International
Is the US intelligence apparatus preparing the public for future election interference?
From LifeSiteNews
Is the warning perhaps not what it seems? Is it an attempt to provide camouflage — a strategy known as ‘pre-bunking’ — for future election interference sanctioned by the Washington political machine?
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) together with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) released a joint statement ostensibly intended to assure U.S. voters in advance that the 2024 election that, despite anticipated attacks on the country’s voting systems that might make getting election information hard for citizens to obtain, election results would nonetheless be unaffected and election integrity would be maintained.
The FBI is responsible for investigating and prosecuting election crimes and malicious cyber activity targeting election infrastructure. The CISA plays a role in securing election infrastructure from physical and cyber threats.
The joint statement, however, has been met with skepticism based on the earlier roles of both agencies in past elections and their participation in massive suppression of conservative voices in social media.
As such, is the warning perhaps not what it seems? Is it an attempt to provide camouflage — a strategy known as “pre-bunking” — for future election interference sanctioned by the Democrat-powered Washington political machine — a.k.a., the Deep State — that wants to maintain control of the White House and Congress at any cost?
“CISA & FBI issue bulletin that upcoming cyberattacks may ‘prevent the public from receiving timely information’ about the 2024 election,” conservative commentator Emerald Robinson wrote on X.
“These same agencies told you: America’s voting machines were never connected to the Internet,” Robinson noted.
BREAKING: CISA & FBI issue bulletin that upcoming cyberattacks may "prevent the public from receiving timely information" about the 2024 election.
These same agencies told you: America's voting machines were never connected to the Internet.
— Emerald Robinson ✝️ (@EmeraldRobinson) August 2, 2024
Jeanette Manfra, Acting Under Secretary for Cybersecurity and Communications at the Department of Homeland Security, told Congress in 2017 that America’s voting machines “are not connected to the internet.”
Manfra was responsible for the security of the nation’s voting system. Yet according to a 2020 report by NBC News, a team of 10 cybersecurity experts who specialize in voting systems and elections found nearly three dozen U.S. voting systems connected to the internet.
“We found over 35 (voting systems) had been left online and we’re still continuing to find more,” Kevin Skoglund, a senior technical adviser at the election security advocacy group National Election Defense Coalition, told NBC News at the time.
“We kept hearing from election officials that voting machines were never on the internet,” Skoglund said. “And we knew that wasn’t true. And so we set out to try and find the voting machines to see if we could find them on the internet, and especially the back-end systems that voting machines in the precinct were connecting to report their results.”
Can CISA be trusted?
“CISA has worked with Big Tech corporations to silence Americans since 2020,” noted Logan Washburn, writing at The Federalist last month. “A congressional report from last fall found it had become a “domestic intelligence and speech-police agency” whose behavior was ‘unconstitutional.’”
Last year, the Biden administration blocked the release of documents “revealing the extent to which deep state actors and their third-party allies interfered in the 2020 presidential election by pushing social media censorship,” according to a Breitbart report.
“The government seems particularly eager to stop the release of documents pertaining to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and the closely linked Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), both of which are under intense scrutiny for their 2020 interference efforts,” Breitbart’s Allum Bokhari wrote.
Bokhari reported in May 2023 on the U.S. House Homeland Security Committee’s hearing on the government’s “laundering” of censorship through NGOs and private entities:
In the runup to the 2020 election, the consortium created a system whereby state actors including the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department could file “tickets” alongside news stories, flagging them so that Big Tech platforms could subsequently suppress or attach warning labels to them.
Beyond this blatant case of a private-public censorship coalition, the EIP also engaged in partisan politics, allowing the Democratic National Committee to file tickets through the system, as well as the Democrat-aligned groups Common Cause and the NAACP.
News outlets targeted by the EIP included Breitbart News, Fox News, the New York Post, and the Epoch Times, as well as the social media accounts of prominent conservatives Charlie Kirk, Tom Fitton, Jack Posobiec, Mark Levin, James O’Keefe, and Sean Hannity, amongst others.
President Donald Trump was also frequently flagged by the consortium, as well as his sons Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr.
In April, The Washington Examiner noted the connection of CISA and the suppression of the New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story just weeks before the election, which no doubt had a big impact on the election’s outcome, in favor of leftist Joe Biden and against incumbent Republican Donald Trump:
On Oct. 14, 2020, hours after the New York Post published a story based on Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop that Twitter blocked from being shared online, the State Department’s Global Engagement Center reached out to “misinformation” researchers behind the Election Integrity Partnership, a collaboration between universities, left-wing think tanks, social media companies, and the U.S. government to thwart alleged falsehoods online in the lead-up to the presidential election. That outreach from the GEC, a foreign-focused office Republican lawmakers are investigating for its ties to anti-speech projects in the United States, was apparently thanks to guidance from the DHS and its Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, according to internal documents.
