worldās Energy Partner, We Need to Act Like It
-
Alberta2 days ago
Pierre Poilievre ā Per Capita, Hardisty, Alberta Is the Most Important Little Town In Canada
-
Aristotle Foundation2 days ago
How Vimy Ridge Shaped Canada
-
Alberta1 day ago
Alberta uncorks new rules for liquor and cannabis
-
Canadian Energy Centre2 days ago
Alberta oil sands legacy tailings down 40 per cent since 2015