Business
Canada’s local governments have a spending problem

From the Fraser Institute
By Jake Fuss and Austin Thompson
How would your life improve if you and every member of your family had an extra $1,178 per year? That’s a question Canadians should ask themselves in light of the growth of local government spending.
In 2000, Canada’s local governments spent $4,673 per person annually (on average, after adjusting for inflation). By 2023, the latest year of available data, that number had grown to $5,851—an increase of $1,178 for every man, woman and child. That’s a 25 per cent increase above and beyond inflation and population growth, pushing local government spending per person close to its highest level in history.
Local government infrastructure and services are undoubtedly important. Municipal finances fund the roads we drive on, the water we drink, and the park spaces we cherish. Schools, a component of local government spending, help prepare Canadian children for the future. It’s no surprise that such services cost money. But clearly the cost and scope of these services have grown over time.
Canadians across the country should judge for themselves whether this rise in spending has improved the quality of local government services. Each person’s assessment may differ depending on where they live or what they value. But in many communities, many of these services are not improving. Commute times have barely budged for a decade. Public satisfaction with road and public transit infrastructure is not improving. Violent and property crime rates have been rising since 2014, albeit from historically low levels. The bar here should be high—if local governments weren’t spending this money on our behalf, taxpayers could keep it for themselves.
The rise in local government spending should also raise alarm bells about the sustainability of local government finances.
The Canadian taxpayer cannot endlessly pay for a local government spending bill that grows faster than population growth and inflation—especially considering they are already on the hook for even steeper increases in provincial and federal spending. The inability of municipal governments to control costs has caused some to turn to new revenue sources including damaging taxes on new housing development that undermine urgent efforts to build desperately needed homes. And municipalities often receive large grants from provincial governments whose debt burdens are already high. This can’t go on forever.
The sustainability question is critically important given that Canada’s municipalities continue to claim they are chronically underfunded. Despite the spending increases we’ve seen in recent decades, municipalities admit they have allowed a $170 billion infrastructure maintenance backlog to pile up. They’re eager to claim this is evidence they need yet more taxpayer dollars, when it’s in fact evidence of inefficient and poorly prioritized spending.
Examples of local government waste are not hard to find. In the Alberta town of Cochrane, an ordinary park bench costs between $5,000 and $7,000—a figure that reportedly shocked even the town’s councillors who should have been familiar with such figures given they approve the budget. Ottawa’s infamous light rail boondoggle has been beset by cost overruns, severe technical challenges and costly litigation. The price tag for a major wastewater treatment plant in the Vancouver area ballooned from an initial estimate of $700 million to $3.86 billion.
Canadians should be vigilant about spending by their local governments and deeply skeptical about endless pleas for more tax dollars. Local governments should eliminate waste, control costs and prioritize spending on critical infrastructure rather than asking overstretched taxpayers for yet more money.
Business
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink is new co-chair of WEF, finds no misconduct in Klaus Schwab

From LifeSiteNews
In what appears to be the most obvious conflict of interest in history, the World Economic Forum which was formed to infiltrate governments and influence government decisions has elected two of the world’s largest hedge fund managers as co-chairs.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) has elected BlackRock CEO Larry Fink and Roche Holding vice-chair Andre Hoffmann to serve as interim co-chairs of its board.
Last Friday, the WEF announced that the investigation into Klaus Schwab had found no misconduct by its former chairman and founder. In the same press release, the globalist organization also announced Fink and Hoffmann as new interim leaders.
Schwab was under investigation in April this year after a whistleblower alleged financial impropriety and behavioral issues. The 87-year-old Schwab had already resigned from his position as chairman of the board shortly before the investigation was launched.
“Minor irregularities, stemming from blurred lines between personal contributions and Forum operations, reflect deep commitment rather than intent of misconduct,” the WEF stated in regard to the allegations made against Klaus Schwab and his wife Hilde.
