Connect with us

International

‘Democracy is now a farce’: How the EU-NATO axis abolished freedom in Romania

Published

11 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Frank Wright

Following the success of Romanian anti-war presidential candidate Calin Georgescu, the EU and NATO-backed regime in the eastern European nation has canceled his election and banned him from standing again.

In response to the cancellation of the counter-globalist Georgescu, Christine Anderson, an AfD member of the EU Parliament, gave a speech today in which she condemned the effective abolition of democracy by the European Union.

“The EU Commission states its citizens can freely choose their leaders. Why do we interfere? This is not democracy. We need to have a debate on this to get back to our principles.”

 

So what has happened in Romania? The Romanian writer Titus Techera has published a rundown of the prohibition of democracy under the EU-NATO umbrella:

On November 24, 2024, the Romanian people made the mistake to think that they live in a democracy guaranteed by the most moral institutions in world history, the EU and NATO, so they voted for the most recognizably Romanian kind of guy that ever captured the public attention, Calin Georgescu, in the first round of presidential elections.

Who was Georgescu? He was not a member of the corrupt globalist club, and his crime was to call for peace in Ukraine. “Unfortunately, he was not a politician, elites didn’t like him, and he committed an unforgivable sin – he represented vocally the anti-war opinions of the Romanian people.”

He won the first round of the election – and was described as a “far-right populist” and as a “pro-Russian independent.” Ahead of the second round, the election was annulled. The reason given was “Russian interference.” Politico, itself mired in the USAID scandal, published an article on January 1 saying, “How Putin won the Romanian election”:

The hit piece reported that the sitting president had released files days before the second and third rounds of voting alleging Russian interference.

The documents were incendiary, alleging the country was under a “hybrid” attack from Moscow.

Following this, reports say the Romanian intelligence chief directed judges to rule the election should be canceled. Yet journalist Thomas Fazi’s report says the “hybrid attack” came not from the Russians – but from the “EU-NATO establishment.”

 

“Today is the moment when the Romanian state trampled over democracy. God, the Romanian people, the truth and the law will prevail and will punish those who are guilty of destroying our democracy” – said Elena Lasconi, a liberal former broadcaster who intended to stand against Georgescu in the second round.

The reason for the action against Georgescu was also recorded by Politico: he spoke against the ideological apparatus and war machine of the liberal-global empire.

Georgescu’s fiery criticism of NATO and the EU – and his threat to end all assistance for Ukraine – stoked fears that Romania was on the brink of turning away from the West toward Moscow.

On March 11, Georgescu announced on X:

While America is becoming great again, Europe and Romania have become petty, corrupt, and under dictatorship. Our indifference, along with that of our partners, will be paid for with the broken soul of our people!

Georgescu joins Donald Trump and U.S. Vice President JD Vance in being branded agents of the Russians for seeking peace instead of war. Former Defense Secretary John Bolton, a lifelong promoter of “forever war,” has described Trump’s efforts to “stop the killing” in Ukraine as a “surrender to Putin.”

 

The battle lines are clearly drawn between the old globalist order and the new geopolitics of realism and a return to “normalcy.” It is sanity versus continuity, it is popular democracy versus corruption – a durable peace or permanent war. In the absence of a credible army, the EU and NATO provide one obvious security guarantee – they will protect all their subjects from popular democracy and from the dangers of free speech.

 

Romanian coup

The canceled election in Romania has been described as a “coup d’etat” directed by the corrupt elites of the liberal-globalist order. After filing his candidacy last Friday to run in the upcoming repeat elections, Georgescu was barred from standing by the Central Election Bureau of Romania.

Georgescu responded with a post on X, saying Europe was “now a dictatorship” and that Europe was “under tyranny.”

 

The move sparked further protests. Romania has seen mass demonstrations in support of Georgescu since the election was canceled in December.

