Dan McTeague
Call out ‘net zero’ for what it is, a scam

From Canadians for Affordable Energy
Net Zero emissions by 2050. Have you heard this line? It is increasingly hard to miss. Every trendy business, bank, corporation and government boasts about their commitment to it. But what exactly do they mean by it?
In short, Net Zero by 2050 means our country either emits no greenhouse gases or offsets whatever it does emit through measures such as buying carbon credits or investing in carbon capture technology.
Net Zero has been a central project of groups such as the World Economic Forum, the United Nations and other globalist institutions. Theyāve spent the past several years pressuring governments around the world to commit to Net Zero and to make those commitments legally binding, so it will be difficult for elected officials to roll them back in the future.
Thatās whatās happening here in Canada. This has been a major priority for Justin Trudeau. The Liberals have spent years championing the push to Net Zero,Ā mandating it by law in 2021.
But law or not, Net Zero isnāt actually going to happen.
It is a ludicrous goal, in part because achieving it would be unimaginably expensive. So expensive, in fact, governments the world over donāt even attempt to estimate the total cost. Whenever theyāre asked, they just say āthe cost of doing nothing will be higher.ā But if they donāt know how expensive their own plan is, how on earth could they know that it would be cheaper than not doing it?
External estimates place the cost for Canada alone somewhere in the neighborhood of $2 trillion. That number is so staggering it is impossible to fully comprehend it. It is more than our nationās entire Gross Domestic Product! Look at it this way ā that is the equivalent of spending $1 a second for 63,417 YEARS.
But the fact Net Zero will ultimately fail doesnāt mean attempting it isnāt going to negatively affect your daily life. It will.
Under the umbrella of Net Zero youāll find,
- Carbon taxes
- Clean Fuel Standards
- Just Transition
- Emissions caps
- Cancelled pipelines
- Electrification strategies
- Gas and diesel car bans
- Electric vehicle subsidies
- Costly building codes
- Curtailed food production
The list goes on and on.
But beyond the economic impact and the personal hardship, we must remember the end game of this Green Agenda isnāt really about reducing carbon emissions. No, it is much more insidious than that.
At the heart of this Net Zero movement is a desire to fundamentally change our economy and way of life. They are looking for a complete transition from the economy that has made Canada the great nation that it is.
āYou will own nothing and be happy.ā Remember those words attributed to Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum (WEF)? Well take those words to heart, because he means it.
The implications of Net Zero are broad and overreaching. And they will have the effect of fundamentally affecting our quality of life.
It will make energy more expensive. It will raise the cost of everything. It will make us less competitive in the global economy, especially against countries such as China because, you will not be surprised to learn, China has not signed on to this suicide pact. (But they are keen for other countries to stifle their economy in pursuit of this absurd goal, not least because they produce 70% of the worldās solar panels.)
Net Zero regulations, policies and mandates are a direct assault on affordable energy, and an affordable way of life. That is the goal of the Green agenda, and if they have their way, Canada, its standard of living and its way of life will suffer.
Net Zero is a scam.
Dan McTeague is President of Canadians for Affordable Energy
Automotive
Canadaās EV house of cards is close to collapsing

By Dan McTeague
Well, Canadaās electric vehicle policies are playing out exactly as I predicted. Which is to say, theyāre a disaster.
Back in November, in the immediate aftermath of Donald Trumpās re-election, I wrote in these pages that, whatever else that election might mean for Canada, it would prove big trouble for the Justin Trudeau/Doug Ford EV scam.
The substance of their plot works like so: first, the federal and provincial governments threw mountains of taxpayer dollars in subsidies at automakers so that theyād come to Canada to manufacture EVs. Then Ottawa mandated that Canadians must buy those EVs ā exclusively ā by the year 2035. That way Ford and Trudeau could pat themselves on the back for ācreating jobs,ā while EV manufacturers could help themselves to the contents of our wallets twice over.
But the one variable they didnāt account for was a return of Donald Trump to the White House.
Trump had run on a promise to save America from their own back-door EV mandates. Though Kamala Harris had denied that any such mandates existed, they did, and they were founded on two acts of the Biden-Harris administration.
First, they issued an Executive Order setting significantly more onerous tailpipe regulations on all internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, with the explicit goal of ensuring that 50 percent of all new vehicles sold in America be electric by 2030.
Second, they granted California a waiver to make those regulations more burdensome still, so that only EVs could realistically be in compliance with them. Since no automaker would want to be locked out of the market of the most populous state, nor could they afford to build one set of cars for California (plus the handful of states which have ā idiotically ā chosen to align their regulations with Californiaās) and another set for the rest of the country, they would be forced to increase their manufacture and sale of EVs and decrease their output of ICE vehicles.
