Media
Matt Walsh: CBS pushes dangerous free speech narrative, suggests it led to the Holocaust
MxM News
Quick Hit:
CBS News is facing backlash after host Margaret Brennan suggested on-air that free speech played a role in enabling the Holocaust. The comments came amid a broader discussion on censorship in Germany and Vice President JD Vance’s speech at the Munich Security Conference. Daily Wire commentator Matt Walsh dismantled the claim, calling it an example of the media’s ongoing push for authoritarian control under the guise of democracy.
Key Details:
-
Margaret Brennan’s Remark: CBS’s Brennan questioned whether “weaponized free speech” allowed the Nazis to carry out the Holocaust.
-
Historical Context: Walsh noted that pre-Nazi Germany had strict hate speech laws, contradicting Brennan’s assertion.
-
Media Hypocrisy: CBS recently praised Germany’s government for conducting pre-dawn raids on citizens over online speech.
Diving Deeper:
Daily Wire commentator Matt Walsh sharply criticized CBS News for pushing what he described as an “astonishingly ignorant” argument about free speech. In a segment on Face the Nation, host Margaret Brennan questioned whether the Holocaust was made possible by an unregulated public discourse, saying, “Didn’t the Nazis weaponize free speech to conduct a genocide?”
Walsh wasted no time dissecting the absurdity of Brennan’s claim. “It doesn’t actually mean anything to ‘weaponize free speech to conduct a genocide.’ The words don’t come together in a way that makes any sense,” he wrote. “It’s like saying the Nazis ‘weaponized air to conduct a genocide.’”
He then pointed out the historical reality that completely undermines Brennan’s argument. “Before the Nazis rose to power, Weimar Germany had laws against so-called ‘hate speech,’ including laws that prohibited hate speech against Jews,” Walsh noted. In fact, German authorities cracked down on dissenting voices long before Hitler’s rise, shutting down newspapers and banning public speeches. Yet, as history showed, these restrictions did nothing to stop the Nazis from gaining power.
The discussion around free speech restrictions comes at a critical time in Europe, as Germany prepares for a major election where the nationalist party, Alternative for Germany (AfD), is surging in popularity. The establishment media has repeatedly labeled AfD “far-right,” despite the party’s focus on issues like border control, energy independence, and rejecting radical gender ideology.
This broader push for censorship was highlighted by a separate CBS segment showcasing how German authorities now conduct pre-dawn raids on people over online speech deemed offensive. Walsh highlighted the disturbing reality of the situation: “Try to imagine how CBS would be covering raids like this if they came at the direction of Donald Trump.”
The media’s reaction to Vice President JD Vance’s speech at the Munich Security Conference further underscored their bias. The Ohio senator directly challenged European elites on their handling of migration and security, prompting outrage from diplomats and bureaucrats alike. Christoph Heusgen, the conference chair and a former German diplomat, went so far as to break down in tears in his farewell speech—a moment Walsh ridiculed as a “new low in global leadership.”
For Walsh, the media’s selective outrage over free speech and censorship is telling. “The corporate press isn’t actually concerned about the rise of an authoritarian government,” he concluded. “They just want to make sure they’re the ones running it.”
Media
Breaking News: the public actually expects journalists to determine the truth of statements they report
CBC’s David Cochrane explaining to viewers how the CBC is blameless for accurately reporting a statement later determined to be false
Who knew? Plus! Online smartassery by reporters continues to curse the industry, Vancouver loves Harry Potter (shhhh!), layoffs continue and newspaper revenue now in uncontrolled descent
Journalists just love sensational political accusations and way too many of them are more than happy to spread them far and wide while shrugging aside their first obligation, the truth.
Why they put so much faith in the honesty of politicians, who have a history of being a bit, shall we say, truthy, is quite beyond me, but reporters often seem more interested in it being true something salacious was said than they are whether the scandalous thing that was said is true.
To help save journalism from bad journalism please subscribe to The Rewrite.
