Yes Alberta has a spending problem. But it has solutions too

The Smith government’s recent fiscal update sparked concerns as once again the province has swung from budget surpluses to a budget deficit. To balance the budget, Finance Minister Nate Horner has committed to address the spending side and will “look under every stone” before considering the revenue side, and this is the right approach. Alberta’s fiscal challenges are a spending problem, not a revenue problem.

For perspective, if program spending had grown by inflation and population over the past two decades, it would be $55.6 billion in 2025/26 rather than the actual $76.4 billion. So, while the Smith government has demonstrated important restraint in recent years, total program spending and per person (inflation-adjusted) program spending is still materially higher in 2025/26 than in previous periods.

Alberta’s high spending is fuelling the projected $6.5 billion deficit. Consider that at the alternative spending level ($55.6 billion) Alberta would be enjoying a large budget surplus of $14.4 billion in 2025/26—rather than adding to the province’s red ink.

Despite this, the discussion around deficits often revolves around volatile resource revenue (e.g. oil and gas royalties). It’s true—resource revenue has declined year over year and that has an impact on the budget. But again, it’s not the underlying problem. The problem is successive governments have increased spending during good times of relatively high resource revenue to levels that are unsustainable without incurring deficits when resource revenue inevitably declines. In other words, the fiscal framework for the provincial government relies too heavily on volatile resource revenues to balance its budget.

As a share of the economy, non-resource revenue (e.g. personal income and business income) averaged 12.5 per cent over the last decade (2016/17 to 2025/26) compared to 11.1 per cent between 2006/07 to 2015/16. In other words, Alberta is collecting a larger share of non-resource revenues than in the past as a share of the economy. This statistic alone makes it difficult to argue that the province has a revenue problem.

So, what can the government do to rein in its spending?

Government employee compensation typically accounts for nearly 50 per cent of the Alberta government’s operating spending. From 2019 to 2024, the number of provincial government jobs in Alberta increased by 46,500. Over that period, total compensation for provincial government jobs jumped from $24.2 billion to $29.5 billion. Put differently, government compensation now costs $5.3 billion more annually than pre pandemic. The government should reduce the number of government jobs back to pre-pandemic levels through attrition and a larger program review.

Business subsidies (a.k.a. corporate welfare) is another clear area for reform. Business subsidies consume a meaningful share of each ministries‘ annual budget costing billions of dollars. For example, in 2024/25, grants were the second-largest expense for the ministry of environment at $182.0 million and the largest expense for the ministry of arts, culture and status of women at $154.2 million. For the ministry of energy and minerals, grants totalled $166.3 million in 2024/25. With more than 25 ministries, the provincial government could find meaningfully savings by requiring that each to closely examine their budgets and eliminate business subsidies to yield savings.

The Smith government’s recent fiscal update rung the alarm bells, but to fix the province’s fiscal challenges, one must first understand the underlying problem—Alberta has a spending problem. Fortunately, there are some clear first steps to tackle it.

Related Topics:#FraserInstitute #MilagrosPalacios #TeganHill AlbertaBusinessSubsidies AlbertaPublicEmployees AlbertaSpendingProblem feature

Up Next

French government collapses after budget vote, Le Pen demands elections

Don't Miss

Canada Post is broken beyond repair

Todayville

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Canada’s COVID mandates linked to rise in ‘unexplained deaths’: new report

International / 14 mins ago

A social media crackdown sparked the revolution but government corruption set Nepal’s youth on fire

Crime / 5 hours ago

‘Dark Moment For America’: Trump Addresses Nation After Kirk Assassination

Alberta

Province urging post secondary students to apply for loans, grants, scholarships, bursaries and awards

Published on September 10, 2025

Government of Alberta

Alberta’s government is helping build the province’s future workforce through funding to support post-secondary students.

Alberta’s government is investing almost $1.2 billion in post-secondary students through loans, grants, scholarships, bursaries and awards. Post-secondary students are essential to building Alberta’s future workforce and ensuring the province remains competitive both nationally and internationally.

As of Sept. 2, Alberta Student Aid has received more than 90,000 loan and grant applications for the 2025-26 academic year, and about 17,000 scholarship and award applications. The Alberta Student Aid system automatically processes student aid applications, though some applications require staff review to determine eligibility.

“Alberta’s post-secondary students are investing their time, energy and money in pursuing higher education. Our future leaders are among these young Albertans, and we are proud to support them through a variety of repayable and non-repayable funding supports. An investment in these students is an investment in the future of our workforce, our economy and our province.”

