Connect with us

Health

Province & Doctors Ratify New Agreement

Published

3 minute read

By Sheldon Spackman

The Alberta Government has announced the ratification of an amending agreement between the province and it’s physicians that aims to improve patient care. However, the amending agreement still needs to be signed by both parties.

Government officials say the voting process for Alberta Medical Association (AMA) members started six weeks ago with the final count showing that 74 per cent of voting physicians were in favour of amending the existing 2011-18 master agreement.

Minister of Health Sarah Hoffman says ā€œWe thank Alberta’s physicians for their support of these amendments and their dedication and commitment to improving the health and well-being of all Albertans. As shared stewards of our health system, we now look forward to working together on changes that will improve accessibility to high-quality care and keep the health system sustainable in the long term.ā€

Alberta Medical Association President Dr. Padriac Carr says ā€œIn ratifying this agreement, physicians and government are moving in positive new directions. We will work to moderate the rate of expenditure growth while maintaining quality care and providing greater value for patients. The amending agreement will also contribute to a higher level of integration and increased efficiency in the system in the long term.ā€

The ratified amendments come after six months of negotiations and are based on a tentative agreement announced Aug. 31. The agreement, which recognizes a shared responsibility to provide quality health care in a financially sustainable framework, is expected to improve patient care and significantly slow the growth of health-care spending by the end of 2018.

Highlights of the amending agreement include a needs-based Physician Resource Plan that will help place doctors in the communities that need them. Primary care improvements, including new information technology and data-sharing. New compensation models for some primary-care physicians, as well as academic physicians, to reward time and quality of care given to patients rather than just the number of services provided. New physician peer review and accountability mechanisms and the linking of certain benefits and compensation increases to performance on other cost-saving measures.

The current master agreement with physicians will now be amended. The government and the AMA will immediately start negotiations on the overall master agreement that expires in 2018.

Follow Author

Health

RFK Jr. purges CDC vaccine panel, citing decades of ā€˜skewed science’

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Robert Jones

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. hasĀ dismissedĀ every member of the CDC’s top vaccine advisory panel, citing what he described as a ā€œdecadesā€ of ā€œconflicts of interestā€ and ā€œskewed scienceā€ in the vaccine regulatory system.

RFK Jr.’s abrupt decision to ā€œretireā€ all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was announced in aĀ Wall Street JournalĀ op-ed Monday andĀ confirmed by HHS shortly thereafter.

The move marks the most sweeping reform to federal vaccine policy in years and follows months of internal reviews and mounting public skepticism.

Kennedy accused the ACIP of being ā€œlittle more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine,ā€ claiming ā€œit has never recommended against a vaccine.ā€

ā€œThe public must know that unbiased science guides the recommendations from our health agencies,ā€ Kennedy wrote. ā€œThis will ensure the American people receive the safest vaccines possible.ā€

ACIP holds the power to influence which vaccines are recommended by the CDC and covered by insurers. But according to Kennedy, it has failed in its duty to protect the public.

He cited multiple government investigations—dating back to 2000 and 2009—finding that ACIP members were routinely advising on products from pharmaceutical firms with which they had financial ties. Committee members were also issued conflict-of-interest waivers from the CDC.

Kennedy pointed to the 1997 vote approving the Rotashield vaccine – later withdrawn forĀ causingĀ severe bowel obstructions in infants – as a case study in regulatory failure. Four of the eight members who voted for it had financial stakes in rotavirus vaccines under development.

He explained ā€œretiringā€ the 17 members, ā€œsome of whom were last-minute appointees of the Biden administration,ā€ by saying that without such a move, ā€œthe Trump administration would not have been able to appoint a majorityā€ until 2028.

Under Kennedy’s leadership, HHS has already halted recommendations for routine COVID-19 shots for healthy children and pregnant women and cancelled COVID-era programs to fast-track new vaccines.

It remains unclear who will replace the outgoing ACIP members, though HHSĀ confirmed the committee will still meet later this month, now under new leadership.

