From LifeSiteNews

By Frank Wright

Alastair Crooke says the situation in Ukraine is headed for an ‘inevitable escalation’ threatening a far bigger war with the West that Putin is trying to avoid.

What is the Trump administration doing about the Ukraine war? This week President Trump said the Russian leader Putin had “gone crazy” and issued what seemed to be a threat in response to Russian air strikes across Ukraine.

Reports in the Western media of a three-day Russian air assault on Ukraine – launched overnight on Sunday, May 25 – sparked outrage. The condemnation of the attacks was paired with renewed calls from the forever war faction to escalate U.S. involvement – leading to fears of a move towards World War III.

As usual, this media campaign for more war did not include the Russian perspective.

An unprecedented number of drones – over 1,000 – had been launched into Russia by Ukraine. It was reported May 25 that there was even a “large-scale” attempted assassination attack against Putin’s helicopter, involving dozens of Ukrainian drones, while the Russian president was on his way to visit the Kursk region. Putin survived thanks to the successful defensive actions of Russian military protecting the helicopter.

Putin’s helicopter ‘fended off Ukraine drone attack’ https://t.co/NT2LBwgqUl

— ❌RYLEIGH❌ (@RyleighRueWhoo) May 25, 2025

This was one reason for the Russian assault which seemed to have been news even to Donald Trump himself.

“I don’t like what Putin is doing … he’s killing people,” Trump said in a report of May 26. “Something happened to this guy.”

A reporter then tells Trump that a Russian military commander said Putin was targeted in a Ukrainian drone attack.

“I haven’t heard that,” said Trump, adding “maybe that would be a reason” for the Russian response.

See video report below from the Redacted team indicating it was NATO that almost assassinated Trump using Ukrainian forces.

Another reason was given by the Russian Foreign Ministry on May 23.

⚡️ The Kiev regime is relentless in its terror attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure in numerous Russian regions, including Moscow.

Russia will deliver a matching response to barrages of terrorist attacks carried out by the Kiev regime.

👉… pic.twitter.com/wmx3SxFrmN

— MFA Russia 🇷🇺 (@mfa_russia) May 23, 2025

Two days after Trump’s remarks, Russian outlet TASS reported a “massive overnight attack by Ukrainian drones on Russian regions has been repelled,” claiming Russian defenses had downed almost 300 drones targeting 13 regions – including Moscow.

Trump added that Zelensky was not helping the cause of peace.

“He is doing his Country no favors by talking the way he does. Everything out of his mouth causes problems, I don’t like it, and it better stop.”

Does Trump know what is going on?

Speaking to Judge Napolitano, an unusually passionate and alarmed Alastair Crooke, a British former Middle East negotiator, noted how Trump “seemed not to know” that Ukraine had “launched over a thousand drones” and an attempted “assassination of President Putin.”

Crooke warns that Putin and the Russians understandably no longer trust anything that Trump and the Americans say. He tells Napolitano the situation is headed for an “inevitable escalation” threatening a far bigger war with the West, which Putin has been trying to avoid. See the exceptional interview below.

Trump is hypocritical in not telling the exact truth to reporters he openly denounces – as he did here – of being “fake news.”

What can the U.S. do?

Perhaps it is wise to ask what the Trump administration can do. With a new grand strategy of national security through the promotion of world peace, it would appear that all-out war with Russia is off the table.

The bipartisan push for escalation to war is ever-present, however. Whether it is war with Russia or war with Iran, the “neocon” faction constantly urges military action.

Why? The motives of people like Lindsey Graham – who once called for Putin’s assassination – are only partially explained by the capture of the U.S. House and Senate by the Israel lobby.

At base, this is about business. The economics of permanent war is the lifeline of the neocons, and of the European political establishment. If peace breaks out, they are all finished, as their business goes bankrupt as their promotion of war as the “defense of democracy.”

This is not only morally bankrupt, as JD Vance pointed out last May, but the forever wars pursued by Zionist neocons have driven America’s debt to a record $36 trillion high.

Trump’s goal is to change all of that. To do so, the business model of permanent war must go – in order to “make America great again.” Another reason was supplied by Vance last week: the “era of uncontested U.S. dominance” is now over.

It makes no sense to launch a great project to reverse the financially and diplomatically ruinous project of “liberal intervention” and then start a major war which many Western experts not on the military-industrial complex payroll are warning you will not win.

U.S. wars have cost ‘$21 trillion’

Speaking in Saudi Arabia on May 13, Trump derided the so-called “nation builders, neocons, liberal non-profits” who he said “spent trillions and trillions of dollars failing to develop Kabul, Baghdad, and so many other cities…”

As Newsweek reported, a 2021 study showed “[i]n the 20 years since the September 11 attacks, the United States government has spent more than $21 trillion” on funding the forever wars abroad – and on mass surveillance at home. The bottom line is that the business model of neocon wars has broken America, and Trump says he wants to fix that.

Given that the Russians have not lost in Ukraine, and have not collapsed as the Pentagon hoped they would in 2019, where does this leave the U.S.?

