National
BC Conservative leader tells Jordan Peterson he opposes puberty blockers for children

From LifeSiteNews
‘I do not believe it is the right thing to do to support any kind of procedure that would sterilize a child.’
British Columbia Conservative leader John Rustad has told Dr. Jordan Peterson that he believes provincial governments should protect children from puberty blockers.
During a September 2 interview of the Jordan Peterson podcast, Rustad, who is running for premier of British Columbia, discussed protecting Canadians against the LGBT agenda, including safeguarding women’s sports and banning puberty blockers for children.
“I do not believe it is the right thing to do to support any kind of procedure that would sterilize a child, they are not old enough to make those kinds of decisions,” Rustad stated.
“Who knows where they’ll want to be in their future and I just think as a as a province we need to do everything we can to be able to protect children,” he continued.
Rustad also discussed the “Fairness in Women’s and Girls’ Sports Act,” which aimed to ban gender-confused males from competing in women’s sports.
“The intent is not to exclude anybody but not to take the rights of one people to give to the rights of other people,” Rustad explained.
“I think quite frankly it’s important that the rights of everybody should be able to be protected and particularly for you know women and girls if they want to you know for example go after scholarships or whatever it is and they want to be able to compete at high levels you know they should be able to compete fairly,” he continued.
Introduced in April, the private member bill would have mandated that all publicly-funded sports and athletic teams, events and tournaments be classified by sex. However, it was quickly shut down by the New Democratic Party (NDP), the left-wing party which currently runs the province.
“The interesting part was the left wouldn’t even allow it on the floor,” Rustad recalled. “They voted against it. They wouldn’t even let it pass first reading and first reading is usually just a formality before and then it gets called for further debate.”
In addition to this bill, Rustad has continuously worked to promote parental rights.
As LifeSiteNews previously reported, in October 2023, Rustad condemned SOGI 123, a nation-wide program pushing LGBT values in schools under the label of inclusivity.
Rustad also condemned school libraries for offering pornographic literature to children, citing a recent case where a library book deemed too offensive to be read in the legislature was available for children in school libraries.
Rustad is far from alone in his fight to protect Canadians from the LGBT agenda. In fact, Alberta, Saskatchewan and New Brunswick have all introduced legislation to uphold parental rights.
In February, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced new legislation that would ban doctors from pharmaceutically “transitioning” children, require parental consent for pronoun changes in school, and bar men claiming to be women from women’s sports.
Similarly, last September, Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe announced that he will invoke his government’s notwithstanding clause to protect legislation stating that parents must be told if their child changes “genders” at school; a judge had ruled against the enforcement of the law earlier that day.
Even prior to Saskatchewan’s move, New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs came under-fire by LGBT activists for reviewing the province’s “gender identity” policy, as it allowed schools to hide students’ “transgender” status from parents.
Business
Carney should rethink ‘carbon capture’ climate cure

From the Fraser Institute
In case you missed it amid the din of Trump’s trade war, Prime Minister Carney is a big believer in “carbon capture and storage.” And his energy minister, Tim Hodgson, who said it’s “critical to build carbon capture systems for the oilsands,” wants the Smith government and oilsands companies to get behind a proposed project (which hasn’t been unable to raise sufficient private investment) in Cold Lake, Alberta.
The term “carbon capture and storage” (or CCS) essentially refers to technology that separates carbon dioxide (CO2) from emissions and either stores it or uses it for other products. Proponents claim that CCS could replace other more ham-handed climate regulations such as carbon taxes, emission caps, etc. The problem is, like many (or most) proposed climate panaceas, CCS is oversold. While it’s a real technology currently in use around the world (primarily to produce more oil and gas from depleting reservoirs), jurisdictions will likely be unable to affordably scale up CCS enough to capture and store enough greenhouse gas to meaningfully reduce the risks of predicted climate change.
Why? Because while you get energy out of converting methane (natural gas) to CO2 by burning it in a power plant to generate electricity, you have to put quite a lot of energy into the process if you want to capture, compress, transport and store the attendant CO2 emissions. Again, carbon capture can be profitable (on net) for use in producing more oil and gas from depleting reservoirs, and it has a long and respected role in oil and gas production, but it’s unclear that the technology has utility outside of private for-profit use.
And in fact, according to the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), most CCS happening in Canada is less about storing carbon to avert climate change and more about stimulating oil production from existing operations. While there are “seven CCS projects currently operating in Canada, mostly in the oil and gas sector, capturing about 0.5% of national emissions,” CCS in oil and gas production does not address emissions from “downstream uses of those fuels” and will, perversely, lead to more CO2 emissions on net. The IISD also notes that CCS is expensive, costing up to C$200 per tonne for current projects. (For reference, today’s government-set minimum carbon market price to emit a tonne of CO2 emissions is C$95.) IISD concludes CCS is “energy intensive, slow to implement, and unproven at scale, making it a poor strategy for decarbonizing oil and gas production.”
Another article in Scientific American observes that industrial carbon capture projects are “too small to matter” and that “today’s largest carbon capture projects only remove a few seconds’ worth of our yearly greenhouse gas emissions” and that this is “costing thousands of dollars for every ton of CO2 removed.” And as a way to capture massive volumes of CO2 (from industrial emission streams of out the air) and sequestering it to forestall atmospheric warming (climate change), the prospects are not good. Perhaps this is why the article’s author characterizes CCS as a “figleaf” for the fossil fuel industry (and now, apparently, the Carney government) to pretend they are reducing GHG emissions.
Prime Minister Carney should sharpen his thinking on CCS. While real and profitable when used in oil and gas production, it’s unlikely to be useful in combatting climate change. Best to avoid yet another costly climate change “solution” that is overpromised, overpriced and has historically underperformed.
Energy
Is Carney ‘All Hat And No Cattle’?

