Opinion
SOMEBODY SHOULD DO SOMETHING
?
I listened to another conversation about the continued decline of the neighbourhoods north of the river. It was the sense of acceptance that these neighbourhoods were so inferior and undesirable that worried me.
These are educated people, accepting something that should be abhorrent.
Remember 1985. Parkland Mall was a vibrant shopping destination, for Central Alberta. 40 percent of the residents lived north of the river. The last school north of the river was built. The Dawe Centre was open and then the clock stopped.
Now, in 2017, Parkland Mall is but a shadow of it’s former south and only 30 percent of the residents live north of the river, the population actually declined by 777 residents last year.
The school that was to be built in Johnstone Park, was when it came to be built was built south of the river, and the school site was turned into a park. The superintendent e-mailed me and explained that the growth was in the south. I asked if their policies was actually assisting in the mass relocating of the north side residents and I was brushed off with the standard; “Something to think about” response. I noted that in the planning of 5 square miles of land north of 11a there are only 2 sites for schools but in the plans around the 67 Street and 30 Avenue traffic circle there are 9 sites with 3 high schools. Again; “Something to think about”.
With 30,000 residents with plans for 55,000 residents north of the river is there no plans for a high school? Blackfalds and Penhold will have a high school. The residents south of the river will have 6 high schools with 5 high schools along 30 Avenue between 29 Street and 69 Street. Somebody should do something so people will not move out from the north side because the school that was promised will not be built and there are no high schools planned. Wait 777 residents did move out last year, is there a connection? Do families want to move into neighbourhoods near their children’s schools?
Perhaps families would rather live near recreation centres? On the north side of the river we have the Dawe Centre, built in the 70s, and there are no plans to build a new recreation centre, including a swimming pool.
On the south side we only have; the Downtown Recreation Centre, Michener Aquatic Centre, Downtown Arena, Centrium complex, Collicutt Recreation Centre, Pidherney Curling Centre, Kinex Arena, Kinsmen Community Arenas, Red Deer Curling Centre, and the under-construction Gary W. Harris Centre. The city is also talking about replacing the downtown recreation centre with an expanded 50m pool.
A little lop-sided would you not say. Somebody should do something.
Back to this conversation. If it is accepted that the neighbourhoods north of the river, are lower income, less educated and have higher crime and poorer air, are we creating these scenarios with our policies. Why do we build high schools easily accessible to the higher income families and make the lower income families drive across the city? Same with the recreational complexes. Are we pushing the young people out to the streets because they do not have the time to travel across the city to participate in extra curricular activities let alone the funds for travel? Somebody should do something.
Perhaps the citizens north of the river should create a block of candidates for the municipal election this October. A block of trustee candidates for each school board and a block of candidates for city council. Perhaps individuals could run on that platform if not demand answers as to why we continue with this discrimination of the north side of the river. Again; Somebody should do something.
Before it gets any worse.
Business
Liberal’s green spending putting Canada on a road to ruin
Once upon a time, Canadians were known for our prudence and good sense to such an extent that even our Liberal Party wore the mantle of fiscal responsibility.
Whatever else you might want to say about the party in the era of Jean Chrétien and Paul Martin, it recognized the country’s dire financial situation — back when The Wall Street Journal was referring to Canada as “an honorary member of the Third World” — as a national crisis.
And we (remember, I proudly served as Member of Parliament in that party for 18 years) made many hard decisions with an eye towards cutting spending, paying down the debt, and getting the country back on its feet.
Thankfully we succeeded.
Unfortunately, since then the party has been hijacked by a group of reckless leftwing fanatics — Justin Trudeau and his lackeys — who have spent the past several years feeding what we built into the woodchipper.
Mark Carney’s finally released budget is the perfect illustration of that.
The budget is a 400 page monument to deficit delusion that raises spending to $644.4 billion over five years — including $141.4 billion in new spending — while revenues limp to $583.3 billion, yielding a record (non-pandemic) $78.3 billion shortfall, an increase of 116% from last year.
This isn’t policy; it’s plunder. Interest payments alone devour $55.6 billion this year, projected to hit $76.1 billion by 2029-30 — more than the entire defence budget and rising faster than healthcare transfers.
We can’t discount the possibility that this will lead to a downgrade of our credit rating, which will significantly increase the cost of borrowing and of doing business more generally.
