Connect with us

National

Canadian twins Chase and Sydney Brown set to make American college football history

Published

7 minute read

They were born together, they grew up together and attend the same American university.

Next week, Canadians Chase and Sydney Brown will make U.S. college football history together.

The Browns, identical twins from London, Ont., will represent Illinois at the Big Ten media days Tuesday and Wednesday at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis. It’s reportedly the first time in U.S. college football history that twins will participate in a media day event together.

Illinois’ session is scheduled for Wednesday.

“Sydney and I always dreamt about playing college ball together and that’s been the story since the start,” Chase Brown told The Canadian Press in a telephone interview. “A couple of days ago we looked back and reflected on our path to where we are right now.

“We recalled a time when we were at our mom’s place looking out at local high school in London watching homecoming games and thinking we couldn’t wait to play high school football and be like those guys . . . and here we are now. This is a terrific opportunity to represent the great men and players who’ve been part of this program and the university at such a high level . . . it’s one we’re looking forward to and ready for.”

The brothers were significant contributors last season for Illinois (5-7 overall record, 4-5 in the Big Ten) in Bret Bielema’s first season as head coach.

Chase Brown, a five-foot-11, 205-pound running back, was the Big Ten’s third-leading rusher (1,005 yards on 170 carries, 5.9-yard average) with five touchdowns. He added 14 catches for 142 yards (10.1-yard average) and was named to the All Big 10 third team.

Sydney Brown, a six-foot, 200-pound defensive back, is a four-year starter at the school with 262 tackles and four interceptions in 38 career starts. He was an All-Big Ten honorable mention last season after registering 81 tackles (team-high 50 solo).

This week, Chase Brown was added to the watch list for both the Maxwell Award for college player of the year and Doak Walker Award for top running back. He was also on last year’s Walker list.

A second straight 1,000-yard season would enhance Chase Brown’s childhood dream of one day playing in the NFL. And he’s looking forward to being a part of first-year offensive co-ordinator/quarterback coach Ā Barry Lunny Jr.’s gameplan.

“His offence is a lot faster, we’re spread out more and we’re going to get a lot of playmakers the ball as well,” Brown said. “That’s going to be exciting to watch and I’m glad to be a part of it.

“But I’m not going to change the way I play. I’m going to go hard no matter what every single time I get an opportunity on the field . . . if I do that, then everything else will fall into place.”

While an NFL career remains a priority for Brown, he’s keeping the door open on a possible return to Canada.

“My goal since I I was a child was to play pro football,” he said. “I grew up watching Canadian football, I played it in high school and I’m not opposed to that idea at all.

“I’m not in control of where I go. The only thing I control right now is the work I put in and the production I have on the field . . . that’s what I have to focus on.”

The Browns began their high school careers in London before moving to Bradenton, Fla., and helping St. Stephen’s Episcopal School win consecutive Sunshine State Athletic Conference titles. Chase Brown originally enrolled at Western Michigan because of its aviation program before rejoining his brother at Illinois.

There’s precious little physically that distinguishes the two, who both wear their hair in a bun. Sydney Brown is slightly bigger but Chase Brown is the older of the two, by about two minutes. In full gear, the only way to tell them apart on the field is by their numbers — Chase Brown wears No. 2 while Sydney Brown dons No. 30.

If the Browns graduate to the pro ranks. they’ll very likely be on different teams, something Chase Brown said he and his brother fully understand.

“Obviously we don’t choose where we go at the next level,” Brown said. “A lot of it has to do with how we play and what teams are interested.

“But we’ve done so much here together that we’ll be able to reflect upon it together in the future, so we’re good.”

This season, the Browns will again be carrying the torch for young football players north of the border, providing more evidence Canadians can play in the NCAA.

“Canada is often overlooked for football,” Brown said. “I just hope we can motivate more Canadians to make the move and just know it’s not impossible to get down and play at a Power Five school.

“But this doesn’t come without sacrifice, it takes a lot of hard work. As long as you learn to put in the work, it’s not impossible to do.”