The newly unearthed coordination underscores the major role that CISA, an agency under scrutiny from the House GOP for allegedly colluding “with Big Tech and ‘disinformation’ partners to censor Americans” in 2020, played in the Election Integrity Partnership, or EIP. Both CISA and Alex Stamos, who directed the Stanford Internet Observatory, a Stanford University office behind the EIP, have appeared to downplay CISA’s role in the partnership despite some since-released records indicating a closer relationship than previously known, the Washington Examiner reported.
CISA and the FBI: paving the way for domestic election interference?
“With Election Day less than 100 days away, it is important to help put into context some of the incidents the American public may see during the election cycle that, while potentially causing some minor disruptions, will not fundamentally impact the security or integrity of the democratic process,” CISA senior advisor Cait Conley said.
“DDoS attacks are one example of a tactic that we have seen used against election infrastructure in the past and will likely see again in the future, but they will NOT affect the security or integrity of the actual election. They may cause some minor disruptions or prevent the public from receiving timely information,” Conley suggested.
“It is important to talk about these potential issues now, because nefarious actors, like our foreign adversaries or cybercriminals, could use DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) incidents to cast doubt on the election systems or processes,” Conley said.
“Congress is still exposing the extent of the detailed coordination platform between Big Tech platforms and the Censorship Industrial Complex,” noted Republican Rep. Darrell Issa of California, who sits on the House Judiciary Committee, in April. “Rather than promote free speech and free expression, this partnership was dedicated to denying it to those it did not favor.”
Questions remain: Did government agencies facilitate cheating and lie to the American people in 2020 in order to drag Biden across the finish line? Are they preparing to unconstitutionally install Kamala Harris in 2024?
From the Daily Caller News Foundation
The U.S. is mulling military strikes on cartel-associated targets in Venezuela, multiple sources told the Wall Street Journal Thursday.
The possible strikes would reportedly include among the targets Venezuelan military airports and seaports involved in the illicit drug trade. They would serve an additional purpose of warning dictator Nicolás Maduro he should step down from power, sources with knowledge of the matter told the WSJ.
The strikes could reportedly happen in a matter of days or hours, sources with knowledge of the situation told the Miami Herald Friday. President Donald Trump has stepped up his pressure campaign against the South American leader, taking a more forceful military posture than during his first term.
Dear Readers:
As a nonprofit, we are dependent on the generosity of our readers.
Please consider making a small donation of any amount here.
Thank you!
Most recently, the USS Gerald Ford carrier strike group was deployed to the Caribbean Sea October 24, adding to an already impressive U.S. presence off the Venezuelan coast in international waters. The Trump administration deployed naval assets to the southern Caribbean in August following their designation of Latin American cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs).
The White House told the Daily Caller News Foundation that the anonymous sources reporting the story “don’t know what they’re talking about,” and that “any announcements regarding Venezuela policy would come directly from the President.”
From LifeSiteNews
Despite a majority of national governments and Christian prelates demanding a two-state solution, experts warn that Israel and the US aim to crush all hope for a Palestinian state.
After killing 104 Palestinians, including 46 children and 20 women with aggressive overnight airstrikes, Israel announced Wednesday that it was resuming observation of its ceasefire deal with Hamas that was penned earlier this month.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered the Israeli army on Tuesday to “immediately carry out forceful strikes in the Gaza Strip,” signaling a collapse of the October 10 agreement brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump.
Israel claimed the strikes were retaliation for its forces coming under fire from Hamas fighters in the southern city of Rafah. And though Palestinian sources reported hearing gunshots and strikes in the area, Hamas stated they had “no relation to the shooting incident” and reaffirmed their “commitment to the cease-fire agreement.”
Though the Israeli army has currently taken control of 58% of the Gaza Strip, local media reported a decision of the prime minister to expand its occupation to more land in response to the reported attack.
Following Netanyahu’s order, a series of Israeli strikes were reported in Gaza City, Rafah and later Khan Younis. These included one “massive” explosion near al-Shifa Hospital with and Al Jazeera correspondent reporting from the ground “major activity in the air over Gaza’s skies, with drones hovering above.”
Israeli bombardment targets also included a refugee camp in central Gaza, homes and tents with additional injury numbers logged at 253, including 78 children. With no medical supplies or medicines to treat the wounded, the hospital director at al-Shifa said the health situation was “catastrophic.”
Netanyahu’s strike order also followed an accusation from the Israeli government that Hamas was in violation of the ceasefire due to their delaying the return of bodies of deceased hostages. But before the agreement being signed, Israeli officials acknowledged it may take significant time to locate and return these corpses and CNN quoted Israeli officials who acknowledged some of the bodies may never be returned.
Additionally, according to Al Jazeera, while Israel maintains pressure on Hamas to return these bodies, the Palestinian militant group continues to call on Israel to allow the entry of heavy bulldozer equipment for facilitating this process since some of these bodies are believed to be buried deep under the rubble of buildings destroyed by Israeli bombardments.
