Connect with us

Opinion

Is the City of Red Deer a Small Tent that is getting even smaller?

Published

5 minute read

Red Deer appears to be shrinking in more ways than in population. Our city is becoming a smaller and smaller tent. The most recent example is the city’s decision to withdraw from the Central Alberta Economic Partnership, (CAEP).
With a partnership of 40 municipalities representing 300,000 residents, and Red Deer representing 1/3 of the population. It is a commendable group seeking solidarity in voice with the larger governments. This was a big tent endeavour that could be a help or a hindrance, but as in any group it would be impossible to get unanimity on any issue. Of course politics can impede or derail even the best of intentions.
Perhaps Red Deer outgrew the CAEP, which is a possibility, but should we withdraw. Could we not listen and learn from the other partners. While Red Deer is shrinking in population, others are growing.
Councillor Lee recommended the withdrawal, citing the plan to focus on Red Deer’s interest like Sports Tourism and Downtown Redevelopment. I interpret this to mean 2019 Canada Games and a new aquatic centre and concert hall downtown and the Riverlands.
Sports Tourism, is a great sound byte, but is not given any serious consideration beyond the 2019 games and how it benefit’s the downtown, that is it. Just ask Councillor Lee about building the Aquatic Centre around Hazlett Lake, visible from Hwy2, incorporating the lake for a high-profile highly-visible tourist attraction and not downtown, replacing the Rec Centre. I did and he responded, about the needs of the Riverlands.
I remember talking about moving the public yard, the railroad and downtown redevelopment almost 30 years ago. The city admits it will be 20 more years before the Riverlands is fully developed and downtown redevelopment is a never ending process.
The CAEP may be a tool, we have failed to avail ourselves. I know we deal with other communities on many issues, but perhaps we could adjust the bigger picture. Less focus on single issues and more real-time focus on bigger issues.
I have been told on numerous occasions that the city focuses too much of it’s time, money and energy on the downtown. Nearly 1,000 people moved out of Red Deer last year, 777 of those who moved away lived north of the river. The city hasn’t ever built a high school north of the river, they are planning 6 south of the river. They haven’t built a school north of the river in 41 years. It has been over 40 years since they built an indoor pool or indoor ice rink north of the river.
Blackfalds, built the Abbey Centre away from their downtown and their population grew by over 700 residents, last year. Penhold built a multi-plex near Hwy2 and their town needs to expropriate more land for residential developments.
These communities live in the same province, at the same time but are achieving drastically different results.
Perhaps instead of withdrawing into a smaller and smaller tent, instead of focusing inward it should be focusing outward and seek a bigger tent.
So, (I have to add) how about building a Collicutt type complex, incorporating a 51m pool, and an indoor ice rink, around Hazlett Lake. It is visible from Hwy 2 and Hwy 11A. You could incorporate the lake for competitive swimming, canoeing, boat races, outdoor skating, hockey games, even ice fishing. It would boost tourism, kick-start development in the north, help the less fortunate who needs a staycation destination. What do you say? I know; it is not downtown, how dare I even dream of it. Could you at least build a high school for the thousand plus students living on the north side?
These suggestions don’t fit in a small tent.

Follow Author

Economy

Ottawa’s muddy energy policy leaves more questions than answers

Published on

From the Fraser Institute

By Kenneth P. Green

Based on the recent throne speech (delivered by a King, no less) and subsequent periodic statements from Prime Minister Carney, the new federal government seems stuck in an ambiguous and ill-defined state of energy policy, leaving much open to question.

After meeting with the premiers earlier this month, the prime minister talked about “decarbonized barrels” of oil, which didn’t clarify matters much. We also have a stated goal of making Canada the world’s “leading energy superpower” in both clean and conventional energy. If “conventional energy” includes oil and gas (although we’re not sure), this could represent a reversal of the Trudeau government’s plan to phase-out fossil fuel use in Canada over the next few decades. Of course, if it only refers to hydro and nuclear (also forms of conventional energy) it might not.

According to the throne speech, the Carney government will work “closely with provinces, territories, and Indigenous Peoples to identify and catalyse projects of national significance. Projects that will connect Canada, that will deepen Canada’s ties with the world, and that will create high-paying jobs for generations.” That could mean more oil and gas pipelines, but then again, it might not—it might only refer to power transmission infrastructure for wind and solar power. Again, the government hasn’t been specific.