A fine example of this behaviour, which continues to undermine public trust in journalism, unfolded a week ago. That was when freshly-minted Liberal MP and Tory turncoat Chris d’Entremont told the CBC’s Catherine Cullen that, after publicly musing about crossing the floor, “Conservative House leader Andrew Scheer and party whip Chris Warkentin “barged” into his office, pushed open the door — almost knocking down his assistant — and yelled at him about “how much of a snake” he was.”
The Conservatives, in response, issued a statement accusing d’Entremont of telling barefaced lies and described a much calmer scenario. CBC then issued a correction after d’Entremont “clarified” an embellishment but some journalists were happy to ignore that and stick with repeating the original, more salacious version.
Stu Benson of The Hill Times enthusiastically Tweeted that ““[D’Entremont] says Conservative House leader Andrew Scheer and party whip Chris Warkentin ‘barged’ into his office, pushed his assistant aside and yelled at him about ‘how much of a snake’ he was.”
National Newswatch, despite CBC’s correction still had a Tweet up days later stating “Pushing, yelling from Conservative leadership ‘sealed the deal’ on defection: d’Entremont. MP says Conservatives felt like ‘part of a frat house rather than a serious political party.”
 |
Ignoring the correction and “clarification,” CBC’s Power & Politics used the clip of d’Entremont’s self-confessed embellishment and repeated what both he and the CBC knew not to be true. To be fair, the segment that can be found here fully details the Conservatives’ response but, according to one of the CBC’s most diligent critics, no on air correction has been made. Instead, host David Cochrane went out of his way to point out that while his editors had used the term “correction,” the CBC was blameless for reporting d’Entremont’s admittedly false representation of the event.
The pattern of behaviour indicates to the public that news organizations do not take their obligation to the truth seriously. The public actually expects journalists to seek to establish the truth of statements they are reporting before they report them.
Edmonton City News reporter Sean Amato meanwhile managed to take foolish online smartassery to a new level when, repeating the Liberals’ Trump = Tories theme, he posted:
“Quite the press conference from (Conservative Leader) Pierre Poilievre in Calgary today. Basically…the Liberals suck, the media sucks and a lot of other stuff in Canada sucks. Hey, it worked for Trump.”
Tens of thousands of views and (at time of writing) more than 500 comments later, he replied with renewed smug smartassery:
“Never thought a tweet that says “the Liberals suck, the media sucks” would anger so many Conservatives. But here we are 
.”
Here we are, indeed. Amato appears to have set a new personal best for comments in response to one of his Tweets while simultaneously embedding the impression that not only he but all journalists are biased against Conservatives. And, I ask, for what? And why?
Maybe think before you Tweet or, better yet, just shut up. Many good journalists find that works just fine.
Amato, though, seems determined to prioritize personal commentary over journalism. When he recently got some pushback on lack of objectivity, his response was unrepentant.
“Bonnie…mute me, follow people you like, no hard feelings. But let me be free too. Cheers!”
Liberation awaits.
The “controversial” Harry Potter Forbidden Forest experience opened 10 days ago in Vancouver, weeks after the parks board, cowed by trans activists, vowed such an event would never happen again.
The distress of the “Qmunity” over the connection to J.K. Rowling and her vocal insistence on a traditional definition of women was well documented in the weeks leading up to the event. But there was nary a peep from CTV, CBC or Global News when organizers announced on media day that the pre-sales were the largest they had experienced anywhere in the world.
I found coverage in The Daily Hive and in Black Press papers in British Columbia. But it wasn’t until Remembrance Day that one of the city’s legacy media, the Vancouver Sun, delivered a review of any kind. CBC, CTV and Global News appear to be boycotting.
To help save journalism from bad journalism please subscribe to The Rewrite.
Operating revenue for Canada’s publishers continues to plummet – an indication the nation’s newspapers are increasingly unable to deliver the readers needed to provide results to advertisers.
