COVID-19
Italy’s ex-health minister under investigation for murder after allegedly covering up COVID jab deaths
Roberto Speranza, former health minister of Italy
From LifeSiteNews
Multiple outlets in Italy are reporting that former health minister Roberto Speranza is one of two officials under investigation for ‘ideological forgery’ and murder for allegedly covering up COVID shot injuries and deaths.
Italy’s former health minister is under investigation for murder after allegedly covering up deaths related to the COVID-19 vaccines.
The Italian TV network Rete 4 published internal documents from the public prosecutor’s office showing that former Italian health minister Roberto Speranza and the former director of the Italian Medicines Agency (Aifa) are being investigated for “ideological forgery” and murder for their role in covering up COVID shot injuries and deaths.
The Italian newspaper La Verità confirmed the report by Rete 4 and quoted the public prosecutor Francesco Lo Voi, who said that he believes the conditions for opening the file against the two government officials were met.
Catholic outlet La Nuova Bussola reported that potential offenses by the former government officials include “bribery for the exercise of function,” “bribery for an act contrary to official duties,” ideological forgery committed by a public official, murder, personal injury, and administering medicines in a manner dangerous to public health.
The case was opened after a complaint was filed by lawyers representing a group of over 4,200 people who suffered injuries from the COVID jabs and is based on information uncovered by the so-called “Aifa leaks.”
According to La Nuova Bussola, the internal documents from “Aifa leaks” showed that Aifa executives issued orders to suppress and ignore reports of adverse events, including deaths, from the COVID shots, even though it was the agency’s responsibility to warn about them.
The host of Rete 4 show “Fuori dal coro,” Marianna Canè, said that for the Health Ministry and Aifa officials, “saving the vaccine was more important than saving people.”
La Nuova Bussola journalist Andrea Zambrano lamented the fact that most mainstream media outlets, apart from Rete 4 and La Verità, ignored the bombshell revelation of the former health minister being investigated for murder over his role in covering up vaccine injuries.
“The bond between the political power that has imposed an experimental vaccine on pain of loss of civil rights and the media power that has conveyed this imposition by passing it off as a civic duty is still as strong as ever and is in no danger of being undermined,” Zambrano wrote.
In early 2022, Italy’s government, led by Prime Minister Mario Draghi, introduced a draconian vaccine mandate for all citizens over the age of 50 after having previously imposed a general vaccine mandate for certain occupations: school staff, health care workers, the police, and the military.
Multiple studies have found that COVID-19 shots increase the risk of heart inflammation, including a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-sponsored study which concedes that the jab increases the risk of myocarditis in children. Another FDA-funded study showed that the COVID shots increase the risk of strokes in the elderly.
Are governments around the world covering up COVID jab injuries?
Italy is not the only country where politicians are accused of suppressing data that points to the severe damage to people’s health caused by the COVID vaccines.
This month, a whistleblower who revealed government data that allegedly shows a connection between the excess deaths and the COVID jabs in New Zealand was arrested and is facing seven years in prison in what looks like a cover-up operation by the government of former Prime Minister and WEF “Young Global Leader“ Jacinda Ardern.
There has been a massive increase in excess deaths in many countries around the world since the COVID shot rollouts, especially in highly-jabbed regions and in young people who would typically not be expected to die in large numbers at their age. Many critics of the mainstream COVID narrative, like British MP Andrew Bridgen, have credibly argued that the COVID jabs have to be responsible for this sudden increase in excess deaths.
COVID-19
Crown still working to put Lich and Barber in jail
From LifeSiteNews
The Crown’s appeal claims the judge made a mistake in her verdict on the intimidation charges, and also in how she treated aggravating and mitigating factors regarding sentencing.
Government lawyers for the Crown have filed an appeal the acquittals of Freedom Convoy leaders Tamara Lich and Chris Barber on intimidation charges.
The Crown also wants their recent 18-month conditional sentence on mischief charges replaced with harsher penalties, which could include possible jail time.
According to the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), it is “asking the Ontario Court of Appeal to enter a conviction on the intimidation charge or order a new trial on that count,” for Barber’s charges.
Specifically, the Crown’s appeal claims that the judge made a mistake in her verdict on the intimidation charges, and also in how she treated aggravating and mitigating factors regarding sentencing.
As reported by LifeSiteNews, both Lich and Barber have filed appeals of their own against their house arrest sentences, arguing that the trial judge did not correctly apply the law on their mischief charges.
