Connect with us

COVID-19

Canadian doctor forced to pay $44K fine, serve suspension for prescribing Ivermectin to treat COVID

Published

5 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan claimed that a Regina doctor was engaged in unprofessional conduct for going against a policy that restricted doctors from prescribing Ivermectin or ‘alternative’ therapies.

A doctor working in a medium-sized Canadian city has been suspended and fined for prescribing Ivermectin to some of his patients to treat or prevent one from getting COVID.

On June 7, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan (CPSS)Ā ruled that Regina doctor Tshipita Kabongo was engaged in unprofessional conduct for going against a policy that restricted doctors from prescribing Ivermectin or ā€œalternativeā€ therapies to patients.

As a result, Kabongo was hit with a one-month suspension starting August 1 and was ordered to pay $44,783.72, which was what it cost for the investigation and hearing.

Kabongo worked at the Integrated Wellness and Health Balance Centre in Regina. From April 2020 to March 2022, he prescribed Ivermectin to some of his patients.

The CPSSĀ policy onĀ ā€œalternativesā€ to the COVID jabs as a means to combat the virus stated that it is ā€œunethical to engage in or to aid and abet in treatment which has no acceptable scientific basis, may be dangerous, may deceive the patient by giving false hope, or which may cause the patient to delay in seeking conventional care until his or her condition becomes irreversible.ā€

Instead, the CPSS only promoted the COVID shots for the virus, which today are known to have many negative side effects.

ā€œThe most effective strategy for preventing COVID-19 continues to be immunization and all Saskatchewan. Ministry of Health approved vaccines provide a high level of protection,ā€ the CPSS said in a joint letter.

According to the CPSS, Kabongo’s recommendation of Ivermectin to some of his patients was not ā€œmedicallyā€ necessary because he did not recommend other treatment options.

Health Canada, along with many medical groups in Saskatchewan and in other provinces, in the fall of 2021 said that using Ivermectin to treat COVID was potentially dangerous and claimed that there was no evidence the drugs worked to stop the virus.

However, Dr. Pierre Kory, the author ofĀ The War on Ivermectin,Ā claimed in testimonyĀ that the drug is safe and said some meta-studies show that it has an 81 percent mortality reduction rate in those with COVID.

COVID vaccine mandates, which came from provincial governments with the support of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s federal government, split Canadian society. Many governmental or private sector workers lost their jobs for refusing to get the shots.

Shots were promoted by health officials as only way to treat COVIDn

The mRNA shotsĀ haveĀ been linked toĀ a multitude of negative and often severe side effects in children.

A recent study by aĀ team of expertsĀ that includes prominent critics of the COVID establishment as well as Dr. Peter McCullough shows that the COVID shots have a 200-times higher risk of brain clots than other injections.

The jabs alsoĀ haveĀ connections to cellĀ lines derived from aborted babies.Ā As a result, many Catholics and other Christians refused to take them.

However, despite health officials in Canada and the United States opposing using Ivermectin, which is historically used to treat parasites and rosacea when applied to the skin, the drug has long been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for a variety of human ailments. In fact, it isĀ includedĀ in the World Health Organization’s (WHO’S) Model List of Essential Medicines.

During the earlier days of COVID, the use of Ivermectin to treat COVID gained notoriety, and there have been manyĀ promising studiesĀ along withĀ anecdotal reportsĀ ofĀ positive results from the use of the drugs.

It even got to the point that some families in the United StatesĀ had to go to courtĀ to force hospitals to let them try the medications for their loved ones. Some U.S. doctors have seen their medical licensesĀ threatenedĀ for prescribing it, which prompted states such asĀ MissouriĀ andĀ OklahomaĀ to take action to protect medical freedom for those who wish to try and prescribe them.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

COVID-19

Study finds Pfizer COVID vaccine poses 37% greater mortality risk than Moderna

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

A study of 1.47 million Florida adults by MIT’s Retsef Levi and Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo finds significantly higher all-cause mortality after Pfizer vaccination compared to Moderna

A new study of 1.47 million Florida adults by MIT’s Retsef Levi and Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo finds significantly higher all-cause, cardiovascular, and COVID-19 mortality after Pfizer vaccination.

The study titled ā€œTwelve-Month All-Cause Mortality after Initial COVID-19 Vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech or mRNA-1273 among Adults Living in Floridaā€ was just uploaded to the MedRxiv preprint server. This study was headed by MIT Professor Retsef Levi, with Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo serving as senior author:

Study Overview

  • Population: 1,470,100 noninstitutionalized Florida adults (735,050 Pfizer recipients and 735,050 Moderna recipients).
  • Intervention: Two doses of either:
    • BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech)
    • mRNA-1273 (Moderna)
  • Follow-up Duration: 12 months after second dose.
  • Comparison: Head-to-head between Pfizer vs. Moderna recipients.
  • Main Outcomes:
    • All-cause mortality
    • Cardiovascular mortality
    • COVID-19 mortality
    • Non-COVID-19 mortality

All-cause mortality

Pfizer recipients had aĀ significantly higherĀ 12-month all-cause death rate than Moderna recipients — aboutĀ 37% higher risk.

  • Pfizer Risk: 847.2 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Moderna Risk: 617.9 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Risk Difference:
    āž”Ā +229.2Ā deaths per 100,000 (Pfizer excess)
  • Risk Ratio (RR):
    āž”Ā 1.37Ā (i.e., 37% higher mortality risk with Pfizer)
  • Odds Ratio (Adjusted):
    āž”Ā 1.384Ā (95% CI: 1.331–1.439)

Cardiovascular mortality

Pfizer recipients had aĀ 53% higher riskĀ of dying from cardiovascular causes compared to Moderna recipients.

