Connect with us

Opinion

How bad does it have to be, before city-hall stops growing?

Published

4 minute read

Red Deer is shrinking. There are 1,000 fewer residents living in Red Deer now than there were a year ago. Jobless rate just went up a half a percentage point. The majority of Red Deer residents are having to do with less, but not our city hall. They are expanding again.
When times are tough, like they are now, people adjust, they multi-task, they adapt and they get it done.
In business, every crew, every department, every division, and every employee believes they are indispensable, they need a full or expanded team, and yet they survive cut-backs, lay-offs and down sizing. But not our city hall, it continues to grow.
An employer once told me he would not hire a former public service employee, because of the culture. A lawyer once told me that there is a certain culture down at city hall that defies logic and common sense. When I hear about how the bickering and internal conflict between employees has increased 1,275% in 6 years, down at city hall, I start to grasp the ā€œcultureā€, reference. Do the employees, check reality at the door, when they go to work?
The city will be hiring another full time human resource staff. Councillors Tanya Handley, Lawrence Lee, Buck Buchanan and Mayor Veer voted against the hire. Interesting is the fact that our Mayor who spends the most time, of all elected officials, at city hall, and deals with more issues directly, voted against the hire.
Some of the rationale for voting in favour of the hire, seemed almost protectionist and counter to the reason for them being able to vote in the first place. The councillors were elected to protect the residents, needs and taxes, not to act as a union representative for the employees. It comes back to the idea of a culture, almost like a cult, within city hall.
ā€œFamiliarity breeds contemptā€ An odd expression, but appropriate. Perhaps the turnover of councillors is so low that the employees as a whole have contempt for the councillors? One on one, maybe less than obvious, but as a whole, the employees control the council.
Perhaps it is time to seek out councillors who had to be fiscally responsible, had to be accountable for profit and losses other than on a balance sheet. Councillors who have had to tighten their belts, make the tough decisions, and face shareholders and investors?
Perhaps on October 16 we should do a zero based audit on our incumbents and decide whether to renew their contracts. If there ever was need for a slate of fiscal-hawks, perhaps this election is the time?
If there ever was a time in recent history for a council with some backbone, it is now. If the conflict between workers is so high, then perhaps we should re-examine our hiring criteria and practices.
An oil company can lay off 25% of it’s staff, during tough times and still produce oil, I am sure our city can cut back and still run our city. After all there are fewer builds, fewer permits, fewer inspections……….

Crime

Eyebrows Raise as Karoline Leavitt Answers Tough Questions About Epstein

Published on

The Vigilant Fox

Peter Doocy asked directly, ā€œWhat happened to the Epstein client list that the Attorney General said she had on her desk?ā€ Here’s how Leavitt tried to explain it.

The Epstein client list was supposed to be SITTING on Pam Bondi’s desk for review.

But months later, the DOJ says no such list even exists.

Karoline Leavitt was just asked why there was such a reversal in so little time.

Her responses today are raising eyebrows.

On February 21st, Pam Bondi told the world the Epstein client list was ā€œsitting on [her] desk right now to review,ā€ explaining it was part of a directive ordered by President Trump.

Shortly afterward, she and Kash Patel pledged to end the Epstein cover-up, promising to fully disclose the Epstein files to the public, hold accountable any government officials who withheld key evidence, and investigate why critical documents had been hidden in the first place.

But ever since late February, it seems the cover-up wasn’t exposed but buried even deeper by those who promised transparency.

First, they handed out the so-called ā€œEpstein filesā€ to influencers like golden Willy Wanka tickets, only for everyone to discover that almost all of the contents inside were already public and contained no new revelations.

Image

Fast-forward to May, and suddenly Kash Patel and Dan Bongino are declaring firmly that Epstein killed himself.

ā€œI’ve seen the whole file. He killed himself,ā€ Bongino stated bluntly to Fox News’s Maria Bartiromo.

Today, the Trump-appointed DOJ and FBIĀ released a new reportĀ that’s turning heads and raising plenty of questions.

They concluded that Epstein had no clients, didn’t blackmail anyone, and definitely killed himself.

FBI Concludes Epstein Had No Clients, Didn’t Blackmail Anyone, and Definitely Killed Himself

FBI Concludes Epstein Had No Clients, Didn't Blackmail Anyone, and Definitely Killed Himself

This article originally appeared on Infowars and was republished with permission.

