Connect with us

Focal Points

Trump Walks Back His Tomahawk Tease from Zelensky

Published

6 minute read

FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse)

By John Leake

The President meets with the Ukrainian dictator but prudently declines to give him the long range missiles he seeks.

Yesterday, after seeing reports of Zelensky meeting with Raytheon executives before his scheduled meeting with President Trump at the White House, I wrote an essay expressing my dismay at how the President has—since he entered office eight months ago—walked back his campaign promise to end the war in Ukraine. Instead, he has recently made statements suggesting a willingness to escalate the war, most notably by giving Ukraine long range missiles that can be armed with nuclear warheads.

Some of my readers objected to my suggestion that the U.S. government’s relationship with Ukraine is now so corrupt that Zelensky could get the missiles he seeks without following proper legal procedures. They should consider that the U.S. government has sent billions of money and weapons to Ukraine—long ruled by a money-laundering oligarchy —without any accounting.

Now comes the news that President Trump walked back his Tomahawk tease in his meeting with Zelensky. As he put it:

That is why we are here. Tomahawks are very dangerous… It could mean escalation – a lot of bad things could happen. Hopefully we will be able to get this war over with without thinking about Tomahawks. I think we are pretty close to that.

We thank President Trump for his prudence and we hope he will continue on the same path of prudence.

Yesterday, our NATO partner Poland allowed the alleged Ukrainian lead perpetrator of the Nord Stream pipeline bombing to walk free. Such is the fantastically corrupt world in which we are now living.

The war in Ukraine is yet another species of globalist, criminal humbug that in no way serves the interests of the American people. Consider that, while we constantly hear about the “existential threat” of climate change from carbon emissions, there has been no talk in the media—including the hysterical “climate change” German media—about the fact that the Nord Stream sabotage released between 150 million and 300 million cubic meters of gas—the equivalent to roughly 5.3 to 11 billion cubic feet.

This was the largest single industrial release of natural gas, which is largely composed of methane, widely characterized as a potent “greenhouse gas.” Bill Gates is always prattling on about the need to get rid of cattle because the ruminants release methane. I haven’t heard him say a word about Nord Stream.

If I were President Trump, I would tell Zelensky the following:

1). You and your predecessors should have never listened to the idiot U.S. foreign policy establishment of my predecessors—an establishment that has ruined every country it has touched since Vietnam. Every single blowhard Neocon foreign policy wonk in this city is a total retard.

2). I am going to use my executive power—provided by the U.S. Constitution—to end the reckless and criminal foreign policies of my predecessors, including their insane policies with respect to Russia and Ukraine since the Cold War ended in 1991.

3). The United States has always maintained elections, even in wartime, and I was elected to end U.S. involvement in your war against Russia.

4). The American people I represent have no quarrel with the Russian people, and they therefore object to American weapons being used to kill Russians. To give you long range missiles to use against Russia would significantly elevate the risk of the Russians eventually using their long range missiles to strike American targets.

5). I am bound by my oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution to serve the American people, and not the interests of warring parties 5,000 miles away, on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean.

6). I will assist you in peace negotiations with the Russians, but I will not escalate this conflict in a gambit to extract better concessions from Russia. Such an escalation will only result in more needless death and destruction, and it risks spinning out of control—a scenario deemed to be unacceptably risky during the Cold War.

7). I intend to inaugurate a new era of friendship and cooperation between the U.S. and Russia, based on the interests of our people, and not the U.S. national security state and Military Industrial Complex that President Eisenhower warned about in 1961. This Establishment has doggedly maintained a state of enmity with Russia for its own selfish interests.

8). I will offer Russia numerous incentives to give Ukraine a fair deal in peace negotiations, but effective immediately, I am terminating all military aid to Ukraine, as well as all military intelligence and targeting assistance.

9). Here’s a $7,000 cash gift from me to you as private pals. Please stop by Anderson & Sheppard tailor in London on your way back to Kiev and get fitted for a suit. You look ridiculous in that silly outfit and you’ll need a suit for our Budapest summit with Vladimir.

Share

Please subscribe to FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse).

For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Autism

Secretary Kennedy’s Key Remark at Autism Press Conference

Published on

FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse)

By John Leake

“Some 40% to 70% of mothers who have children with autism believe that their child was injured by a vaccine.”

Within medical freedom circles, much of the commentary on the September 22 press conference has focused on Tylenol being presented as the prime suspect for the autism epidemic.

While President Trump’s medical advisors chose to focus exclusively on Tylenol—therefore revealing that they have, to some degree, been captured by the Vaccine Cartel—HHS Secretary Kennedy managed to make what I believe to be the most important statement of the press conference.