WATCH: Dark origin and agenda of Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum
“Following a thorough review of all facts, the Board has concluded that, while the organization must evolve toward a more institutional model, there is no evidence of material wrongdoing by Klaus Schwab,” the organization concluded.
Larry Fink is no stranger to the critics of the globalist “Great Reset” agenda spearheaded by Schwab. He founded BlackRock, the largest asset manager in the world, presiding over $10 trillion in assets, more than any country except the U.S. and China.
He announced in 2017 that he intends to use the enormous power he wields to engage in “forcing behaviors” in support of diversity and inclusion – and to promote the ESG agenda endorsed by the World Economic Forum. Fink, at the time, even threatened any companies who refuse to submit to his vision with punitive economic measures.
“You have to force behaviors. If you don’t force behaviors, whether it’s gender or race or just any way you want to say the composition of your team, you’re going to be impacted. That not just recruiting, it’s development,” Fink said. “We’re gonna have to force change.”
READ: BlackRock CEO Larry Fink: Understanding the man who invented woke capitalism
Over the last several years, the WEF’s annual meeting of political and business elites in the Swiss mountain town of Davos has become synonymous with globalism. Even the mainstream news outlet Reuters wrote that the gathering “has in recent years drawn criticism from opponents on both left and right as an elitist talking shop detached from lives of ordinary people.”
Business
Canada’s Real Estate Economy, Fueled by Mass Immigration and Offshore Cash, Is Unsustainable, Mayor Brad West Warns

Port Coquitlam Mayor Brad West meets with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken in 2023 to discuss American concerns over fentanyl trafficking and money laundering tied to transnational crime groups operating in British Columbia.
“Billions upon billions” poured into land speculation have turned B.C. housing into a magnet for global money and mass migration, Mayor Brad West writes in an exclusive Op-Ed for The Bureau.
By Brad West
British Columbia, and much of the country, is confronting the consequences of an economic model that was never built to last. For years, we have been told a comforting story about growth — that as long as cranes dot the skyline and property values climb, prosperity will follow. But beneath that veneer lies a stark truth: our economy is not driven by value-added manufacturing, groundbreaking technology, innovation, or by unlocking our vast natural resource potential. It is built almost entirely on real estate and relentless population growth driven by mass immigration. And it relies on the building and selling of homes to the next wave of newcomers.
This is not diversification. This is dependency. And like all dependencies, it eventually demands a price.
In the not-too-distant past, B.C.’s prosperity came from sectors that created enduring value: forestry and mining that supplied the world; fisheries that sustained communities; manufacturing that turned raw materials into products; and, in more recent years, tech companies that could compete globally.
Today, those industries are shadows of their former selves in our economic mix — thanks, in part, to the strangulation of over-regulation and inordinately lengthy approval processes easily weaponized by those ideologically opposed to resource extraction. Their demise is not a naturally occurring phenomenon — and it is reversible — but it reflects the agenda and decisions of policymakers. In their place, real estate has become the dominant force, representing nearly 30 percent of B.C.’s GDP with its ancillary sectors. That’s a hell of a lot of eggs in a single basket, and the province’s balance sheet has become frighteningly tied to this cycle.
As the government oversaw this reorganization of the economy, it sent out the proverbial bat signal that investment capital didn’t belong in business development, but in land. Message received. Billions upon billions poured into bidding up land prices. Among the many consequences of this misallocation of capital are high land values squeezing out industrial employers and gnawing away at industrial land, weakening our capacity to make and export things. Today, industrial land makes up barely 4 percent of Metro Vancouver’s landmass.
Mass Immigration as Fuel for the Model
This new growth machine runs on people — specifically, the rapid influx of newcomers. In theory, immigration is a tool to strengthen an economy, replenish a workforce, and foster innovation. But in practice, B.C. and Canada have relied on it as the primary fuel for real estate demand. In 2023 alone, Canada added 1.27 million people — the most in 66 years, and almost entirely through immigration. No other G7 country comes close.