Illinois is slated to open its ’22 season hosting Wyoming on Aug. 27. And Brown, for one, isn’t resting upon his laurels.

“We’re really confident in what we have and we’re just looking forward to putting it on the field,” he said. “We just have to dominate every single week, be the best players we can be on the field, the best people we can in the community and leave Champagne, Ill., feeling good and like we left this university in a better place than when we came in.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 20, 2022.

Dan Ralph, The Canadian Press

Storytelling is in our DNA. We provide credible, compelling multimedia storytelling and services in English and French to help captivate your digital, broadcast and print audiences. As Canada’s national news agency for 100 years, we give Canadians an unbiased news source, driven by truth, accuracy and timeliness.

Follow Author

2025 Federal Election

Post election…the chips fell where they fell

Published on

William Lacey's avatar William Lacey

I put a lot of personal energy into this election, trying to understand why it was that Canadians so wholeheartedly endorsed Mark Carney as their new leader, despite the fact that it was the same party who caused irreparable economic harm to the economy, and he has a similar philosophical outlook to the core outlook of the party. I truly believe that we have moved to a phase in our electoral process where, until something breaks, left leaning ideology will trump the day (pun intended).

Coming out of this election I have three questions.

1.Ā What of Pierre Poilievre?Ā The question for Conservatives is whether the wolves feed on the carcass of Poilievre (in my opinion the worst enemy of a Conservative is a Conservative) and initiate the hunt for a new leader (if they do, I believe the future should be led by a woman – Melissa Lantsman or possibly Caroline Mulroney), or does Poilievre move to Alberta and run for a ā€œsafeā€ seat to get back into the House of Commons, change his tone, and show people he too can be Prime Ministerial? His concession speech gives clues to this.

2.Ā What of Mark Carney?Ā Maybe (hopefully) Carney will see the light and try to bring the nation together, as there is an obvious east-west split in the country in terms of politics. Time will tell, and minority governments need to be cautious. Will we have a Supply and Confidence 2.0 or will we see olive branches extended?

3.Ā What of the House of Commons?Ā As I have mentioned previously, there has been discussion that the House of Commons may not sit until after the summer break, meaning that the House of Commons really will not have conducted any business in almost a year by the time it reconveens. If indeed ā€œwe are in the worst crisis of our livesā€ as Prime Minister Carney campaigned on, then should we not have the House of Commons sit through the summer? After all, the summer break usually is for politicians to go back to their ridings and connect with their constituents, but if an election campaign doesn’t constitute connecting, what does?

Regardless, as the election is behind us, we now need to see what comes. I will try to be hopeful, but remain cautious. May Canada have better days ahead.

Thanks for reading William’s Substack!

Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Continue Reading

2025 Federal Election

In Defeat, Joe Tay’s Campaign Becomes a Flashpoint for Suspected Voter Intimidation in Canada

Published on

Sam Cooper's avatar Sam Cooper

Canadian police initiated review of campaign complaint.

In one of the most closely scrutinized races of Canada’s 2025 federal election, Joseph Tay—the Conservative candidate identified by federal authorities as the target of aggressive Chinese election interference operations—was defeated Monday night in Don Valley North by Liberal Maggie Chi, following a campaign marred by threats, suspected intimidation, and digital suppression efforts.

The BureauĀ has learned that Canadian police last week reviewed complaints alleging that members of Tay’s campaign team were shadowed in an intimidating manner while canvassing in the final days of the race. The status of the incident review remains unclear.

With over 20,000 votes—a 43 percent share compared to 53 percent for Liberal Maggie Chi—Tay nearly doubled the Conservative Party’s 2021 vote total of 12,098 in this riding.

Last Monday, federal intelligence officials disclosed that Tay was the subject of a highly coordinated transnational repression operation tied to the People’s Republic of China. The campaign aimed to discredit his candidacy and suppress Chinese Canadian voters’ access to his messaging through cyber and information operations.

