Connect with us

Duane Rolheiser

Team Canada is driving us right into the arms of The Donald

Published

12 minute read

Some day in the near future those of us who fondly remember the Canada that stretched from sea to sea, will look back to see how the best country in the world (at least for a while) fell apart.  In the end our love for national sporting endeavors and our multicultural charm couldn’t hold us together anymore.  Sure we may not have been able to define what a Canadian was, but for the longest time at least we could all agree we weren’t American.

At some point the country of Canada simply couldn’t support a decent living for the average citizen anymore.  Fiscally, it became inevitable that Canada would splinter and fall apart as desperate citizens made desperate political moves to do what immigrants have always done, uproot their lives in search of safety and financial security.

A number of serious academics will point to the first NAFTA agreement as the starting point for all this turmoil.  They might indicate NAFTA was Canada’s first Great Mistake. Tough to avoid even in hindsight.  Free Trade Agreements swept the planet and it would have been expensive and maybe even impossible to avoid that route.  Problem is, we were a small country surrounded by oceans and the biggest market in the world.  At first it looked like we were in the most enviable position of any country. Eventually we came to depend entirely on Big Brother next door and we didn’t aggressively pursue development and trade relationships with other countries and regions with the gusto that we could have and surely would have with better hindsight / foresight / intelligence.

It only took a few decades for our country to become entirely dependent.  One day Canadians woke up and realized we completely relied upon not just the US market, but the good graces of successive US governments who were perfectly happy to throw us a bone periodically to ensure at least limited success… until they weren’t.

The day we woke up and realized the water was rising all around us was very early on in the Trump 47 Presidency.  That’s when US voters decided their economy was off the rails. Their tax burdens were unsustainable. They were buying manufactured goods, including necessities like food, energy, microchips, and medicines from everywhere except the US. They were supporting economies actively engaged in the military / financial destruction of the US.  They spent far too much on their military and their bureaucracy, and funding for necessities at home were at risk.  In the end their reasons weren’t as important as their actions.  Their actions compelled Canada to do something and quick.

We didn’t. Instead of fighting like mad to build pipelines and move energy, to swiftly develop minerals the world needed stat, to immediately erase interprovincial trade and employment barriers, Canada fought the US.  Too many politicians and too many voters reacted the way most people do when they’re punched.  They punched back without stopping to think.

In retrospect it would have been a great time for someone with a wider view, someone that could have seen the world in 20 or 30 years time. Instead our politicians were focused on the oncoming political campaign.  Just like we could have used someone with foresight when we entered into NAFTA, it would have been incredibly helpful for the sea to sea version of Canada if politicians would have been leaders instead of vote collectors.  They might say this was Canada’s second Great Mistake.  We entered into a fight against a much larger and more powerful opponent. It was a fight we had no chance in winning. But our leaders weren’t interested in “saving” Canada so much as in “fighting for” Canada.  Turned out there was a big difference between “saving” Canada and “fighting for” Canada.  Who knew?  Retrospect.

As a side note, there were a couple of political leaders pushing for the longer view. Alberta’s Danielle Smith had some momentum, at least at first, in taking the fork toward resource development and even dealing with interprovincial trade barriers.  Saskatchewan’s Scott Moe was on side, but they were drowned out by Team Canada and were unable to form the political coalitions they needed to sway the fighting camp into the saving camp.  Federally there was one leader who took this route as well.  Max Bernier made the right calls, but unfortunately for his People’s Party only a couple of voters picked up the phone when he called. He was more less completely ignored.  It’s his own fault.  He called for immigration limits about 10 years too early and he was written off as a racist lunatic.  Remember those days? That’s what we did to just about everyone who stuck their necks up.

The problem for the “saving” Canada crew was that the “fighting for” Canada crew had all the major national political parties, all the corporate media (remember them?) and almost all the academics (or at least the ones the corporate media talked to).  Team Canada was at war and they acted like it. Even Canada’s greatest sporting hero of all time, Wayne Gretzky, fell to their blades.  When The Great One was sentenced to a lifetime of golfing in sunny Arizona / California / Florida and banished from visiting his national non-profit head office in wintery Ontario, well that was Canada’s third Great Mistake.  Those who saw the influence of Team Canada knew if they can cancel The Great One, they won’t think twice about your silly arguments for saving their nation.

So, Canadians voted to fight The Donald.  Early losses suffered by Ontario’s newly elected (to fight the tariffs with greater tariffs) Premier Doug Ford were not analyzed the way an intelligent individual might who was looking toward the future. Not a surprise as this forward looking type could not be found since the dawn of that NAFTA Agreement.  Canadian voters voted to follow the politicians who hated The Donald as much as they did.  Ironic because a lot of those voters ended up trying to continue that fight by joining the Democrat party a couple of years later.