Myles McDougall, Minister of Advanced Education

The Alberta Student Awards Personnel Association consists of 85 members representing 25 of Alberta’s post-secondary institutions, and works with Alberta’s government to make improvements to the student financial assistance program in Alberta.

“The Alberta Student Awards Personnel Association sincerely appreciates the noticeable improvements in application processing times this year. The positive impact of the work at Alberta Student Aid is being felt by students and institutions alike, and we recognize the considerable effort and coordination required to achieve this level of service.”

Executive members of the Alberta Student Awards Personnel Association

Alberta’s government is continuing to take action to make post-secondary education more affordable by capping tuition increases, reducing interest rates on student loans, maintaining the interest-free grace period, increasing access to the Repayment Assistance Plan and modernizing shelter allowances for student aid.

Quick facts

Students can get more information and submit their applications at studentaid.alberta.ca.
To avoid delays, students are encouraged to upload all required documentation with their initial application.
Alberta Student Aid does not cover all financial costs associated with attending post-secondary education and is a supplement to other funding sources such as savings, part-time employment or family assistance.

Related information

Alberta Student Aid

Alberta

Maritime provinces can enact policies to reduce reliance on Alberta… ehem.. Ottawa

Published on September 9, 2025

Todayville

From the Fraser Institute

By Alex Whalen

Nova Scotia’s Finance Minister John Lohr recently took the rare step of publicly commenting on the province’s reliance on transfer payments from Ottawa. For decades, the Maritime provinces have heavily relied on federal transfers, and the equalization program in particular, to fund provincial budgets.

Ottawa collects taxes from across Canada and then redistributes money to different provinces and/or individual Canadians through various programs, including equalization. The MacDonald Notebook recently reported that Lohr told a Halifax Chamber of Commerce audience “we’re very aware that we are very dependent on transfer payments from other parts of the country… we can’t continue to take that for granted… we have the resources here.”

Lohr makes an important point. Consider equalization, a federal program that, in effect, provides payments to provinces with weaker economies and a lower ability to raise tax revenues, with the goal of ensuring all provinces can deliver comparable services at comparable tax rates.

Premiers in other provinces have often lobbied for changes including reform or outright elimination of the program. In fact, Newfoundland and Labrador (backed by Alberta, British Columbia and Saskatchewan) is currently challenging the program in court. These provinces believe the program is unfair given how equalization payments are calculated on an annual basis. And this is a serious political concern because at some point these provinces could force reforms to equalization that would result in reduced payments to recipient provinces.

Such a move would have a major impact on provincial finances in the Maritimes. In 2024/25, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia are the three provinces most dependent on equalization funds, ranging between $3,718 per person in P.E.I. to $3,252 per person in Nova Scotia. Equalization represents between 19.4 per cent and 21.9 per cent of provincial revenue in these provinces. Put differently, without this federal transfer program, these provinces would lose roughly one-fifth of their revenue. Only Manitoba comes close to this level of reliance on equalization.

But why should the Maritime provinces wait to have reform forced upon them? Moreover, it shouldn’t be a goal to be a long-term recipient province for the same reason one wouldn’t want to be a long-term welfare recipient. Regardless of what Alberta and Saskatchewan wants, we in the east should want to be off equalization for our own reasons. Strengthening provincial economies in the Maritimes would raise living standards and incomes, while strengthening provincial finances and reducing reliance on programs such as equalization.

So, what can be done?

First, the Nova Scotia government’s recent shift in policy to permit more natural resource development in areas such as mining and natural gas is a strong first step. The province is sitting on billions of dollars in economic opportunity in this sector, while the sector’s wages tend to be among the highest of any industry. Other provinces should follow suit and develop their natural resource sectors.

More broadly, governments in the region should trim their bloated bureaucracies to make way for broad-based tax relief. The Maritime provinces have the largest governments in Canada, with government spending (at all levels—federal, provincial and local) exceeding 57 per cent of provincial economies. A consequence of this large government sector is some of the highest taxes in North America (across all types of taxation). Reducing the size of government to national-average levels would make room for substantial tax relief that would boost growth in the region.

Long-term dependence on federal transfers does not need to be a given in the Maritimes. With the right policy environment in place, the governments of Nova Scotia, P.E.I. and New Brunswick can strengthen their economies while reducing reliance on the rest of Canada. On this front, Minister Lohr is on the right track.