Connect with us

International

Can We Finally Talk About United Nations Funding?

Published

8 minute read

David Clinton The Audit

 

Billions of dollars disappear into the black hole. Not much value comes out the other end

No area touched by government policy should be off-limits for open discussion. It’s our money, after all, and we have the right to wonder how it’s being spent. Nevertheless, there’s no shortage of topics that, well, aren’t appreciated in more polite company. Until quite recently, I somehow assumed that Canada’s commitments to the United Nations and its many humanitarian programs were among those restricted topics. I had my own deep reservations, but I generally kept my thoughts to myself.

Then the Free Press published a debate over US funding for the UN. I know that many subscribers of The Audit also read the Free Press, so this probably isn’t news to most of you. If questioning UN funding was ever off limits, it’s officially open season now.

The Audit is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The only defense of the organization to emerge from the debate was that America’s spooks need the surveillance access made possible by the UN headquarter’s New York address, and the city needs the billions of dollars gained from hosting the big party. No one, in other words, could come up with a single friendly word of actual support.

For context, Canada doesn’t bill for parking spots around Turtle Bay in Manhattan. And our spies are not up to the task of bugging hospitality suites anywhere nearby.

How much money do Canadian taxpayers spend on the United Nations? According to data from Canada’s Open Government resource, UN-targeted grants cost us at least $3.7 billion between 2019 and 2022. That number could actually be a lot higher since it’s not always easy to identify spending items as specifically UN-related.

Of that $3.7 billion, more than $265 million went to administrative and headquarters operations. Those administrative grants included $209 million directed to the “United Nations Organization” and officially described as “Canada’s assessed contribution to the United Nations Regular Budget”. Membership dues, in other words.

So what do we get for those dues? Arguably, nothing at all. Because the actual work of the UN happens through their specific programs – which were covered by the other $3.5 billion we contributed.

Unfortunately, those contributions are often misspent. Take as an example the eight million or so dollars Canada sends each year to the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL). Since 1978, UNIFIL’s 10,000-strong contingent’s only job has been to:

“confirm Hezbollah demilitarization, support Lebanese army operations against insurgents and weapon smuggling, and confirm Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, in order to ensure that the government of Lebanon would restore its effective authority in the area”.

It’s no secret how splendidly that worked out. Hezbollah cheerfully spent the best part of the past two decades building some of the most robust military infrastructure on earth. And all under the direct supervision of UNIFIL.

Then there’s the disturbing relationship between United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) and both Hamas and Hezbollah. As I’ve already written, by their own admission, Global Affairs Canada completely missed (or chose to ignore) that one. UNRWA cost Canadians $55 million between 2019 and 2022.

It’s true that some UN peacekeeping missions from decades back saw success, like operations in Namibia, Mozambique, Sierra Leone, East Timor, and El Salvador. But the failures were, to say the least, noticeable. Those included Rwanda, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Somalia, Angola, Haiti, and Darfur. And all that’s besides the accusations of widespread, systemic sexual abuse committed by peacekeepers just about anywhere they go. The peacekeeping model’s value proposition is far from proven, but the financial costs are right out there in the open.

Besides their regular happens-to-the-best-of-us failures, the UN has carefully cultivated their own unique brand of corruption. In 2005, Paul Volcker’s Independent Inquiry Committee (IIC), for example, reported on widespread corruption and abuse associated with the UN’s Oil-for-Food program for Iraqi citizens.

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) has long been associated with corruption, cronyism, and a general lack of financial control. But to be fair, those claims are very much in line with accusations regularly leveled against the UN as a whole.

Most Canadians are agreeable to sharing their collective wealth and expertise with those around the world who are less fortunate. But we’d be far more effective at it by creating our own programs and bypassing the rotting corpse of the United Nations altogether. That is, after all, what Global Affairs Canada is supposed to be doing.

While I’ve still got your attention, there’s one other United Nations-y thing that I’d like to discuss. While researching this post, I accessed official data representing all UN Security Council and General Assembly resolutions since 2000. Fascinating stuff, I assure you. But it didn’t turn out the way I’d expected.