The throne speech was a bit more specific on the topic of regulatory reform and the federal impact assessment process for energy projects. Per the speech, a new “Major Federal Project Office” will ensure the time needed to approve projects will be reduced from the currently statutory limit of five years to two. Also, the government will strike cooperation agreements with interested provinces and territories within six months to establish a review standard of “one project, one review.” All of this, of course, is to take place while “upholding Canada’s world-leading environmental standards and its constitutional obligations to Indigenous Peoples.” However, what types of projects are likely to be approved is not discussed. Could be oil and gas, could be only wind and solar.

Potentially good stuff, but ill-defined, and without reference to the hard roadblocks the Trudeau government erected over the last decade that might thwart this vision.

For example, in 2019 the Trudeau government enacted Bill C-48 (a.k.a. the “Tanker Ban Bill”), which changed regulations for large oil transports coming and going from ports on British Columbia’s northern coast, effectively banning such shipments and limiting the ability of Canadian firms to export to non-U.S. markets. Scrapping C-48 would remove one obstacle from the government’s agenda.

In 2023, the Trudeau government introduced a cap on Canadian oil and gas-related greenhouse gas emissions, and in 2024, adopted major new regulations for methane emissions in the oil and gas sector, which will almost inevitably raise costs and curtail production. Removing these regulatory burdens from Canada’s energy sector would also help Canada achieve energy superpower status.

Finally, in 2024, the Trudeau government instituted new electricity regulations that will likely drive electricity rates through the roof, while ushering in an age of less-reliable electricity supply: a two-handed slap to Canadian energy consumers. Remember, the throne speech also called for building a more “affordable” Canada—eliminating these onerous regulations would help.

In summation, while the waters remain somewhat muddy, the Carney government appears to have some good ideas for Canadian energy policy. But it must act and enact some hard legislative and regulatory reforms to realize the positive promises of good policy.

Continue Reading

Censorship Industrial Complex

Jordan Peterson reveals DEI ‘expert’ serving as his ‘re-education coach’ for opposing LGBT agenda

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Clare Marie Merkowsky

The Ontario College of Psychologists has selected Jordan Peterson’s “re-education coach” for having publicly opposed the LGBT agenda.

In a June 16 op-ed published by the National Post, Canadian psychologist Dr. Jordan Peterson revealed that U.K. citizen Harry Cayton will guide him through the mandatory training.

“In the last week … the College has re-established contact, after months of unnecessary delay, which occurred in violation of their own order and guidelines. They have made me an entirely new offer, all the while insisting that this was their intent all along, which it most clearly was not,” Peterson said.

“All they really want, it turns out, is one two-hour session, which will not involve any ‘social media’ training,” he further explained. “This will be conducted by a man — one Harry Cayton — a citizen of the U.K., who is neither social media expert, according to the College and is definitely not a psychologist.”

Harry Cayton, a supposed expert on “professional regulation and governance,” is known professionally for promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

In 2021, he was appointed to conduct an independent review of the British Columbia Law Society’s governance structure, specifically examining how it supports DEI goals.

Additionally, in 2022, while appearing on Ascend Radio’s podcast, Cayton argued there should be more DEI regulations in professional associations.

Peterson has promised to make the details of his “re-education” public, questioning why the College wishes to hide what Cayton plans to discuss with him.

Peterson also explained that he will publicize the training “so that people who are interested can decide for themselves what is going on.”

In January 2024, Peterson lost his appeal of the board’s decision to compel him to undergo mandatory re-education, meaning that he must attend the training or risk losing his license to practice psychology in Ontario.

Peterson also revealed that his “legal options have” now “been exhausted” after Ontario’s highest court rejected his appeal of the College’s 2022 ruling that his public political statements ran afoul of the administrative board’s rules and that he must therefore submit to, and personally pay for, a “coaching program” on professionalism.

Peterson is a widely-known critic of Canada’s increasingly totalitarian government. He has also spoken frequently on the need for young men to accept and take on personal responsibility. While he has seemingly inspired others to explore Christianity, he has not yet espoused a personal belief in any religion, though he affirmed his wife Tammy in her decision to convert to Catholicism in 2024.

Continue Reading

Trending

X