  • Pfizer Risk: 248.7 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Moderna Risk: 162.4 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Risk Difference:
    āž”Ā +86.3Ā deaths per 100,000 (Pfizer excess)
  • Risk Ratio (RR):
    āž”Ā 1.53Ā (i.e., 53% higher cardiovascular mortality risk)
  • Odds Ratio (Adjusted):
    āž”Ā 1.540Ā (95% CI: 1.431–1.657)

COVID-19 mortality

Pfizer recipients had nearlyĀ double the riskĀ of COVID-19 death compared to Moderna recipients.

  • Pfizer Risk: 55.5 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Moderna Risk: 29.5 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Risk Difference:
    āž”Ā +26.0Ā deaths per 100,000 (Pfizer excess)
  • Risk Ratio (RR):
    āž”Ā 1.88Ā (i.e., 88% higher COVID-19 mortality risk)
  • Odds Ratio (Adjusted):
    āž”Ā 1.882Ā (95% CI: 1.596–2.220)

Non-COVID-19 mortality

Pfizer recipients faced aĀ 35% higherĀ risk of dying fromĀ non-COVID causesĀ compared to Moderna recipients.

  • Pfizer Risk: 791.6 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Moderna Risk: 588.4 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Risk Difference:
    āž”Ā +203.3Ā deaths per 100,000 (Pfizer excess)
  • Risk Ratio (RR):
    āž”Ā 1.35Ā (i.e., 35% higher non-COVID mortality risk)
  • Odds Ratio (Adjusted):
    āž”Ā 1.356Ā (95% CI: 1.303–1.412)

Biological explanations

The findings of this study are surprising, given that Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine contains approximately three times more mRNA (100 µg) than Pfizer’s BNT162b2 vaccine (30 µg). This suggests that the higher mortality observed among Pfizer recipients could potentially be related to higher levels of DNA contamination — an issue that has beenĀ consistently reportedĀ worldwide:

The paper hypothesizes differences between Pfizer and Moderna may be due to:

  • Different lipid nanoparticle compositions
  • Differences in manufacturing, biodistribution, or storage conditions

Final conclusion

Florida adults who received Pfizer’s BNT162b2 vaccine had higher 12-month risks of all-cause, cardiovascular, COVID-19, and non-COVID-19 mortality compared to Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients.

Unfortunately, without an unvaccinated group, the study cannot determine the absolute increase in mortality risk attributable to mRNA vaccination itself. However, based on theĀ mountain of existing evidence, it is likely that an unvaccinated cohort would have experienced much lower mortality risks. It’s also important to remember that Moderna mRNA injections are still dangerous.

As the authors conclude:

These findings are suggestive of differential non-specific effects of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines, and potential concerning adverse effects on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. They underscore the need to evaluate vaccines using clinical endpoints that extend beyond their targeted diseases.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation

www.mcculloughfnd.org

Please consider following both theĀ McCullough FoundationĀ andĀ my personal accountonĀ X (formerly Twitter) for further content.

Reprinted with permission fromĀ Focal Points.

Continue Reading

COVID-19

Canada’s health department warns COVID vaccine injury payouts to exceed $75 million budget

Published on

Fr0m LifeSiteNews

By Clare Marie Merkowsky

A Department of Health memo warns that Canada’s Vaccine Injury Support Program will exceed its $75 million budget due to high demand, with $16 million already paid out.

COVID vaccine injury payments are expected to go over budget, according to a Canadian Department of Health memo.

According to informationĀ publishedĀ April 28 byĀ Blacklock’s Reporter, the Department of Health will exceed their projected payouts for COVID vaccine injuries, despite already spending $16 million on compensating those harmed by the once-mandated experimental shots.

ā€œA total $75 million in funding has been earmarked for the first five years of the program and $9 million on an ongoing basis,ā€ the December memo read. ā€œHowever the overall cost of the program is dependent on the volume of claims and compensation awarded over time, and that the demand remains at very high levels.ā€

ā€œThe purpose of this funding is to ensure people in Canada who experience a serious and permanent injury as a result of receiving a Health Canada authorized vaccine administered in Canada on or after December 8, 2020 have access to a fair and timely financial support mechanism,ā€ it continued.

Canada’s Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP)Ā was launched in December 2020 after the Canadian government gave vaccine makers a shield from liability regarding COVID-19 jab-related injuries.

While Parliament originally budgeted $75 million, thousands of Canadians have filed claims after received the so-called ā€œsafe and effectiveā€ COVID shots. Of the 3,060 claims received to date, only 219 had been approved so far, with payouts totaling over $16 million.

Since the start of the COVID crisis, official data shows that the virus has been listed as the cause of death forĀ less than 20 kids in CanadaĀ under age 15. This is out of six million children in the age group.

The COVID jabs approved in CanadaĀ have also been associatedĀ with severe side effects such as blood clots, rashes, miscarriages, and even heart attacks in young, healthy men.

Additionally, aĀ recent studyĀ done by researchers with Canada-basedĀ Correlation Research in the Public InterestĀ showed that 17 countries have found a ā€œdefinite causal linkā€ between peaks in all-cause mortality and the fast rollouts of the COVID shots as well as boosters.

Interestingly, while the Department of Health has spent $16 million on injury payouts, the Liberal governmentĀ spentĀ $54 million COVID propaganda promoting the vaccine to young Canadians.

The Public Health Agency of Canada especially targeted young Canadians ages 18-24 because they ā€œmay play down the seriousness of the situation.ā€

The campaign took place despite the fact that the Liberal government knew about COVID vaccine injuries, according to aĀ secret memo.

Continue Reading

Trending

X