The outrage and public unrest in Romania has been met with silence, said Titus Techera in The Critic:

The international media has been largely quiet, suppressing the story as though democracy didn’t matter in the West anymore.

His summary of the events leading to the exclusion of the most popular candidate from the Romanian presidential elections suggests a menacing undercurrent to the public scandal.

In March, after threats of arresting Georgescu, the authority supervising elections and the Supreme Court declared him unfit to run for the presidency. The two candidates who made the runoff have suddenly disappeared from politics, one by political violence, the other by, it seems, private persuasions, after she had declared against the coup and in favor of democracy.

Techera points out that the ground for this “coup” has been laid by a liberal “cordon sanitaire” preventing populist parties taking power. These measures in France, Germany, and Austria exclude counter-globalist parties from government – despite their commanding election gains.

EU Commissioner Ursula von der Leyen is also pursuing a “European Democracy Shield,” to partner with U.K. moves to censor news and online speech critical of the dissolving liberal-globalist order.

 

Techera concludes that:

Democracy is now a farce. With under two months until elections, we have reached a new scandal. Elites demand that the people vote for who they’re told to vote – but then they won’t tell us for whom they want us to vote!

One ray of hope is offered in an appeal to President Trump: “I suppose we’re all waiting to see whether Ursula von der Leyen has any opinions; or whether Trump swoops in, shines a light on the scam, and saves the day.”

Peter Hitchens, seen as the grandfather of the British right, has added his voice to that of Elon Musk, declaring for democracy and against the corrupt EU-NATO axis which now openly prohibits free elections.

 

This is the “threat” that JD Vance warned of in February, when he told EU and NATO leaders that the enemy of democracy was not found in Russia nor in China – but in the counter-democratic regime they represent.

As for the war, a former British naval commodore published his view last week. NATO strategy seems to be “double down and hope” in Ukraine, with Steve Jermy adding that NATO has no hope of winning any war with Russia, either.

Likewise, the liberal-globalist holdouts in Europe have no hope of turning back the tide of history which has swept their sponsored system aside. They are now “doubling down” and hoping they can hold on. Yet the threat to them is also from within. It is from their own people, who are increasingly demanding an alternative to the globalist agenda.

The liberal-globalist agenda has left the Western world in bankrupt chaos, and with the example of real change in the United States, populations in Europe are increasingly demanding renewal instead of continuing ruin. Time is running out for this cartel.

The open suspension of democracy is a desperate gambit to censor reality out of politics entirely. The reason is simple: this global system was neither liberal nor democratic. It was simply a racket, run by corrupt officials, wearing the uniforms of Church and state.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Health

RFK Jr. purges CDC vaccine panel, citing decades of ‘skewed science’

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Robert Jones

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has dismissed every member of the CDC’s top vaccine advisory panel, citing what he described as a “decades” of “conflicts of interest” and “skewed science” in the vaccine regulatory system.

RFK Jr.’s abrupt decision to “retire” all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was announced in a Wall Street Journal op-ed Monday and confirmed by HHS shortly thereafter.

The move marks the most sweeping reform to federal vaccine policy in years and follows months of internal reviews and mounting public skepticism.

Kennedy accused the ACIP of being “little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine,” claiming “it has never recommended against a vaccine.”

“The public must know that unbiased science guides the recommendations from our health agencies,” Kennedy wrote. “This will ensure the American people receive the safest vaccines possible.”

ACIP holds the power to influence which vaccines are recommended by the CDC and covered by insurers. But according to Kennedy, it has failed in its duty to protect the public.

He cited multiple government investigations—dating back to 2000 and 2009—finding that ACIP members were routinely advising on products from pharmaceutical firms with which they had financial ties. Committee members were also issued conflict-of-interest waivers from the CDC.

Kennedy pointed to the 1997 vote approving the Rotashield vaccine – later withdrawn for causing severe bowel obstructions in infants – as a case study in regulatory failure. Four of the eight members who voted for it had financial stakes in rotavirus vaccines under development.

