Alberta
Federal policies continue to block oil pipelines

From the Fraser Institute
By Tegan Hill and Elmira Aliakbari
Prime Minister Carney’s recently released list of five projects—which the government deems to be in the national interest and will expedite—doesn’t include a new oil pipeline for western Canada in general or Alberta in particular. The reason given was that no private developer stepped forward to finance or build one. But the reason for that is not a mystery: Justin Trudeau’s damaging energy policies continue to drive away oil and gas investment even though his successor campaigned on a different, more pragmatic approach. It’s no wonder Albertans are frustrated.
Promising to make Canada the world’s leading “energy superpower,” the Carney government in the spring introduced Bill C-5, the “Building Canada Act,” to give the federal cabinet sweeping powers to circumvent existing laws and regulations for projects deemed to be in the “national interest.” In effect, cabinet and the prime minister are empowered to pick winners and losers based on vague criteria and priorities. But while specific projects will be expedited, so far nothing has been done to undo the damaging federal policies that have hamstrung Canada’s energy sector over the last decade.
Trudeau-era changes to the regulatory system for large infrastructure projects included: Bill C-69 (the federal “Impact Assessment Act”); the West Coast tanker ban (as spelled out in federal Bill C-48); and the federal cap imposed exclusively on oil and gas emissions. These have hindered energy investment and development and impeded prosperity, not only in energy-producing provinces, but across the country.
The Energy East and Eastern Mainline pipelines from Alberta and Saskatchewan to the east coast would have expanded Canada’s access to European markets. But the Trudeau government rendered the projects (Energy East and the Eastern Mainline) economically unprofitable by introducing new regulatory hurdles that ultimately forced TransCanada to withdraw from the project.
A year after taking office, the Trudeau government simply cancelled the Northern Gateway pipeline, an already approved $7.9 billion project that would have transported crude oil from Alberta to the B.C. coast, thus expanding Canada’s access to Asian markets. As for Trans Mountain, the one pipeline project that did survive the Trudeau years, after the private investor was frightened off by regulatory hurdles and delays and the federal government took over, costs sky-rocketed to $34 billion—more than six times the original estimate.
With policies like these still in place, it’s no wonder investors aren’t lining up to put big money into Canadian oil and gas. Just how great the discouragement has been is indicated by the 56 per cent inflation-adjusted decline in overall investment in the oil and gas sector between 2014 and 2023 (from $84.0 billion to $37.2 billion).
That decline in investment has had and will continue to have big consequences for the western provinces, particularly Alberta, where energy is a key part of the economy. But it would be a mistake to think the costs are limited to Alberta. From 2007 to 2022, Albertans’ net contribution to federal finances (total federal taxes they paid minus federal money spent on or transferred to them) was $244.6 billion. A strong Alberta helps keep taxes lower and fund public services across Canada.
Canada urgently needs new oil pipelines to tidewater. The U.S. is currently the destination for 97 per cent of our oil exports. This heavy reliance on a single customer leaves us exposed to policy shifts in Washington, such as the recent threat of tariffs on Canadian energy. Expanding pipeline infrastructure both westward and eastward would help diversify our export market into Asia and Europe, as well as strengthen our energy security.
Prime Minister Carney’s short list of projects is another blow to western Canada, and especially Alberta. There’s an obvious reason no private developer has stepped forward to finance or build a new oil pipeline: the Trudeau government’s damaging energy policies. The federal government needs to undo these policies and allow the private sector to make Canada an energy superpower.
Alberta
Alberta preparing to protect pro-family laws by invoking notwithstanding clause: leaked memo

From LifeSiteNews
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith plans to use the notwithstanding clause to protect parental notification, female sports, and prohibitions on gender transitions for minors.
Alberta is preparing to invoke the notwithstanding clause to enact pro-family laws that are under attack by LGBT activists.
According to an internal memo leaked to the Canadian Press, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s office plans to use the notwithstanding clause to override opposition to three laws that protect children from the LGBT agenda.
“As you are aware, the premier’s office has directed that legislation be developed for the fall legislative session to amend the following pieces of legislation to permit each to operate notwithstanding the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Alberta Bill of Rights,” the September 10 memo from Deputy Minister of Justice Malcolm Lavoie reads.
“This legislative initiative is highly sensitive and should be approached with the utmost confidentiality,” it continued.
According to the memo, the proposal will be presented to the cabinet on October 21.
The clause would be used to protect three pro-family laws that Alberta has enacted in the past months. The first mandates that parents are informed of any changes to their child’s name or gender in school.
The second, enacted at the beginning of September, ensures that women and girls are protected from competing against gender-confused men and boys in sporting competitions.
The third, and arguably most important, blocks irreversible “gender transitioning” surgeries and drugs like puberty blockers and hormones for minors.
The legislation was introduced after overwhelming evidence showed that persons who undergo so-called “gender transitioning” procedures are more likely to commit suicide than those who are not given such irreversible surgeries.
Meanwhile, a study on the side effects of “sex change” surgeries discovered that 81 percent of those who have undergone them in the past five years reported experiencing pain simply from normal movements in the weeks and months that followed, among many other negative side effects.
However, shortly after the legislation was introduced, an Alberta court justice granted a temporary injunction after outcry from LGBT activists. Alberta has since promised to continue the fight to enact the legislation.
If Smith uses the notwithstanding clause, her government can override the courts and enforce the pro-family laws regardless of previous court rulings.
The notwithstanding clause, embedded in section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, allows provinces to temporarily override sections of the Charter and protect new laws from being scrapped by the courts.
Alberta’s move would be similar to Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe invoking his government’s notwithstanding clause to protect pro-family legislation from the courts in 2023.
Alberta
How Alberta is moving to speed up oil sands reclamation with mine water treatment

