Day after day, we lose more people to covid-19. Seemingly the majority of Canadians are under the impression there’s not much we can do when we catch covid other than hope we don’t get incredibly ill. Most do not realize some doctors are treating covid patients and having astounding success. There is a shocking and criminal lack of knowledge about medical treatments for covid. Doctors are confused and intimidated by directives insisting they NOT EVEN TRY to use repurposed drugs the way they’ve always done. Unfortunately that’s been enough to stop treatment for millions.
Even more shocking is that many of the richest and most well informed nations remain unaware of the incredible success of medical treatments on covid in countries like India and Japan. India and Japan were in the middle of desperate surges in cases when their governments decided to allow doctors to do whatever they could to save lives. The doctors went to work and have completely turned their situations around.
You may not realize it but there are a few brave doctors in every region of Canada using treatments. They don’t dare do this publicly as they’d be quickly punished as was shown by the AHS punishment of visiting doctor Dr Daniel Nagase after he successfully treated three desperate patients with Ivermectin, and Hydroxychloroquine. The news stories somehow left out the most important information of all in that situation. Of the three patients treated, the two patients in their 70’s as well as one in her 90’s all recovered.
In early November, hundreds of doctors who are treating covid gathered in Ocala, Florida for weekend conference called The Global Covid Summit. There a number of their sessions were recorded and can be found online. In his session Dr. Pierre Kory outlined up the nearly twenty medical treatments which are being used as well as the studies showing their efficacy. Here’s that amazing address.
Restrictions continue to take a toll on our economy, our mental health, and our way of life. Countries with among the highest vaccination rates are continually battered by wave after wave of covid. It’s clear that treatment combined with available vaccines are the answer. The question is, when will our public health officials and our politicians act on this LIFE SAVING information.
FOIA Doc Shows BioNTech Founders Postdated Start of C19 Vax Project
From the Brownstone Institute
As noted in my last article on BioNTech’s “brazen” avoidance of safety testing of its Covid-19 vaccine, BioNTech founders Ugur Sahin and Özlem Türeci claim in their book The Vaccine that the company’s Covid-19 vaccine project got underway on January 27, 2020. But documentary evidence released in response to a FOIA request (and included in the so-called “Pfizer documents”) shows that this is not true and that the company had in fact already begun preclinical, i.e. animal, testing nearly two weeks earlier, on January 14.
BioNTech R&D STUDY REPORT No. R-20-0072 is available here. The report is also referenced and discussed in an FDA submission on the preclinical study program that is available here. The below screenshot shows the study dates from p. 8 of the report.
In the book, Sahin claims furthermore that he only even became interested in the outbreak in Wuhan on January 24, after reading an article in the German weekly Der Spiegel (p. 4) and/or a submission to The Lancet (p. 6). But look again at the study dates above. BioNTech had already completed the first preclinical study for its Covid-19 vaccine the day before!
January 24, 2020 was a Friday. On Sahin’s account, he took the decision to launch his Covid-19 vaccine project over the weekend and unveiled his plans to his collaborators at BioNTech’s headquarters in Mainz, Germany on the following Monday: January 27 (ch. 2 passim and p. 42; see screencap below).
Sahin claims (p. 33) that it was at this January 27 meeting that he asked BioNTech’s animal testing team to prepare the preclinical program that was in fact already underway!
It should be noted that January 14, 2020, the start-date of the first preclinical study, was just two weeks after the first report of Covid-19 cases in Wuhan and just a day after the release of the full SARS-CoV-2 genome (drafts had been released previously).
BioNTech’s first preclinical study was evidently prepared before publication of the genome and in anticipation of it. As explained in the summary of the study (p. 6), its purpose was to test BioNTech mRNA formulated in lipid nanoparticles produced by the Canadian firm Acuitas. But the mRNA was here encoding a proxy antigen (luciferase), not the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 that would later serve as the target antigen.
The study looked at both biodistribution and immune system activation. As the FDA submission on the preclinical program puts it, “Platform properties that support BNT162b2 were initially demonstrated with non-SARS-CoV-2 antigens” (2.4 NONCLINICAL OVERVIEW, p. 7).
