Connect with us

Opinion

Is the City of Red Deer a Small Tent that is getting even smaller?

Published

5 minute read

Red Deer appears to be shrinking in more ways than in population. Our city is becoming a smaller and smaller tent. The most recent example is the city’s decision to withdraw from the Central Alberta Economic Partnership, (CAEP).
With a partnership of 40 municipalities representing 300,000 residents, and Red Deer representing 1/3 of the population. It is a commendable group seeking solidarity in voice with the larger governments. This was a big tent endeavour that could be a help or a hindrance, but as in any group it would be impossible to get unanimity on any issue. Of course politics can impede or derail even the best of intentions.
Perhaps Red Deer outgrew the CAEP, which is a possibility, but should we withdraw. Could we not listen and learn from the other partners. While Red Deer is shrinking in population, others are growing.
Councillor Lee recommended the withdrawal, citing the plan to focus on Red Deer’s interest like Sports Tourism and Downtown Redevelopment. I interpret this to mean 2019 Canada Games and a new aquatic centre and concert hall downtown and the Riverlands.
Sports Tourism, is a great sound byte, but is not given any serious consideration beyond the 2019 games and how it benefit’s the downtown, that is it. Just ask Councillor Lee about building the Aquatic Centre around Hazlett Lake, visible from Hwy2, incorporating the lake for a high-profile highly-visible tourist attraction and not downtown, replacing the Rec Centre. I did and he responded, about the needs of the Riverlands.
I remember talking about moving the public yard, the railroad and downtown redevelopment almost 30 years ago. The city admits it will be 20 more years before the Riverlands is fully developed and downtown redevelopment is a never ending process.
The CAEP may be a tool, we have failed to avail ourselves. I know we deal with other communities on many issues, but perhaps we could adjust the bigger picture. Less focus on single issues and more real-time focus on bigger issues.
I have been told on numerous occasions that the city focuses too much of it’s time, money and energy on the downtown. Nearly 1,000 people moved out of Red Deer last year, 777 of those who moved away lived north of the river. The city hasn’t ever built a high school north of the river, they are planning 6 south of the river. They haven’t built a school north of the river in 41 years. It has been over 40 years since they built an indoor pool or indoor ice rink north of the river.
Blackfalds, built the Abbey Centre away from their downtown and their population grew by over 700 residents, last year. Penhold built a multi-plex near Hwy2 and their town needs to expropriate more land for residential developments.
These communities live in the same province, at the same time but are achieving drastically different results.
Perhaps instead of withdrawing into a smaller and smaller tent, instead of focusing inward it should be focusing outward and seek a bigger tent.
So, (I have to add) how about building a Collicutt type complex, incorporating a 51m pool, and an indoor ice rink, around Hazlett Lake. It is visible from Hwy 2 and Hwy 11A. You could incorporate the lake for competitive swimming, canoeing, boat races, outdoor skating, hockey games, even ice fishing. It would boost tourism, kick-start development in the north, help the less fortunate who needs a staycation destination. What do you say? I know; it is not downtown, how dare I even dream of it. Could you at least build a high school for the thousand plus students living on the north side?
These suggestions don’t fit in a small tent.

Follow Author

2025 Federal Election

Post election…the chips fell where they fell

Published on

William Lacey's avatar William Lacey

I put a lot of personal energy into this election, trying to understand why it was that Canadians so wholeheartedly endorsed Mark Carney as their new leader, despite the fact that it was the same party who caused irreparable economic harm to the economy, and he has a similar philosophical outlook to the core outlook of the party. I truly believe that we have moved to a phase in our electoral process where, until something breaks, left leaning ideology will trump the day (pun intended).

Coming out of this election I have three questions.

1. What of Pierre Poilievre? The question for Conservatives is whether the wolves feed on the carcass of Poilievre (in my opinion the worst enemy of a Conservative is a Conservative) and initiate the hunt for a new leader (if they do, I believe the future should be led by a woman – Melissa Lantsman or possibly Caroline Mulroney), or does Poilievre move to Alberta and run for a “safe” seat to get back into the House of Commons, change his tone, and show people he too can be Prime Ministerial? His concession speech gives clues to this.

2. What of Mark Carney? Maybe (hopefully) Carney will see the light and try to bring the nation together, as there is an obvious east-west split in the country in terms of politics. Time will tell, and minority governments need to be cautious. Will we have a Supply and Confidence 2.0 or will we see olive branches extended?

3. What of the House of Commons? As I have mentioned previously, there has been discussion that the House of Commons may not sit until after the summer break, meaning that the House of Commons really will not have conducted any business in almost a year by the time it reconveens. If indeed “we are in the worst crisis of our lives” as Prime Minister Carney campaigned on, then should we not have the House of Commons sit through the summer? After all, the summer break usually is for politicians to go back to their ridings and connect with their constituents, but if an election campaign doesn’t constitute connecting, what does?