ā€œThe new members won’t directly work for the vaccine industry,ā€ he promised. ā€œThey will exercise independent judgment, refuse to serve as a rubber stamp, and foster a culture of critical inquiry—unafraid to ask hard questions.ā€

Continue Reading

Health

Police are charging parents with felonies for not placing infants who died in sleep on their backs

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Dr. Brenda Baletti, The Defender

Pennsylvania authorities brought felony charges against the parents of two different babies after police said the infants died because the parents placed them in unsafe sleeping positions.

Parents of two different babies are being charged with felonies in Pennsylvania after police say their babies died because the parents placed them in unsafe sleeping positions,Ā SpotlightPA reported.

In both cases, police allege that the parents failed to follow guidance, including handouts given to them at doctor’s visits, stating that babies should be put to sleep on their backs.

GinaĀ andĀ David StrauseĀ of Lebanon County are accused of putting their 3-month-old infant son, Gavin, to sleep on his stomach and allowing him to sleep with stuffed animals in the crib.

They are charged with involuntary manslaughter, recklessly endangering another person, and endangering the welfare of children.

Natalee Rasmus of Luzerne County is accused of putting her 1-month-old daughter, Avaya Jade Rasmus-Alberto, to sleep on her stomach on aĀ boppy pillow, often used for nursing. She isĀ chargedĀ with third-degree murder, involuntary manslaughter, and endangering the welfare of children.

Rasmus was a 17-year-old mother when her daughter died in 2022. Court records show that she continues to be held at the Luzerne County Correctional Facility with bail set at $25,000 pending resolution of her case.

In both cases, autopsiesĀ concludedĀ the babies died of accidental death from asphyxiation. Law enforcement argued in both cases that parents should have known that putting the babies to sleep on their stomachs was unsafe, because they had received paperwork at wellness visits informing them of safe sleeping practices.

The law requires hospitals, birthing centers, and medical providers to give parents educational materials from the nationalĀ Safe to Sleep campaign, and ask them to certify that they received them.

Signing the statement is voluntary. The statement doesn’t indicate that parents can be charged with a criminal offense if they don’t follow the campaign advice.

Advocates from national organizations that educate parents about safe sleep practices found the charges shocking. Nancy Maruyama, the executive director ofĀ Sudden Infant Death Services of Illinois,Ā toldĀ Spotlight PA, ā€œTo charge them criminally is a crime, because they have already suffered the worst loss.ā€

Alison Jacobson, executive director ofĀ First Candle, a non-profit that also educates parents about safe sleep practices, toldĀ Pennlive,Ā ā€œThere is no law against placing a baby on his or her stomach to sleep. How they can charge this family with involuntary manslaughter is completely baffling to me.ā€

ResearcherĀ Neil Z. Miller, an expert on SIDS and the Safe to Sleep campaign, told The Defender, ā€œParents of a sleeping baby who dies in the middle of the night should never be charged with murder. That’s just cruel.ā€

Miller, author of ā€œVaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective?ā€ added:

Should parents be obligated to follow every ā€œrecommendationā€ made by their doctor or the Safe to Sleep campaign? Would we as a society prefer that doctors raise our babies instead of the parents? Have other possible causes of death been considered, such as vaccinations? As a society, we can, and must, do much better.

Does placing infants on their backs make a difference?Ā 

The handouts shared with new Pennsylvania parents are based on the National Institutes of Health ā€œSafe to Sleepā€ campaign, which institutionalized a program initiated by theĀ American Academy of PediatricsĀ (AAP) in 1992 to inform parents to put children to sleep on their backs rather than on their stomachs.

The campaign is based on the premise that babies who sleep on their backs or sides are less likely to die in their sleep. Until that time, it was common for babies to sleep on their stomachs.

The program was launched in the wake of a rising number of SIDS deaths – and growing concern among some parents that the deaths were linked to vaccination.

In a 2021 article in the peer-reviewed journalĀ Toxicology Reports, vaccine researcherĀ Neil Z. MillerĀ provides a history of the SIDS diagnosis, noting that the rise of SIDS coincided with the firstĀ mass immunization campaigns.

