Connect with us

Alberta

Olivia and Noah most popular baby names in 2021

Published

5 minute read

Olivia is once again the most popular baby girl’s name in Alberta, tying the record for the longest any name has spent at No. 1, while Noah held onto the top spot for baby boys.

There were 49,938 babies born in Alberta in 2021 – 25,714 boys, 24,219 girls and five genders not stated in the initial registration. Olivia maintained a record-setting popularity streak for girls’ names, topping the list every year since 2013. Noah placed first among baby boy names for the third consecutive year.

Charlotte, Ava, Emma and Amelia were among the top five most popular names for baby girls, while Jack, Oliver, Liam and Theodore ranked high among name choices for baby boys.

“I want to congratulate everyone who welcomed a new addition to their family in 2021. After a challenging couple of years, the birth of a baby is something we can all celebrate. The future is bright for Alberta families, as parents are now benefiting from our made-in-Alberta child-care agreement with the federal government that reduces fees for parents of children who are newborn to kindergarten age by an average of half this year, and an average of $10 per day in 2026. We look forward to watching these children grow up and seeing how they shape the future of our province.”

Nate Glubish, Minister of Service Alberta

In 2021, Alberta’s baby names reflected parents’ creativity, with names like Archangel, Chickadee, Tuba and Jocko appearing on the list. Other names appear to be inspired by popular fictional characters (Mads, Jedi, Anakin, Hobbes, Furious), vehicles (Audi, Benz, Royce, Chevy, Mercedes), locations (Monaco, Scotland, Denver, Brisbane, Nairobi) and music (Zeppelin, Jagger, Jethro).

Quick facts

  • Notable changes to the 2021 lists:
    • Evelyn appears in the top 10 list for girls for the first time, after placing 12th in 2020.
    • Henry appears in the top 10 list for boys for the first time, after placing 11th in 2020.
    • Chloe and Aria both reappear in the girls’ top 10 list for the first time since 2017; they tied for ninth place that year.
    • Emily dropped to 14th place among the most popular girls’ names, after appearing in the top 10 list every year since 1993.
    • Ethan, which until this year held the record as being No. 1 for the longest period, has moved back into the top 10 list of popular boys’ names, after dropping to 12th place in 2020.
    • Maverick has increased in popularity on the boys’ names list over the last five years, steadily moving up from 45th most popular in 2017 to 13th most popular in 2021.
  • Historically, girls’ names that held the No. 1 spot for the longest consecutive time period include:
    • Jessica: six years (1990-1995)
    • Emily: five years (1998-2002)
    • Olivia: nine years (2013-2021)
  • Historically, boys’ names that held the No. 1 spot for the longest consecutive time period include:
    • Matthew: five years (1995-1999)
    • Ethan: nine years (2001-2009)
    • Liam: seven years (2010-2016)
  • Parents have up to one year to register their child’s birth. As a result, the list of 2021 baby names and birth statistics may change slightly.

Boys’ names and frequency – top 10

(In brackets is the number of babies with each name)

Place Boy Names (2021) Boy Names (2020) Boy Names (2019) Boy Names (2018) Boy Names (2017)
1 Noah (274) Noah (239) Noah (275) Liam (225) Noah (250)
2 Jack (219) Oliver (229) Liam (234) Oliver (212) Liam (244)
3 Oliver (208) Liam (206) Oliver (225) Noah (199) Benjamin (229)
4 Liam (197) Benjamin (182) Ethan (213) Ethan (188) Logan (226)
5 Theodore (191) William (178) Jack (198) Logan (182)

Lucas (182)

Lucas (216)
6 William (174) Jack (169) William (185) Jacob (181) William (213)
7 Ethan (162) Lucas (163) Lucas (174) William (178) Ethan (192)
8 Levi (148) Theodore (159) Owen (167) Benjamin (176) Oliver (190)
9 Benjamin (147) Levi (153) Benjamin (163) Jack (167) Jack (189)
10 Henry (146) Owen (152) Jacob (162) Alexander (158)

James (158)

Jacob (178)

Girls’ names and frequency – top 10

(In brackets is the number of babies with each name)

Place Girl Names (2021) Girl Names (2020) Girl Names (2019) Girl Names (2018) Girl Names (2017)
1 Olivia (210) Olivia (236) Olivia (229) Olivia (235) Olivia (236)
2 Charlotte (166) Emma (184) Charlotte (188) Emma (230) Emma (215)
3 Ava (165) Charlotte (161) Sophia (181) Charlotte (175) Charlotte (187)
4 Emma (163) Ava (159) Emma (178) Emily (164) Ava (184)

Sophia (184)

5 Amelia (160) Sophia (151) Ava (161) Ava (161) Emily (159)
6 Sophia (137) Amelia (145) Amelia (159) Abigail (153) Abigail (154)
7 Isla (135) Isla (133) Emily (150) Harper (150) Amelia (149)
8 Abigail (120) Emily (127) Abigail (141) Sophia (146) Isabella (141)
9 Evelyn (119)

Chloe (119)

Lily (123) Hannah (137) Amelia (145) Aria (129)

Chloe (129)

10 Aria (112) Abigail (114) Elizabeth (124) Elizabeth (130) Lily (127)

This is a news release from the Government of Alberta.

Follow Author

Alberta

Alberta Next Panel calls to reform how Canada works

Published on

From the Fraser Institute

By Tegan Hill

The Alberta Next Panel, tasked with advising the Smith government on how the province can better protect its interests and defend its economy, has officially released its report. Two of its key recommendations—to hold a referendum on Alberta leaving the Canada Pension Plan, and to create a commission to review programs like equalization—could lead to meaningful changes to Canada’s system of fiscal federalism (i.e. the financial relationship between Ottawa and the provinces).

