Censorship Industrial Complex
Tucker Carlson: Longtime source says porn sites controlled by intelligence agencies for blackmail

From LifeSiteNews
Journalist Glenn Greenwald replied with a story about how U.S. Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson changed his tune on a dime about the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows the government to spy on American communications without a warrant. The journalist made the caveat that he is not assuming blackmail was responsible for Johnsonās behavior.
Tucker Carlson shared during an interview released Wednesday that aĀ ālongtime intel officialā told him that intelligence agencies control the ābig pornography sitesā for blackmail purposes.
Carlson added that he thinks dating websites are controlled as well, presumably referring at least to casual āhook-upā sites like Tinder, where conversations are often explicitly sexual.
āOnce you realize that, once you realize that the most embarrassing details of your personal life are known by people who want to control you, then youāre controlled,ā Carlson said.
He went on to suggest that this type of blackmail may explain some of the strange, inconsistent behavior of well-known figures, āparticularlyā members of Congress.
āWe all imagine that itās just donorsā influencing their behavior, Carlson said. āI think itās more than donors. Iāve seen politicians turn down donors before.ā
Journalist Glenn Greenwald replied with a story about how U.S. Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson changed his tune on a dime about the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows the government to spy on American communications without a warrant. The journalist made the caveat that he is not assuming blackmail was responsible for Johnsonās behavior.
Greenwald told how he had seen Johnson grill FBI Director Christopher Wray about his agencyās spying and ācould just tell that he felt passionately about (this),ā prompting Greenwald to invite Johnson on his show, before anyone had any idea he might become Speaker of the House.
āOne of the things we spent the most time on was (the need for) FISA reform,ā Greenwald told Carlson, noting that the expiration of the current iteration of the FISA law was soon approaching. He added that Johnson was ādeterminedā to help reform FISA and that it was in fact āhis big issue,ā the very reason he was on Greenwaldās show to begin with.
Johnson said regarding FISA, āWe cannot allow this to be renewed; itās a great threat to American democracy; at the very least, we need massive, fundamental reformā according to Greenwald.
Johnson became House Speaker about two months to three months later, and Greenwald was excited about the FISA reform he thought Johnson would surely help bring about.
āNot only did Mike Johnson say, āIām going to allow the FISA renewal to come to the floor with no reforms.ā He himself said, āIt is urgent that we renew FISA without reforms. This is a crucial tool for our intelligence agencies,āā Greenwald reounted.
He noted that Johnson was already getting access to classified information while in Congress, wondering at Johnsonās explanation for his behavior at the time, which was that he was made aware of highly classified information that illuminated the importance of renewing FISA and the spying capabilities it grants, as is.
Greenwald doesnāt believe one meeting is enough to change the mind of someone who is as invested in a position as Johnson was on FISA reform.
āI can see someone really dumb being affected by that ⦠heās a very smart guy. I donāt believe he changed his mind. So the question is, why did he?ā Greenwald asked.
āI donāt know. I really donāt. But I know that the person that was on my show two months ago no longer exists.ā
Theoretically, there are many ways an intelligence agency could coerce a politician or other person of influence into certain behaviors, including personal threats, threats to family, and committing outright acts of aggression against a person.
A former CIA agent hasĀ testifiedĀ during an interview with Candace Owens that his former employer used the latter tactic against him and his family, indirectly through chemicals that made them sick, when he blew the whistle on certain unethical actions the CIA had committed.
āThis is why you never hear about CIA whistleblowers. They have a perfected system of career destruction if you talk about anything you see that is criminal or illegal,ā former CIA officer Kevin Shipp said.
As a form of coercion, sexual blackmail in particular is nothing new, although porn sites make the possibility much easier. In herĀ bookĀ āOne Nation Under Blackmail: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime That Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein,ā investigative journalist Whitney Webb discusses not only how the intelligence community uses sexual blackmail through people like Jeffrey Epstein but how it was used by organized crime before U.S. intelligence even existed.
Censorship Industrial Complex
Is free speech over in the UK? Government censorship reaches frightening new levels

From LifeSiteNews
By Frank Wright
Instead of changing policies which threaten the collapse of Western civilization, the liberal-global governments prefer to make public opposition to their politics a crime.
The UKās crackdown on free speech continues, with two online platforms withdrawing over censorship concerns ā whilst liberal-critical speakers are banned from entering Britain, and even arrested on arrival.
Following the introduction of laws which could see online platforms fined millions of pounds, free speech social media companyĀ GabĀ and video sharing platformĀ Bitchute have withdrawn their services from UK users.
As Reclaim the Net, a UK-based online freedom campaign group,Ā saidĀ on March 28:
āThe British government has begun aggressively extending its censorship regime beyond its borders, invoking the sweeping powers granted by the Online Safety Act 2023 to demand compliance from foreign-based platforms.ā
Bitchute withdrew its services from UK users āover online censorship laws,ā as the Free Speech UnionĀ reportedĀ on April 10. GabāsĀ statement, published on its UK domain, said the company was acting to protect British users from being jailed for posting on its platform:
After receiving yet another demand from the UKās speech police, Ofcom, Gab has made the decision to block the entire United Kingdom from accessing our website.