He explained “retiring” the 17 members, “some of whom were last-minute appointees of the Biden administration,” by saying that without such a move, “the Trump administration would not have been able to appoint a majority” until 2028.

Under Kennedy’s leadership, HHS has already halted recommendations for routine COVID-19 shots for healthy children and pregnant women and cancelled COVID-era programs to fast-track new vaccines.

It remains unclear who will replace the outgoing ACIP members, though HHS confirmed the committee will still meet later this month, now under new leadership.

“The new members won’t directly work for the vaccine industry,” he promised. “They will exercise independent judgment, refuse to serve as a rubber stamp, and foster a culture of critical inquiry—unafraid to ask hard questions.”

Continue Reading

Health

Police are charging parents with felonies for not placing infants who died in sleep on their backs

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Dr. Brenda Baletti, The Defender

Pennsylvania authorities brought felony charges against the parents of two different babies after police said the infants died because the parents placed them in unsafe sleeping positions.

Parents of two different babies are being charged with felonies in Pennsylvania after police say their babies died because the parents placed them in unsafe sleeping positions, SpotlightPA reported.

In both cases, police allege that the parents failed to follow guidance, including handouts given to them at doctor’s visits, stating that babies should be put to sleep on their backs.

Gina and David Strause of Lebanon County are accused of putting their 3-month-old infant son, Gavin, to sleep on his stomach and allowing him to sleep with stuffed animals in the crib.

They are charged with involuntary manslaughter, recklessly endangering another person, and endangering the welfare of children.

Natalee Rasmus of Luzerne County is accused of putting her 1-month-old daughter, Avaya Jade Rasmus-Alberto, to sleep on her stomach on a boppy pillow, often used for nursing. She is charged with third-degree murder, involuntary manslaughter, and endangering the welfare of children.

Rasmus was a 17-year-old mother when her daughter died in 2022. Court records show that she continues to be held at the Luzerne County Correctional Facility with bail set at $25,000 pending resolution of her case.

In both cases, autopsies concluded the babies died of accidental death from asphyxiation. Law enforcement argued in both cases that parents should have known that putting the babies to sleep on their stomachs was unsafe, because they had received paperwork at wellness visits informing them of safe sleeping practices.

The law requires hospitals, birthing centers, and medical providers to give parents educational materials from the national Safe to Sleep campaign, and ask them to certify that they received them.

Signing the statement is voluntary. The statement doesn’t indicate that parents can be charged with a criminal offense if they don’t follow the campaign advice.

Advocates from national organizations that educate parents about safe sleep practices found the charges shocking. Nancy Maruyama, the executive director of Sudden Infant Death Services of Illinois, told Spotlight PA, “To charge them criminally is a crime, because they have already suffered the worst loss.”

Alison Jacobson, executive director of First Candle, a non-profit that also educates parents about safe sleep practices, told Pennlive, “There is no law against placing a baby on his or her stomach to sleep. How they can charge this family with involuntary manslaughter is completely baffling to me.”

Researcher Neil Z. Miller, an expert on SIDS and the Safe to Sleep campaign, told The Defender, “Parents of a sleeping baby who dies in the middle of the night should never be charged with murder. That’s just cruel.”

Miller, author of “Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective?” added:

Should parents be obligated to follow every “recommendation” made by their doctor or the Safe to Sleep campaign? Would we as a society prefer that doctors raise our babies instead of the parents? Have other possible causes of death been considered, such as vaccinations? As a society, we can, and must, do much better.

Does placing infants on their backs make a difference? 

The handouts shared with new Pennsylvania parents are based on the National Institutes of Health “Safe to Sleep” campaign, which institutionalized a program initiated by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in 1992 to inform parents to put children to sleep on their backs rather than on their stomachs.

The campaign is based on the premise that babies who sleep on their backs or sides are less likely to die in their sleep. Until that time, it was common for babies to sleep on their stomachs.