As Alastair Crooke and Col. Douglas Macgregor have pointed out, it leaves the U.S. with “no leverage.”

If you're a Russian and listened to Trump prior to the election you would have assumed when he took office that he would have withdrawn all support for Ukraine.

Through some bad advice, he did the opposite.

This is exactly why we have minimal to no leverage or trust during…

— Douglas Macgregor (@DougAMacgregor) May 26, 2025

This means that after sanctions and after arming Ukraine and funding its regime have failed to stop Russia, the Russians will conclude the war on their own terms because they have won it.

So what can Trump do if the stick of further sanctions and arms is useless? Trump has offered the carrot of the inclusion of Russia in a new geopolitical dispensation which replaces conflict with strategic balance and stable trade deals.

Yet Russia has managed – and rather well – to realign the sale of its oil, gas, and other vast mineral resources. Its informal bloc sees it partnered with two other major producer nations – China and Iran. It is the consumer economic model of the West which needs these resources and cheap manufactured goods, which have the rest of the world for an alternative market should it sanction itself from access to them.

Will the U.S. walk away?

Along with the raw military power and industrial production capacity of the Russians, this is a compelling reason for the U.S. to just walk away from Ukraine. Both Trump and Vice President Vance have said the U.S. may do so.

That is the solution offered by Dr. S. Maitra, whose recommendation for a U.S. drawdown from NATO two years ago is now close to being realized. German outlet Handelsblatt warned on Monday that the EU and the UK must prepare for the imminent withdrawal of U.S. troops from Europe. The U.S. is already walking away from Europe on “defense” – and who pays for it.

Europe is preventing peace, says Lavrov

The search for reasons for the continuing war can be satisfied by noticing the lifeline of funding and arms provided to Ukraine.

The Russians have said that Trump, the “peace president,” promises peace but hypocritically continues to prolong the war with billions more U.S. money, weapons, intelligence, and U.S. special forces in Ukraine and Israel, without which both wars would quickly end. On Tuesday, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz responded by lifting range limits on weapons supplied to Ukraine – allowing U.S. and European supplied missiles to hit Moscow.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov added this week that British and EU leaders were “sabotaging” the peace process. Why? He said in Istanbul on Friday: “President Trump has already said that this is not his war. He is interested in the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine continuing.”

Lavrov explained, “European leaders are trying to prevent this, because if the war suddenly stops, they will end their political careers in disgrace.”

‘I see Brussels trying to disrupt the negotiation process. It’s reaching unprecedented levels of actions, statements, and appeals. European hawks understand that they don’t have the strength to continue the war. They are mortally afraid that the US will give up on them and say:… pic.twitter.com/b7CIJJCYwI

— Zlatti71 (@Zlatti_71) May 27, 2025

Lavrov added, “They’ve bet their reputation on dragging Europe into a war against Russia to facilitate the militarization of Europe,” saying “huge sums” of money were being allocated towards that end.

Lavrov’s remarks dispel any mystery over the reasons for prolonging and escalating the Ukraine war. The liberal-globalist leadership of Britain and Europe have invested their political futures in it. The vast economic might of the U.S. war faction relies on the production of wars for its existence.

With around three-fifths of the U.S. national debt of $36 trillion a direct result of its decades of wars it is clear whose money is talking up the need for more war. This is the “democracy” our tax money is defending in Ukraine.

It is the business of monetized death that has a low regard for the sacredness of human life. It is one of the largest and potentially most dangerous results of the modern culture of death that Pope John Paul II constantly warned the world to oppose.

Since NATO intelligence has been embedded in Ukraine it is inconceivable that Trump does not know how U.S. money is being spent – on launching attacks on Russia to provoke a major war.

Trump certainly knows that starting wars is the business of the neocon faction – the whole mission of his MAGA movement can be explained as an attempt to change the U.S. from a war economy with global ambitions. As Crooke points out, Europe knows this, too.

If Trump walks away, Crooke says, the Europeans don’t have the money or the troops to fight the war without him. The Europeans also fear Trump’s alternative “economic model” to the war economy will ruin them. Aside from the fact that they “hate him,” Crooke says, this is the reason they want to destroy him. How?

They want to “push Trump … into an escalation against Russia … to undermine Trump and his program…” he says.

This is an existential moment for the survival of an economic model – whose vast profits have captured the governance of the West. Behind the MAGA hats and talk of democracy’s defense, a battle for the life of the business of death is still being waged – with our taxes.

It would be crazy not to walk away from that and return to spreading a culture of life for the benefit of all mankind.

From LifeSiteNews

By Conservative Treehouse

President Trump may not want to engage in the conflict with Russia, but the NATO alliance is not willing to allow him any independent retreat.

The escalation continues and unfortunately there are few indications the people around President Donald Trump are advising caution.

The U.K., German, French, EU, NATO and “Western” intelligence control agents are pushing for expanded conflict with Russia. The latest development comes as the new leftist German Chancellor Friedrich Merz gives the greenlight for Ukraine to launch long-range Taurus cruise missiles directly into Russia.