They also released surveillance footage and claimed it showed no one entered Epstein’s cell area, supporting the suicide ruling.

But people aren’t convinced.Ā Some allege the video cuts off, with a minute of footage missing between 11:59 PM and midnight.

Monday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to questions about the Epstein client list in light of these new DOJ and FBI statements.

A reporter asked, ā€œKaroline, the DOJ and FBI have now concluded there was no Jeffrey Epstein client list. What do you tell MAGA supporters who say they want anyone involved in Epstein’s alleged crimes held accountable?ā€

Leavitt replied, ā€œThis administration wants anyone who has ever committed a crime to be accountable, and I would argue this administration has done more to lock up bad guys than certainly the previous administration.ā€

She continued, ā€œThe Trump administration is committed to truth and transparency. That’s why the Attorney General and the FBI Director pledged, at the president’s direction, to do an exhaustive review of all the files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes and his death. They put out a memo in conclusion of that review.ā€

ā€œThere was material they did not release because frankly it was incredibly graphic and contained child pornography, which is not something that is appropriate for public consumption,ā€ she added.

ā€œBut they committed to an exhaustive investigation. That’s what they did and they provided the results of that.ā€

ā€œThat’s transparency,ā€ Leavitt said.

Leavitt was also pressed about Attorney General Pam Bondi’s comments in February when she claimed she had the Epstein list ā€œon [her] desk.ā€

Peter Doocy asked, ā€œOkay, so the FBI looks at the circumstances surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein. According to the report, this systematic review revealed no incriminating client list. So what happened to the Epstein client list that the Attorney General said she had on her desk?ā€

Leavitt responded, ā€œI think if you go back and look at what the Attorney General said in that interview, which was on your network, on Fox Newsā€”ā€

Doocy pushed back, ā€œI have the quote. John Roberts said: ā€˜DOJ may release the list of Jeffrey Epstein’s clients, will that really happen?’ And she said, ā€˜It’s sitting on my desk right now to review.ā€™ā€

Leavitt explained, ā€œYes. She was saying the entirety of all of the paperwork, all of the paper in relation to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes, that’s what the Attorney General was referring to. And I will let her speak for that.ā€

ā€œBut when it comes to the FBI and the Department of Justice, they are more than committed to ensuring that bad people are put behind bars.ā€

So, after months of patiently waiting, the American people get a nothing burger that simply repeats the same old claims we heard under Bill Barr.

Even worse, it’s purported that this is what ā€œtransparencyā€ and ā€œaccountabilityā€ look like.

The story went from saying the Epstein client list was ā€œon my deskā€ to ā€œactually, there is no client list.ā€

And the newly released video footage raises questions and, in the age of AI, proves nothing.

If there’s really nothing to hide, why does it still feel like they’re hiding everything?

And most importantly—who’s still being protected?

Thanks for reading to the end. I hope you found this timeline of events and recap helpful.

Get more from The Vigilant Fox in the Substack app
Available for iOS and Android

Subscribe to The Vigilant Fox

The stories that matter the media hopes you’ll never hear. Subscribe now to stay sharp and informed.
Continue Reading

Bruce Dowbiggin

Eau Canada! Join Us In An Inclusive New National Anthem

Published on

This past week has seen (some) Canadians celebrating their heritage— now that Mike Myers has officially reinterpreted Canadian culture as a hockey sweater and Mr. Dressup. This quick-change was so popular that Canadian voters even forgot an entire decade of Justin Trudeau.

In the United States, the people who elected Donald Trump– and not Andrew Coyne– to run their nation celebrated Independence Day with stirring renditions off The Star Spangled Banner, although few could surpass the brilliant performance of the song by the late Whitney Houston at the 1991 Super Bowl.

The CDN equivalent is some flavour of the month changing the words to O Canada at the Grey Cup game. Canada’s national anthem has always been open to interpretation by people who may or may not have Canada in their hearts. At the 2023 NBA All Star Game Canadian chanteuse Jully Black became the latest singer to attempt a manicure to the English lyrics of O Canada, penned for the 1880 Saint-Jean-Baptiste Day ceremony ( Calixa LavallĆ©e composed the music, after which words were written by the poet and judge Sir Adolphe-Basile Routhier. The English lyrics have ā€œevolvedā€ over the years, just like the dress code for the CDN PM..)