This latest email from Ofcom ordered us to disclose information about our users and operations. We know where this leads: compelled censorship and British citizens thrown in jail for āhate speech.ā We refuse to comply with this tyranny.
The UK government claims its laws support āonline safetyā ā but as Reclaim the NetĀ explains,Ā ācritics argue ⦠the term ⦠is being used as a smokescreen for state-sanctioned thought control.ā
The future of information in Britain looks bleak, as one UK commentatorĀ said, promising a āTV versionā of the internet ā sterilized by UK government media watchdog Ofcom:
āUnless the White House really forces Britain to do it, Ofcom will not be abolished, because the mainstream parties approve of it and no party that doesnāt will be allowed anywhere near power.ā
Millennial WoesĀ concludesĀ that there is likely a āhit listā of further online platforms to be taken down in order, beginning with video outlets Odysee and Rumble, the messenger service Telegram, then the free speech publisher Substack ā and on to Elon Muskās X.
Woes warns:
āIf allowed to continue in its current mode, Ofcom will take down the platforms it wants to, then tame the others by hook or by crook. The Internet in Britain will be a homogenised, redacted farce ā a pathetic āTV versionā of what people in more civilised countries have.ā
Cambridge professor arrested
The charge of āstate-sanctioned thought controlā is reinforced by the arrest ā on Good Friday ā-of a Palestinian Christian and Cambridge University professor at Londonās Heathrow Airport. The reason for Professor Makram Khoury-Machoolās detention was that he has spoken out against Israelās war in Gaza, asĀ reportsĀ from the UK said.
āKeir Starmerās long and intensifying war on pro-Palestine, anti-genocide speech through the misuse of the Terrorism Act ⦠has continued to escalate,āĀ notedĀ UK outlet Skwawkbox, which covers stories such as this āĀ neglectedĀ by the mainstream press ābecause it doesnāt fit their agenda.ā
Professor Khoury, whose speech was criminalized under anti-terror laws, had in the past co-founded an anti-extremismĀ instituteĀ in 2016 at Cambridge University.
British left-populist George Galloway responded on X (formerly Twitter), saying the arrest of this āgentle, devout moderate academic fatherā suggests that the āgovernment has declared war on its own citizens, that liberty is dead in this land, and that Britain is no longer a safe country.ā
Gallowayās warning of āIt can happen to you. And it willā came a day after reports that a French philosopher noted for his outspoken criticism of mass migration had beenĀ bannedĀ from entering the UK.
French anti-migration speaker banned
Renaud Camus is the author ofĀ The Great ReplacementĀ ā coining a term now used to describe the liberal-global policy of the replacement of Western populations via mass immigration.
The āgreat replacementā is routinely ādebunkedā by the ruling elite as a āconspiracy theory.ā As Camus once said to Britainās Matt Goodwin,Ā āHow can it be debunked when it is evident in every street?ā
He was due to speak at a āremigration conferenceā in England on April 26. Organized by the nationalist Homeland Party, it is dedicated to the discussion of policies similar to those now being enacted by the Trump administration.
According to theĀ Daily Telegraph, Camus wasĀ deniedĀ entry to the UK by government order.
In an email seen by The Telegraph, the Home Office informed Mr Camus that he had been denied the electronic travel authorisation (ETA) needed to enter Britain.
āYour presence in the UK is not considered to be conducive to the public good,ā the email read.
The TelegraphĀ reports that Mr Camus, āwho is gay and has advocated for non-violence,ā supplied one convincing explanation for his treatment:
[He] told The Telegraph that āof all the European governments guiltyā of allowing unchecked migration, āthe British government is one of the guiltiestā.
āNo wonder it does not want me to speak,ā Mr Camus added.
The fact the British government is banning speakers who promote policies now being enacted with widespread support in the United States has not only provoked criticism ā it may derail UK/U.S. trade negotiations.
Days ago, Vice President JD VanceĀ warnedĀ UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer that Britain will get no deal with the U.S. over tariffs if its āhate speechā laws remain in place.
āSir Keir Starmer must embrace Donald Trumpās agenda by repealing hate speech laws in order to get a trade deal over the line, a Washington source has told The Independent.ā
A āWashington sourceā told the UK-basedĀ Independent,Ā āNo free speech, no deal. It is as simple as that.ā
Vance has been a stern critic of British and European moves towards increasing censorship and the suppression of freedom of opinion, describing it in his FebruaryĀ Munich speechĀ as a āthreatā to democracy āfrom withinā Western Europe ā and one which is led by its liberal-globalist governments.
Vance is reportedly āobsessed by the fall of Western civilisation,āĀ The Independentās Washington sourceĀ explained. It is clear that Vance believes that this fall is very much a threat created by the political decisions of governments like Starmerās.
