Connect with us

COVID-19

Canadian doctor forced to pay $44K fine, serve suspension for prescribing Ivermectin to treat COVID

Published

5 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan claimed that a Regina doctor was engaged in unprofessional conduct for going against a policy that restricted doctors from prescribing Ivermectin or ‘alternative’ therapies.

A doctor working in a medium-sized Canadian city has been suspended and fined for prescribing Ivermectin to some of his patients to treat or prevent one from getting COVID.

On June 7, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan (CPSS)Ā ruled that Regina doctor Tshipita Kabongo was engaged in unprofessional conduct for going against a policy that restricted doctors from prescribing Ivermectin or ā€œalternativeā€ therapies to patients.

As a result, Kabongo was hit with a one-month suspension starting August 1 and was ordered to pay $44,783.72, which was what it cost for the investigation and hearing.

Kabongo worked at the Integrated Wellness and Health Balance Centre in Regina. From April 2020 to March 2022, he prescribed Ivermectin to some of his patients.

The CPSSĀ policy onĀ ā€œalternativesā€ to the COVID jabs as a means to combat the virus stated that it is ā€œunethical to engage in or to aid and abet in treatment which has no acceptable scientific basis, may be dangerous, may deceive the patient by giving false hope, or which may cause the patient to delay in seeking conventional care until his or her condition becomes irreversible.ā€

Instead, the CPSS only promoted the COVID shots for the virus, which today are known to have many negative side effects.

ā€œThe most effective strategy for preventing COVID-19 continues to be immunization and all Saskatchewan. Ministry of Health approved vaccines provide a high level of protection,ā€ the CPSS said in a joint letter.

According to the CPSS, Kabongo’s recommendation of Ivermectin to some of his patients was not ā€œmedicallyā€ necessary because he did not recommend other treatment options.

Health Canada, along with many medical groups in Saskatchewan and in other provinces, in the fall of 2021 said that using Ivermectin to treat COVID was potentially dangerous and claimed that there was no evidence the drugs worked to stop the virus.

However, Dr. Pierre Kory, the author ofĀ The War on Ivermectin,Ā claimed in testimonyĀ that the drug is safe and said some meta-studies show that it has an 81 percent mortality reduction rate in those with COVID.

COVID vaccine mandates, which came from provincial governments with the support of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s federal government, split Canadian society. Many governmental or private sector workers lost their jobs for refusing to get the shots.

Shots were promoted by health officials as only way to treat COVIDn

The mRNA shotsĀ haveĀ been linked toĀ a multitude of negative and often severe side effects in children.

A recent study by aĀ team of expertsĀ that includes prominent critics of the COVID establishment as well as Dr. Peter McCullough shows that the COVID shots have a 200-times higher risk of brain clots than other injections.

The jabs alsoĀ haveĀ connections to cellĀ lines derived from aborted babies.Ā As a result, many Catholics and other Christians refused to take them.

However, despite health officials in Canada and the United States opposing using Ivermectin, which is historically used to treat parasites and rosacea when applied to the skin, the drug has long been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for a variety of human ailments. In fact, it isĀ includedĀ in the World Health Organization’s (WHO’S) Model List of Essential Medicines.

During the earlier days of COVID, the use of Ivermectin to treat COVID gained notoriety, and there have been manyĀ promising studiesĀ along withĀ anecdotal reportsĀ ofĀ positive results from the use of the drugs.

It even got to the point that some families in the United StatesĀ had to go to courtĀ to force hospitals to let them try the medications for their loved ones. Some U.S. doctors have seen their medical licensesĀ threatenedĀ for prescribing it, which prompted states such asĀ MissouriĀ andĀ OklahomaĀ to take action to protect medical freedom for those who wish to try and prescribe them.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

COVID-19

Canadian veteran challenges conviction for guarding War Memorial during Freedom Convoy

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Clare Marie Merkowsky

When the convoy first came to Ottawa, allegations were floated that the memorial had been desecrated. After learning of this, Evely quickly organized a group of veterans to stand guard around the clock to protect the area.

A Canadian veteran appealed to the Ontario courts after he was convicted for organizing a guard around the National War Memorial during the Freedom Convoy.

In an OctoberĀ press release, the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) announced that an appeal has been filed in the Ontario Court of Appeals on behalf of Master Warrant Officer (Ret’d) Jeffrey Evely over his conviction for mischief and obstructing police while on his way to guard the Ottawa War Memorial during the 2022 Freedom Convoy.

ā€œBy locking down large sections of downtown Ottawa, the police were effectively preventing all civilians from accessing public areas and greatly exceeded their powers under the common law,ā€ constitutional lawyer Chris Fleury explained.

ā€œThis case raises issues that have implications for protests across the province and the country. We are hopeful that the Ontario Court of Appeal will agree and grant leave to appeal,ā€ he added.

The appeal argues that police overstepped their authority in their response to the 2022 protest of COVID mandates. Police actions at the time included locking down the Ottawa core, establishing checkpoints, and arresting protesters.