Trumpās victory took Canadaās political class completely by surprise, and it threw a spanner into the workings of the Liberalsā plan.
Thatās because there just arenāt enough Canadians, or Canadian tax dollars, to make their EV scheme even kindaā work. Canadaās unique access to the worldās biggest market ā America ā was a key component of the plan.
After all, vehicles are āthe second largest Canadian export by value, at $51 billion in 2023, of which 93 percent was exported to the US,ā according to the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers Association, and āAuto is Ontarioās top export at 28.9 percent of all exports (2023.)ā
It further depended on Americans buying more and more EVs every year. But since, when given a choice, most people prefer the cost and convenience of ICE vehicles, this would only work if Americans were pushed into buying EVs, even if in a more roundabout way than theyāre being forced on Canadians.
Which is why the plan all began to unravel on January 20, the day of Trumpās inauguration, when he signed Executive Order 14154, āUnleashing American Energy,ā which, among other things, rescinded Joe Bidenās pro-EV tailpipe regulations. And it has continued downhill from there.
Just last week, the US Senate voted to repeal the Biden EPAās waiver for California. Not that thatās the end of the story ā in the aftermath of the vote, California governor Gavin Newsom vowed āto fight this unconstitutional attack on California in court.ā (Though donāt be surprised if that fight is brief and half-hearted ā Newsom has been trying to leave his lifelong leftism behind recently and rebrand as a moderate Democrat in time for his own run at the White House in 2028. Consequently, being saved from his own EV policy might only help his career prospects going forward.)
But itās worth noting the language used by the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents car companies like Toyota, GM, Volkswagen and Stellantis (several of whom, it should be noted, have received significant subsidies from the Liberal and Ford governments to manufacture EVs), which said in a statement, āThe fact is these EV sales mandates were never achievable.ā
Thatās worth repeating: these EV sales mandates were never achievable!
Thatās true in California, and itās true in Canada as well.
And yet, our political class has refused to accept this reality. Doug Ford actually doubled down on his commitment to heavily subsidizing the EV industry in his recent campaign, saying āI want to make it clear⦠a re-elected PC government will honour our commitment to invest in the sector,ā no matter what Donald Trump does.
Except, as noted above, Donald Trump represents the customers Doug Ford needs!
Meanwhile, our environmentalist-in-chief, Mark Carney, has maintained the Liberal Partyās commitment to the EV mandates, arguing that EVs are essential for his vacuous plan of transforming Canada into a āclean energy superpower.ā How exactly? Thatās never said.
These are the words of con artists, not men who we should be trusting with the financial wellbeing of our country. Unfortunately, in our recent federal election ā and the one in Ontario ā this issue was barely discussed, beyond an 11th-hour attempted buzzer-beater from Pierre Poilievre and a feeble talking point from Bonnie Crombie about her concern āthat the premier has put all our eggs in the EV basket.ā
Meanwhile, 2035 is just around the corner.
So we canāt stop calling attention to this issue. In fact, weāre going to shout about our mindless EV subsidies and mandates from the rooftops until our fellow Canadians wake up to the predicament weāre in. It took some time, but we made them notice the carbon tax (even if the policy change we got from Carbon Tax Carney wasnāt any better.) And we can do it with electric vehicles, too.
Because we donāt have the money, either as a nation or as individuals, to prop this thing up forever.
Dan McTeague is President of Canadians for Affordable Energy.
Business
The Liberal war on our cost of living lives on


Well, the election is over, and it turns out that I was right to beĀ scepticalĀ of the polls. Polling which showed collapsing support for the Conservative Party, which I said over and over didnāt track with what I was seeing on the ground, was clearly wrong. In fact, the Conservative Party increased their share of the vote by more than 7 points, breaking 40% for the first time since 1988, while picking up 23 seats in parliament.
That kept the Liberals to a minority government ā something the pollsters were definitely not predicting ā and they only did as well as they did because the Bloc QuĆ©bĆ©cois lost ground and the NDP were absolutely decimated.
For this we have Donald Trump to thank, and his unprecedented intervention in our election. Not to mentionĀ Canadian boomers, who as a groupĀ ranked TrumpĀ as the most important issue in this election, and āMaking Canada a better place to liveā as their least important issue, just behind āGrowing the Economyā and making life more affordable.