The use of āhate speechā and āanti-terrorismā laws in these cases shows how the UK state-sanctioned suppression of speech affects anyone ā from the left, right, or from the Christian faith ā who criticizes the policies of the government.
These are not fringe extremist views, but those held by increasing numbers of ordinary people in Britain and throughout the Western world. Instead of changing policies which threaten the collapse of Western civilization, the liberal-global governments prefer to make public opposition to their politics a crime.
In the case of the British state, its hardline stance to defend its idea of democracy from free speech is now threatening its economic future. The politics and laws celebrated as the guarantee of safety increasingly resemble a form of extremism which will not tolerate debate.
Business
āGreat Resetā champion Klaus Schwab resigns from WEF

From LifeSiteNews
Schwabās World Economic Forum became a globalist hub for population control, radical climate agenda, and transhuman ideology under his decades-long leadership.
Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum and the face of the NGOās elitist annual get-together in Davos, Switzerland, has resigned as chair of WEF.Ā
Over the decades, but especially over the past several years, the WEFās Davos annual symposium has become a lightning rod for conservative criticism due to the agendas being pushed there by the elites. As the Associated PressĀ noted:Ā
Widely regarded as a cheerleader for globalization, the WEFās Davos gathering has in recent years drawn criticism from opponents on both left and right as an elitist talking shop detached from lives of ordinary people.Ā
While WEF itself had no formal power, the annual Davos meeting brought together many of the worldās wealthiest and most influential figures, contributing to Schwabās personal worth and influence.
Schwabās resignation on April 20 was announced by the Geneva-based WEF on April 21, but did not indicate why the 88-year-old was resigning. āFollowing my recent announcement, and as I enter my 88thĀ year, I have decided to step down from the position of Chair and as a member of the Board of Trustees, with immediate effect,ā Schwab said in a brief statement. He gave no indication of what he plans to do next.Ā
Schwab founded the World Economic Forum ā originally the European Management Forum ā in 1971, and its initial mission was to assist European business leaders in competing with American business and to learn from U.S. models and innovation. However, the mission soon expanded to the development of a global economic agenda.Ā Ā
Schwab detailed his own agenda in several books, includingĀ The Fourth Industrial RevolutionĀ (2016), in which he described the rise of a new industrial era in which technologies such artificial intelligence, gene editing, and advanced robotics would blur the lines between the digital, physical, and biological worlds. Schwab wrote:Ā
We stand on the brink of a technological revolution that will fundamentally alter the way we live, work, and relate to one another. In its scale, scope, and complexity, the transformation will be unlike anything humankind has experienced before. We do not yet know just how it will unfold, but one thing is clear: the response to it must be integrated and comprehensive, involving all stakeholders of the global polity, from the public and private sectors to academia and civil society ā¦
The Fourth Industrial Revolution, finally, will change not only what we do but also who we are. It will affect our identity and all the issues associated with it: our sense of privacy, our notions of ownership, our consumption patterns, the time we devote to work and leisure, and how we develop our careers, cultivate our skills, meet people, and nurture relationships. It is already changing our health and leading to a āquantifiedā self, and sooner than we think it may lead to human augmentation.
How? Microchips implanted into humans, for one. Schwab was a tech optimist who appeared to heartily welcome transhumanism; in aĀ 2016 interview with France 24Ā discussing his book, he stated:Ā Ā
And then you have the microchip, which will be implanted, probably within the next ten years, first to open your car, your home, or to do your passport, your payments, and then it will be in your body to monitor your health.
In 2020, mere months into the pandemic, Schwab publishedĀ COVID-19: The Great Reset, in which he detailed his view of the opportunity presented by the growing global crisis. According to Schwab, the crisis was an opportunity for a global reset that included āstakeholder capitalism,ā in which corporations could integrate social and environmental goals into their operations, especially working toward ānet-zero emissionsā and a massive transition to green energy, and āharnessingā the Fourth Industrial Revolution, including artificial intelligence and automation.Ā
Much of Schwabās personal wealth came from running the World Economic Forum; as chairman, he earned an annual salary of 1 million Swiss francs (approximately $1 million USD), and the WEF was supported financially through membership fees from over 1,000 companies worldwide as well as significant contributions from organizations such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Vice Chairman Peter Brabeck-Letmathe is now serving as interim chairman until his replacement has been selected.Ā
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
NDP Floor Crossers May Give Carney A Majority
-
espionage2 days ago
Longtime Liberal MP Warns of Existential Threat to Canada, Suggests Trumpās ’51st State’ Jibes Boosted Carney
-
Business2 days ago
Losses Could Reach Nearly One Billion: When Genius Failed…..Again
-
Alberta2 days ago
Preston Manning: Canada is in a unity crisis
-
Bjorn Lomborg1 day ago
How Canada Can Respond to Climate Change Smartly
-
Automotive1 day ago
New federal government should pull the plug on Canadaās EV revolution
-
Business1 day ago
New federal government plans to run larger deficits and borrow more money than predecessorās plan
-
Business1 day ago
Scott Bessent says U.S., Ukraine “ready to sign” rare earths deal