This article supplied by Troy Media.

 By Perry Kinkaide

China is an example of AI surveillance in action. Canada should take that as a warning, not a blueprint

China shows what happens when artificial intelligence is weaponized by the state.

Its Social Credit System, a nationwide framework to rate the “trustworthiness” of citizens and businesses, decides whether people can get a loan, buy a home, travel abroad or even move freely inside the country by merging financial records, online activity, travel history and facial recognition data into one algorithmic profile.

Sold as a way to curb fraud and tax evasion, it quickly became a tool to track political loyalty and personal behaviour the state doesn’t like. Step out of line, and the system punishes you.

Canadians should treat China’s misuse of AI as a warning. AI is advancing so fast that, without strict limits, we could slide into a similar dystopian future—one where governments promise efficiency and safety but use technology to tighten control over everyday life.

It wouldn’t take much for such a system to take root here. The data, the technology and the surveillance tools already exist. All that’s missing is the
decision to connect them.

Canadian governments have already shown they are willing to impose sweeping controls and restrict freedoms when faced with dissent or crisis. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Liberal government invoked the Emergencies Act—a law that grants Ottawa extraordinary temporary powers, including the ability to freeze bank accounts and bypass normal parliamentary debate—to limit movement in response to protests. Across Canada, governments closed businesses, banned gatherings, restricted travel within and outside the country, and introduced vaccine passport systems that
restricted access to certain public spaces.

Now imagine those same powers supercharged by AI—able to track, predict and act in real time, with decisions automated and enforcement instant. What used to be broad and temporary restrictions could become precise, ongoing controls that are almost impossible to resist.

A Canadian version of China’s Social Credit System could link tax filings, health records, driver’s licences, transit passes, social media accounts and other personal data. When once-separate databases are linked, previously separate pieces of information combine into a detailed profile, making it far easier to monitor, predict and restrict a person’s actions. With that much linked information, governments wouldn’t just know what you’ve done—they could control what you’re allowed to do next. That’s not a distant, sci-fi scenario.

This is why regulation matters—but Canada’s current plan falls short. The proposed Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA), part of Bill C-27, is meant to be Canada’s first law governing artificial intelligence systems that could have major impacts on people’s lives. These so-called “high-impact” systems include AI used in areas like health care, hiring, law enforcement, credit scoring and critical infrastructure—technologies where errors, bias or abuse could have serious consequences.

On paper, AIDA would regulate these systems, require risk assessments and keep humans in the loop for key decisions. But with its narrow scope, weak enforcement powers and a rollout that could take years before its rules are fully in force, it risks becoming a safety net with a hole in the middle, in effect more about managing political optics than preventing abuse.

AI surveillance is no longer a future threat—it’s already here. It combines cameras, sensors and massive databases to track people in real time, often without their knowledge or consent. It can predict behaviour, automate decisions and enforce rules instantly. Mustafa Suleyman, in The Coming Wave, warns that AI must be contained before it becomes uncontrollable. Shoshana Zuboff, in The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, reaches the same conclusion: AI is tailor-made for mass monitoring, and once embedded, these systems are almost impossible to dismantle.

Some insist that slowing AI’s development would be pointless, that other nations and corporations would race ahead. But that argument is dangerously naive. History shows that once governments and corporations gain powerful surveillance tools, they don’t give them up—they expand their reach, change their purpose and tighten their grip.

China’s example proves the point. The Social Credit System was never just about unpaid debts or tax evasion. Its real purpose has always been to track people and control their behaviour. Today, it measures political loyalty as much as financial reliability, punishing citizens for anything from joining a protest to criticizing the government online. Jobs, housing, education and even the right to travel can be revoked with a few keystrokes. Once a government is allowed to define “public good” and enforce it algorithmically, freedom becomes a privilege—granted or taken away at will.

Yes, AI-driven surveillance can catch criminals, detect threats and manage crises. But those benefits come at a cost. Once such a system is in place, it rarely returns to its original purpose. It finds new uses, and it becomes permanent.

The choice for Canadians is clear: demand enforceable laws, transparent oversight and real accountability now—before it’s too late.

Dr. Perry Kinkaide is a visionary leader and change agent. Since retiring in 2001, he has served as an advisor and director for various organizations and founded the Alberta Council of Technologies Society in 2005. Previously, he held leadership roles at KPMG Consulting and the Alberta Government. He holds a BA from Colgate University and an MSc and PhD in Brain Research from the University of Alberta.

Troy Media empowers Canadian community news outlets by providing independent, insightful analysis and commentary. Our mission is to support local media in helping Canadians stay informed and engaged by delivering reliable content that strengthens community connections and deepens understanding across the country

MxM News

Quick Hit:

The White House says California’s sanctuary state policies are to blame for last week’s Florida Turnpike crash that left three Americans dead. The truck driver, an illegal alien carrying a California-issued commercial license, made a reckless U-turn that ended in tragedy.

Key Details:

• The driver, an Indian national in the U.S. illegally, carried a California commercial license — which the White House said “put the lives of American citizens at risk every single day.”
• Governor Gavin Newsom refused to back down, insisting that licenses for illegals “improve public safety.” The White House called that defense “callous” and “reckless.”
• Homeland Security vowed to hold the driver accountable, declaring: “We pray for the victims and their families. Secretary Noem and DHS are working around the clock to protect the public and get these criminal illegal aliens out of America.”

3 innocent people were killed in Florida because Gavin Newsom’s California DMV issued an illegal alien a Commercial Driver’s License—this state of governance is asinine.

How many more innocent people have to die before @GavinNewsom stops playing games with the safety of the… pic.twitter.com/chT7ln1TTZ

— Tricia McLaughlin (@TriciaOhio) August 18, 2025

Diving Deeper:

Three lives were lost on the Florida Turnpike when an illegal alien truck driver made an outrageous U-turn across the highway. But according to the White House, the wreck goes beyond one man’s reckless decision — it traces directly back to California’s sanctuary state policies.

The driver, an Indian national who entered the country illegally, carried a commercial driver’s license issued by California under rules signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom. The White House didn’t hold back: “The illegal alien is an Indian national who was granted a commercial driver’s license by the so-called ‘sanctuary state’ of California, whose reckless policies put the lives of American citizens at risk every single day.”

Rather than express regret, Newsom doubled down. He defended the licensing of illegal aliens as a policy that “improves public safety.” The administration blasted that claim, saying California’s priorities put ideology above lives — and in this case, left three Florida families grieving.

Homeland Security made clear that the Trump administration will not allow the driver to slip through the cracks. “How many more innocent people have to die before Gavin Newsom stops playing games with the safety of the American public?” the statement asked. “We pray for the victims and their families. Secretary Noem and DHS are working around the clock to protect the public and get these criminal illegal aliens out of America.”

The crash itself — a truck blocking every lane as a minivan plowed helplessly into the trailer — was horrific enough. But for the White House, the greater outrage is that California handed a license to someone who never should have been behind the wheel in the first place.