In the end it wasn’t the tariff war that sunk the sea to sea Canada.  Canadians eventually got around to lowering trade barriers and even signed some significant deals with other nations that hated The Donald as much as they did. In the end though, the nations we wanted to deal with the most had no interest in what Canada has most to offer.

Do I need to say it?  Oil and Gas?  Cheap, reliable energy. It still hurts to talk about it.  Sure the Canadians who held on to the name of that formerly great country held a big party when they decided they were the world’s first Net Zero Nation.  They used paper cups and paper straws and paper plates and wooden forks to eat their organic cake.  All the public news services covered it.  People in the US might have even noticed if the remaining Canadians hadn’t decided to hold their event on July 4 so they could go head to head with.. oh forget it.

No it wasn’t the tariffs in the end. The tariffs were one of the battles in the war. The war ended for all intents and purposes when the people running sea to see Canada decided to take their longer vision of the future and apply it to the entire earth instead of the country they loved.  After all there would be no Canada at all if the world was too hot for life to continue.  So they continued to use reams of the dwindling supply of taxpayer dollars to subsidize what they were sure would be a world wide move to renewable energy sources. Problem is, they’re still looking for affordable battery technology.  Some say the greedy Americans actually discovered the science behind it but the oil and gas people bought it and buried it.  They’re going to be sorry when their coastal properties sink some day soon.  Rich pricks.

At least the remaining Canadians can feel good about saving the planet.

PS. Of course most of this can be avoided.  Canadians can still decide they love their country even more than they hate The Donald.  We could still direct ALL of our efforts into becoming as economically viable as possible.  But that would mean ending years of climate change crisis planning.  It would mean cutting the size and the scope of our bureaucracy to counter the wild advantages investors and businesses are building in the US. It would mean we’d come to the understanding that Saving Canada and Fighting For Canada have become 2 separate ideas.  It would mean taking this blow from the US on the cheek and turning that cheek to accept more blows while we focus ALL our attention on building a stronger nation as quickly as possible.  Not bloody likely, eh?

After 15 years as a TV reporter with Global and CBC and as news director of RDTV in Red Deer, Duane set out on his own 2008 as a visual storyteller. During this period, he became fascinated with a burgeoning online world and how it could better serve local communities. This fascination led to Todayville, launched in 2016.

Follow Author

Duane Rolheiser

Unite the Kingdom Rally: demonstrators take to the streets in historical numbers to demand end to mass migration in the UK

Published on

If you haven’t been following the emergence of controversial UK journalist Tommy Robinson, you should try not to skip ahead to the aerial shot of what is likely the largest rally in modern UK history.

To even begin to understand the scope of the passion and to comprehend the numbers of English people who attended the “Unite the Kingdom Rally” in London on Saturday, some background information will be very helpful.

Like many western nations, Britain has seen an historical influx of immigrants.  With millions of new immigrants competing for housing, medical care, and government resources, very serious issues are bound to arise.  It makes you wonder how a government could or why a government would allow this to happen.

The following video shows very well what has taken place in terms of how many people have arrived in recent years, and who they are.

As the presenter showed, most of these migrants are from non European Union nations.  Many are from Muslim nations.  That means even in a highly multi-cultural nation like the UK, towns and cities are facing the cultural challenges of suddenly hosting a significant minority of young Muslim men.

Enter the most controversial political figure in Britain, Tommy Robinson.  Robinson’s hometown of Luton, Bedfordshire, England, was one of the first communities in the UK to see a significant percentage of Muslim population.  According to Robinson he noticed his childhood schoolyard and lunchrooms were divided into two separate groups, the traditional English (white Europeans, people from India, and the Caribbean, etc) and the Muslims.

As he got older Robinson claims he started to see a number of young girls being ‘recruited’ by older Muslim men into the drug culture, and becoming sexual partners for multiple Muslim men, including prominent members of the community.  When Robinson started to speak out publicly he was hit with a wall of official denials.  He would go on to challenge the authorities for years, becoming a citizen journalist and eventually an enemy of the state. If you watch his documentary series called The Rape of Britain you will understand just what he’s been claiming for about 15 years.

Fast forward to September of 2025.  The streets of many cities in the UK resemble Robinson’s hometown of Luton.  Robinson’s followers have multiplied from hundreds to thousands, to potentially millions.  The situation has caught the attention of President Donald Trump and X owner Elon Musk. On the weekend, untold thousands of Britons took to the streets of London for Robinson’s “Unite the Kingdom March”, a massive rally for free speech and British identity.

