Connect with us

espionage

Textbook Case of FBI Grooming a Troubled Young Man to Commit Violent Crime

Published

6 minute read

By John Leake

Schizophrenic Jerry Drake Varnell was encouraged and assisted by an undercover FBI agent in “foiled” plot to blow up BancFirst building in Oklahoma City

In researching the strange cases ofĀ Thomas Matthew CrooksĀ andĀ Luigi Mangione, I have wondered with whom they were in contact, and if they were possibly groomed, by an undercover FBI who—for reasons that are unclear—wished to incite these young men to participate in violent crimes.

I first started wondering about FBI grooming when I learned about an undercover FBI agent’s involvement in the 2015 plot to attack a convention at the Curtis Culwell Center in Garland, Texas (see my postĀ “Tear Up Texas”: FBI Encouraged a 2015 Shooting & Did Nothing to Stop It).

This morning I learned about the remarkable case of a 23-year-old diagnosed schizophrenic named Jerry Drake Varnell who—with the encouragement and assistance of an undercover FBI agent in 2017—participated in what he believed was a plot to blow up the BancFirst building in downtown Oklahoma City. He was found guilty in 2019. In 2020 he was sentenced to 25 years in prison ā€œfor attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction at BancFirst in downtown Oklahoma City.ā€

According to the US Attorney’s OfficeĀ press releaseĀ on the conviction:

At trial, the jury heard testimony from an informant who made recordings of his conversations with Varnell. It also heard from the undercover FBI agent who helped Varnell build what he thought was a bomb, an FBI bomb technician, and others. It listened to numerous recordings in which Varnell planned the attack and reviewed numerous written electronic communications that corroborated his intent. Furthermore, it heard the testimony of a defense expert concerning Varnell’s mental health. Through its verdicts, the jury concluded any mental health problems did not prevent Varnell from forming the intent required for conviction.Ā It also determined the FBI did not entrap him.

To me, what is most striking about this case—apart from the fact that the offender was a diagnosed schizophrenic—is how he drew the attention of federal law enforcement. AsĀ reported by KGOUĀ (an Oklahoma NPR station):

Government witnesses said they deemed Varnell a threatĀ based on his online activity such as ā€œlikingā€ anti-government groups on Facebook and messages referencing Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and Tyler Durden, a split personality character from the 1999 film ā€œFight Club.ā€Ā Agents also said Varnell claimed he had built homemade explosives during conversations with undercover FBI agent Williams and an FBI informant named Brent Elisens.

As was repeatedly pointed out by Varnell’s defense attorney:

Varnell isĀ a diagnosed schizophrenic. He told federal agents that his anti-government sentiments started around age 16, the same age his parents say his schizophrenic episodes began.

Defense attorneys asked FBI agents if they knew of Varnell’s paranoid schizophrenia.Ā Retired FBI agent Jennifer Schmidtz, who testified Wednesday, said she knew of ā€œallegationsā€Ā in a Custer County case involving Varnell and self-reported mental health issues in Varnell’s college transcripts. In a 2017 statement, Varnell’s parents claimed he has been institutionalized on multiple occasions.

The defense has team also focused on anĀ FBI report from Dec. 2016 that stated, ā€œVarnell does not have a job or a vehicle. The threat has not been repeated. Varnell does not have the means to commit the act at this time.ā€

By August 2017, the defense pointed out, Varnell was still unemployed and without a car. …

Varnell’s property was searched the day of his arrest, andĀ Schmidtz, who supervised the search, testified there was no physical evidence showing Varnell experimented with chemicals capable of causing an explosion. The search did uncover a speech written by Varnell laiden with conspiracy theories about developing psychotropic drugs, the Clintons and Timothy McVeigh.

During cross examinations the defense continued to point out that Varnell never followed through on pieces of the plan he was responsible for, like choosing a time and place and supplying barrels.Ā Varnell came up with a list of locations after encouragement from undercover agent Williams,Ā and he settled on the on the BancFirst location after Williams took him to scout the location on July 13. He suggested Nov. 5 as an attack date, butĀ Williams said it was too far away. And Varnell never supplied barrels, so Williams provided them.

In other words, ā€œundercover agent Williamsā€ was the chief planner and executor of the apparent plot. Jerry Varnell participated in this plot with the encouragement of undercover agent Williams and under the direction of undercover agent Williams.

Share

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

espionage

24 years later: Tucker Carlson releases interview with retired CIA agent claiming the CIA KNEW 9/11 was coming

Published on

Tucker Carlson has a new 9/11 series, and after a deep-dive investigation, he firmly believes he and his team have answered one of ā€œthe larger questionsā€ surrounding that tragic event 24 years ago.

From The Vigilant Fox

ā€œCIA knew the hijackers were here… to commit acts of terror against the United States.ā€

The fact that blew Tucker’s mind most is that insiders bet against (shorted) the stocks of airlines and banks tied to 9/11, made a fortune, and the US government has kept their identities secret for 24 years.

