Opinion
Judge Andrew P. Napolitano: Can Congress Ban TikTok?

From Heartland Daily News
“Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech.”
–First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
When James Madison set about to draft the Bill of Rights — the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution — he was articulating what lawyers and philosophers and judges call “negative rights.” A positive right grants a privilege, like a driver’s license. A negative right restrains the government from interfering with a preexisting right. In order to emphasize his view that the freedom of speech preexisted the government, Madison insisted that the word “the” precede “freedom of speech” in the First Amendment.
If the freedom of speech preceded the government, where did it come from?
Speech is a natural right; it comes from our humanity. The framers of the Constitution and the ratifiers of the Bill of Rights understood and recognized this. Congress doesn’t grant the freedom of speech; rather it is prohibited absolutely from interfering with it. In the years following the ratification of the 14th Amendment, the courts began applying the restrictions in the First Amendment to the states and their municipalities and subdivisions.
Today, the First Amendment bars all government — federal, state and local — and all branches of government — legislative, executive and judicial — from interfering with the freedom of speech.
You’d never know this listening to Congress today. The same Congress that can’t balance a budget or count the number of foreign military bases the feds own, that thinks it can right any wrong and tax any event, that has borrowed over $34 trillion and not paid back any of it; the same Congress now wants to give the President of the United States — whomever might occupy that office — the lawful power to suppress websites he thinks are spying on their users or permitting foreign governments to influence what folks see on the sites. All this is an effort to ban the popular website for young folks called TikTok and force its owners to sell its assets.
Here is the backstory.
Throughout American history, we have suffered from mass fears. In the 1790s, it was fear of the French and of Native Americans. In the 1860s, it was fear of African Americans and fear of Confederates. In the 1900s, it was fear of anarchists, Nazis and Communists. In the first quarter of the present century, the government has whipped up fear of terrorists, Russians, Saddam Hussein, Vladimir Putin and now the Chinese.
In his dystopian novel, “1984,” George Orwell analyzed the totalitarian mind and recognized the need that totalitarians have for fear and hatred. They know that when folks are afraid, they will bargain away the reality of liberty for the illusion of safety. Without fear and hatred, totalitarians have fewer tools for control of the population.
What is the government’s problem with TikTok? The feds want to use fear and hatred of the Chinese government in order to regulate the sources of data and information that Americans can consult. They have projected upon the government of China the very same unlawful and unconstitutional assaults on natural rights that the feds themselves perpetrate upon us.
Thus, in order to gain control over the American public, the deep state — the parts of the government that do not change, no matter which political party is in power — and its friends in Congress have advanced the myth that the Chinese government, which commands the loyalty of the owners of TikTok, might use the site to pass along misinformation or to spy on its users. The key word here is “might,” as the intelligence officials who testified to Congress on this were unable to produce any solid evidence — just fear — that the Chinese government is doing this.
You can’t make this up.
Remember the bumper stickers from the 1970s: “Don’t steal. The government hates competition!” I thought of that line when analyzing this. Why? Because the federal government itself spies on every American who uses a computer or mobile device. The federal government itself captures every keystroke touched on every device in the U.S. The federal government itself captures all data transmitted into, out of and within the U.S. on fiber-optic cables. And the federal government itself told the Supreme Court earlier this week that it needs to be able to influence what data is available on websites in order to combat misinformation.
The federal government basically told the court that it — and not individual persons — should decide what we can read and from what sources. What the federal government did not reveal is its rapacious desire to control the free market in ideas.
Now back to the First Amendment.
The principal value underlying the freedom of speech is free will. We all have free will to think as we wish, to say what we think, to read what we want, to publish what we say. And we can do all this with perfect freedom. We don’t need a government permission slip. The whole purpose of the First Amendment is to guarantee this freedom by keeping the government out of the business of speech — totally and completely. This is the law of the land in modern Supreme Court jurisprudence.
Were this not the law, then the government could suppress the speech it hates and fears and support the speech of its patrons. And then the values that underly the First Amendment would be degraded and negated. The government has no moral or constitutional authority to spy on us or to influence our thoughts. Period.