In September 2024, Everly was convicted of mischief and obstruction after his involvement in the 2022 Freedom Convoy, which protested COVID mandates by gathering Canadians in front of Parliament in Ottawa.

As LifeSiteNewsĀ previously reported, when the convoy first came to Ottawa, allegations were floated that the memorial had been desecrated. After learning of this, Evely quickly organized a group of veterans to stand guard around the clock to protect the area.

However, under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s use of the Emergencies Act, many parts of downtown Ottawa were blocked to the public, and a vigilant police force roamed the streets.

It was during this time that Evely was arrested for entering a closed off section of downtown Ottawa during the early hours of February 19, 2022. He had been on his way to take the 4:25 a.m. shift protecting the Ottawa War Memorial.

He was forcibly pushed to the ground, landing face first. The veteran was then arrested and charged with mischief and obstructing police.

At the time, the use of the EA was justified by claims that the protest was ā€œviolent,ā€ a claim that has still gone unsubstantiated.

In fact, videos of the protest against COVID regulations and shot mandates show Canadians from across the country gathering outside Parliament engaged in dancing, street hockey, and other family-friendly activities.

Indeed, the only acts of violence caught on video were carried out against the protesters after the Trudeau government directed police to end the protest. One such video showed an elderly women being trampled by a police horse.

While the officers’ actions were originally sanctioned under the EA, Federal Court Justice Richard Mosley ruled that Trudeau was ā€œnot justifiedā€ in invoking the EA, forcing Crown prosecutors to adopt a different strategy.

Now, Crown prosecutors allege that the common law granted police the authority to stop and detain Evely, regardless of the EA.

However, Evely and his lawyers have challenged this argument under section 9 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, insisting that his ā€œarrest and detention were arbitrary.ā€

Earlier this month, Freedom Convoy organizers Tamara Lich and Chris BarberĀ were sentencedĀ to 18-month house arrest after a harrowing 25-month trial process. Many haveĀ condemnedĀ the sentence, warning it amounts to ā€œpolitical persecutionā€ of those who stand up to the Liberal government.

Continue Reading

COVID-19

Freedom Convoy leader Tamara Lich says ā€˜I am not to leave the house’ while serving sentence

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

‘I was hoping to be able to drop off and pick up my grandsons from school, but apparently that request will have to go to a judge’

Freedom Convoy leader Tamara Lich detailed her restrictive house arrest conditions, revealing she is ā€œnotā€ able to leave her house or even pick up her grandkids from school without permission from the state.

Lich wrote in aĀ X postĀ onĀ Wednesday that this past Tuesday was her first meeting with her probation officer, whom she described as ā€œfair and efficient,ā€ adding that she was handed the conditions set out by the judge.

ā€œI was hoping to be able to drop off and pick up my grandsons from school, but apparently that request will have to go to a judge under a variation application, so we’ll just leave everything as is for now,ā€ she wrote.

Lich noted that she has another interview with her probation officer next week to ā€œassess the level of risk I pose to re-offend.ā€

ā€œIt sounds like it’ll basically be a questionnaire to assess my mental state and any dangers I may pose to society,ā€ she said.

While it is common for those on house arrest to have to ask for permission to leave their house, sometimes arrangements can be made otherwise.

On October 7, Ontario Court Justice Heather Perkins-McVeyĀ sentencedĀ Lich and Chris Barber to 18 months’ house arrest after being convicted earlier in the year convicted of ā€œmischief.ā€

Lich was given 18 months less time already spent in custody, amounting to 15 1/2 months.

AsĀ reported byĀ LifeSiteNews, the Canadian government was hoping to put Lich in jail for no less than seven years and Barber for eight years for their roles in the 2022 protests against COVID mandates.

Lich said that her probation officerĀ ā€œinformed me of the consequences should I breach these conditions, and I am not to leave the house, even for the approved ā€˜necessities of life’ without contacting her to let her know where I’ll be and for how long,ā€ she wrote.

ā€œShe will then provide a letter stating I have been granted permission to be out in society. I’m to have my papers on my person at all times and ready to produce should I be pulled over or seen by law enforcement out and about.ā€

Lich said that the probation officer did print a letter ā€œbefore I left, so I could stop at the optometrist and dentist offices on my way home.ā€

She said that her official release date is January 21, 2027, which she said amounts to ā€œ1,799 days after my initial arrest.ā€

AsĀ reported byĀ LifeSiteNews, Lich, reflecting on her recent house arrest verdict, said she has no ā€œremorseā€ and will not ā€œapologizeā€ for leading a movement that demanded an end to all COVID mandates.

LifeSiteNewsĀ reportedĀ that Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre offered his thoughts on the sentencing, wishing them a ā€œpeacefulā€ life while stopping short of blasting the sentence as his fellow MPs did.

In early 2022, the Freedom Convoy saw thousands of Canadians from coast to coast come to Ottawa to demand an end to COVID mandates in all forms. Despite the peaceful nature of the protest, Trudeau’s government enacted the never-before-used Emergencies Act (EA) on February 14, 2022.

Continue Reading

Trending

X