Connect with us

Energy

Will Coastal GasLink Do for Natural Gas What TMX Did For Oil?

Published

7 minute read

From Resource Works

New pipelines already proving their worth

It may have taken a decade, but Canada’s Asia Pacific Gateway now has two new pipelines providing egress for Canadian oil and natural gas to Asia. They are already adding billions to the Canadian economy. TMX alone has added $13 billion to the Alberta economy just in its first year of operation, according to one economist.

One year after Alberta crude started sailing to Asia via an expanded Trans Mountain pipeline and export terminal in Burnaby, Canadian natural gas is also now making its way to Asia, via the Coastal GasLink pipeline and LNG Canada export terminal in Kitimat. On June 30, the first LNG carrier loaded with liquefied Canadian natural gas left Kitimat.  To date, half a dozen LNG carriers have loaded up in Kitimat. LNG Canada expects to load one LNG carrier every two days.

In the past, lumber and metallurgical coal have been B.C.’s two most valuable export commodities. By 2026, I wager natural gas will surpass both commodities to become B.C.’s most valuable export. It’s a little too early to tell just what kind of uplift LNG exports will give to B.C. and Alberta’s oil and gas sector, but if TMX is any indicator, it should be substantial. The economics math here is pretty simple. In 2024, half of the natural gas produced in Canada was sold to the U.S. at a price of $2.50 per gigajoule ($2.63 per MMBtu), according to the Canadian Energy Regulator.

The Japan-Korea Marker for LNG prices in Asia, by contrast, is about $15 per MMBtu. So Canadian natural gas sold in Asia is currently worth about six times more than pipeline exports to the U.S. Like Alberta crude oil, Canadian natural gas producers have been selling natural gas at a steep discount to the U.S. For oil, the differential has narrowed, thanks to the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, according to Charles St-Arnaud, senior economist for Alberta Central. St-Arnaud estimates the price differential between Alberta and American oil has narrowed by about US$8 per barrel, since TMX was commissioned. He estimates this narrower spread has increased revenues by US$9 billion ($13 billion Canadian). “This means that the reduction in the oil discount has boosted oil revenues by about 10 per cent,” St-Arnaud concludes. St-Arnaud estimates this will boost revenues to the Alberta government by $5.3 billion.

The $40 billion question now is whether the Coastal GasLink pipeline and LNG Canada export terminal will provide the same economic uplift for B.C. that TMX has for Alberta. The B.C. government is banking on it. Budget 2025 projects natural gas royalties will double — from $576 million in 2024-25 to $920 million in 2025-26, and $1.2 billion in 2026-27. Heather Exner-Pirot, director of energy, natural resources and environment for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, notes that even the Globe and Mail‘s editorial board has recently raised flags over B.C.’s massive $208 billion debt and worsening debt-to-GDP ratio. The taxes and royalties from LNG exports will provide important new revenues for B.C. “Your best hope for digging out some of that hole is natural gas exports,” she said.

There is currently such an over-supply of natural gas in Western Canada right now that it may take a while before we start seeing the kind of lift to B.C. gas that TMX gave to Alberta oil. Jackie Forrest, executive director of ARC Energy Research Institute, recently noted that, in 2024, Canadian natural gas sold for “about one-half of the U.S. price — effectively giving it away.” She estimates that, even if Canadian natural gas prices rise just $1 per gigajoule, as a result of new access to tidewater, “producers would gain an additional $7 billion per year.” “And this doesn’t even factor in the additional growth in gas and liquids production that new export terminals can unlock.”

In a recent ARC Energy Research Institute podcast with Mark Fitzgerald, CEO of Petronas Canada — LNG Canada’s second largest shareholder — estimated LNG Canada exports will be worth $2 billion a year to the B.C. economy. “Over the life of the project or the planning cycle that we use, that’s almost ($90 billion) in cumulative government revenue just to the government of British Columbia,” Fitzgerald said. He added: “That development, LNG Canada 1, with the upstream will create more than 100,000 jobs potentially annually across British Columbia.”

That’s just phase 1. The current output of LNG Canada — 14 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) — would double, if the LNG Canada partners sanction a phase 2 expansion. The construction of the Coastal GasLink pipeline facilitated two LNG export projects — LNG Canada and Cedar LNG. But we need another natural gas pipeline to fully exploit our abundant natural gas resources and get full value for them. The next large project in the queue is Ksi Lisims LNG and the associated Prince Rupert Gas Transmission (PRGT) pipeline. This project would add another 12 MPTA of export capacity, not to mention tens of thousands of jobs.

In 2020, the Conference Board of Canada projected Canadian LNG exports could increase Canada’s GDP by $11 billion per year, generate $2 billion a year in additional taxes and royalties, and create 100,000 additional jobs. Had we listened to the critics, who said there would be no market in Asia for Canadian oil and natural gas, and had we not built TMX and CGL, we would still be hostage to a single customer, the U.S., for our oil and gas.  We would have foregone tens of billions of dollars in investments, revenue and jobs.

We will certainly hear the same arguments against PRGT and Ksi Lisims that we heard against CGL And LNG Canada. Let’s ignore them this time around, shall we?

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Daily Caller

Now Is A Great Time To Be Out Of America’s Offshore Wind Business

Published on

 

From the Daily Caller News Foundation

By David Blackmon

Is the push and pull in the energy and climate regulatory environment hurting the ability for companies to finance and complete energy projects in the United States? The head of Shell in the United States, Colette Hirstius, said she believes it is in a recent interview.

“I think uncertainty in the regulatory environment is very damaging,” Hirstius said, adding, “However far the pendulum swings one way, it’s likely that it’s going to swing just as far the other way.”