Bloomberg:

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Ukraine has been given permission to use weapons supplied by its allies to launch strikes deep inside Russia.

“There are absolutely no range limits anymore for weapons delivered to Ukraine, not from Britain, the French or from us — also not from the Americans,” Merz said at a conference in Berlin on Monday. “That means Ukraine can defend itself by attacking military positions also in Russia.”

[…] Ukraine’s Western allies are trying to intensify pressure on the Kremlin after Moscow launched its biggest drone barrage against Ukraine since the full-scale invasion over three years ago. European leaders have condemned what they call Russia’s foot-dragging as efforts to lock in a ceasefire have gone nowhere.

[…] Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that, if confirmed, a decision to allow long-range strikes could undermine efforts toward reaching a political settlement, according to Interfax. He called such a decision “dangerous.”

The proxy war between the U.S./NATO and Russia is now entering its fourth year.

In some ways these efforts by the “coalition of the nervously willing” only solidify the previous position of Russian President Vladimir Putin that any Western move toward a diplomatic handshake was generally duplicitous and not to be trusted. Hence, Putin has instructed the armed forces of the Russian Federation to continue building out an expanded “buffer zone” between Russian held territory and NATO within Ukraine.

Factually, as previously admitted and outlined by reporting from the New York Times, it is U.S. military and intelligence assets in the region who are leading the attacks from bases in Germany and the front lines within Ukraine.

The New York Times published two articles (HERE and HERE) revealing: 1) that U.S. military boots are on the ground in Ukraine. (2) The U.S. military is actively involved in the ongoing targeting of strikes into Russia. (3) The CIA is operating in Ukraine and conducting targeted strikes into the Russian Federation mainland.

The sourcing for the New York Times outline of American leadership against Russian Federation troops was transparently generated by U.S. military and intelligence leaks intended to stop any negotiations between President Trump and President Putin. Since the release of those articles two months ago, they have succeeded in exactly that.

President Trump may not want to engage in the conflict with Russia, but the NATO alliance is not willing to allow him any independent retreat. The recent Romanian election outcome solidified their stranglehold on the geopolitical interests at stake.

Romania is currently building the largest NATO base in Europe, and Vladimir Putin can see the intention therein with very clear eyes. Unfortunately, American students are no longer taught geography or history in school, because one simple look at a map tells us the motives and intents.

Previously Germany offered to send military forces through Poland to march into Ukraine and confront the Russians.

The last time Germany marched through Poland to confront Russia things did not exactly end well for the rest of the world.

History rhymes!

As we have outlined for several years, including our own research by driving through Ukraine, the CIA has been operating on the ground in Ukraine from the outset of the conflict. Over time the CIA took over most of the strategic operations, and as it currently stands the United States CIA is organizing the majority of the Ukraine war against Russia.

This is where you need to understand how CIA authorization takes place.

In order for the CIA to operate in Ukraine, Joe Biden had to sign a “presidential finding memo” authorizing the CIA to conduct covert operations. This New York Times article is describing the outcome of those “finding memoranda.”

Which brings me to this Tweet I sent in response to the NYT article:

Dear President Trump, if this NYT article is accurate (it is), there has to be a “Presidential Finding Memo” authorizing the CIA to coordinate attacks into Russia.

You might want to have CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and DNI Tulsi Gabbard pull it out of the authorization library for your review, prior to the next call with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Also, to avoid embarrassment, as your team are likely aware – and possibly willing to admit, that “finding memo” was also briefed to the former Gang of Eight in congress. Which means Secretary of State Marco Rubio as vice-chair of the SSCI and Go8 member, already knew of this CIA operation, authorizing their involvement in targeting Russian Federation territory.

You might want to ask Secretary Rubio about that, and organize a way to discuss it, prior to Rubio coming face to face with his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov at the next meeting.

Warmest possible regards, and deepest appreciation for your ongoing “ceasefire” efforts.

Good luck

The motive is clear for the New York Times to outline how the CIA is operating inside Ukraine to target the Russian Federation.

The operatives who leak to the NYT want distance between Trump and Putin. This admission of CIA involvement puts Trump in an awkward place.

The awkwardness expands, when you understand how the CIA is authorized to conduct these operations. The president, Biden, signed a “finding memo,” authorizing the CIA to conduct missile strikes into the Russian Federation.

Senator Marco Rubio as SSCI vice-chair and a Gang of Eight member, was “read in” to that CIA authorization.

Senator Rubio is now Secretary of State facing Sergey Lavrov, and the Russians know exactly how these things are done.

On one hand, the NYT article spills the beans and informs the public. On the other hand, their reason for purposefully spilling the beans is to create a problem for Trump and Rubio, and possibly between Trump and Rubio.

It makes sense now why Secretary of State Rubio was the first Trump official to publicly say the United States was in a proxy war against Russia using Ukraine as the justification.

Many people keep asking if the “new Rubio” is the real Rubio, or if he has been positioning as a neocon stealth influence. I think we are about to find out.

Keep watching closely.

Reprinted with permission from Conservative Treehouse.