The panel stemmed from a growing sense of unfairness in Alberta. From 2007 to 2022, Albertans’ net contribution to federal finances (total federal taxes paid by Albertans minus federal money spent or transferred to Albertans) was $244.6 billion—more than five times the net contribution from British Columbians or Ontarians (the only other two net contributors). This money from Albertans helps keep taxes lower and fund government services in other provinces. Yet Ottawa continues to impose federal regulations, which disproportionately and negatively impact Alberta’s energy industry.

Albertans were growing tired of this unbalanced relationship. According to a poll by the Angus Reid Institute, nearly half of Albertans believe they get a “raw deal”—that is, they give more than they get—being part of Canada. The Alberta Next Panel survey found that 59 per cent of Albertans believe the federal transfer and equalization system is unfair to Alberta. And a ThinkHQ survey found that more than seven in 10 Albertans feel that federal policies over the past several years hurt their quality of life.

As part of an effort to increase provincial autonomy, amid these frustrations, the panel recommends the Alberta government hold a referendum on leaving the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and establishing its own provincial pension plan.

Albertans typically have higher average incomes and a younger population than the rest of the country, which means they could pay a lower contribution rate under a provincial pension plan while receiving the same level of benefits as the CPP. (These demographic and economic factors are also why Albertans currently make such a large net contribution to the CPP).

The savings from paying a lower contribution rate could result in materially higher income during retirement for Albertans if they’re invested in a private account. One report found that if a typical Albertan invested the savings from paying a lower contribution rate to a provincial pension plan, they could benefit from $189,773 (pre-tax) in additional retirement income.

Clearly, Albertans could see a financial benefit from leaving the CPP, but there are many factors to consider. The government plans to present a detailed report including how the funds would be managed, contribution rates, and implementation plan prior to a referendum.

Then there’s equalization—a program fraught with flaws. The goal of equalization is to ensure provinces can provide reasonably comparable public services at reasonably comparable tax rates. Ottawa collects taxes from Canadians across the country and then redistributes that money to “have not” provinces. In 2026/27, equalization payments is expected to total $27.2 billion with all provinces except Alberta, British Columbia and Saskatchewan receiving payments.

Reasonable people can disagree on whether or not they support the principle of the program, but again, it has major flaws that just don’t make sense. Consider the fixed growth rate rule, which mandates that total equalization payments grow each year even when the income differences between recipient and non-recipient provinces narrows. That means Albertans continue paying for a growing program, even when such growth isn’t required to meet the program’s stated objective. The panel recommends that Alberta take a leading role in working with other provinces and the federal government to reform equalization and set up a new Canada Fiscal Commission to review fiscal federalism more broadly.

The Alberta Next Panel is calling for changes to fiscal federalism. Reforms to equalization are clearly needed—and it’s worth exploring the potential of an Alberta pension plan. Indeed, both of these changes could deliver benefits.

Tegan Hill

Director, Alberta Policy, Fraser Institute
Continue Reading

Alberta

Alberta’s huge oil sands reserves dwarf U.S. shale

Published on

From the Canadian Energy Centre

By Will Gibson

Oil sands could maintain current production rates for more than 140 years

Investor interest in Canadian oil producers, primarily in the Alberta oil sands, has picked up, and not only because of expanded export capacity from the Trans Mountain pipeline.

Enverus Intelligence Research says the real draw — and a major factor behind oil sands equities outperforming U.S. peers by about 40 per cent since January 2024 — is the resource Trans Mountain helps unlock.

Alberta’s oil sands contain 167 billion barrels of reserves, nearly four times the volume in the United States.

Today’s oil sands operators hold more than twice the available high-quality resources compared to U.S. shale producers, Enverus reports.

“It’s a huge number — 167 billion barrels — when Alberta only produces about three million barrels a day right now,” said Mike Verney, executive vice-president at McDaniel & Associates, which earlier this year updated the province’s oil and gas reserves on behalf of the Alberta Energy Regulator.

Already fourth in the world, the assessment found Alberta’s oil reserves increased by seven billion barrels.

Verney said the rise in reserves despite record production is in part a result of improved processes and technology.

“Oil sands companies can produce for decades at the same economic threshold as they do today. That’s a great place to be,” said Michael Berger, a senior analyst with Enverus.

BMO Capital Markets estimates that Alberta’s oil sands reserves could maintain current production rates for more than 140 years.

The long-term picture looks different south of the border.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration projects that American production will peak before 2030 and enter a long period of decline.

Having a lasting stable source of supply is important as world oil demand is expected to remain strong for decades to come.

This is particularly true in Asia, the target market for oil exports off Canada’s West Coast.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) projects oil demand in the Asia-Pacific region will go from 35 million barrels per day in 2024 to 41 million barrels per day in 2050.

The growing appeal of Alberta oil in Asian markets shows up not only in expanded Trans Mountain shipments, but also in Canadian crude being “re-exported” from U.S. Gulf Coast terminals.

According to RBN Energy, Asian buyers – primarily in China – are now the main non-U.S. buyers from Trans Mountain, while India dominates  purchases of re-exports from the U.S. Gulf Coast. .

BMO said the oil sands offers advantages both in steady supply and lower overall environmental impacts.

“Not only is the resulting stability ideally suited to backfill anticipated declines in world oil supply, but the long-term physical footprint may also be meaningfully lower given large-scale concentrated emissions, high water recycling rates and low well declines,” BMO analysts said.

Continue Reading

Trending

X