Connect with us

Business

Trump approves deal for majority-American control of controversial app TikTok

Published

5 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Calvin Freiburger

A new majority-American joint venture will control most of TikTok in the United States, with China-linked ByteDance retaining under 20 percent.

President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday approving a deal to place social video platform TikTok under predominantly American control, though questions remain as to whether the arrangement severs enough of the app’s ties to the Chinese government to satisfy the requirements of the law.

In April 2024, former President Joe Biden signed the bipartisan Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, which forbids applications controlled by a “foreign adversary” from operating within the United States, “including any cooperation with respect to the operation of a content recommendation algorithm or an agreement with respect to data sharing.”

It was motivated primarily by TikTok Chinese parent company ByteDance’s links to the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its military and surveillance operations, sparking national security concerns over the Chinese regime’s ability to use TikTok to collect personal data on American users and influence American opinion.

TikTok is also notorious for sexually explicit and leftist content, including regarding transgenderism, and for harming children.

The law, which was unanimously upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, placed a January 19, 2025, deadline for ByteDance to sell off TikTok’s American operations or see the app shut down in the United States, but Trump issued multiple extensions of the deadline, despite the law only allowing for a single 90-day extension, subject to a concrete divestment proposal being on the table.

Trump’s executive order says a proposal that qualifies has finally been reached. Under the terms, it says, “TikTok’s United States application will be operated by a newly established joint venture based in the United States. It will be majority-owned and controlled by United States persons and will no longer be controlled by any foreign adversary, since ByteDance Ltd. and its affiliates will own less than 20 percent of the entity, with the remainder being held by certain investors (Investor Parties). This new joint venture will be run by a new board of directors and subject to rules that appropriately protect Americans’ data and our national security.”

According to an accompanying White House fact sheet, the agreement “puts the operation of the algorithm, code, and content moderation decisions under the control of the new joint venture”; “prohibits the storage of sensitive U.S. user data in a manner that would allow such data to be under the control of a foreign adversary. All U.S. user data will be stored in a trusted, secure, and purpose-built cloud environment in the United States run by Oracle”; and “includes intense monitoring of software updates, the algorithm, and data flows, and it requires all recommendation models, including algorithms, that use U.S. user data to be retrained and monitored by America’s trusted security partners.”

The order directs the federal government not to enforce the ban for another 120 days so the deal can be finalized.

It is unclear, however, whether ByteDance retaining even a small stake in TikTok satisfies the requirements of the law. Business Insider notes that another “big” question is “who exactly is getting TikTok. While it will be a consortium of investors, the exact makeup of the group wasn’t disclosed. Trump said ‘four or five world-class investors’ are involved, including Michael Dell, Rupert Murdoch, and Larry Ellison.”

“President Trump found a solution for the 170 million Americans who use TikTok, ensuring users will be able to safely enjoy the same global TikTok experience and view content from around the world with the confidence that their data is secure in the United States,” the White House says.

 

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Business

Gun Buyback Program creating criminals out of law abiding citizens and directing police away from actual crime

Published on

Not only do police chiefs not want to go after legal gun owners to help the federal government’s gun buyback program.. even if they did want to, they don’t have the resources.

But that hasn’t stopped Mark Carney’s government from implementing a program that will cost at least three quarters of a billion dollars which in effect will create a new class of criminals.  Millions of Canadians who followed the stringent rules to obtain firearms will become criminals if they choose not to turn in guns they bought, used, and stored legally for years or even generations.

In an effort to appear to be doing ‘something’ about gun crime Mark Carney’s government has created this expensive program which is already being called a boondoggle.

The Conservative Opposition is pointing out just how ludicrous this new program is in the parliamentary hearing where MP Andrew Lawton asks representatives of Canadian police forces if this law will help curve crime, and if their forces are prepared to help implement the new law.

Video from the Canadian Coalition for Firearms Rights

The federal government is rolling out the law in the Cape Breton region of Nova Scotia.  Cape Breton gun owners will be the first to be required to hand in the firearms which the federal government is in effect confiscating.

For it’s part, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation is hoping to head off this potential billion dollar boondoggle before the feds spend hundreds of millions of dollars.  The CTF is offering free legal advice to Cape Bretoners threatened by the gun buyback program.

From the Canadian Taxpayers Federation

CTF offering free legal advice to Cape Breton gun owners targeted by federal gun grab

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation is offering free legal advice to Cape Breton firearms owners after the federal government announced a pilot project to confiscate firearms.

