Business
No Ministers, No Progress, Opposition Corners the Liberals in Ottawa

Conservatives and the Bloc demand cabinet face the hot seat before C-4 moves forward and open an investigation into offshore billions
Here’s the story. The Liberals jammed through their so-called affordability bill, C-4. And they didn’t wait for debate. Instead, they used a procedural shortcut called a Ways and Means motion. What does that mean? In Ottawa, a Ways and Means motion is the tool the government uses to make tax changes legally binding the moment the motion passes in the House of Commons even before the bill has gone through committee hearings or votes in Parliament.
So right now, the tax hikes, credits, and changes in C-4 are already in effect. Canadians are paying under these rules today. Yes, MPs on the Finance Committee are “studying” the bill, they’ll hold hearings, hear witnesses, and go through it line by line in what’s called clause-by-clause review. That’s normally the stage where MPs can debate and amend legislation. But with C-4, it’s happening after the fact.
Think about that. Implementation first, scrutiny later.
But this week, the opposition finally said: enough. Conservatives and the Bloc forced a new rule: no clause-by-clause until the ministers show up. Finance, Housing, Environment. One hour each. Separate panels. No ministers? No progress.
Why did they have to do this? Because the government has been stalling for months, refusing to commit to dates. Instead of ministers showing up in person, Liberals kept offering up everyone but the actual decision-makers, deputy ministers, senior bureaucrats, even departmental staff. The excuse? The ministers were “busy” all summer on so-called budget consultations which mostly looked like taxpayer-funded travel and photo-ops. Bloc MPs literally laughed when Liberal MP Ryan Turnbull tried to pass that off as a defense. And they were right to laugh.
For once, bureaucrats don’t get to hide behind their bosses’ schedules. The ministers themselves now have to sit in the hot seat, face MPs directly, and explain their decisions.
And it gets better. The committee also voted to launch a probe into offshore tax havens, the globalist money-laundering operations where billions vanish every year while small businesses get crushed by CRA audits. Remember the Panama Papers? The Paradise Papers? We learned then that Canada’s so-called revenue agency cut sweetheart deals with the rich, let corporate giants off the hook for billions, while squeezing ordinary taxpayers for every penny. Well, now Parliament is going to drag this into the light. Six meetings minimum. Finance officials. CRA brass. The Parliamentary Budget Officer. Even law-enforcement experts in financial crime. Imagine that… accountability.
And of course, the Liberals tried to stall it. They buried language in the motion that said the tax-haven probe could only begin “after the conclusion” of the affordability study, code for months of delay while ministers played hide-and-seek with their schedules. Why would they want that? Think about it: this is the same government hinting at cuts, floating austerity, telling Canadian public sector to brace for restraint. Yet at the same time, they show zero urgency in chasing down up to approx. $50 billion a year leaking into offshore tax shelters. Why on earth wouldn’t they want to plug that hole before they slash programs or raise taxes? But the opposition caught it, ripped it out, and forced a rewrite: the tax-haven study runs at the same time as C-4. No more excuses.
So what does this tell you? It tells you two things. First, the Liberals will rig process any way they can to avoid scrutiny, implement first, answer questions never. And second, when opposition MPs actually use the tools at their disposal, the swamp can be forced to act. Billions are at stake. Billions that should be lowering your taxes, funding real infrastructure, protecting Canadians instead of vanishing into shell companies in Barbados.
So the question is simple: will this committee have the courage to follow through? Or will the Liberals and their media allies smother it in delay and jargon until the public forgets?
One thing’s for sure: the smell of panic is back in Ottawa. And for taxpayers who’ve been bled dry while watching global elites hide their fortunes offshore, that’s very good news.
Subscribe to The Opposition with Dan Knight
I’m an independent Canadian journalist exposing corruption, delivering unfiltered truths and untold stories.
Invite your friends and earn rewards
If you enjoy The Opposition with Dan Knight , share it with your friends and earn rewards when they subscribe.
Business
Public Safety Minister admits gun buyback program is waste of money and resources – 742,000,000 projected cost to taxpayers