You see, for years I’ve been hearing about how UN resolutions are overwhelmingly focused on condemnations of Israel – to the point where Israel takes up the majority of the organization’s time.

In fact, there were far too many spurious and gratuitously hostile anti-Israel resolutions. And I defer to no one in my contempt for each one’s dishonesty and hypocrisy. But unless there’s something very wrong with the official UN data on resolutions, condemnations of Israel take up no more than a small minority of their time.

Specifically, of the 1,594 General Assembly resolutions from the past quarter century, just 60 or so targeted Israel. And the Security Council faced a total of 1,466 resolutions over that time, of which only somewhere in the neighborhood of 55 concerned everyone’s favorite colonial-settler, apartheid, space laser-firing, and weather-controlling oppressor.

The cesspool that is the modern UN is bad enough on its own merits. There’s no need to manufacture fake accusations.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

International

Trump Says U.S. Strike Captured Nicolás Maduro and Wife Cilia Flores; Bondi Says Couple Possessed Machine Guns

Published on

Sam Cooper's avatar Sam Cooper

Military strike part of a wider confrontation with cartel-state alliances and Iran-linked networks.

President Donald Trump said early Saturday that the United States carried out a “large scale strike” in Venezuela and that President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were “captured and flown out of the Country,” in an operation conducted jointly with U.S. counter-narcotics agencies.

Attorney General Pam Bondi said Maduro and Flores “have been indicted in the Southern District of New York,” and that Maduro has been charged with narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess destructive devices against the United States.

Bondi said they will “soon face the full wrath of American justice on American soil in American courts,” and credited “our brave military” for what she called a successful mission to capture “two alleged international narco traffickers.”

Bondi’s statement builds on the Justice Department case first unveiled on March 26, 2020, when federal prosecutors in Manhattan unsealed an indictment accusing Maduro and other current and former Venezuelan officials of leading a long-running narcotics conspiracy tied to multi-ton cocaine shipments, with linkages to terrorist actors.

Bondi has also linked Maduro’s regime to fentanyl-tainted trafficking networks, while senior lawmakers — including Senator Tom Cotton — have cast Maduro’s alleged operations as intertwined with Iranian regime activity and broader hostile-state plots against the United States.

The dramatic U.S. announcement followed a night of explosions and rolling power outages in Caracas and other parts of Venezuela, with witnesses reporting flare-like streaks crossing the sky before blasts hit near major military installations in the capital, including the Fuerte Tiuna complex and the La Carlota area.

The Associated Press reported the strike “lasted less than 30 minutes,” with at least seven blasts that sent residents into the streets as videos and photos showed smoke plumes and a fireball over the city. The early fallout remained murky—questions persisted about casualties, and how fully Congress and senior military leadership were consulted—while Venezuelan authorities demanded proof of life for Maduro and declared an emergency, as uncertainty spread over who controls the country’s government apparatus following the strike and extraction operation.

After sunrise, Reuters reported Caracas appeared relatively calm, with soldiers patrolling some areas; separately, Reuters said Venezuela’s oil facilities appeared to be operating normally, though the port of La Guaira sustained severe damage.

Previously, Bondi has described the 2020 indictment as the backbone of the administration’s claim that Maduro ran a state-protected trafficking enterprise aligned with cartel partners to push cocaine toward the United States, including cocaine allegedly mixed with fentanyl-laced additives. The Bureau has also reported Bondi’s earlier assertion that authorities seized more than $700 million in assets linked to Maduro, including private jets, and nearly seven tons of cocaine allegedly tied directly to him.

The evidentiary foundation for those allegations, U.S. officials have repeatedly said, is the Southern District of New York indictment itself — along with related prosecutions and investigative records that, in the government’s telling, map a long-running alliance among Venezuelan officials, Colombian armed actors, and international facilitators.

One of the most consequential bridges between narcotics trafficking and terrorism claims in the Maduro case emerged in May 2020, when the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration announced charges against former Venezuelan legislator Adel El Zabayar. In that statement, officials alleged that El Zabayar supported the Cártel de los Soles and worked “in coordination with designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations … Hizballah and Hamas,” including allegations that the cartel sought to recruit operatives from those groups to assist in plotting attacks against U.S. interests.