Does the government work for us or do we work for the government? Have we consented to a nullification of free speech in deference to whomever might be living in the White House? Why do we repose the Constitution into the hands of those who subvert it?
To learn more about Judge Andrew Napolitano, visit https://JudgeNap.com.
COPYRIGHT 2024 ANDREW P. NAPOLITANO
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
For more great content from Rights, Justice & Culture News.
Crime
How the CCP’s United Front Turned Canada’s Legal Cannabis Market into a Global Narcotics Brokerage Network

Short-term rentals. Legal weed. Illegal exports. United Front agents built a decentralized drug trafficking network—using Canadian land and export markets to fuel China’s narco-financial machine.
VANCOUVER, Canada — Around the time Canadian police uncovered a massive Chinese drug cash bank in Richmond, B.C.—exposing the so-called Vancouver Model of transnational money laundering—investigators made another stunning discovery that has never before been publicly disclosed.
According to sources with direct knowledge, operatives tied to Beijing’s foreign influence arm, the United Front Work Department, were orchestrating a parallel cannabis trafficking and money laundering operation—leveraging Canada’s legalization of marijuana to export the lucrative commodity to the United States and Japan. The scheme used short-term rental platforms to operate illicit cannabis brokerage houses in Vancouver, aggregating product from vast acreages across Western Canada and shipping it to destinations including Tokyo and New York City. Proceeds were collected in United Front-linked drug cash brokerages in those cities and laundered back through Canadian banks.
As previously reported by The Bureau, the RCMP has observed a two-decade-long consolidation of legal cannabis licenses in British Columbia by Chinese state-linked mafia networks. These groups have exploited illegal migrant labor from Asia—often housed in suburban townhomes and single-family grow-ops across Vancouver—to power what amounts to a parallel, state-enabled narco economy.
But as real estate prices in Metro Vancouver soared—driven in part by drug capital—RCMP investigators noticed Chinese triads strategically selling off high-priced grow-op properties to avoid scrutiny and reinvesting profits in remote farmland across B.C., including in Oliver, Prince George, and the Okanagan Valley.
These rural acreages became production zones. Asian organized crime groups transported cannabis to centralized brokerage houses, where senior Sam Gor figures and affiliated United Front community leaders established hubs for transnational shipment, trafficking, and laundering. The system—structured like a decentralized factory—was engineered to distribute risk and rapidly shift locations.
“They transport it down, and then we started seeing the rise of these brokerage houses again, with United Front control and Asian organized crime links,” a Canadian intelligence source told The Bureau. “New York is a favourite destination. The weed goes out in a variety of routes, the money comes back to be laundered. The process is repeated.”
In the case that triggered the discovery, an RCMP informant observed a steady stream of individuals entering a Vancouver-area home with black garbage bags, heading into the garage, and emerging minutes later with duffel bags of unknown contents. To detectives from E-Pirate—Canada’s largest-ever casino money laundering investigation—the duffel bags looked strikingly familiar.
This was the same method used by Chinese high-rollers supplied through a Sam Gor-linked cash brokerage in Richmond. In that case, associates of Paul King Jin and Jian Jun Zhu received large cash deposits at a bulletproof-glass storefront called Silver International—funds delivered by drug traffickers from across Western Canada. Couriers from Alberta and B.C. drove proceeds into Richmond, dropped off suitcases of cash, and each transaction was meticulously recorded in paper ledgers. Sam Gor would then transfer the equivalent funds into Chinese bank accounts—often linked to fentanyl production.
The warehoused cash at Silver International was also loaned to Chinese gamblers, with Paul Jin himself frequently delivering bundles to parking lots outside River Rock Casino in Richmond, as well as to other government-run casinos in Burnaby and surrounding suburbs. The funds were laundered through B.C.’s provincially regulated gaming system. This was the Vancouver Model. Chinese high-rollers provided liquidity to the system by depositing funds into United Front-linked bank accounts in China, then receiving their payouts in Richmond—delivered in duffel bags of cash.
The discovery of cannabis collector sites near these casinos resembled the other side of the pipeline—this time focused on cannabis rather than cocaine, fentanyl, or methamphetamine—a ‘legal’ narcotics trade now dominated across North America by Chinese organized crime networks operating in tandem with CCP-linked regional officials, according to former DEA Special Operations Division leader Don Im.