Statscan reported a decline of a whopping 17.9 per cent since 2022, which compares with a drop of 7.3 percent from 2020-2022.
News Media Canada lobbyist Paul Deegan, meanwhile, confessed to a House of Commons committee that operators “cannot make a buck as a digital-only publisher,” have failed to transition their business models and still need revenue from print.
Profit margins, according to Statscan, are down to 3.2 per cent.
Postmedia, meanwhile, is later than usual in posting its annual report but has a little under another two weeks to do so.
Last week, The Rewrite noted how an extra $150 million from the government for the CBC would be bad news for everyone else in the business. This week, Groupe TVA announced it was eliminating 87 positions and laid the blame squarely at Prime Minister Mark Carney’s door.
“Repeated appeals to government authorities to support the private television industry, at a time when it faces fierce competition from the web giants and CBC/Radio-Canada, have been ignored,” a company statement explained.
Poilievre, who has been the focus lately of much of the press inclined to favour the Liberals, tried to shame media into paying some attention to dissent from the likes of Beaches-East York MP Nate Erskine-Smith within Liberal ranks.
It was left to the Toronto Star’s Althia Raj to gently explain to his Deputy Leader, Melissa Lantsman, why dissent within Liberal ranks is not a story because, unlike dissent with Conservative ranks, it’s in the best interests of the country.
“Nate has normalized independent thought so it isn’t new/s,” she wrote. “IMO it would be nice to see this from other MPs. Those outside of cabinet, their job is to hold the govt to account. More independent thought means better reports, better debate, better policy. Better social cohesion too.”
Take that, you silly Tories! 
The narrative is entrenched.
Some of you will remember how last fall, CTV News terminated two employees following the doctoring of Poilievre’s quotes in a fashion not too dissimilar to that used by the producers of a Panorama documentary at the BBC. Two of the BBC’s senior executives walked the plank there when it was revealed its team had intentionally misrepresented a speech by US President Donald Trump, who then threatened to sue the organization for $1 billion.
Well, one of those fired CTV employees, Derek Thacker, is back on the list of approved Parliamentary Press Gallery members as an employee of Global News.
Don’t forget to check out this week’s Full Press podcast and, if you haven’t done so yet, click at least one of the Subscribe, Share or Donate buttons provided.
(Peter Menzies is a commentator and consultant on media, Macdonald-Laurier Institute Senior Fellow, a past publisher of the Calgary Herald, a former vice chair of the CRTC and a National Newspaper Award winner.)
To help save journalism from bad journalism please subscribe to The Rewrite.
For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.
From Resource Works
By Stewart Muir
What if the secret to understanding Canada’s energy future lies not in spreadsheets but in storytelling?
When I think about who has done the most to make sense of Canada’s energy story — not just in charts and forecasts but in human terms — Peter Tertzakian sits near the top of that list. He’s an energy economist, author, and communicator who has spent decades helping Canadians understand the world beneath their light switches and fuel gauges — and why prosperity, energy, and responsible development are inseparable.
Peter is the founder and CEO of Studio.Energy. He is also widely known as the founder of the ARC Energy Research Institute and co-host of the ARC Energy Ideas podcast, alongside Jackie Forrest. Week after week, they unpack what’s happening in the markets, in technology, and in policy, always with the rare gift of clarity. He’s also the author of two influential books, A Thousand Barrels a Second and The End of Energy Obesity, both written long before “energy transition” became a household term.
When we sat down for our Power Struggle conversation, I mentioned how remarkable it is that someone with Peter’s credentials — an economist, investor, and advisor to industry — is also an exhibiting artist whose photography can regularly be found in a gallery in the Canadian Rockies. That’s when he smiled and said what has become one of his signature lines: “I’ve always said a picture is worth a thousand spreadsheets.”