The Southern District of New York superseding indictment against Maduro also underscores the government’s contention that the alleged conspiracy’s footprint extended beyond Latin America — listing the offense as “begun and committed” in multiple jurisdictions, including Venezuela, Colombia, Mexico, Iran, and Syria.

Senator Tom Cotton amplified the administration’s message Saturday, saying he had spoken with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who “confirmed that Maduro is in U.S. custody and will face justice for his crimes against our citizens.”

Cotton added that “the interim government in Venezuela must now decide whether to continue the drug trafficking and colluding with adversaries like Iran and Cuba or whether to act like a normal nation and return to the civilized world,” urging Venezuelan authorities to “choose wisely.”

The escalation also comes as Iran faces intensifying internal unrest, with protests and crackdowns that U.S. officials and allied analysts have framed as additional pressure on Tehran at the same time Washington signals willingness to use direct force against governments it portrays as cartel-state partners.

Early Friday morning, in a social media post, Trump commented on the growing movement against Iran’s clerical leadership, warning that if security forces opened fire on demonstrators, the United States was “locked and loaded and ready to go.”

As of early Saturday, the U.S. government had not publicly released new court filings detailing the capture operation itself or clarifying whether prosecutors filed additional charges beyond the New York case first unsealed in 2020, and it remained unclear when Maduro and Flores would make their first appearance in a U.S. federal court.

President Trump said he will speak on the operation against Maduro later this morning in Florida.

The Bureau is a reader-supported publication.

To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Continue Reading

International

“Captured and flown out”: Trump announces dramatic capture of Maduro

Published on

MXM logo MxM News

President Trump stunned the world early Saturday with a dramatic announcement saying Venezuela’s socialist strongman Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, had been captured and removed from the country following U.S. military action that rocked Caracas overnight. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said the United States “successfully carried out a large-scale strike against Venezuela and its leader,” adding that Maduro and Flores were “captured and flown out of the country” in an operation conducted alongside U.S. law enforcement.

The announcement came just hours after multiple explosions were reported across Caracas and other parts of the country, with witnesses describing airstrikes and widespread power outages. Trump’s statement was quickly amplified by senior administration officials, including Pete Hegseth and Karoline Leavitt, who shared the message on X as speculation swirled about the scope and targets of the operation.

Maduro, who has clung to power through what critics and international observers have long described as rigged elections, has been a top target of U.S. law enforcement for years. Washington has accused him of running—or at minimum directing—the Cartel of the Suns, an international cocaine trafficking network allegedly embedded within Venezuela’s regime. In 2020, U.S. prosecutors charged Maduro with narco-terrorism, accusing him and senior officials of conspiring to “flood” the United States with cocaine. A $50 million U.S. reward remains in place for information leading to his arrest or conviction.

Venezuela’s government had not formally responded to Trump’s claim as of early Saturday, but local reporting painted a picture of chaos and uncertainty on the ground. The Venezuelan daily El Nacional reported that large portions of Caracas were without electricity, with residents evacuating areas around Fuerte Tiuna, the country’s main military complex long believed to house Maduro’s personal bunker. The outlet also said La Carlota, Venezuela’s principal military airport, was struck during the overnight bombardment.

Shortly before Trump’s announcement, Venezuela’s defense minister, Vladimir Padrino López, addressed the nation in a video posted to Instagram, denouncing the strikes as an “invasion” and “the greatest outrage suffered by Venezuela.” Padrino López, who is himself wanted by U.S. authorities on drug trafficking charges, dismissed the narco-terrorism allegations and claimed the attacks were part of a U.S.-led regime-change effort. “Desperation is the invader’s ally,” he said, urging Venezuelans to avoid “chaos and anarchy” and calling on the international community to condemn the United States.

Trump said further details on the operation, including how Maduro was taken into custody and where he was flown, would be released later in the day during a press conference at Mar-a-Lago, setting the stage for what could be one of the most consequential developments in U.S.–Venezuela relations in decades.

(AP Photo/Ariana Cubillos)

Continue Reading

Trending

X