In this operation, RCMP investigators recorded license plates of drivers arriving at the suspected brokerage house. They matched many of them to vehicles also seen at Paul Jin’s Richmond boxing gym—an establishment tied to the highest levels of Sam Gor and UFWD figures in Vancouver.
“It was just phenomenal,” a Canadian intelligence source said. “And all of it links back, ultimately, to the exact family and community of people that we’ve talked about for years. You’d see a girlfriend—the girlfriend’s car of some well-known guy that goes to Paul Jin’s gym—would be showing up at this place for five minutes, would drive away, and then somebody else’s car which was associated to this guy’s girlfriend.”
In one RCMP raid on a brokerage house, investigators seized not only cannabis, but packaging materials and branded labels imported from Asia via commercial carriers—designed for a recognizable brand of cannabis sold online.
“What these guys were doing,” the source disclosed, “was securing rental houses through VRBO or other short-term platforms—one, two, three months at a time—and using them as brokerage houses. Then they’d move to another location. And they would bring in labor from overseas.”
That labor, often undocumented immigrants from China and Vietnam, was found living in squalid, makeshift conditions.
“Mattresses on the floor,” the source said. “This is where we get into the CBSA piece—where they found people at these locations who were overstays, undocumented, all the rest of it—and they would boot them out.”
The level of sophistication in these narcotics brokerage operations—essentially the mirror image of Chinese cash collection hubs uncovered by DEA agents in the United States—stunned RCMP intelligence officials.
They noted unintended consequences stemming from cannabis legalization under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government in 2018.
“Since legalization, Asian organized crime has emerged as the dominant force behind cannabis in Canada. Product from grow ops in the interior of B.C. gets consolidated at a variety of VRBO and short-term rental houses in the Lower Mainland,” one source texted to The Bureau. “Brokers bid on product and provide packaging services for online sales.”
“In one case, the brokerage house was in the east end of Vancouver,” the source, who could not be named, said. “It was equipped with a cryptocurrency ATM. Come in, pay by Bitcoin, leave with your weed.”
The discovery of these covert brokerages prompted RCMP transnational crime investigators to dig deeper.
“And that led to a couple of other investigations,” the source said. “And that led to marijuana that we knew was getting shipped to New York State. They really liked B.C. Bud.”
According to the source, the cannabis was often transported overland across Canada in commercial vehicles, hidden inside consumer goods.
“We found evidence of water coolers and stuff like that, or on-demand water heater systems—gutted and repurposed just to move the product. They’d drive it across the country with this stuff packed inside.”
And Sam Gor operatives transported Canada’s “legal” weed through Ontario and across the border into the United States.
“They would get it over into New York State,” the source said. “And then we actually—years previous to this—we did a money laundering file where we were receiving back the money from those proceeds, coming back through the United States from New York. So it showed you a full circle of it.”

Meanwhile, a source added that a small island in the Fraser River, near River Rock Casino, has drawn law enforcement attention due to warehouses allegedly controlled by Sam Gor associates and underground bankers connected to the Silver International case and United Front networks.
“There’s a whole series of warehouses there that are of extreme interest to CBSA and to us,” a source said, explaining that consumer goods from across Western Canada are exported from the location, with narcotics secreted inside, and product labels altered to evade international customs scrutiny.
“What they did is they secreted—they would cut open the bags and they’d put marijuana inside those bags, and then they were going to export to Japan,” the source said. “So that’s the kind of thing that we’re seeing going on here as well—these brokerage facilities are multipurpose. Some of the product is also moved to other locations where they’re actually altering packaging and everything else to head off detection.”
“That use of brokerage houses—just moving it around—is extremely common now,” the source added. “In fact, that’s been known for years—even over in Australia.” Describing a typical “shore party” tactic, the source said:
“They’ll send a local guy from Vancouver down to Sydney. He’ll stay in a VRBO at Bondi Beach. While he’s there, a UPS package arrives. He takes it to a drop point, gets paid, spends a few days on the beach, and flies home. From the AFP’s perspective, they find that, obviously, quite difficult too.”