What followed was a fascinating discussion about how visual storytelling can bridge the gap between data and understanding. Peter explained that what began as a hobby has evolved into a personal quest to communicate complex energy subjects more effectively. His photographs, which range from industrial scenes to landscapes shaped by human activity, help connect the emotional and analytical sides of the energy story. The pictures, he said, reveal the same truths that his spreadsheets do — only in a way that more people can feel.
That resonates deeply with what we do at Resource Works — translating complexity into clarity so that Canadians can see how responsible resource development strengthens communities, funds public services, and opens doors for Indigenous partnerships. Like Peter, we believe that understanding energy isn’t about choosing sides; it’s about understanding systems, trade-offs, and the people behind the numbers.
Peter’s concern — and one I share — is how difficult it has become to find truth amid the noise. “People are bombarded by noise, especially today. And not all of that noise is true,” he said. “The challenge now is extracting the signal.” Whether you’re a policymaker, a corporate leader, or just someone trying to make sense of global change, Peter’s approach is to step away from confrontation and toward comprehension. His ability to blend visuals, narrative, and numbers makes complicated issues accessible without oversimplifying them.
Prosperity, Not Population, Drives Energy Demand
Our conversation also turned to the forces shaping global energy demand. Peter reminded me that the biggest driver isn’t population growth — it’s prosperity. “When a person moves from a rural setting to a city, their energy consumption goes up twentyfold, sometimes more,” he said. The story of urbanization, particularly in China, explains much of the past few decades of energy growth. Renewables have slowed that curve, but as Peter points out, “our use of fossil fuels is still growing.”
What I most admire about Peter is that he doesn’t preach. “I don’t have all the answers,” he told me. “My role is to discuss treatment options — not to perform the surgery.” It’s a refreshingly honest stance in a world where too many experts claim certainty.
On Power Struggle, Peter Tertzakian reminded me why he’s so respected across the energy world: he brings intelligence without ego, curiosity without ideology, and a deep respect for the audience’s ability to think. His work reminds us that Canada’s resource story — when told with honesty and creativity — is one of innovation, community, and shared prosperity. And that storytelling — visual, verbal, and numerical — remains our most powerful tool for navigating change.
- Power Struggle audio and transcript
- Peter Tertzakian in Arc Energy Research Institute podcasts
- Peter Tertzakian on X
- Peter Tertzakian on LinkedIn
- Stewart Muir on X
- Stewart Muir on LinkedIn
Power Struggle on social media
- Power Struggle on LinkedIn
- Power Struggle on Instagram
- Power Struggle on Facebook
- Power Struggle on X
Chinese-Owned Trailer Park Beside U.S. Stealth Bomber Base Linked to Alleged Vancouver Repression Case
US Nuclear Bomber Fleet Shares Fence With Trailer Park Linked To Chinese Intel-Tied Fraudster
School defunding petition in Alberta is a warning to parents
Bovaer Backlash Update: Danish Farmers Get Green Light to Opt Out as UK Arla Trial Abruptly Ends!
-
espionage2 days ago
Chinese-Owned Trailer Park Beside U.S. Stealth Bomber Base Linked to Alleged Vancouver Repression Case
-
Daily Caller2 days ago
US Nuclear Bomber Fleet Shares Fence With Trailer Park Linked To Chinese Intel-Tied Fraudster
-
Daily Caller2 days agoLaura Ingraham Presses Trump On Allowing Flood Of Chinese Students Into US
-
Crime18 hours agoCBSA Bust Uncovers Mexican Cartel Network in Montreal High-Rise, Moving Hundreds Across Canada-U.S. Border
-
Business2 days agoCarney’s Floor-Crossing Campaign. A Media-Staged Bid for Majority Rule That Erodes Democracy While Beijing Hovers
-
Environment19 hours agoThe Myths We’re Told About Climate Change | Michael Shellenberger
-
Energy1 day agoIt should not take a crisis for Canada to develop the resources that make people and communities thrive.
-
Dr John Campbell1 day agoCures for Cancer? A new study shows incredible results from cheap generic drug Fenbendazole