From the Canadian Energy Centre
New standards to build on rules already in place for other mining sectors
In what the former Chief of the Fort McKay First Nation calls “a critical step in the right direction,” the Alberta government is moving to accelerate reclamation of more than 1.3 trillion litres of water stored in oil sands tailings ponds.
On Sept. 5, the province announced it will expedite setting standards that allow for “mine water” to be treated and released into the environment, building on the rules that are already in place for other mining operations across Canada.
“We cannot ignore this challenge, we need to keep working together to find practical and effective solutions that protect Indigenous rights, people and the environment,” said Chief Jim Boucher, a member of Alberta’s Oil Sands Mine Water Steering Committee.
That committee is behind a suite of nine recommendations that Alberta is putting into action to improve mine water management and tailings pond reclamation.
The Mining Association of Canada (MAC) says decades of research give the industry confidence that mine water can be safely treated and released once regulations are in place.
But that will take the federal government moving faster too.
Both the federal and provincial governments play a role in potential regulations for the treatment and release of oil sands mine water.
“Alberta is proposing science-based parameters to ensure the safe return of treated water used in oil sands mining, just as other provincial governments do for their respective mining sectors,” MAC CEO Pierre Gratton said in a statement.
“We are hopeful that this will accelerate the development of federal regulations – which we requested almost 15 years ago – to be similarly advanced.”
Gratton said setting standards for safe mine water release could unlock “significant investments” in oil sands reclamation and water treatment.
What are tailings ponds?
Tailings are a byproduct of mining operations around the world.
Oil sands tailings ponds are engineered basins holding a mix of mine water, sand, silt, clay and residual bitumen generated during the extraction process. There are eight operating oil sands mines with tailings ponds in northern Alberta.
Recycling water held in these basins helps operators reduce the amount of fresh water withdrawn from the Athabasca River.
In 2023, 79 per cent of the water used for oil sands mining was recycled, according to the Alberta Energy Regulator.
What is oil sands mine water?
Oil sands mine water is water that comes into contact with the various stages of oil sands mining operations, including bitumen extraction and processing.
Tailings ponds in the oil sands also hold water from significant amounts of rain and snow collected in the decades since the first mines began operating.
While the oil sands mining sector has reduced the amount of fresh water it uses per barrel of oil produced by nearly one-third since 2013, the total volume of mine water in tailings storage has grown as production has increased.
What’s in oil sands mine water?
The constituents of oil sands mine water requiring treatment for safe release are both typical of water in other industrial processes and unique to the oil sands sector.
MAC says common materials are suspended solids like sand, silt and clay, as well as a range of metals. These can be treated by a wide range of proven technologies already in use in Canada and globally.
Unique to oil sands mine water are organic compounds such as naphthenic acids. According to MAC, operators have demonstrated and continue to invest in processes to treat these to levels safe for environmental release.
How does mine water impact reclamation?
At the end of an oil sands mine’s life, operators must remove all infrastructure and restore the land to features of a self-sustaining boreal forest similar to what was there before.
Addressing the challenge of tailings ponds and the mine water stored in them is critical to the overall success of oil sands mining reclamation.
Why is mine water release important?
MAC says the only way to remove mine water in tailings ponds is to treat it for safe release to the environment.
Strict regulations allow for this process across Canadian copper, nickel, gold, iron ore, and diamond mining operations. But it is prohibited in the oil sands.
The safe release of treated oil sands mine water into the environment can reduce the need to store it, minimize further land disturbance and help reclamation happen faster.
MAC says operators have shown they can treat mine water to safe release levels, using processes that include innovative technologies developed through Canada’s Oil Sands Innovation Alliance.
What is Alberta doing?
Alberta has accepted the Oil Sands Mine Water Steering Committee’s nine recommendations aimed at speeding up solutions for safe mine water release.
The province says the recommendations, developed with input from industry, technology providers, Indigenous communities and scientists, will now be evaluated to determine how they can be put into practice.
-
Agriculture2 days ago
Ottawa’s EV Gamble Just Cost Canola Farmers Billions
-
Business2 days ago
How the feds blew your money this week
-
Frontier Centre for Public Policy2 days ago
Charlie Kirk Fought A Progressive Ideology That Punishes Truth
-
Business2 days ago
Canadian gov’t spending on DEI programs exceeds $1 billion since 2016
-
Censorship Industrial Complex2 days ago
Media’s Psyop Against Climate Scientists
-
Crime2 days ago
Charlie Kirk’s Widow Says She Forgives Her Husband’s Assassin During Memorial
-
Sports1 day ago
CFL Evolution! Canadian Football League moving field goal posts, changing “rouge” rules, shrinking end zone and field size!
-
Bruce Dowbiggin1 day ago
Choking The Night Away: Can Blue Jays/ Tigers Recover?