Asked whether these Sam Gor and United Front-linked cannabis trafficking and money laundering networks were also dealing in fentanyl, one source responded bluntly:
“No doubt. When you are in one aspect of the biz, what’s the disincentive not to be in fentanyl too? Or wine, or cigarettes.”
Former DEA Special Operations Division leader Don Im, a veteran expert on China’s transnational narcotics and money laundering architecture, reviewed the evidence cited in this story for The Bureau. Decades ago, as a young agent in New York City, Im said he witnessed the early evolution of Triad-linked money laundering networks—surveilling Colombian heroin traffickers forging connections in Chinatown.
Prior to his retirement in 2022, Im said he had direct visibility into how Chinese Communist Party-linked drug barons—operating through Sam Gor and allied Triad syndicates—seized control of cannabis cultivation across much of the world. These networks, he explained, have repurposed the same smuggling corridors, laundering systems, and brokerage house infrastructure to traffic a range of narcotics, from synthetic opioids to methamphetamine.
“This playbook was being mirrored throughout the U.S., Canada, Europe,” Im said of the cannabis brokerage system described in this story.
“The Chinese have become the dominant cultivators of marijuana in North America, in my opinion. They’re doing it in Europe, too. Why? Because it’s legal in most places—with little to no risk of imprisonment. So they’re generating literally tens of billions from marijuana alone.”
Im said U.S. law enforcement began noticing the pattern around the same time Canadian police observed Triads consolidating medicinal marijuana licenses in British Columbia.
“We started seeing it in the mid-2000s—Chinese workers coming into indoor grows, especially in Colorado,” he said. “At first, we thought it was an anomaly. But it wasn’t.”
“Now, China holds an annual hemp trade fair because they’re trying to corner the global hemp industry. They bring in thousands of companies and individuals to expand the global marijuana market.”
According to Im, Chinese Communist Party officials—particularly in provincial governments—view global decriminalization trends as a strategic opening to dominate transnational black markets with minimal legal risk.
“The global drug markets have become the ad hoc bank not just for Chinese citizens seeking to move capital abroad—but for CCP officials, provincial governors, and state-owned enterprises,” Im said. “They use drug proceeds to pay off massive debts, fund capital projects, finance Belt and Road operations, and carry out influence campaigns. It’s a cycle.”
“People think, ‘Oh, marijuana is a benign drug.’ Okay? It’s still a drug. And the value it generates—the profit—is massive,” Im continued. “Even on a conservative estimate, we’re talking half a trillion to three-quarters of a trillion dollars annually. That’s off the streets and across the world—not just Europe and North America.”
“People think I’m crazy when I say it generates that much,” he added. “But the RAND Corporation and the U.N.—they track the value of heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine, fentanyl, ecstasy, and marijuana. That’s the number.”

Recommend The Bureau to your readers
espionage
Hong Kong Police Detain Relatives of Canadian Candidate Targeted by Beijing Election Interference

Sam Cooper
Move follows aggressive PRC disinformation against Joe Tay, RCMP security warnings, and raises pressure on Prime Minister Mark Carney after White House meeting
In a striking escalation of Beijing’s interference in Canada’s Parliament and its global campaign to silence dissent, Hong Kong police have reportedly detained and questioned relatives of former Conservative election candidate Joe Tay—who was targeted by aggressive Chinese cyber and ground operations during the recent federal campaign, according to The Bureau’s intelligence sources.
The move to detain and question Tay’s cousin and the man’s wife in Hong Kong—reported by multiple sources, including Hong Kong Free Press—appears aimed at ramping up pressure on Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney, whose campaign plausibly benefited from Beijing’s interference and the Liberal pledge to fight President Donald Trump’s global tariff regime.
Tay, who lost by roughly 5,000 votes to his Liberal opponent in Don Valley North, has yet to comment on the detentions. As The Bureau previously reported, the RCMP advised Tay to suspend in-person campaigning during the final week of the election due to credible threats tied to foreign interference.