Between 1992, when the Safe to Sleep program launched, and 2001,Ā SIDS deaths reportedly declinedĀ a whopping 55 percent – aĀ number toutedĀ in articles celebrating the program, making it appear that babies sleeping on their stomachs was the cause of SIDS, not vaccines.

However, at the same time deaths from SIDS decreased, the rate of mortality from ā€œsuffocation in bed,ā€ ā€œsuffocation other,ā€ ā€œunknown and unspecified causes,ā€ and ā€œintent unknownā€ all increased significantly.

Why? The classification system had changed. SIDS deaths were being reclassified by medical certifiers, usually coroners, as one of the other similar categories, not SIDS.

Research published in the journalĀ Pediatrics, the AAP’s flagship journal, concluded that deaths previously certified as SIDS were simply being certified as other non-SIDS causes, such as suffocation – but the deaths were still essentially SIDS deaths.

That change in classification accounted for more than 90 percent of the drop in SIDS rates.

TheĀ PediatricsĀ paper showed no decline in overall postneonatal mortality after the Safe to Sleep campaign was launched, despite the program’s – and the AAP’s – claims to the contrary.

Others verified theĀ PediatricsĀ paper’s findings, and the trend continued, as reported by multiple studiesĀ inĀ top journals. Miller reported that, for example, ā€œFrom 1999 through 2015, the U.S. SIDS rate declined 35.8% while infant deaths due to accidental suffocation increased 183.8%.ā€

Research shows that almostĀ 80 percent of SIDS deathsĀ reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) happen within seven days of vaccination.

Theories linking vaccines to SIDS suggest that, in some cases,Ā underdeveloped liver enzyme pathwaysĀ may make it harder for some infants to processĀ toxic ingredientsĀ in vaccines. Others argue that other,Ā multiple, complex factorsĀ can make some infants vulnerable to toxic ingredients inĀ vaccines.

Baby Gavin was ā€˜a dream come true’

On April 30, Gina and David Strause were charged with involuntary manslaughter, which carries a sentence of up to 10 years, and other lesser charges in the death of their son, Gavin.

According to theĀ police report, Gina found her son unresponsive, cold, and blue in his crib when she woke up to feed him on the morning of May 8, 2024. She immediately called 911 and performed CPR until the police arrived.

The baby was pronounced dead at the hospital. The autopsy report found the cause of death to be ā€œcomplications of asphyxia.ā€

Police said they observed loose items in the crib, ā€œsuch as blankets and stuffed animals.ā€

Gina said that after feeding her baby at about 11:30 p.m. the night before he died, she placed him in his crib on his belly, because he was a ā€œbelly sleeper,ā€ and covered him with a blanket. She said that she had received the recommendation that he should sleep on his back, but that he preferred to sleep on his stomach.

In anĀ interview with Pennlive, Gina said that she typically put Gavin to sleep on his back, but he had gotten into the daily habit of rolling onto his belly.

Davis Stause told police that when he left for work at 5:30 a.m., he checked on Gavin, who was sleeping on his stomach and moving around a little bit. David said he ā€œpatted his buttā€ to put him back to sleep.

The police reported that they also obtained medical records from birth through death that showed that on the discharge paperwork that the parents received information about safe sleep practices, which included putting the baby on its back, having it sleep in the same room as the parents, and keeping the crib clear of bumper pads and stuffed animals.

They said this paperwork explained how parents could create a safe sleeping environment for their babies to reduce the risk of SIDS.

Baby Gavin also went to the pediatrician for well-child visits on February 7 and 14, March 5, and April 9, a month before he died.

Gina told Pennlive that Gavin, who was born when she was almost 40, was ā€œa dream come true.ā€ She had taken 10 weeks of maternity leave and largely worked at home to spend as much time with him as possible. She said that after she gave birth, she was ā€œoverwhelmedā€ and didn’t remember receiving any paperwork or instructions about sleep.

Gina also said that at the hospital, police treated her and her husband with immediate suspicion, separating and questioning them. They were not allowed to see their baby again before he was taken by the coroner’s office.

The parents created aĀ GoFundMe page, where they shared a copy of the police report, to help cover their legal costs, because they said they do not qualify for a public defender.