The country’s notorious Temporary Foreign Worker Program and unprecedented number of international students have figured prominently in this surge. Programs once intended to fill specific gaps or foster academic exchange have morphed into de facto population pipelines.
It’s all about feeding the beast: bring in more people than the market can comfortably absorb, then build and sell homes to meet the stimulated demand. Rising prices are framed as a sign of economic health, when in reality, they are a sign of scarcity and strain. In B.C., the government has clung to this model by throwing community planning out the window with legislation that overrides local decision-making and forces blanket upzoning without regard for infrastructure capacity or livability.
But all the smoke and mirrors in the world can’t obscure the reality. Hospital emergency rooms close not sporadically, but routinely. More and more students are educated in portables rather than properly resourced schools. Infrastructure — from roads and public transit to sewers and utilities — is under immense strain. It was never designed for the pace of expansion we’ve seen, and the costs of playing catch-up are staggering.
And still the cycle continues — because without that constant flow of new buyers, the whole structure starts to wobble. And wobbling it is.
Ponzi Economics: Why B.C.’s Housing Foundations Are Failing
To call this a Ponzi scheme is not to say it is literally fraudulent in the legal sense. But the comparison is apt: returns for current “investors” depend on recruiting new participants at ever-higher prices. The moment the influx slows, the math stops working.
We’ve seen this movie before. Jurisdictions from Ireland before the 2008 crash, to parts of Spain’s coastal boom towns, to U.S. “Sun Belt” cities in the lead-up to the subprime meltdown — all rode a similar wave. And when it broke, the fallout was severe: construction job losses, collapsing home values, public finances in crisis, and a wave of personal bankruptcies.
In B.C., the warning lights are already flashing. Housing sales have cooled. Developers are shelving projects. Construction employment, once a driver of job growth, is faltering. Debt loads — both personal and governmental — are dangerously high. In the case of the Government of British Columbia, that would be a historic $133 billion. Youth unemployment in the province reached 14.6 percent in July — the highest level since September 2010.
Meanwhile, the sectors that could cushion a downturn — manufacturing, technology, value-added resource development — suffer from the province’s unilateral disarmament.
Let’s be honest: status quo politicians have taken us too far down this road to turn back without consequence. The damage is already being felt — and more is coming. But that doesn’t mean we can stay the course. We must act deliberately, and with purpose, to shift away from an economic model where our primary export is real estate, toward one where we build and produce the goods, technology, and services the world actually needs.
The turnaround won’t be easy, and it won’t be quick. But the longer we wait, the higher the cost of inaction. That means unshackling our resource sectors from endless regulatory gridlock so they can innovate and compete. It means investing in productivity-enhancing infrastructure, research and development, and the skills of our own workforce. And it means having an honest conversation about immigration levels — balancing economic benefits with our capacity to house and integrate new arrivals without fueling a speculative frenzy.
B.C. can either confront these realities now, or wait until the market forces a reckoning upon us. One path allows for a managed, strategic shift toward long-term prosperity. The other leaves us at the mercy of the same “house of cards” economics that has collapsed elsewhere — only this time, we will have no one to blame but ourselves.
Brad West is the Mayor of Port Coquitlam, British Columbia.
-
COVID-192 days ago
Agencies ordered to delete worker COVID vaccine records
-
Alberta1 day ago
India and Spain are buying Canadian oil…from the U.S.
-
Business1 day ago
Canada’s great PONI race – projects of national interest
-
Business1 day ago
Canada’s new pipeline opens a direct oil route to India, offering a sanctions-proof rival to Russian crude.
-
Bruce Dowbiggin2 days ago
Golf’s Best 2025 Moment Is A Film That Endlessly Mocks The Game
-
Alberta2 days ago
Alberta fights court order blocking ban on transgender surgeries, drugs for children
-
Daily Caller2 days ago
US Judge Deals Devastating Blow to Climate Lawfare Campaign against Oil and Gas Producers
-
Alberta1 day ago
Albertans simply want a fair shake in the federation