Without watching Robinson’s documentaries and journalism it can be difficult to understand the passion of his presentation from Saturday.  The growing thousands and millions in the UK understand.  Those who do not are very likely swayed by the media and government establishment who are trying desperately and less successfully by the day to brand Robinson as a Far Right racist.

Tommy Robinson appeared to be losing the battle for public opinion until Elon Musk stepped in.  Robinson was in jail last January when Musk took note and used his incredible social media reach to bring Robinson’s struggle to a much wider audience.

The owner of the X platform addressed the crowd via video link. In the days following the public execution of Charlie Kirk, Musk condemned the left as “the party of murder” and accused Britain’s political establishment of weaponizing mass migration to reshape the electorate.

 

Prime Minister Keir Starmer was quick to denounce the march while Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said the vast majority of demonstrators are “good, ordinary decent people” voicing legitimate concerns about mass migration and the safety of British streets.  At least 25 arrests were made Saturday and police say four police officers were seriously injured.

As for Tommy Robinson, he likely over achieved any expectations he had for this rally and now both he and the UK authorities are planning their next moves.

 

Continue Reading

Duane Rolheiser

Carney Wins: What now Alberta?

Published on

There’s an uncomfortable quiet over much of the prairies.  In Alberta it’s the type of quiet you can actually feel.

It’s not the typical disappointed silence you expect after another election defeat. It’s more like the kind of quiet that snaps an entire room to attention after someone has been slapped in the face. Bystanders in the immediate area watch to see what happens next. Those a step further back watch to see where the bystanders will weigh in.

At first all eyes are on the red cheeked person taking offense. This is the time before anyone in the room moves. The split second when all the bystanders process the situation to decide whether the slap was deserved, or a provocation, or something else. Over the next few hours and the next few days those who feel slapped are first to respond.

First reactions are typically instinctual and may be effective, but are just as likely to lead in precisely the wrong direction.  Those furious citizens and angry columnists with stinging cheeks are already lashing out. Jeffrey Rath has already written “A Requiem for Canada”. Rath is convinced Albertan’s will vote to leave Canada in the fall of 2025.  I’m not saying he’s wrong.  But if there was a vote at this moment Rath would not get the clear majority he’s looking for.

Rath is right in saying the fire for separation is started. But even the election of yet another Liberal minority government did not result in a four alarm fire. Not yet anyway.  Some of the bystanders will join them in rage-filled response. For a few days it might even look like fisticuffs are about to break out. This time, one senses the initial response will not be the real response.

So what now?

This initial anger will die down, but that’s not the same as saying the fire will go out.  There are more than enough people who feel burnt by these continual election defeats to keep the fire going.

Mark Carney will decide how much kindling is added.  If the newly elected Prime Minister charges into his stated agenda of climate alarmism and energy denialism this fire will certainly flare up. Each anti oil and gas decision will add kindling to the fire.

It’s safe to say that Carney, most of his voters, even those Progressives right here in Alberta do not understand the frustration of the prairie conservative voter.  Many of those voters are not recovered from the rejection of the annoying Freedom Convoy.  Can it possibly be true a majority of Canadians are perfectly happy the two people most responsible for ensuring not a single window was broken and not a single person was assaulted (truly an incredible feat and probably miraculous) are facing prison terms?  It is true.  Lich and Barber sentenced to prison time. More kindling.

Now it is time to move on.  But what does that mean?

The Liberal government and millions of voters who supported Carney are expecting that Canadians, and Canada’s premiers will fall in line and do their best to support the Prime Minister’s agenda as long as this minority government holds power.

That is not going to happen.

Premier Danielle Smith clearly shared Alberta’s position before the election.  The election changed nothing. Hours after the results were clear Premier Smith was out of the gates with an invitation to ‘reset’ the federal relationship with Alberta.  The Prime Minister is free to ignore her. He probably will.  That won’t work out well for Canada. More kindling.

If you’re looking for the bumpkins from the farms and the oil patch to lash out in meaningless memes and curse filled comment sections, get your fill.  I don’t think this vitriol will be the force leading the charge this time.

The results of the 2025 election might look incredibly similar to the results in 2019 and 2021, but the reaction in Alberta feels different. It’s more ominous. This time it feels like the bystanders have learned something from being slapped before. This time it feels like Albertans are taking a deep breath before responding to that slapping noise.

Continue Reading

Trending

X