Business
Carney’s Move to Strip Religious Charities Undermines Canada’s Foundations, Liberal Elder Warns

Faith and Freedom Are Constitutional Pillars — Religious Charity Flows From and Sustains Canada’s Foundation
I am a former partner of a national accounting firm and a registered Liberal who has served seven leaders of the Liberal Party, including four prime ministers. I am also a Christian actively involved in not-for-profit entities that “advance religion.”
I strongly oppose the new direction of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government, as outlined in the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance report, Pre-Budget Consultations in Advance of the 2025 Budget, which recommends removing “advancement of religion” as a recognized charitable purpose.
Recommendation 430 advises the government “amend the Income Tax Act to provide a definition of a charity which would remove the privileged status of ‘advancement of religion’ as a charitable purpose.”
As the Gospel of Matthew reminds us: “For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in.”
Regarding economic and social trends in Canada and across the world, it is clear that religious charities matter as much as ever. Feeding the hungry, sheltering the poor, visiting the sick, welcoming strangers — these are not merely spiritual ideals but measurable contributions to Canadian society.
There are four issues that are worthy of investigation related to this proposed recommendation from the Finance Committee.
First, as reported by the Fraser Institute on Dec. 10, 2024, Canadian generosity hit its lowest point in 20 years. Nationally, the percentage of Canadian tax filers donating to charity has fallen over the last decade from 22.4% in 2012 to 17.1% in 2022. The percentage of aggregate income donated to charity by Canadian tax filers has decreased from 0.55% in 2012 to 0.50% in 2022. This decline in generosity in Canada undoubtedly limits the ability of Canadian charities to improve the quality of life in their communities and beyond.
Second, the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada (EFC) is a national association comprised of over 7,000 churches, as well as 32 post-secondary institutions and 86 ministry organizations. On March 10, 2025, the EFC made a submission to the federal Department of Finance noting that religious charities play a significant role within the charitable sector and the life of our country.
The EFC stated that of the 73,000 charitable organizations registered with the Canada Revenue Agency, more than 30,000 fall under the advancement of religion — roughly 42% of the charitable sector. Many religious traditions teach their adherents to care for their neighbours — to reach out in compassionate ways and care for those who are vulnerable.
As an example, Christian, Jewish and Muslim faith leaders stated in a 2016 Interfaith Statement on Palliative Care: “Our traditions instruct that there is meaning and purpose in supporting people at the end of life. Visiting those who are sick and caring for those who are dying are core tenets of our respective faiths and reflect our shared values as Canadians.” Read the EFC’s submission here.
The following table of religious composition in Canada in 2020 (Pew Research Center, June 9, 2025) demonstrates the mosaic of faith communities in Canada:
Christian – 20,350,000
Muslim – 1,870,000
Unaffiliated – 13,220,000
Hindu – 580,000
Buddhist – 660,000
Other religions – 1,140,000
Jews – 350,000
Total – 38,170,000
All major faith communities have expressed their vigorous opposition to the removal of the privileged status of “advancement of religion” as a charitable purpose.
I, along with many Canadians, strongly assert that the proposed amendment to remove the privileged status of “advancement of religion” as a charitable purpose undermines interfaith ministries. We also believe that the proposed recommendation is a politicization of charitable status for those who hold opinions and views that are different from the government.
Third, the preamble to the Constitution Act, 1982, Part 1 states: “Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law.” It also states that everyone has the freedom of conscience and religion.
After consultation within my professional community, I assert that the proposed amendment to remove the privileged status of “advancement of religion” as a charitable purpose is discriminatory. It fails to recognize Charter rights and the principles underlying the supremacy of God and the rule of law.
Fourth, Prime Minister Mark Carney has described, with perspective and humility, value-based leadership in his book Value(s): Building a Better World for All. He states that value-based leadership includes “perspective” and must “take in the periphery.”
The prime minister references how Pope Francis emphasized that we perceive a situation more accurately when we look at it from the standpoint of those on the edge rather than those in the center: “The state of the economy looks different to the unemployed. The political structure looks different to someone who is powerless, the community to the excluded or the security forces to the persecuted.”
The statement by Prime Minister Carney on the passing of Pope Francis, on April 21, 2025, concluded with the following remark: “Pope Francis leaves a spiritual and ethical legacy that will shape our collective conscience for generations to come. May we honour his memory by continuing to work for a world that reflects the solidarity, justice, and sustainability that he so powerfully embodied.”