Numbers this big start to feel very abstract. But think of it this way: that is your money they’re spending. Ottawa’s wealth is made up entirely of our tax dollars. We’ve entrusted that money to them with the understanding that they will use it responsibly. In the decade these Liberals have been in power, they have betrayed that trust.
They’ve pursued policies which have made life in Canada increasingly unaffordable. For example, at the time of writing it takes 141 Canadian pennies (up from 139 a few days ago) to buy one U.S. dollar, in which all of our commodities are priced. Well, that’s .25 cents per litre of gasoline. Imagine what that’s going to do to the price of heating, of groceries, of the various other commodities which we consume.
And this budget demonstrates that the Carney era will be more of the same.
Of course, the Elbows Up crowd are saying the opposite — that this shows how fiscally responsible Mark Carney is, unlike his predecessor. (Never mind that they also publicly supported everything that Trudeau did when he was in government.) They claim that Carney shows that he’s more open to oil and gas than Trudeau was.
Don’t believe it.
The oil and gas sector does get a half-hearted nod in the budget with, for instance, a conditional pathway to repeal the emissions cap. But those conditions are important. Repeal is tied to the effectiveness of Carney’s beloved industrial carbon tax. If that newly super-charged carbon tax, which continues to make our lives more expensive, leads to government-set emissions reductions benchmarks being met, then Ottawa might — might — scrap the emissions.
Meanwhile, the budget doubles down on the Trudeau government’s methane emissions regulations. It merely loosens the provisions of the outrageous Bill C-59, an act which should have been scrapped in its entirety. And it leaves in place the Trudeaupian “green” super structure, which has resource sector investment, and any business that can manage it, fleeing to the U.S.
In these perilous times, with Canada teetering on the brink of recession, a responsible government would be cutting spending and getting out of the way of our most productive sectors, especially oil and gas — the backbone of our economy.
It would be repealing the BC tanker ban and Bill C-69, the “no more pipelines act,” so that our natural resources could better generate revenue on the international market and bring down energy rates at home.
It would quit wasting millions on Electric Vehicle charging stations; mandating that all Canadians buy EVs, even with their elevated cost; and pressuring automakers to manufacture Electric Vehicles, regardless of demand, and even as they keep closing up shop and heading south.
But in this budget the Liberals are going the opposite direction. Spend more. Tax more. Leave the basic Net-Zero framework in place. Rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic.
They’re gambling tomorrow’s prosperity on yesterday’s green dogma, And every grocery run, every gas fill-up, every mortgage payment will serve as a daily reminder that we are the ones footing the bill.
Once upon a time, the Liberals knew better. We made the hard decisions and got the country back on its feet. Nowadays, not so much.
Business
Carney doubles down on NET ZERO
If you only listened to the mainstream media, you would think Justin Trudeau’s carbon tax is long gone. But the Liberal government’s latest budget actually doubled down on the industrial carbon tax.
While the consumer carbon tax may be paused, the industrial carbon tax punishes industry for “emitting” pollution. It’s only a matter of time before companies either pass the cost of the carbon tax to consumers or move to a country without a carbon tax.
Dan McTeague explains how Prime Minister Carney is doubling down on net zero scams.
-
espionage2 days agoChinese-Owned Trailer Park Beside U.S. Stealth Bomber Base Linked to Alleged Vancouver Repression Case
-
Daily Caller2 days agoUS Nuclear Bomber Fleet Shares Fence With Trailer Park Linked To Chinese Intel-Tied Fraudster
-
Daily Caller2 days agoLaura Ingraham Presses Trump On Allowing Flood Of Chinese Students Into US
-
Crime17 hours agoCBSA Bust Uncovers Mexican Cartel Network in Montreal High-Rise, Moving Hundreds Across Canada-U.S. Border
-
Business2 days agoCarney’s Floor-Crossing Campaign. A Media-Staged Bid for Majority Rule That Erodes Democracy While Beijing Hovers
-
Environment18 hours agoThe Myths We’re Told About Climate Change | Michael Shellenberger
-
Energy1 day agoIt should not take a crisis for Canada to develop the resources that make people and communities thrive.
-
Dr John Campbell1 day agoCures for Cancer? A new study shows incredible results from cheap generic drug Fenbendazole