The DefenderĀ attempted to contact the parents to inquire about the baby’s overall health, if he had any medical conditions, was born prematurely, or had recently received any vaccines, but the parents did not respond by deadline.

The district attorney’s office also did not respond to requests for comment.

ā€˜Tragic accident with no criminal intent to harm or kill the baby’

The forensic pathologist who performed the autopsy for Natalee Rasmus’ baby listed the cause of death as accidental. According to the report, the baby died from asphyxiation, theĀ Times LeaderĀ reported.

Rasmus discovered her baby had died on the morning of October 23, 2022, when she picked her up to get her ready for a doctor’s appointment.

Pennsylvania State Police in December charged Rasmus, alleging that she placed her baby face down to sleep against the recommendations of medical personnel and prenatal classes at Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center.

At a preliminary hearing on the case in February, a state trooper testified that Rasmus ignored safe sleeping practices because she had placed her baby face down in her bassinet with a Boppy pillow, which has a tag warning, ā€œDo not use for sleeping.ā€

The trooper, Caroline Rayeski, also testified that a search of Rasmus’ cell phone found that she had searched the internet to see whether it was ok to allow newborns to sleep on their stomachs. The trooper also seized literature from the prenatal classes stating it is ā€œrecommendedā€ to put newborns to sleep on their backs.

ā€œYeah, she wouldn’t sleep, she’ll just scream, so she has to be like propped up,ā€ Rasmus told the investigating officer, according toĀ Spotlight PA, which reported the story.

Assistant attorneys argued in a preliminary hearing that she disregarded safe sleeping practices, and a judge forwarded the criminal case to county court.

Rasmus is being represented by public defenders Joseph Yeager and Melissa Ann Sulima, who told theĀ Times LeaderĀ the baby’s death was ā€œa tragic accident with no criminal intent to harm or kill the baby.ā€

Yeager said the prenatal literature referring to newborn sleep positions are ā€œrecommendations,ā€ not mandates.

ā€œAs the death certificate says, it was an accident. Clearly, there was no malice in this accidental death,ā€ said Yeager, who also said the case should be dismissed.

Rasmus’ most serious charge, third-degree murder, is a homicide that involves killing someone without intent to kill, but with reckless disregard for human life. In Pennsylvania, it can carry a prison sentence ofĀ up to 40 years.

Court documents indicateĀ that Rasmus remains in jail with a $25,000 bail, pending the outcome of her case. Neither the district attorney nor Rasmus’ attorneys responded to The Defender’s request for comment.

How common is it to bring criminal charges against parents in infant deaths?

Attorney Daniel Nevins toldĀ SpotlightPAĀ it is extremely rare for parents to be criminally charged when infants die after sleeping on their stomachs, and that the burden of proof on the prosecutors will be high.

In 2014, Virginia resident Candice Christa Semidey, age 25, was charged with murder after she swaddled her baby and put it to sleep on its stomach,Ā theĀ Washington PostĀ reported. In that case, police similarly did not think that she intended for the baby to die.

SheĀ pleaded guiltyĀ to involuntary manslaughter and child neglect. She was ordered to serve three years of probation to avoid theĀ five-year prison termĀ she was sentenced to.

SomeĀ chargesĀ have also been brought againstĀ parentsĀ in deaths of infants sleeping with Boppy pillows. There have also been severalĀ casesĀ ofĀ parents chargedĀ for sleeping in theĀ same bedĀ as their child.

The Defender recently reported on three SIDS deaths that occurred shortly after vaccination. Police are still investigating the parents ofĀ 18-month-old twins who diedĀ together a week after receiving three vaccines. Authorities have not yet charged the parents, but initially said they were investigating the deaths as homicides.

Blessings Myrical Jean Simmons, age 6 months, receivedĀ six routine vaccines at a well-baby visit on January 13. The next morning, her parents found the baby dead in her bassinet. The autopsy lists SIDS as the infant’s cause of death, and no charges were filed against the parents.

This article was originally published byĀ The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please considerĀ subscribing to The DefenderĀ orĀ donating to Children’s Health Defense.

Continue Reading

Trending

X