ā€œWhoever made those trades clearly knew 9/11 was coming, andĀ the government has protected the identity of those people for 24 years. And I just have to ask, what could possibly be the explanation for that?ā€ Tucker objected.

Tucker, who once attacked people for questioning 9/11, now says the case that there was foreknowledge is ā€œconclusive.ā€

ā€œDid they know it and allow it unintentionally or intentionally, or did they stage it?ā€ Tucker asked.

ā€œI can’t answer those questions. But we conclusively answered the larger question, which is — oh yeah — there was foreknowledge of it.ā€’

From TuckerCarlson.com

A former FBI agent who was embedded in the CIA’s Bin Laden unit, Mark Rossini, claims the CIA was fully aware that the 9/11 hijackers were in the United States planning an attack.

Rather than inform the FBI, the CIA tried to recruit two of theĀ hijackers for a ā€œfalse-flagā€ operation, which quickly spiraled out of control. The failed mission raises urgent questions about government secrecy, intelligence failures, and what really happened before 9/11.

This is the first part of a 5 part series called The 9/11 Files.Ā  Episode 1 is free.Ā  Episodes 2 to 5 can be found at TuckerCarlson.com

This is the

Continue Reading

espionage

Canada Under Siege: Sparking a National Dialogue on Security and Corruption

Published on

By Garry Clement, and Dean Baxendale

Authors, Parliamentarians and Security Experts Rally for Ottawa Conference.

Canada is under siege — and most Canadians don’t even know it. Foreign interference, organized crime, opaque money flows, and state-backed influence operations are not distant threats. They are here, in our communities, our financial system, and even our political processes. They are undermining our sovereignty, corroding trust in our institutions, and shaping policies in ways that put the interests of hostile states and criminal networks ahead of those of Canadians.

This is no longer speculation. It is documented. It is systemic. And it is happening in plain sight.

To bring these dangers into the open, we are launching a national conversation through a press conference and public platform hosted by the Macdonald-Laurier Institute. On October 8 in Ottawa, we will introduce these threats to the national agenda. The event coincides with the release of our new book,Ā Canada Under Siege:Ā How Prince Edward Island Became a Forward Operating Base for the PRC, co-authored by Michel Juneau-Katsuya, Dean Baxendale, and myself. The book traces how Canada’s smallest province became a beachhead for Chinese state-linked influence operations.

Through real estate acquisitions, immigration and investor programs, and targeted political donations, foreign state actors — particularly the People’s Republic of China — have leveraged PEI as a soft entry point to the Canadian political and economic system. The island has become, in effect, a forward operating base for Chinese threat actors — and Canada looked away as it happened.

For too long, Canada has been complacent — willfully blind to malign influence operations, hostile state actors, and the domestic enablers who profit from weak laws and lax enforcement. Our financial system remains a magnet for dirty money, with beneficial ownership hidden behind shell companies. Our sanctions regime is inconsistently enforced, allowing sanctioned individuals and entities to move assets into Canada with impunity. Our immigration system has been exploited by corrupt actors who see Canada not as a home, but as a safe haven for assets and influence.

Ordinary Canadians are paying the price — housing unaffordability as foreign funds inflate markets; national security risks as critical infrastructure and technology sectors are infiltrated or acquired; and erosion of trust as Canadians lose faith in institutions that fail to protect them.

This national conversation will be evidence-based and solutions-focused. At the event we will assemble a distinguished group of experts — including former Prince Edward Island MP Wayne Easter; Senator Leo Housakos, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate, who will address Canada’s lack of action on national-security threats; Kevin Vuong, former Member of Parliament; LGen (Ret’d) Christopher Coates; Dean Baxendale, President of Optimum Publishing and democracy advocate; and Garry Clement, former RCMP Superintendent — to map the threat landscape and chart a practical, actionable path forward to safeguard Canada’s sovereignty, democracy and economy.

Canada must stop being a soft target. We must strengthen transparency laws to expose foreign funding, lobbying efforts, and beneficial ownership of Canadian assets; enforce sanctions and anti-money-laundering measures so dirty money cannot quietly flow into our economy; equip our intelligence and law enforcement agencies with the legal tools, resources, and political backing they need to disrupt and prosecute interference operations; and educate and engage Canadians so the public understands what is happening — and demands accountability from government and institutions.

The launch ofĀ Canada Under SiegeĀ and the Macdonald-Laurier Institute’s platform represent a turning point. This is our chance to move beyond whispers, beyond closed-door briefings, beyond the false comfort of ā€œthis could never happen here.ā€ The threats to Canada’s democracy are real. They are here. And they are growing.

We believe Canadians deserve the truth — and a plan to confront it. This initiative will give them both. Canada has faced existential threats before, and we have always prevailed. But only when we recognized the danger, mobilized our citizens, and acted decisively.

The time to act is now.

The Bureau is a reader-supported publication.

To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

 

Continue Reading

Trending

X