From the National Citizens Coalition
By National Citizens Coalition President Peter Coleman
Mark Carney promised to lead Canada with bold vision and economic strength. But his latest stall tactics on removing red tape for Canadian oil and gas, his floundering in tariff negotiations despite lofty “elbows up” promises, and his refusal to address shocking interference allegations tied to his public safety minister so far show that he’s all hat and no cattle.
Today, Prime Minister Mark Carney held consultations and conversations with Indigenous groups on Bill C-5, which claims to fast-track “nation-building” energy projects. Yet he announced no major approvals on the horizon, and impressed no urgency or authority upon those in attendance who would seek to claim veto over vital projects.
Canada doesn’t need more endless talk or one bill to pick more losers than winners. We need action to remove anti-resource laws and regulatory roadblocks that choke our energy sector. Projects like pipelines and LNG facilities are critical for jobs, economic growth, and energy security, but they’re stalled by bureaucratic overreach and outdated policies. Hard-working Canadians deserve affordable energy. Our economy needs rescuing from tariff threat and a decade of Liberal sabotage. And Indigenous communities deserve real economic partnerships, not more delays and cowardly half-measures that often only placate anti-resource interests and insiders, not the real needs of the community.
Streamlined approvals with clear economic benefits will unlock prosperity for all Canadians. Carney’s stall tactics only hold back progress. It’s time to cut the red tape and get out of the way so that real Canadian leaders, and our great Canadian workers, can rebuild Canada after all that’s been broken.
Carney campaigned as the economic genius who could handle U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff threats. Yet, with Trump’s August 1 deadline for a 35% tariff on Canadian goods approaching, Carney’s negotiations are going nowhere. His vague promises do nothing to protect Canadian jobs, industries, or families facing higher costs. Canadians deserve a leader who delivers results, not one who breaks campaign promises with empty rhetoric.
Meanwhile, he’s been shielding corruption and dodging accountability. Carney, now revealed to have 16 pages of conflicts that were kept from voters during the election, continues to protect Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree, who faces serious allegations of lobbying for those with listed terrorist ties. Instead of demanding transparency, Carney is shielding his minister from scrutiny, doubling down on the Liberal tradition of dodging accountability. Canadians deserve a government that upholds integrity, not one that buries troubling connections to protect political allies. Is Carney just like Justin, who broke immigration and invited rampant foreign interference into government? Because this response is right out of his predecessor’s playbook.
Mark Carney’s leadership has been all talk and no action. Canada needs a government that unleashes our energy potential, lives up to its lofty campaign promises, and roots out corruption; not another Justin Trudeau.
We’re not falling for it. And neither are you. Demand action. Demand results.
–Peter Coleman, President, National Citizens Coalition
-
Education1 day ago
Why more parents are turning to Christian schools
-
Alberta1 day ago
OPEC+ is playing a dangerous game with oil
-
Alberta1 day ago
Upgrades at Port of Churchill spark ambitions for nation-building Arctic exports
-
Business1 day ago
Is dirty Chinese money undermining Canada’s Arctic?
-
National2 days ago
Liberals push to lower voting age to 16 in federal elections
-
COVID-191 day ago
Japan disposes $1.6 billion worth of COVID drugs nobody used
-
conflict1 day ago
One of the world’s oldest Christian Communities is dying in Syria. Will the West stay silent?
-
COVID-191 day ago
WATCH: Big Pharma scientist admits COVID shot not ‘safe and effective’ to O’Keefe journalist