Theyāve made their money, after all. Theyāve built up tremendous equity in their homes. And it just made them feel good to vote in a way that they thought would make Donald Trump mad. (Not that it did.)
We are now seeing a rising generation of younger adults who will be the first to lose ground as compared to their parents since the Great Depression. And why is that? Because the Baby Boomers decided to vote to reward those politicians whose policies have been, and will continue to be, a direct assault on the Canadian cost of living.
Carneyās government will double down on the worst policies of the Trudeau era. He is, after all, theĀ Apostle of Net-Zero.
That means doubling down on carbon taxation, especially in the form of the Industrial Carbon Tax, which will hurt existing businesses and discourage others from getting off the ground. And if he sees an opportunity to go back to charging the Consumer Carbon Tax ā remember that itĀ remains on the booksĀ ā he will do that as well.
It also means continued electric vehicle mandates. Many Canadians remain ignorant of the fact that the Trudeau LiberalsĀ bannedĀ the sale of new internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, beginning in 2035, just ten years from now. It took someĀ prodding, but the ConservativesĀ vowedĀ to scrap that mandate.
Now it will remain in effect, and that means higher priced gas-and-diesel driven cars in the near term, as Canadians start to process the fact that they wonāt be able to buy them soon. It will mean eventually being forced to buy even more expensive EVs and, if nothing changes, without government support, as the federal EV subsidy programĀ ran out of moneyĀ months ago.
Meanwhile, prepare for every story about an auto companyĀ bailingĀ on commitments to build electric vehicles in Canada to feel like a crisis. Those agreements were negotiated at a time when decision makers assumed that Donald Trump would lose his second bid for the White House, and Americans would have EVs forced on them as well.
In that climate, it seemed like a great idea to accept the mountains of taxpayer dollars being offered to automakers by Justin Trudeau and Doug Ford. But without the American market, doing so makes much less business sense. Even with Doug FordĀ bellowingĀ that heās going to āhold them accountableā and force them to ācontinue manufacturing automobiles here in Ontario!ā
And it further means that the Trudeau governmentās war on pipelines will now become the Carney governmentās war on pipelines.
Remember, while campaigning just a few weeks ago, how Carney went to Edmonton and proclaimed his intention to:
Make Canada āthe worldās leading energy superpower,ā
Invest in our ānatural strengths and ensure our economic sovereignty,ā and
fast-track āprojects of national interest,ā
while acknowledging that,
āany major energy project that comes from this great province is going to pass the boundaries of other provinces?ā
His clear implication was that he intended to change course from his predecessor, to facilitate the building of pipelines, perhaps to revive Energy East, and to do so even over the objections of Quebec.
Suffice it to say,Ā we didnāt believe a word of it.Ā And now we see we were right not to do so, as weāve just seen two of Carneyās ministers āĀ Steven GuilbeaultĀ andĀ Dominic LeBlancĀ ā throw cold water on the idea that the Carney government would support new pipeline projects.
Thatās because the activists who continue to run our country would prefer the pat on the head they get from the Davos brigade than to support theĀ backbone of our economy, the natural resource sector, upon which Canadian jobs, energy affordability, and our overallĀ cost of livingĀ rests.
All this means, of course, is that our work is not done. Our fight to protect the Canada we all know and love, where regular people can do honest work, buy a house, raise a family and live comfortably, goes on.
As disappointing as the outcome of this election was, it is just a setback. More and more people are hearing our message. Weāre already seeing signs ofĀ buyerās remorseĀ among Carney voters. And, to put it bluntly, if something canāt continue on one way forever, it wonāt. Which is to say, weāre going to have to change course sometime. The sooner, the better.
So, to borrow a phrase, Elbows Up.
Dan McTeague is President of Canadians for Affordable Energy.
-
Crime1 day ago
How Chinese State-Linked Networks Replaced the MedellĆn Model with Global Logistics and Political Protection
-
Addictions1 day ago
New RCMP program steering opioid addicted towards treatment and recovery
-
Aristotle Foundation1 day ago
We need an immigration policy that will serve all Canadians
-
Business1 day ago
Natural gas pipeline ownership spreads across 36 First Nations in B.C.
-
Courageous Discourse22 hours ago
Healthcare Blockbuster – RFK Jr removes all 17 members of CDC Vaccine Advisory Panel!
-
Business4 hours ago
EU investigates major pornographic site over failure to protect children
-
Health18 hours ago
RFK Jr. purges CDC vaccine panel, citing decades of āskewed scienceā
-
Censorship Industrial Complex21 hours ago
Alberta senator wants to revive lapsed Trudeau internet censorship bill