In conclusion, the proposed amendment to revoke charitable status based on religious beliefs contravenes the Charter guarantees of freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief, opinion and expression.
We are reminded of the following biblical saying, as well as the prime minister’s recent call to honour the life and teaching of Pope Francis: “He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.”
I urgently request that the government not follow the recommendation of the Finance Committee to remove “advancing religion” as a charitable purpose, but instead to recognize the relevance and benefits of religion to the charitable sector and Canadian public life and values.
In the words of Prime Minister Mark Carney: We need to be “building a better world for all” now.
The Bureau is a reader-supported publication.
To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Invite your friends and earn rewards
Business
Canadian gov’t spending on DEI programs exceeds $1 billion since 2016

From LifeSiteNews
Some departments failed to provide clear descriptions of how the taxpayer funds were used. For example, Prairies Economic Development Canada spent $190.1 million on projects related to diversity, equity and inclusion ventures but could not provide details.
Federal diversity, equity and inclusion programs have cost Canadian taxpayers more than $1 billion since 2016.
According to information published September 18 by Blacklock’s Reporter, diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) government grants have totaled $1.049 billion since 2016, including grants for “cultural vegetables.”
A $25 million grant, one of the largest individual grants, was given to the Canadian Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce to “strengthen Canada’s entrepreneurship ecosystem to be more accessible to LGBTQ small businesses.”
The government payouts were distributed among 29 departments, ranging from military to agricultural projects.
The Department of Agriculture spent $90,649 for “harvesting, processing and storage of cultural vegetables to strengthen food security in equity-deserving Black communities” in Ontario.
Some departments failed to provide clear descriptions of how the taxpayer funds were used. For example, Prairies Economic Development Canada spent $190.1 million on projects related to diversity, equity and inclusion ventures but could not provide details.
“PrairiesCan conducted a search in our grants and contributions management system using the keywords ‘equity,’ ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion,’” the Inquiry said. “Certain projects were included where diversity, equity and inclusion were referenced but may not be the main focus of the project.”
DEI projects are presented as efforts by organizations to promote fair treatment, representation, and access to opportunities for people from varied backgrounds. However, the projects are often little more than LGBT propaganda campaigns funded by the Liberal government.
As LifeSiteNews reported, the University of British Columbia Vancouver campus posted an opening for a research chair position that essentially barred non-homosexual white men from applying for the job.
Additionally, during his short time in office, Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney has already shown Canadians that he is a staunch supporter of the LGBT agenda after he spent over $2 million in taxpayer funding on LGBT groups during his first week in office.
Canadians have repeatedly appealed to Liberals to end pro-LGBT DEI mandates, particularly within the education system.
As LifeSiteNews previously reported, in June 2024, 40 Canadian university professors appealed to the Liberal government to abandon DEI initiatives in universities, arguing they are both ineffective and harmful to Canadians.
Business
How the feds blew your money this week

The Governor General’s closet: A queen’s dream and a taxpayers’ nightmare
Governor General Mary Simon is spending your money like it’s her personal fund for Buckingham Palace’s boutique.
The governor general dipped into her taxpayer piggy bank (a.k.a. your wallet) to fund her shoe collection — six new pairs in 12 months — and is even charging you for her undergarments.
You read that right. Apparently, hundreds of dollars in silk undergarments are now considered essential to public services.
Simon spent $330 of taxpayers’ money on silk camisoles, $1,117 on shoes, $875 on a single blazer, $1,500 on a “sealskin chest piece” and $2,510 on luxury wool suits during the last fiscal year.
Simon spent $144 on a “black dress cardigan.” The “value of the item” according to the expense sheet is half that, listed at only $72. Is there anything the government doesn’t go overbudget on?
It’s very rare for any minister or prime minister to expense clothing. Only two ministers expensed apparel last year — each less than $300 for work boots for an event at a construction site.
Simon billed you for a total of $7,576 on shoes and clothing last year.
Simon’s annual salary is $378,000 a year. Let’s just say she doesn’t need to force you to pay for her clothes.
And that’s not all! Simon’s expansive wardrobe isn’t the only way the governor general’s office is draining the public purse.
Her lavish wardrobe is just the start of the spending spree. Since her appointment, she spent more than $120,000 on speech writers — and don’t get us started on her crazy travel expenses.
