Environment
Experiments to dim sunlight will soon be approved by UK government: report
From LifeSiteNews
Dimming the sunlight poses serious dangers, including by blocking vitamin D, potentially reducing rainfall, and releasing toxins into the environment.
Experiments aimed at dimming sunlight with the stated goal of reducing “global warming” will be approved by the U.K. government within weeks, according to The Telegraph.
Professor Mark Symes, the program director for Aria (Advanced Research and Invention Agency), said the organization has planned “small controlled outdoor experiments on particular approaches” to sunlight dimming.
These trials could include “injecting aerosols into the atmosphere, or brightening clouds,” which are both Sunlight Reflection Methods (SRM). Marine Cloud Brightening (MCB) involves spraying sea-salt particles into the sky to make low-lying clouds more reflective.
It is unclear what kind of aerosols are being considered for the trials, although according to geoengineering.global, sulfate aerosols as well as black carbon, metallic aluminum, aluminum oxide, and barium titanate aerosols are “being considered for this solar radiation management approach.” Metallic aerosols in particular would raise health concerns for human beings as well as animal and plant life.
Symes has insisted to the public that the experiments won’t release toxic substances but has not specified what they will involve. “We have strong requirements around the length of time experiments can run for and their reversibility and we won’t be funding the release of any toxic substances to the environment,” he said.
Geoengineering.global admits that stratospheric aerosol injection poses dangers such as the possibility of reduced rainfall in certain areas, with accompanying “loss of crops and access to freshwater.”
According to The Telegraph, researchers have said in recent years that pollution above shipping routes has caused clouds above them to become brighter than normal, bringing about an overall dimming effect by reflecting sunlight back into the atmosphere.
While the scientific establishment often claims there is a “consensus” that the earth is warming, and, moreover, at a dangerous rate, six top international scientists released findings in 2022 that projected a cooling of the Northern hemisphere until the 2050s, and, by extension, the rest of the globe.
Most compellingly, over 1,100 scientists and professionals signed a “World Climate Declaration (WCD)“ in 2022 declaring that “There is no climate emergency,” even if the globe is warming. They point out that “Earth’s climate has varied for as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm periods,” and add that “warming is far slower than predicted.”
They also note that “there is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and such-like natural disasters, or making them more frequent.”
The question of global warming aside, the effects of dimmed sunlight from even short-term experiments could have detrimental effects on mental and physical health. Sunlight is a critical source of vitamin D, which is needed to help defend against infections. Those who live above the 37th parallel are already said to be exposed to insufficient amounts of sunlight for vitamin D production during the fall and winter.
Dimmed sunlight could also put people at increased risk of Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD), a type of depression linked to reduced levels of sunlight during the winter. According to researchers, the mechanism behind SAD involves lowered serotonin levels and a disrupted circadian rhythm caused by lack of sunlight.
Environment
The Myths We’re Told About Climate Change | Michael Shellenberger
Why is it, I asked him, that Bill Gates recently rejected “doomsday” predictions and started calling for a more pragmatic, human-centered approach?
From rising sea levels to surging forest fires to dying polar bears to disappearing coral reefs, much of what we’ve been told about climate change is not true, he says.
The rising sea level narrative, for example, rests entirely on computer models that were manipulated to produce the desired outcome, Shellenberger says.
“It’s clear that the activist scientists were manipulating models to show an acceleration in sea level rise when the only long-term, reliable source of data, which is called tide gauge data…shows no acceleration from the 1850s on,” he says.
How is data cherry-picked or skewed to create misleading narratives? What’s behind the sudden embrace of nuclear energy—after it had been demonized for decades? How might it be related to the global AI race?
Environment
The era of Climate Change Alarmism is over
All over the world, mouths were dropping and eyeballs were popping. Bill Gates has changed his approach to the climate change issue.
This week Gates flipped a switch from funding climate change initiatives, to urging the world’s decision makers to put their attention and their funding towards issues such as fighting poverty and illness.:
Click here to read what Bill Gates said in his own words:
Bill Gates’ is no climate scientist but his about face has brought the issue to the forefront. This could lead to a breakthrough in the way average people approach climate change.
For decades we’ve been told “the science is settled”. Serious scientists don’t make such claims, but the statement has halted millions of conversations that might otherwise have informed. That was the intezntion.
Now that the issue has been opened, it’s a great time to take in this recent interview from the Joe Rogan Experience.
If you have anxiety over climate change or if you know young people who are overwhelmed by concern, this is a must see. If you’re simply someone who simply appreciates the pursuit of knowledge and you’ve never heard from Dr’s Linzen or Happer before, you will be amazed at this conversation.
From the Joe Rogan Experience
Richard Lindzen, PhD, is Professor Emeritus of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. William Happer, PhD, is Professor Emeritus of Physics at Princeton University. Doctors Lindzen and Happer are recognized for questioning prevailing assumptions about climate change and energy policy.
-
Business2 days agoCarney shrugs off debt problem with more borrowing
-
Alberta2 days agoWhen Teachers Say Your Child Has Nowhere Else to Go
-
Automotive2 days agoThe high price of green virtue
-
Addictions2 days agoCanada is divided on the drug crisis—so are its doctors
-
Bruce Dowbiggin2 days agoMaintenance Mania: Since When Did Pro Athletes Get So Fragile?
-
Daily Caller2 days agoProtesters Storm Elite Climate Summit In Chaotic Scene
-
MAiD2 days agoQuebec has the highest euthanasia rate in the world at 7.4% of total deaths
-
National1 day agoConservative bill would increase penalties for attacks on places of worship in Canada