Regardless, as the election is behind us, we now need to see what comes. I will try to be hopeful, but remain cautious. May Canada have better days ahead.

Thanks for reading William’s Substack!

Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Continue Reading

Banks

TD Bank Account Closures Expose Chinese Hybrid Warfare Threat

Published on

From the Frontier Centre for Public Policy

By Scott McGregor

Scott McGregor warns that Chinese hybrid warfare is no longer hypothetical—it’s unfolding in Canada now. TD Bank’s closure of CCP-linked accounts highlights the rising infiltration of financial interests. From cyberattacks to guanxi-driven influence, Canada’s institutions face a systemic threat. As banks sound the alarm, Ottawa dithers. McGregor calls for urgent, whole-of-society action before foreign interference further erodes our sovereignty.

Chinese hybrid warfare isn’t coming. It’s here. And Canada’s response has been dangerously complacent

The recent revelation by The Globe and Mail that TD Bank has closed accounts linked to pro-China groups—including those associated with former Liberal MP Han Dong—should not be dismissed as routine risk management. Rather, it is a visible sign of a much deeper and more insidious campaign: a hybrid war being waged by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) across Canada’s political, economic and digital spheres.

TD Bank’s move—reportedly driven by “reputational risk” and concerns over foreign interference—marks a rare, public signal from the private sector. Politically exposed persons (PEPs), a term used in banking and intelligence circles to denote individuals vulnerable to corruption or manipulation, were reportedly among those flagged. When a leading Canadian bank takes action while the government remains hesitant, it suggests the threat is no longer theoretical. It is here.

Hybrid warfare refers to the use of non-military tools—such as cyberattacks, financial manipulation, political influence and disinformation—to erode a nation’s sovereignty and resilience from within. In The Mosaic Effect: How the Chinese Communist Party Started a Hybrid War in America’s Backyard, co-authored with Ina Mitchell, we detailed how the CCP has developed a complex and opaque architecture of influence within Canadian institutions. What we’re seeing now is the slow unravelling of that system, one bank record at a time.

Financial manipulation is a key component of this strategy. CCP-linked actors often use opaque payment systems—such as WeChat Pay, UnionPay or cryptocurrency—to move money outside traditional compliance structures. These platforms facilitate the unchecked flow of funds into Canadian sectors like real estate, academia and infrastructure, many of which are tied to national security and economic competitiveness.

Layered into this is China’s corporate-social credit system. While framed as a financial scoring tool, it also functions as a mechanism of political control, compelling Chinese firms and individuals—even abroad—to align with party objectives. In this context, there is no such thing as a genuinely independent Chinese company.

Complementing these structural tools is guanxi—a Chinese system of interpersonal networks and mutual obligations. Though rooted in trust, guanxi can be repurposed to quietly influence decision-makers, bypass oversight and secure insider deals. In the wrong hands, it becomes an informal channel of foreign control.

Meanwhile, Canada continues to face escalating cyberattacks linked to the Chinese state. These operations have targeted government agencies and private firms, stealing sensitive data, compromising infrastructure and undermining public confidence. These are not isolated intrusions—they are part of a broader effort to weaken Canada’s digital, economic and democratic institutions.

The TD Bank decision should be seen as a bellwether. Financial institutions are increasingly on the front lines of this undeclared conflict. Their actions raise an urgent question: if private-sector actors recognize the risk, why hasn’t the federal government acted more decisively?

The issue of Chinese interference has made headlines in recent years, from allegations of election meddling to intimidation of diaspora communities. TD’s decision adds a new financial layer to this growing concern.

Canada cannot afford to respond with fragmented, reactive policies. What’s needed is a whole-of-society response: new legislation to address foreign interference, strengthened compliance frameworks in finance and technology, and a clear-eyed recognition that hybrid warfare is already being waged on Canadian soil.

The CCP’s strategy is long-term, multidimensional and calculated. It blends political leverage, economic subversion, transnational organized crime and cyber operations. Canada must respond with equal sophistication, coordination and resolve.

The mosaic of influence isn’t forming. It’s already here. Recognizing the full picture is no longer optional. Canadians must demand transparency, accountability and action before more of our institutions fall under foreign control.

Scott McGregor is a defence and intelligence veteran, co-author of The Mosaic Effect: How the Chinese Communist Party Started a Hybrid War in America’s Backyard, and the managing partner of Close Hold Intelligence Consulting Ltd. He is a senior security adviser to the Council on Countering Hybrid Warfare and a former intelligence adviser to the RCMP and the B.C. Attorney General. He writes for the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.

Continue Reading

Trending

X