Alberta
Post Halloween thoughts from parents who have children with mobility challenges
Submitted by Catherine Bangel
Just coming off Halloween, I wanted to say thanks to everyone who stopped to explain our Halloween Accessibility sign and what it means to their kids. Not all kids, wheelchair or not, can climb stairs. Yet all our homes have them. Even for us, our kiddo lacks balance, coordination and stamina. Stairs while wearing a costume and winter boots is hard! I sat at the end of our stairs to hand out candy and for some it was very much appreciated.
For the Mamas in my Cerebral Palsy mom group, Halloween was super hard. Their kiddos don’t yet walk and are ages 2-4 and riding in strollers. They couldn’t go to the doors but very much wanted to.
So for next year I encourage you to change up your Halloween just slightly. Sit down off your steps, greet those kids at the sidewalk and even think about offering alternatives like playdough or glow sticks for those that can’t eat candy. I was shocked how popular the playdough was! And .. .if you see a turquoise pumpkin…it means they would like a non-food item because they can’t eat candy.
It doesn’t take much to make sure ALL kids can take part in Halloween!!
Here’s a link to more information from RE/MAX Accessible Trick or Treat Campaign
Alberta
Alberta government should eliminate corporate welfare to generate benefits for Albertans
From the Fraser Institute
By Spencer Gudewill and Tegan Hill
Last November, Premier Danielle Smith announced that her government will give up to $1.8 billion in subsidies to Dow Chemicals, which plans to expand a petrochemical project northeast of Edmonton. In other words, $1.8 billion in corporate welfare.
And this is just one example of corporate welfare paid for by Albertans.
According to a recent study published by the Fraser Institute, from 2007 to 2021, the latest year of available data, the Alberta government spent $31.0 billion (inflation-adjusted) on subsidies (a.k.a. corporate welfare) to select firms and businesses, purportedly to help Albertans. And this number excludes other forms of government handouts such as loan guarantees, direct investment and regulatory or tax privileges for particular firms and industries. So the total cost of corporate welfare in Alberta is likely much higher.
Why should Albertans care?
First off, there’s little evidence that corporate welfare generates widespread economic growth or jobs. In fact, evidence suggests the contrary—that subsidies result in a net loss to the economy by shifting resources to less productive sectors or locations (what economists call the “substitution effect”) and/or by keeping businesses alive that are otherwise economically unviable (i.e. “zombie companies”). This misallocation of resources leads to a less efficient, less productive and less prosperous Alberta.
And there are other costs to corporate welfare.
For example, between 2007 and 2019 (the latest year of pre-COVID data), every year on average the Alberta government spent 35 cents (out of every dollar of business income tax revenue it collected) on corporate welfare. Given that workers bear the burden of more than half of any business income tax indirectly through lower wages, if the government reduced business income taxes rather than spend money on corporate welfare, workers could benefit.
Moreover, Premier Smith failed in last month’s provincial budget to provide promised personal income tax relief and create a lower tax bracket for incomes below $60,000 to provide $760 in annual savings for Albertans (on average). But in 2019, after adjusting for inflation, the Alberta government spent $2.4 billion on corporate welfare—equivalent to $1,034 per tax filer. Clearly, instead of subsidizing select businesses, the Smith government could have kept its promise to lower personal income taxes.
Finally, there’s the Heritage Fund, which the Alberta government created almost 50 years ago to save a share of the province’s resource wealth for the future.
In her 2024 budget, Premier Smith earmarked $2.0 billion for the Heritage Fund this fiscal year—almost the exact amount spent on corporate welfare each year (on average) between 2007 and 2019. Put another way, the Alberta government could save twice as much in the Heritage Fund in 2024/25 if it ended corporate welfare, which would help Premier Smith keep her promise to build up the Heritage Fund to between $250 billion and $400 billion by 2050.
By eliminating corporate welfare, the Smith government can create fiscal room to reduce personal and business income taxes, or save more in the Heritage Fund. Any of these options will benefit Albertans far more than wasteful billion-dollar subsidies to favoured firms.
Authors:
Alberta
Official statement from Premier Danielle Smith and Energy Minister Brian Jean on the start-up of the Trans Mountain Pipeline
-
Business3 hours ago
UN plastics plans are unscientific and unrealistic
-
Brownstone Institute6 hours ago
The Teams Are Set for World War III
-
Education47 mins ago
Support a young reader through the Tim Hortons Smile Cookie campaign
-
Opinion4 hours ago
The Climate-Alarmist Movement Has A Big PR Problem On Its Hands
-
Addictions5 hours ago
Why can’t we just say no?
-
Automotive2 days ago
Vehicle monitoring software could soon use ‘kill switch’ under the guise of ‘safety’
-
Opinion2 days ago
Climate Murder? Media Picks Up Novel Legal Theory Suggesting Big Oil Is Homicidal
-
Energy1 day ago
Net Zero’s days are numbered? Why Europeans are souring on the climate agenda