The program was launched in the wake of a rising number of SIDS deaths – and growing concern among some parents that the deaths were linked to vaccination.

In a 2021 article in the peer-reviewed journal Toxicology Reports, vaccine researcher Neil Z. Miller provides a history of the SIDS diagnosis, noting that the rise of SIDS coincided with the first mass immunization campaigns.

Between 1992, when the Safe to Sleep program launched, and 2001, SIDS deaths reportedly declined a whopping 55 percent – a number touted in articles celebrating the program, making it appear that babies sleeping on their stomachs was the cause of SIDS, not vaccines.

However, at the same time deaths from SIDS decreased, the rate of mortality from “suffocation in bed,” “suffocation other,” “unknown and unspecified causes,” and “intent unknown” all increased significantly.

Why? The classification system had changed. SIDS deaths were being reclassified by medical certifiers, usually coroners, as one of the other similar categories, not SIDS.

Research published in the journal Pediatrics, the AAP’s flagship journal, concluded that deaths previously certified as SIDS were simply being certified as other non-SIDS causes, such as suffocation – but the deaths were still essentially SIDS deaths.

That change in classification accounted for more than 90 percent of the drop in SIDS rates.

The Pediatrics paper showed no decline in overall postneonatal mortality after the Safe to Sleep campaign was launched, despite the program’s – and the AAP’s – claims to the contrary.

Others verified the Pediatrics paper’s findings, and the trend continued, as reported by multiple studies in top journals. Miller reported that, for example, “From 1999 through 2015, the U.S. SIDS rate declined 35.8% while infant deaths due to accidental suffocation increased 183.8%.”

Research shows that almost 80 percent of SIDS deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) happen within seven days of vaccination.

Theories linking vaccines to SIDS suggest that, in some cases, underdeveloped liver enzyme pathways may make it harder for some infants to process toxic ingredients in vaccines. Others argue that other, multiple, complex factors can make some infants vulnerable to toxic ingredients in vaccines.

Baby Gavin was ‘a dream come true’

On April 30, Gina and David Strause were charged with involuntary manslaughter, which carries a sentence of up to 10 years, and other lesser charges in the death of their son, Gavin.

According to the police report, Gina found her son unresponsive, cold, and blue in his crib when she woke up to feed him on the morning of May 8, 2024. She immediately called 911 and performed CPR until the police arrived.

The baby was pronounced dead at the hospital. The autopsy report found the cause of death to be “complications of asphyxia.”

Police said they observed loose items in the crib, “such as blankets and stuffed animals.”

Gina said that after feeding her baby at about 11:30 p.m. the night before he died, she placed him in his crib on his belly, because he was a “belly sleeper,” and covered him with a blanket. She said that she had received the recommendation that he should sleep on his back, but that he preferred to sleep on his stomach.

In an interview with Pennlive, Gina said that she typically put Gavin to sleep on his back, but he had gotten into the daily habit of rolling onto his belly.

Davis Stause told police that when he left for work at 5:30 a.m., he checked on Gavin, who was sleeping on his stomach and moving around a little bit. David said he “patted his butt” to put him back to sleep.

The police reported that they also obtained medical records from birth through death that showed that on the discharge paperwork that the parents received information about safe sleep practices, which included putting the baby on its back, having it sleep in the same room as the parents, and keeping the crib clear of bumper pads and stuffed animals.

They said this paperwork explained how parents could create a safe sleeping environment for their babies to reduce the risk of SIDS.

Baby Gavin also went to the pediatrician for well-child visits on February 7 and 14, March 5, and April 9, a month before he died.

Gina told Pennlive that Gavin, who was born when she was almost 40, was “a dream come true.” She had taken 10 weeks of maternity leave and largely worked at home to spend as much time with him as possible. She said that after she gave birth, she was “overwhelmed” and didn’t remember receiving any paperwork or instructions about sleep.