Barber’s lawyer, Diane Magas, said that her client “relied in good faith on police and court direction during the protest. The principles of fairness and justice require that citizens not be punished for following the advice of authorities. We look forward to presenting our arguments before the Court.”
On October 7, Ontario Court Justice Heather Perkins-McVey sentenced Lich and Chris Barber to 18 months’ house arrest after being convicted earlier in the year of “mischief.”
Lich was given 18 months less time already spent in custody, amounting to 15 1/2 months.
Lich and Barber were declared guilty of mischief for their roles as leaders of the protest against COVID mandates in April 2022, and as social media influencers. The conviction came after a nearly two-year trial despite the non-violent nature of the popular movement.
The Lich and Barber trial concluded in September 2024, more than a year after it began. It was originally scheduled to last 16 days.
As reported by LifeSiteNews, the Canadian government was hoping to put Lich in jail for no less than seven years and Barber for eight years.
LifeSiteNews recently reported that Lich detailed her restrictive house arrest conditions, revealing she is “not” able to leave her house or even pick up her grandchildren from school without permission from the state.
As reported by LifeSiteNews, Lich, reflecting on her recent house arrest verdict, said she has no “remorse” and will not “apologize” for leading a movement that demanded an end to all COVID mandates.
COVID-19
Freedom Convoy leader Tamara Lich to appeal her recent conviction
From LifeSiteNews
Lawyers will argue that there is no evidence linking Tamara Lich ‘to the misdeeds of others.’
Freedom Convoy leader Tamara Lich said she will appeal her recent mischief conviction in an Ontario court, with her lawyers saying “there was no evidence linking her to the misdeeds of others.”
In a press release late yesterday, Lich’s legal team, headed by Lawrence Greenspon, Eric Granger, and Hannah Drennan, made the announcement.
“Lawyers for Tamara Lich filed Notice of Appeal in the Ontario Court of Appeal of the conviction for mischief arising out of the Freedom Convoy,” the release stated.
Lich’s legal team noted that there are two reasons for the principal grounds of appeal.
“While there was substantial evidence that Tamara encouraged the protesters to be peaceful, lawful and safe, there was no evidence linking her to the misdeeds of others,” they said.
The second reason for the appeal, according to Lich’s lawyers, is that the “trial judge failed to give effect to the principle that communication that would otherwise be mischief is protected by section 2(b) of the Charter, freedom of expression.”
On October 7, Ontario Court Justice Heather Perkins-McVey sentenced Lich and Chris Barber to 18 months’ house arrest after being convicted earlier in the year of “mischief.”
Lich was given 18 months less time already spent in custody, amounting to 15 1/2 months.
As reported by LifeSiteNews, the Canadian government was hoping to put Lich in jail for no less than seven years and Barber for eight years for their roles in the 2022 protests against COVID mandates.
Interestingly, Perkins-McVey said about Lich and Barber during the sentencing, “They came with the noblest of intent and did not advocate for violence.”
As reported by LifeSiteNews, Lich, reflecting on her recent sentencing of over a year’s house arrest for her role in the 2022 Freedom Convoy, laid bare the fact that when all is said in done, seven years of her life will have been spent in a government-imposed “lockdown” in one form or another.
LifeSiteNews recently reported that Lich detailed her restrictive house arrest conditions, revealing she is “not” able to leave her house or even pick up her grandkids from school without permission from the state.
As reported by LifeSiteNews, Lich, reflecting on her recent house arrest verdict, said she has no “remorse” and will not “apologize” for leading a movement that demanded an end to all COVID mandates.
-
espionage2 days agoU.S. Charges Three More Chinese Scholars in Wuhan Bio-Smuggling Case, Citing Pattern of Foreign Exploitation in American Research Labs
-
Business1 day agoCarney budget doubles down on Trudeau-era policies
-
COVID-191 day agoCrown still working to put Lich and Barber in jail
-
Business1 day agoCarney’s Deficit Numbers Deserve Scrutiny After Trudeau’s Forecasting Failures
-
Business1 day agoCarney budget continues misguided ‘Build Canada Homes’ approach
-
International1 day agoKazakhstan joins Abraham Accords, Trump says more nations lining up for peace
-
armed forces17 hours agoIt’s time for Canada to remember, the heroes of Kapyong
-
Business1 day agoHere’s what pundits and analysts get wrong about the Carney government’s first budget