Black amended the first line from ā€œour home and native landā€ to our home ON native landā€. Because something-something. But this creative license is nothing new. Unlike Chris Stapleton, Marvin Gaye or Whitney Houston with the Star Spangled Banner, interpreters of O Canada have seen fit to amend the lyrics to their sensibilities. Roger Doucet, famed anthem singer of the Montreal Canadiens in the 1970-80s, tried to add the words ā€œwe stand on guard for truth and libertyā€ in place of the first ā€œwe stand on guard for theeā€.

In 1990, having nothing better to do, Toronto City Council voted 12 to 7 in favour of recommending that the phrase “our home and native land” be changed to “our home and cherished land” and that “in all thy sons command” be partly reverted to “in all of us commandā€. (The latter was officially adapted.)

While those attempts had mixed outcomes it appears it’s just a matter of time till Ms. Black’s class-conscious culling of the words is accepted. Being generous we here at IDLM thought we’d short-circuit piecemeal attempts to create a throughly Woke version of the anthem that would last till the latest fad come along. Herewith our 2023 definitive O Canada that even— maybe only— Justin Trudeau could love:

ā€œO Canadaā€ (Ignores the French fact in our culture) Change to ā€œEau Canadaā€

ā€œOur home on native landā€ (ignores indigenous land claims) Change to ā€œGet off our land, settlersā€

ā€œTrue patriot love in all of us commandsā€ (Only true patriot love? There were officially 78 kinds of relationships in Trudeaupia. And commanding love?) Change to ā€œLove the one you’re withā€.

ā€œWith glowing hearts we see thee riseā€ (rise suggests triumph of white triumphalist dogma) Change to ā€œNon judgementally we oppose the crushing impacts of Euro-based autocracyā€

ā€œThe true north strong and freeā€ (How can anyone be strong or free when we support America’s killing fields?) Change to ā€œHeteronormative thinking must be stamped out at our borders. If we even have borders anymore.ā€

ā€œFrom far and wideā€ (Body shaming) Change to ā€œObesity is a disease that is not helped by putting it in the national anthem.ā€

ā€œO Canadaā€ (biased against A, B, AB blood types) change to ā€œScience Must Be Believedā€

ā€œWe stand on guard for theeā€ (Spreads hate against the non ableist community) Change to ā€œPlease remain seated.ā€

ā€œGod keep our landā€ (God? God? What is this, the Reformation) ā€œChange to ā€œIt’s your thingā€

ā€Glorious and freeā€ (Glorious harkens to the bourgeois subjugation of Indigenous thought processes by white Christian priests) Change to ā€œA genocidal state if there ever was oneā€.

ā€œO Canada we stand on guard for thee/Ā 

O Canada we stand on guard for theeā€Ā  The denial of trans rights is used twice here to emphasize the intolerable burdens faced by people of the LGBTQ2R community as they seek respect and compensation for the evils of the founding oppressors.) Change to ā€œEau Canada, after 6.5 hours of intensive lectures on the gender, race and dissociative application of class war on your citizens you may someday come to understand that this song is a manifestation of your bigotry and exploitation of minorities— and why rhyming lines like ā€œthee and freeā€ is the work of the devil or J.K. Rowling, whomever comes to mind first.ā€

There. That wasn’t so tough, was it? Flows trippingly off the tongue like Mark Carney refusing a special inquiry into China buying the electoral process.Ā  Or perhaps we should simply accept a literal translation of the original French lyrics:

ā€œO Canada!

Land of our ancestors

Glorious deeds circle your brow

For your arm knows how to wield the sword

Your arm knows how to carry the cross;

Your history is an epic

Of brilliant deeds

And your valour steeped in faith

Will protect our homes and our rights.ā€

Yikes. That’s downright fascistic. But it’s Quebec, and we have to allow them their peccadilloes. So circle your brow with glorious deeds, grab a cross and a sword and valour steeped in faith. And remember we must be adaptable in the new era.

Unless it’s Alberta using the adapting to fuel its CO2-belching machines. In which case it’s man the battlements and follow Mike Myers into the fight.

Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public BroadcasterĀ  A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, his new book Deal With It: The Trades That Stunned The NHL And Changed hockey is now available on Amazon. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his previous book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via brucedowbigginbooks.ca.

Continue Reading

Trending

X