Gina also said that at the hospital, police treated her and her husband with immediate suspicion, separating and questioning them. They were not allowed to see their baby again before he was taken by the coroner’s office.

The parents created a GoFundMe page, where they shared a copy of the police report, to help cover their legal costs, because they said they do not qualify for a public defender.

The Defender attempted to contact the parents to inquire about the baby’s overall health, if he had any medical conditions, was born prematurely, or had recently received any vaccines, but the parents did not respond by deadline.

The district attorney’s office also did not respond to requests for comment.

‘Tragic accident with no criminal intent to harm or kill the baby’

The forensic pathologist who performed the autopsy for Natalee Rasmus’ baby listed the cause of death as accidental. According to the report, the baby died from asphyxiation, the Times Leader reported.

Rasmus discovered her baby had died on the morning of October 23, 2022, when she picked her up to get her ready for a doctor’s appointment.

Pennsylvania State Police in December charged Rasmus, alleging that she placed her baby face down to sleep against the recommendations of medical personnel and prenatal classes at Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center.

At a preliminary hearing on the case in February, a state trooper testified that Rasmus ignored safe sleeping practices because she had placed her baby face down in her bassinet with a Boppy pillow, which has a tag warning, “Do not use for sleeping.”

The trooper, Caroline Rayeski, also testified that a search of Rasmus’ cell phone found that she had searched the internet to see whether it was ok to allow newborns to sleep on their stomachs. The trooper also seized literature from the prenatal classes stating it is “recommended” to put newborns to sleep on their backs.

“Yeah, she wouldn’t sleep, she’ll just scream, so she has to be like propped up,” Rasmus told the investigating officer, according to Spotlight PA, which reported the story.

Assistant attorneys argued in a preliminary hearing that she disregarded safe sleeping practices, and a judge forwarded the criminal case to county court.

Rasmus is being represented by public defenders Joseph Yeager and Melissa Ann Sulima, who told the Times Leader the baby’s death was “a tragic accident with no criminal intent to harm or kill the baby.”

Yeager said the prenatal literature referring to newborn sleep positions are “recommendations,” not mandates.

“As the death certificate says, it was an accident. Clearly, there was no malice in this accidental death,” said Yeager, who also said the case should be dismissed.

Rasmus’ most serious charge, third-degree murder, is a homicide that involves killing someone without intent to kill, but with reckless disregard for human life. In Pennsylvania, it can carry a prison sentence of up to 40 years.

Court documents indicate that Rasmus remains in jail with a $25,000 bail, pending the outcome of her case. Neither the district attorney nor Rasmus’ attorneys responded to The Defender’s request for comment.

How common is it to bring criminal charges against parents in infant deaths?

Attorney Daniel Nevins told SpotlightPA it is extremely rare for parents to be criminally charged when infants die after sleeping on their stomachs, and that the burden of proof on the prosecutors will be high.

In 2014, Virginia resident Candice Christa Semidey, age 25, was charged with murder after she swaddled her baby and put it to sleep on its stomach, the Washington Post reported. In that case, police similarly did not think that she intended for the baby to die.

She pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter and child neglect. She was ordered to serve three years of probation to avoid the five-year prison term she was sentenced to.

Some charges have also been brought against parents in deaths of infants sleeping with Boppy pillows. There have also been several cases of parents charged for sleeping in the same bed as their child.

The Defender recently reported on three SIDS deaths that occurred shortly after vaccination. Police are still investigating the parents of 18-month-old twins who died together a week after receiving three vaccines. Authorities have not yet charged the parents, but initially said they were investigating the deaths as homicides.

Blessings Myrical Jean Simmons, age 6 months, received six routine vaccines at a well-baby visit on January 13. The next morning, her parents found the baby dead in her bassinet. The autopsy lists SIDS as the infant’s cause of death, and no charges were filed against the parents.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

Continue Reading

Trending

X