Simon has been enjoying mile-high catering — meals on airplanes include beef Wellington, carpaccio, stuffed pork tenderloin and hundreds of dollars on lemons, limes and bottled water. The list goes on.
Simon and her entourage billed you about $100,000 for airplane food during their week-long trip to the Middle East. A separate four-day trip to Germany totaled $103,000 in catering costs. She also spent hundreds of dollars on flowers to go along with the lavish meals.
All on your dime.
Oh, and the cost of those trips totalled $1 million and $700,000, respectively.
Simon also famously spent $71,000 at “Icelimo Luxury Travel” during a four-day trip to Iceland. The total bill for that trip cost taxpayers $298,000.
In fact, the governor general’s travel during her first year in office cost you almost $3 million.
Why is she even going on these far-flung excursions? The governor general’s role is to represent the monarchy here in Canada.
When was the last time you took your family on a vacation? Next time you agonize over fuel or air travel costs, remember you’re already footing the bill for an unelected figurehead’s opulent jet-setting.
The worst part of all this? The governor general’s flamboyant spending is all within rules laid out by the federal government.
Governors general can bill you up to $130,000 on clothes over their five-year term.
And all those posh clothes need cleaning, right? The governor general’s office spent $117,000 on professional dry-cleaning services since 2018, despite having staff dedicated to doing the laundry.
That works out to more than $1,800 per month spent on dry cleaning.
It’s time to close the royal boutique and stop treating taxpayers like an unlimited credit card.
Franco’s note: I just want to give a shout out to the great investigative news outlet, Blacklock’s Reporter. They were the first outlet to report on this spending. And that’s not the only big taxpayer story they uncovered this week. Check this one out: https://www.blacklocks.ca/d-e-
Carney shrinks from pro-active cuts — lets bureaucrats retire themselves
The Canadian Taxpayers Federation called out Prime Minister Mark Carney for his lackadaisical approach to Ottawa’s bureaucracy.
Carney needs to cut staff, not just wait for them to retire.
Here’s the back story:
The federal bureaucracy ballooned disproportionately under the Trudeau Liberals. Carney’s predecessor added nearly 100,000 paper pushers during his decade-long tenure.
The federal bureaucracy cost taxpayers $71.1 billion in 2024-25 — a 77 per cent increase from the $40.2 billion expense in 2016-17.
Enter Mark Carney, armed with a plan … based on inaction and procrastination.
The prime minister said he’s directed federal departments and Crown corporations to cut up to 15 per cent of their budgets over the next few years. He also claimed he would “balance the operating budget by Budget 2028.”
That seemed like a promising start — until Carney announced the cuts would “happen naturally through attrition.”
The bureaucracy now consumes about 55 per cent of the operating budget. And quality of service is decreasing.
Half of Canadians think services are worse than in 2016, according to a Leger poll commissioned by the CTF. Only 11 per cent say they’re better — proving the bureaucracy isn’t shrinking, it’s suffocating.
The poll showed most Canadians want to see the federal bureaucracy cut.
We’ll keep fighting for real cuts — not just a slow march to retirement.
Video: Carney clueless about his own gun confiscation
Carney called his gun confiscation “voluntary.”
Except the federal government announced a list of banned guns that many Canadians had stored in their homes.
Those firearms are suddenly illegal.
The Carney government plans to confiscate them in exchange for compensation. The penalty for illegal possession of a prohibited firearm under the Criminal Code is up to five years in jail.
And taxpayers like you are forced to pay those law-abiding Canadians after the government seizes their property.
“We’re not confiscating guns,” Carney said. “[It’s] an opportunity for Canadians to return guns for compensation.”
What does that mean? Taxpayers have questions.
The CTF’s Gage Haubrich and Kris Sims break it down in the video below and offer Carney an easy solution: scrap the gun ban and confiscation scheme.
-
Business1 day ago
Carney’s ‘major projects’ list no cause for celebration
-
Business1 day ago
Global elites insisting on digital currency to phase out cash
-
Business1 day ago
Red tape is killing Canadian housing affordability
-
Health1 day ago
MAiD should not be a response to depression
-
Artificial Intelligence1 day ago
UK Police Chief Hails Facial Recognition, Outlines Drone and AI Policing Plans
-
Business1 day ago
Ottawa’s so-called ‘Clean Fuel Standards’ cause more harm than good
-
Business1 day ago
The Truth Is Buried Under Sechelt’s Unproven Graves
-
International1 day ago
France records more deaths than births for the first time in 80 years