That same day, federal police advised Tay to suspend door-to-door canvassing, according to two sources with direct knowledge, citing safety concerns. Several days later, Tay’s campaign reported to police that a man had been trailing a door-knocking team in a threatening manner in a Don Valley North neighbourhood.

FollowingĀ The Bureau’sĀ reporting, the New York TimesĀ wrote on Sunday:Ā ā€œFearing for his safety, Mr. Tay… has waged perhaps the quietest campaign of any candidate competing in the election. The attacks on Mr. Tay have sought to influence the outcome of the race in Don Valley North, a district with a large Chinese diaspora in Toronto, in what is the most vote-rich region in Canada.ā€

In a twist, in neighbouring Markham–Unionville, Peter Yuen—the Liberal candidate who replaced former MP Paul Chiang, who had made controversial remarks about Tay being turned over to Chinese officials—was defeated by Conservative candidate Michael Ma. According to Elections Canada’s results, Ma secured the riding by about 2,000 votes.

Tay and his campaign team had conducted extensive groundwork in Markham–Unionville earlier this year, where he publicly announced his intention to seek the Conservative nomination in January. However, the party ultimately assigned him on March 24 to Don Valley North—a riding that, according to the 2024 report of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP), was the site of serious foreign interference by the People’s Republic of China during the 2019 election.

At 2 a.m., Tay posted a message to X thanking supporters: ā€œBy God’s grace, though we did not win tonight, we have already won something far greater—the courage to stand, to speak, and to dream together.ā€

Signaling he may run again, Tay added: ā€œOur journey does not end here. I remain committed to upholding Canadian values—freedom, respect, and community—and will continue to serve and help build a wholesome, principled community in every way I can.ā€

Last Monday, SITE—Canada’s election-threat monitoring task force—confirmed that Tay was the target of a coordinated online disinformation campaign, warning in briefing materials that ā€œthis was not about a single postā€ but a ā€œdeliberate, persistent campaignā€ designed to distort visibility and suppress legitimate discourse among Chinese-speaking voters.

The tactics bore striking resemblance to interference allegations uncovered byĀ The BureauĀ during the 2021 federal election, when Conservative MP Bob Saroya was unseated in Markham–Unionville amid allegations that operatives linked to the Chinese government had shadowed Saroya, surveilled his campaign, and sought to intimidate voters. Senior Conservative officials said CSIS provided briefings at the time warning of what they described as ā€œcoordinated and alarmingā€ surveillance efforts.

In Tay’s case, official sources confirmed that Chinese-language platforms circulated disinformation framing him as a fugitive, invoking his Hong Kong National Security Law bounty—set at $180,000 CAD—to portray his candidacy as a threat to Canada.

Earlier this month,Ā The BureauĀ reported that former Liberal MP Paul Chiang—who defeated Conservative incumbent Bob Saroya in 2021—withdrew as a candidate after the RCMP opened a review into remarks he made suggesting that Joe Tay’s election could sparkĀ ā€œgreat controversyā€Ā for Canada because of Hong Kong’s national security charges, and that Tay could be handed over to the Chinese consulate to collect a bounty. Chiang later apologized, describing the comments as a poorly judged joke. However, prominent diaspora organizations and human rights groups condemned the remarks as a disturbing example of rhetoric echoing transnational repression.

According to SITE assessments reviewed byĀ The Bureau, coordinated suppression efforts were particularly acute in Don Valley North, where Tay’s online visibility was sharply curtailed across Chinese-language social media ecosystems.

The status of the RCMP’s review into Chiang’s remarks—and a separate complaint to Toronto police alleging that Tay’s campaign staff may have been intimidated while canvassing—remains unclear.

With Mark Carney’s Liberals securing a narrow minority and Canada’s political landscape growing increasingly polarized—against the backdrop of an intensifying cold war between Washington and Beijing—some pundits predict voters could be heading back to the polls sooner than expected. Whether election threat reviewers will now dig deeper into China’s suspected interference in this and other ridings remains an open question.

Continue Reading

Trending

X