Finally, autism is a complex disorder with multifactorial etiology. We are continuing to investigate a multiplicity of potential causes where no areas of taboo. One area that we are closely examining, as the president mentioned, is vaccines. Some 40% to 70% of mothers who have children with autism believe that their child was injured by a vaccine. President Trump believes that we should be listening to these mothers instead of gaslighting and marginalizing them, like prior administrations.

As Andy Wakefield has been saying for almost thirty years, the key to determining the cause of autism lies in the witness testimony of mothers.

In the matter of autism, mothers are the best witnesses because they “keep their attention fixed upon what lies nearest”—namely, the behavior, moods, and health of their infants.

It is an astonishing fact that almost none of the literature on autism devotes serious attention to case studies like that of Hannah Poling, documented by J.S. Poling, A.W. Zimmerman et al. in their seminal paper Developmental regression and mitochondrial dysfunction in a child with autism.

For the record, in the case of Hannah Poling, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims acknowledged—albeit in a deal it tried to keep secret—that the girl’s regression into autism had been caused by a large number of vaccines administered all at once.

As we document in our new book, Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and RealityHannah’s parents are far from being alone. Thousands of parents have told similar stories. Hannah’s father, Dr. Jon Poling, had the advantage of being a neurologist at the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, so the U.S. government found his witness testimony impossible to dismiss.

Contrast the common practice of dismissing parents’ testimony in the matter of autism with our standard methods for investigating child abductions. When a child doesn’t come home from school, a detective doesn’t start by consulting the literature on criminology and criminal psychology. No, he interviews the child’s parents and teachers to establish a timeline and to learn about the child’s activities, social circles, habits, and interests.

At the McCullough Foundation, we are forging a new path, beyond the obscurantism of the high priesthood that has controlled the discourse about autism since it waged its calumnious campaign against Dr. Andrew Wakefield twenty years ago.

We are now getting organized to conduct a major case series study on children who had normal births, achieved all developmental milestones during their first twelve to nineteen months of life, but then regressed into autism. Though we will be very thorough and searching in our questions, our inquiry will be guided by the imperative to listen to the mothers.

This will be a major, time consuming enterprise, and we can use your support. Please click on the image below to make a tax-free donation. If you would like to donate more than $1,000., please mail a check to our McCullough Foundation office.

6320 Lyndon B. Johnson Fwy, Suite 221/ Dallas, Texas, 75240

If you are contemplating making a major donation and would like to learn about our work in greater detail, please email me at johnsearsleake@mcculloughfnd.net

Share

Subscribe to FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse).

For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Continue Reading

Crime

A Murder That Says So Much About U.S.

Published on

23-year-old Iryna Zarutska—combined with a collage the offender’s fourteen mugshots from his previous arrests

By John Leake

Just before Christmas, 1959, the American novelist, Truman Capote, began researching the true story of the murder of the Clutter family in Holcomb, Kansas on the night of November 15 of that year. As Capote saw it, the murder seemed—in an extremely dramatic way—to express the state of American society at that time.

Capote’s research ultimately led to the publication of In Cold Blood, which many consider the founding book of the true crime genre.

I thought of In Cold Blood when I saw the following images. The first is a still from the surveillance video on a Charlotte, NC light rail train showing a man nonchalantly opening his folding knife to kill the young woman sitting in front of him.

The second image captures the man initiating the fatal attack in which he stabbed the girl three times, including a fatal wound to her neck.

The third image is of the victim—23-year-old Iryna Zarutska—combined with a collage the offender’s fourteen mugshots from his previous arrests.

Iryna, who sought refuge in the United States from the war in Ukraine, was riding the train home from her job as a clerk in a pizzeria.

A society that does such an appalling job of protecting young women cannot be considered civilized or to have retained anything resembling manly virtue. The incident strikes me as a logical outcome in a society in which Marine veteran Daniel Penny was prosecuted for negligent homicide. Penny took action to protect people on a New York City subway from a deranged homeless man who was shouting “I’m gonna kill you” and other threats. Penny put the man in a chokehold that resulted in the man’s death, which sparked a major protest. The protestors believed that death threats do not warrant the use of force—that administering a chokehold is only justified after a violent attack has been initiated.

So far, no protests of the coldblooded murder of the innocent and unsuspecting girl. Of all major newspapers, only the New York Post has reported the incident, which is such a shameful horror show as to be almost beyond belief.

It seems the other major newspapers don’t consider the slaughter of a young woman on a public train to be newsworthy.

Share

Author’s Note: If you are a regular reader of my reporting and analysis, please consider becoming a paid Subscriber to our Focal Points newsletter.

For just $5.00 per month, you can support us in effort to ascertain and report the truth of what is going on in our world. Many thanks! John Leake

Continue Reading

Trending

X