In The Vaccine, which was written with the journalist Joe Miller, Sahin and Türeci talk about the need to obtain the Acuitas lipids, which, they say, were more suitable for intramuscular injection than BioNTech’s own in-house lipids. But, again, they postdate the matter. Thus, on p. 52, we read: “The missing piece was still Acuitas, who had not yet consented to the use of their lipids. Then, on the morning of Monday 3 February, [Acuitas CEO] Tom Madden offered his help.” But BioNTech was already running tests using the Acuitas lipids three weeks earlier!
Furthermore, BioNTech was not able to formulate its mRNA into the lipids itself, but depended on the Austrian company Polymun to do this for it. As noted in The Vaccine (p.51), Polymun’s facilities are an 8-hour drive from BioNTech’s headquarters in Mainz. In the book, Sahin and Türeci describe the first batch of mRNA for the vaccine tests proper being packed up and driven by car to Polymun outside Vienna: “A couple of days later, a small Styrofoam box containing frozen vials full of vaccine would be driven back over the border to BioNTech” (pp. 116-117).
But presumably this same back-and-forth had to have occurred with the mRNA encoding the luciferase. This means that as a practical matter “Project Lightspeed” must have gotten underway even earlier: at least several days before the January 14 start date of the study.
Why did Sahin and Türeci postdate the launch of their Covid-19 vaccine project in their book? Well, undoubtedly because the actual start date – and we do not know when exactly the actual start date was – would have seemed far too soon. Based on the above considerations, it must have been at the latest just days after the first December 31, 2019 report of Covid-19 cases in Wuhan.
Preston Manning picked to chair review of Alberta’s COVID response
Premier Danielle Smith has struck a committee to investigate how the Alberta government responded to the COVID-19 pandemic and has appointed former Reform Party leader Preston Manning to chair it.
Smith, in a statement, says Manning and the panel will take feedback virtually from experts and the public, then issue a final report and recommendations by Nov. 15.
Manning is to pick the other panel members subject to approval by Smith.
The budget is $2 million, and Manning is to be paid $253,000.
Manning and Smith have been critical of government-imposed health restrictions such as masking, gathering rules and vaccine mandates during the pandemic.
Smith has questioned the efficacy of the methods and their long-term effects on household incomes, the economy and mental health.
She has criticized both Dr. Deena Hinshaw, the former chief medical officer of health, and the Alberta Health Services board for failing to provide good advice and help prepare for the pandemic, which she says forced the government to impose health restrictions and vaccine mandates.
Smith replaced Hinshaw and the board shortly after taking office in October.
The premier said Alberta needs to be ready for future health emergencies.
“There are valuable lessons we learned from the Alberta government’s response to the COVID-19 public health emergency,” Smith said in the statement Thursday.
“It’s important that we apply those lessons to strengthen our management of future public health crises, and the panel’s recommendations will be key in doing so.”
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 19, 2022.
Edmonton to host “Road to the JUNOS Concert Series” leading up to Juno Awards week
Saskatchewan teen sentenced for killing his pregnant mother
Couple arrested and charged after infant sexually assaulted in southern Alberta
Alberta government says no evidence of emails to prosecutors on border blockade cases
200 plus homeless people will find shelter in former Stony Plain Road hotel
Police in India arrest third man in smuggling deaths of family in Canada
Province reminding Albertans to apply for Affordability Payments and watch out for scammers
Alberta2 days ago
Cannabis company The Green Organic Dutchman Holdings changing name to BZAM
Health2 days ago
Toronto mayor calls for national summit to tackle mental health crisis
Top Story CP2 days ago
CP NewsAlert: Quebec woman pleads guilty in mailing of poison to Trump
Alberta1 day ago
Premier Smith asks CBC and opposition NDP to apologize for “defamatory” article
Top Story CP2 days ago
Bank of Canada hikes key interest rate by quarter point, says it plans to hold
Health2 days ago
Just a bit of exercise can improve mental health, scientists, psychologists say
Arts2 days ago
Spanish museum returns 2 paintings looted by Nazis to Poland
Top Story CP1 day ago
CP NewsAlert: 66 more potential graves identified at former B.C. residential school