“If you’re a gun owner in Cape Breton and you want to know your rights, we are here for you,” said Devin Drover, CTF General Counsel. “Ottawa just extended the amnesty until at least October 2026 and you do not have to hand anything over right now.

“Police officers across Canada are saying that confiscating guns from licenced gun owners won’t reduce gun crime so we want to make sure those law-abiding citizens have the legal advice they need.”

The federal government has banned more than 2,500 models of firearms since 2020. Now it is targeting Cape Breton gun owners directly with this confiscation trial, despite warnings from experts that the program will not work.

“It won’t impact crime rates,” said Doug King, professor of justice studies at Mount Royal University.

The National Police Federation, representing RCMP officers, has also warned the scheme “diverts extremely important personnel, resources, and funding away from addressing the more immediate and growing threat of criminal use of illegal firearms.”

Meanwhile, costs continue to escalate. The Parliamentary Budget Officer estimates compensation alone could reach $756 million, with some experts warning the final tab could climb into the billions.

“Confiscating guns from licensed, law-abiding Canadians won’t stop criminals from getting their hands on illegal guns,” said Gage Haubrich, CTF Prairie Director. “Taxpayers should not be left footing the bill for a confiscation scheme that won’t make Canadians safer.”

Cape Breton gun owners seeking free legal advice regarding the firearm confiscation can contact the CTF legal team by emailing [email protected].

Continue Reading

Business

Critics Accuse YouTube of Dragging Out Return Process for Banned Channels

Published on

logo

A promise to let banned creators return rings hollow when only select ones get a second chance.

Stand against censorship and surveillance, join Reclaim The Net.

By

YouTube is being criticized for what many see as backpedaling on its commitment to free speech, after pledging to restore banned accounts, only to continue removing new channels created by previously banned figures.

The initial assurance came in a letter dated September 23, 2025, addressed to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan.

In that communication, YouTube acknowledged its past enforcement actions, which included terminating channels over election-related and COVID-19 content under policies that have since changed. The company claimed that its current guidelines permit more room for such topics and asserted:

“Reflecting the Company’s commitment to free expression, YouTube will provide an opportunity for all creators to rejoin the platform if the Company terminated their channels for repeated violations of COVID-19 and elections integrity policies that are no longer in effect.”

The same day, YouTube posted a message on X describing a “limited pilot project” that would provide “a pathway back to YouTube for some terminated creators to set up a new channel.”

However, the platform immediately added that this option would only apply to a “subset” of creators.

The vagueness of the commitment raised suspicion, which intensified when two prominent figures, Infowars founder Alex Jones and “America First” host Nick Fuentes, launched new channels that were almost immediately taken down.

Cartoon purple monkey wearing a red cap holding a magnifying glass above the message "This page isn't available. Sorry about that. Try searching for something else." with the YouTube logo and a search bar below on a pale gray background.

On September 25, YouTube confirmed in a follow-up post that the pilot program wasn’t active yet and reiterated that users previously banned under its policies would have their new channels removed.

Screenshot of a tweet by verified Updates From YouTube (@UpdatesFromYT) stating that previously terminated creators trying to start new channels are still prohibited, the pilot program on terminations is not yet open, YouTube will terminate new channels from previously terminated users in accordance with Community Guidelines, and more details on a limited pilot program will be shared soon; posted Sep 25, 2025, 9:42 AM, 728.7K views.

This abrupt reversal drew widespread condemnation. Either YouTube is committed to backtracking on its mistakes or it’s not.

YouTube’s September 25 post was heavily ratioed, with users blasting the company for promoting a free speech revival while simultaneously doubling down on removals.

The disconnect between the public promise and its execution fueled accusations of insincerity.

While YouTube didn’t ban Jones and Fuentes under the now-defunct COVID or election integrity policies: Jones was booted in 2018 over what the platform labeled “hate speech,” and Fuentes was removed in 2020 for alleged violations of the same hate speech rule, many argue that the company’s overall stance still undermines the broader principle of open discourse.

By dragging out the reinstatement process and narrowing eligibility through an undefined pilot, YouTube is being accused of turning its supposed “commitment to free expression” into a hollow gesture.

The promise to Congress now appears to be less a genuine policy shift and more a tightly controlled PR maneuver.

Despite YouTube’s attempts to frame its evolving guidelines as a win for free speech, actions speak louder. Blocking even the chance to return, particularly after stating that creators could rejoin, reveals just how selective the platform remains in determining who gets to speak and who doesn’t.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, join Reclaim The Net.

Fight censorship and surveillance. Reclaim your digital freedom.

Get news updates, features, and alternative tech explorations to defend your digital rights.

Continue Reading

Trending

X