Israel violates ceasefire 125 times, kills hundreds with Trump’s support
Even prior to the Israeli army reporting one reservist soldier being killed in the Rafah attack on Tuesday, from unidentified assailants, the Gaza-based Government Media Office had tallied 125 breaches of the ceasefire agreement by Israel which claimed the lives of 107 Palestinians and wounded nearly 350.
Israel has additionally violated the ceasefire agreement by allowing only a fraction of the agreed-upon number of humanitarian aid trucks to enter the enclave that had been officially declared by a UN agency in August to be suffering under a man-made famine.
A further violation of the deal includes Israel’s decision to keep the Rafah crossing with Egypt closed preventing tens of thousands of critically wounded Palestinians to seek medical treatment abroad because Israel has all but completely destroyed the health care system in Gaza. According to reports, thus far 983 patients have died while waiting for the permission from Israel to travel abroad for treatments.
Trump backed Israel’s massive strikes, which killed dozens of children, saying they had a “right to (retaliate)” due to the killing of the Israeli soldier, maintaining that these many violations would not jeopardize the ceasefire agreement.
Ceasefire deal ‘scam’ to retrieve Israeli hostages; Trump complicit with genocide
In a Wednesday interview with Judge Andrew Napolitano, former U.S. Marines Officer, author, and military commentator, Scott Ritter classified the Tuesday bombings as Israel sending “a signal that they are the permanent occupiers, that even under ceasefire conditions, Israel retains the right to strike anytime, anyplace against anyone without any fear of consequence.”
He expressed his belief that Hamas is “serious about this ceasefire agreement” while Israel is not, that the current ceasefire plan is merely a “scam to get the Israeli hostages home” before “finish(ing) the job,” of genocide in Gaza as a means of preventing any possibility of a Palestinian state.
He further assessed that since “the genocide that Netanyahu is carrying out in Gaza couldn’t have been done without the support of Donald Trump and the United States. So, Donald Trump is as guilty for the deaths of the Gazans in Palestine and Gaza as Netanyahu is.”
Solution to conflict affirmed by 96% of world’s nations: establishment of sovereign State of Palestine
In initially evaluating the current ceasefire agreement on October 9, Columbia University economist and senior UN adviser Jeffrey Sachs stated that the solution to the conflict is “very straightforward” and has been affirmed by the “the world community, overwhelmingly, for decades” and this is the call “for a State of Palestine.”
By “massive votes” in the UN General Assembly “more than 90% of the world community” has consistently demanded the establishment of the State of Palestine for many years.
With an overwhelming majority of UN member states (81.3%) formally recognizing the State of Palestine (157 of 193), Sachs has said elsewhere that nations demanding the full establishment of such a sovereign state is even much higher, including 185 of these national governments (95.8%) who have consistently voiced support for this two-state-solution.
This also means these nations demand an end to the ongoing 58-year brutal military occupation of internationally recognized Palestinian territory that was also confirmed as illegal by the International Court of Justice just last year.
Holy Land prelates: Only by ending Israel’s illegal occupation can ‘lasting peace be established’
Consistently affirming and echoing this overwhelming consensus is the Catholic Church, including the unanimous and constant voices of her bishops in the Middle East, those from around the world, and with statements from the Vatican as well. Indeed, in June, the Holy See commemorated the 10th anniversary of its formal recognition of the State of Palestine in 2015 after welcoming UN recognition of the state “with favour” in 2012.
In a formal joint statement celebrating the enactment of the ceasefire earlier this month, the Patriarchs and Heads of Churches in the Holy Land, including Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, rejoiced at the expected ceasing of hostilities, expressed hope for the future and appealed for the international community to “widen the scope of the current negotiations to include an end of the Occupation of both the West Bank and Gaza, leading to the establishment of a Palestinian state living side-by-side in peace with the present State of Israel.”
“Only in this way, we believe, will a just and lasting peace be truly established in the Holy Land and throughout the larger Middle East,” they concluded.
From Underdog to Top Broodmare
Trans Mountain executive says it’s time to fix the system, expand access, and think like a nation builder
The painful return of food inflation exposes Canada’s trade failures
Carney speech highlights how easily newsrooms are played by politicians
-
Alberta21 hours ago
From Underdog to Top Broodmare
-
Media17 hours ago
Carney speech highlights how easily newsrooms are played by politicians
-
Alberta1 day agoHow one major media torqued its coverage – in the take no prisoners words of a former Alberta premier
-
Business1 day ago“We have a deal”: Trump, Xi strike breakthrough on trade and fentanyl
-
Business2 days agoCanada’s attack on religious charities makes no fiscal sense
-
International1 day agoPrince Andrew banished from the British monarchy
-
Crime1 day agoCanada Seizes 4,300 Litres of Chinese Drug Precursors Amid Trump’s Tariff Pressure Over Fentanyl Flows
-
Alberta1 day agoProvince orders School Boards to gather data on class sizes and complexity by Nov 24