The reported detentions occurred Thursday morning in the Fo Tan district of Hong Kong, where Tay’s relatives were taken to a police station for questioning. While Hong Kong police have not publicly confirmed the operation, the tactic aligns with the Chinese Communist Party’s growing use of family-based intimidation to suppress overseas dissent—a strategy documented across multiple countries by rights monitors and Western intelligence agencies.
Thursday’s detentions came just 48 hours after Carney’s closed-door meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance in Washington. Carney has not publicly commented on the content of the meeting, but according to a U.S. intelligence community source, the agenda likely included PRC political interference, trade, espionage, fentanyl trafficking, money laundering, and Chinese national security threats across North America.
Tay, 62, became a top target of Chinese interference networks during the 2025 campaign. Federal intelligence officials and The Bureau identified a coordinated foreign interference operation that promoted disinformation against Tay and other Conservative candidates across PRC-linked channels, particularly on WeChat, with the goal of depressing Chinese-Canadian voter turnout for the Conservative Party.
The SITE Task Force assessed that Tay was subject to a broader transnational repression campaign. PRC-linked accounts circulated narratives portraying Canada as a refuge for fugitives if Tay were elected—rhetoric that was echoed publicly by Liberal MP Paul Chiang, who was supported by Prime Minister Carney after those comments were publicized. Chiang’s campaign collapsed under international pressure after the RCMP announced it would review the matter.
That Beijing appears resolved to continue persecuting Tay and his family—even after his electoral defeat—points to a broader and deeper strategic objective behind this singular, confirmed case of interference. It also presents an early and consequential test for Prime Minister Carney, who campaigned on defending Canadian sovereignty while opposing Donald Trump’s tariff agenda. The timing of the escalation—detaining relatives of a defeated Canadian dissident just days after Carney’s May 6 White House meeting—suggests the PRC may be actively probing Ottawa’s resolve under new leadership.
The Bureau has extensively documented this repressive strategy. On April 10, 2025, The Bureau confirmed that Hong Kong activist Frances Hui’s parents were detained by Hong Kong national security police, following Hui’s testimony before Canada’s Parliament. Hui, now based in Washington, had previously revealed she was allegedly stalked and threatened by a suspected PRC agent.
Tay’s case fits an increasingly global pattern. The Bureau has learned that a report reviewed by Toronto police during the campaign involved a suspected stalking threat against members of Tay’s team. And now, even after democratic outcomes, the Chinese state appears determined to punish political critics through surveillance, coercion, and intimidation directed at family members—sending a clear message to diaspora communities and foreign governments alike.
The formal charges against Tay were issued by Hong Kong police in December 2024. According to official documents reviewed by The Bureau, Tay—born 12 December 1962—was charged with:
- Incitement to secession
- Collusion with a foreign country or with external elements to endanger national security
Authorities allege that between July 2020 and June 2024, Tay operated a platform called HongKonger Station, through which he published “numerous videos inciting secession” and “repeatedly urged foreign countries to impose sanctions” on officials in Beijing and Hong Kong.
The SITE Task Force confirmed that these charges were disseminated and amplified by Chinese intelligence-linked networks during Canada’s 2025 campaign, as part of a broader information warfare effort to delegitimize Tay and portray his candidacy as a national security threat to China.
At the time the charges were announced, Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly condemned them, warning that Beijing’s extraterritorial use of its National Security Law undermined international norms and democratic principles. Since Tay’s defeat—and her party’s electoral victory—Joly has not made any further public comment.
The Bureau will seek comment from Carney and his government today and update this story.
The Bureau is a reader-supported publication.
To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Invite your friends and earn rewards
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
Group that added dozens of names to ballot in Poilievre’s riding plans to do it again
-
Autism2 days ago
NIH, CMS partner on autism research
-
Crime2 days ago
Pam Bondi Reveals What The Holdup Is With Epstein File Release
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
Carney says Liberals won’t make voting pact with NDP
-
conflict2 days ago
WATCH: U.S. ending bombing campaign on Yemeni militant group
-
COVID-192 days ago
Study finds nearly half of ‘COVID deaths’ had no link to virus
-
Business2 days ago
Innovative Solutions Like This Plan To Provide Power For Data Centres Will Drive Natural Gas Demand For Decades
-
Economy1 day ago
Canada’s Energy Wealth Is Bleeding South