From Conservative Party Communications
A decade of reckless Liberal soft-on-crime, bail-not-jail policies have left a majority of Canadians feeling unsafe in their own neighbourhoods with a justice system that works against them. Violent crime has increased by 55%, gun crime 130% and extortion 330%.
Instead of repealing their hug-a-thug laws that put criminals first and victims last, Mark Carney’s hapless Minister of Public Safety is pushing a failed gun buyback program that he admits is a waste of money that will do nothing to keep Canadians safe.
Yesterday, in a leaked recording, Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree was caught telling the truth about the failed Liberal buyback boondoggle while breaching basic ethics:
The program is all for votes
“Quebec is in a different place than other parts of Canada, right? And this is something that is very much a big, big, big deal for many of the Quebec electorate that voted for us, right? And that’s one of the major things. I think it’s, I saw, I’m sure you’ve seen these articles where people said, you know, this is one of the things we should not execute, like as a change from Trudeau’s policies, but we’ve made the decision to go ahead.”
Carney forced me
“But this is the mandate I was given by Carney to complete this…if I were to redo this from scratch, I would have a very different process.”
I’ll pay you back
“In your case, what are your losses? You tell me, I’ll personally offset you.”
Ignore the law, I’ll bail you out
“I’m not going to send the police to you…I doubt (the program) is going to go that far…I will come and bail you out if that happens, I will. You call me.”
Mark Carney has admitted “the vast majority of firearms, illegal firearms, firearms used in crime come across our border,” yet the Liberals are continuing with a confiscation program that goes after legal, trained, tested and licensed Canadian firearms owners. That includes confiscating hunting rifles from Indigenous people exercising their treaty rights to hunt.
Anandasangaree’s buyback boondoggle is conservatively estimated to cost $742 million for a program the Minister himself admits is a waste of money and resources, pursued purely for political gain. $742 million represents 5,000 RCMP officers, 300 port scanners or 37,000 addiction treatment beds. That’s money that could go to restoring safety on our streets, ending gun smuggling and bringing our loved ones home drug-free.
Offering to bail out his tenant from criminal charges is not the first time Anandasangaree has been accused of not being impartial while upholding the law as Minister. After it was discovered he implored CBSA to overturn an immigration decision despite national security concerns, he was forced to recuse himself from files involving terrorist groups “to ensure that there is no perception of any conflict”. The Minister claimed he was simply helping a constituent, but that was also revealed to be a lie.
All of these failures stack on top of an abysmal record. The Minister has failed to ban the extortionist Bishnoi Gang and lost almost 600 non-citizen criminals in Canada, 70% of whom committed serious crimes such as sexual assault. In the pursuit of the buyback boondoggle, he’s also breaking his promise to add 1,000 RCMP and 1,000 CBSA officers.
These failures have real-world consequences: Canadians no longer feel safe in their own homes, and with good reason. This cannot go on. Mark Carney appointed Anandasangaree as Public Safety Minister. He must own up to his terrible judgment, hold his Minister accountable and fire Minister Anandasangaree.
Business
X challenges Ireland’s ‘Online Safety Code,’ warns of EU-wide censorship threat

From LifeSiteNews
By Cindy Harper
Musk’s X platform says Ireland is overreaching with censorship rules that undermine EU law and risk creating fragmented, state-controlled internet regimes.
X is mounting a fresh legal challenge against Ireland’s censorship-driven “Online Safety Code,” seeking to reverse a High Court ruling that dismissed its case earlier this summer.
The company argues the new regulatory framework opens the door to broad censorship and undermines legal protections for speech across the European Union.
The original lawsuit, heard earlier this year, focused on whether Ireland’s code went beyond the authority granted by the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD) and conflicted with the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA).
The court ruled in July that the code fell within the limits of both, stating that the Irish regulator had acted lawfully under the 2022 Online Safety and Media Regulation Act.
That judgment has now been challenged.
X has warned that the ruling sets a precedent that affects all 27 member states. The company said in a statement that the code effectively stretches across the entire bloc, with heavy reporting demands and the threat of large fines for what it called “slip-ups.”
“This ruling opens the door for national watchdogs to go even further,” the company stated, voicing concern over the long-term implications of allowing individual states to impose stricter content controls.
While governments frame these laws as protecting users from online harm, X argued the result could be a fractured regulatory landscape that breaks apart the EU’s digital single market.
“While pitched as child protection and harm reduction, the Online Safety Code threatens to splinter Europe’s digital single market by opening the door to a patchwork of conflicting local laws.”
Last October, Ireland's media regulator, Coimisiún na Meán, rolled out its Online Safety Code—a binding set of rules under the Online Safety and Media Regulation Act of 2022. Created for video-sharing platforms like X, it initially included general obligations in November, and…
— Global Government Affairs (@GlobalAffairs) September 3, 2025
X also argued that the code grants Irish regulators disproportionate authority to control online content and warned that it could conflict with basic civil liberties.
“It risks curbing freedom of speech in ways that clash with the European Convention on Human Rights,” the company stated. “Free expression is non-negotiable, and we’ll keep fighting for a unified, open internet where voices aren’t silenced by fragmented overregulation.”
The company emphasized that it would not retreat from the legal fight. “X isn’t backing down,” the statement read.
The Online Safety Code, introduced last year by Coimisiún na Meán, applies to video-sharing platforms and includes obligations that have steadily become more stringent.
In addition to broad content monitoring duties, platforms must implement age verification tools and submit quarterly compliance reports or face financial penalties.
Supporters of Ireland’s approach say it complements the EU’s DSA, which took effect in February and established a set of common rules for major online platforms. But these laws have been criticized for shifting the balance away from free expression and toward centralized control over what can be said online.
Ireland plays an outsized role in how these rules are applied, given the number of global tech giants that operate out of Dublin.
Any content regulation introduced there inevitably affects users far beyond the country’s borders, turning national policy into de facto EU-wide enforcement.
Reprinted with permission from Reclaim The Net.
-
Agriculture2 days ago
Ottawa’s EV Gamble Just Cost Canola Farmers Billions
-
Crime2 days ago
Conservatives Re-Introduce Bill to Ensure Paul Bernardo Stays in Maximum Security Prison
-
Business2 days ago
How the feds blew your money this week
-
Frontier Centre for Public Policy2 days ago
Charlie Kirk Fought A Progressive Ideology That Punishes Truth
-
Censorship Industrial Complex2 days ago
Media’s Psyop Against Climate Scientists
-
Business2 days ago
Canadian gov’t spending on DEI programs exceeds $1 billion since 2016
-
Crime2 days ago
Charlie Kirk’s Widow Says She Forgives Her Husband’s Assassin During Memorial
-
Bruce Dowbiggin1 day ago
Choking The Night Away: Can Blue Jays/ Tigers Recover?