Hirstius was addressing the moves made by the Trump administration to slow the progress of the offshore wind industry, which was the crown jewel of the Biden administration’s headlong rush into a government-subsidized energy transition. Trump’s regulators, led by Secretary of Interior Doug Burgum and Energy Secretary Chris Wright, have taken a series of actions in compliance with executive orders signed by Trump since January to halt several projects that were under construction, roll back federal subsidies, and review permits they believe were hastily issued in non-compliance with legally required processes.

Dear Readers:

As a nonprofit, we are dependent on the generosity of our readers.

Please consider making a small donation of any amount here.

Thank you!

“I certainly would like to see those [offshore wind] projects that have been permitted in the past continue to be developed,” Hirstius said.

That hope seems discordant, coming as it does amid Shell’s ongoing effort to step back from offshore wind and refocus more of its capital budget back to its core oil and gas business following years of unprofitable ventures into renewables. It also seems fair to point out that the political pendulum about which Hirstius warns already swung wildly in favor of offshore wind and other wind and solar projects in the Biden administration. It is odd that Shell only now decides to roll out that particular warning.

Shell was pulling back from its major offshore wind investments while Trump was still fighting off efforts by an array of Democratic prosecutors to put him in prison. In June 2023, for example, the company announced its intent to offload its 50% share in the Southcoast project offshore Connecticut amid Biden era high inflation and supply chain challenges that were already rocking the industry at the time. Nine months later, Shell sold the interest to another party.

The company announced last December that it was “stepping back from new offshore wind investments” as part of a company-wide review implemented by then-new CEO Wael Sawan in mid-2023. A month later, it cancelled its interest in the Atlantic Shores project, writing off $1 billion in investments in the process. Shell’s ventures into the U.S. offshore wind arena had run head-long into economic reality long before the second Trump presidency came along.

That Atlantic Shores project has become an item of special interest inside the Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) in recent days. In a court filing last Friday, BOEM Deputy Director Matthew Giacona said the Bureau plans to conduct a full review of the process that went into approving Atlantic Shores during the Biden presidency. He also said the review would likely expand to other offshore wind projects given the administration’s concerns that Biden’s regulators failed to properly assess the true environmental impacts these major industrial installations create.

In addition to that, the Daily Caller’s Audrey Streb reported on Monday that Biden regulators gave the go-ahead to some of these offshore projects despite internal concerns expressed as early as 2021 that granting long delays in their decommissioning processes “increases risk to the federal taxpayer.” Offshore developers are normally required to provide financial assurance to pre-fund such costs, but big Danish developer Orsted and others were requesting delays as long as 15 years in that requirement to make their project economics work.

Hirstius’s concerns about regulation are absolutely valid: Having such certainty is a crucial element for any company to be able to plan its future business endeavors. But every presidency has a duty to ensure that actions by prior administrations meet the mandates of prevailing laws. It has long been feared that the Biden regulators cut important corners related to environmental and marine mammal protections to speed some offshore wind projects through the process.

As this current review process plays itself out, Shell might well find itself glad it cut its losses in this failing offshore wind sector when it did.

David Blackmon is an energy writer and consultant based in Texas. He spent 40 years in the oil and gas business, where he specialized in public policy and communications.

Continue Reading

Energy

US oil production reached record-high 13.6 million barrels a day in July

Published on

From The Center Square

By 

The United States produced a record-high 13.6 million barrels of crude oil per day in July, up from 13.5 million barrels per day (b/d) in June, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) said in its latest Short-Term Energy Outlook.

U.S. crude oil production in July was higher than previously estimated, prompting the agency to raise the starting point of its forecasts for the remainder of 2025 and 2026. The agency now projects U.S. crude oil production will average 13.5 million b/d in both 2025 and 2026. For the remainder of 2025, this represents a 100,000 b/d increase from the agency’s August forecast, while 2026 oil production was projected 200,000 b/d higher.

The agency also raised its forecasts of crude oil production in the Gulf of America in 2025 and 2026, noting that some offshore drilling projects are ramping up output faster than expected.

The EIA expects global production of crude oil and petroleum products to increase through 2026, leading to continued growth in international inventories. The agency projects this inventory growth will put downward pressure on global oil prices, with benchmark Brent crude declining to an average of $62 per barrel in the fourth quarter of 2025 and to $52 per barrel in 2026. Brent crude oil spot prices averaged $68 per barrel in September.

The EIA said a key uncertainty in its forecast is the pace at which China continues to purchase oil to put into storage. If China continues to build inventory at the pace estimated in recent months, crude oil prices could be higher than now forecast, the agency said.

The agency projects U.S. dry natural gas production will reach 107 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) in 2026, up 1.0 Bcf/d or about 1% from the EIA’s previous forecast. U.S. dry natural gas production in 2024 averaged approximately 103.5 Bcf/d, according to the agency.

The market price of natural gas at the Henry Hub in Louisiana is expected to rise from an average of $3 per million Btu in September to $4.10 per million Btu in January 2025, according to the EIA’s forecast. The agency expects the Henry Hub price in January will be 50 cents lower than was projected in September, primarily because U.S. gas production will be higher than previously expected. Early Wednesday, the spot price for natural gas at the Henry Hub was at $3.38 per million Btu.

The EIA projects U.S. LNG export capacity will increase by 5 Bcf/d in the remainder of 2025 and in 2026 as production continues to ramp up at the Plaquemines LNG facility in Louisiana and the Corpus Christi plant in Texas. The additional capacity should increase total U.S. LNG exports to 15 Bcf/d in 2025 and to 16 Bcf/d in 2026, up from 12 Bcf/d in 2024, the agency said.

Continue Reading

Trending

X