Energy
Canada Deserves Energy Clarity – Trudeau’s “No Pipeline” Bill Has Simply Been Replaced by Carney’s “Maybe a Pipeline” Bill
From Energy Now
By Jim Warren
I wonder if many supporters of the conventional energy sector in Alberta are embarrassed about having to go cap in hand to Ottawa for permission to expand oil production and seagoing exports. Maybe they’re more angry than embarrassed.
Since the 2025 federal election Mark Carney has claimed to support nation building economic development. However, when it comes to dismantling the restrictions on getting new pipelines built the only concession of consequence he has made to the gas and petroleum sectors is Bill C-5. And the actual significance of that concession remains unclear.
Jason Kenney might well refer to Bill C-5 as the “Maybe a Pipeline” bill.
Optimism ensued after the Calgary Stampede Pancake Breakfast when Carney told reporters he would support a proposal under Bill C-5 for a new oil pipeline extending from Alberta to tidewater. You really can’t blame people for welcoming what could be a pipeline lifeline. After all, Albertans have fought Ottawa for 10 long years without receiving a single meaningful concession for the energy sector.
Unfortunately ifs and buts won’t build a pipeline.
A pipeline could be approved, if Alberta’s oil producers make a monumental investment in capturing their domestic CO2 emissions. It could be approved provided somebody other than Ottawa assembles the resources and commitments required to develop and support a Bill C-5 proposal. And let’s not forget, a pipeline to the East coast could be approved only if Quebec allows it.
This past spring Quebec Premier François Legault hinted he was giving pipelines another look. Frightened by the potential impact of US tariffs, a majority of people in Quebec were warming to the idea of a new oil pipeline crossing their provincial territory. As of May 2025, Legault was prepared to consider it. Perhaps he got to thinking Quebec might want to build a few pipelines to tap into its own undeveloped oil and gas reserves.
Nevertheless, the irritating reality is that if Quebecers say no, Mark Carney has promised they will have a veto over an Energy East 2.0.
And, what about David Eby’s NDP government in BC? The BC NDP have been competing with the Greens for decades over who loves the environment the most. That being said, some observers suggest Eby has become less hostile to a Northern Gateway 2.0 than he was in the past. However, given Carney’s promise of a veto for Quebec, BC’s world-class tree huggers and whale savers can be expected to demand the same treatment.
I admit being sucked into the desperate practice of micro-parsing every public statement made by Mark Carney; hoping one of his word salads actually contained good news. It is no simple task. As Danielle Smith deftly noted, Mark Carney speaks in riddles. I’ve read Bill C-5 but remain puzzled. I still see a big problem with getting a supposedly approved project actually built under it.
I’d be thrilled to be proven wrong on this count, but I haven’t found convincing evidence to the contrary.
Take the case of the TMX. Despite being approved and purchased by the Liberal government the project was plagued by expensive delays. The pipeline fell victim to an avalanche of protests, lawsuits, and court injunctions. Minor adjustments to the route of the right of way had to be run through a whole new approval gauntlet. It seemed like environmental monitors would halt construction if it threatened a puddle containing a few tadpoles or if a non-human bone fragment was discovered.
Impediments to construction post-approval were in large part responsible for the $38 billion in cost overruns chalked up by the project. Unless approval under Bill C-5 promises to immunize projects from the same sort of frustrations that plagued the TMX, who would want to take the risk?
An Indigenous youth group in Ontario has already announced a protest campaign aimed at thwarting Doug Ford’s plans for developing the mineral rich Ring of Fire.
Unlike Albertans who are left wondering about the future of their most significant industry, Quebecers have been doing just fine under the Carney Liberals. As mentioned, they have been promised a veto over new oil pipelines. And more recently the federal government passed Bill C-202, guaranteeing that the supply management program for dairy and poultry farmers cannot be used as a bargaining chip in Canada’s international trade negotiations.
The Liberal government has conceded that both Quebec’s 4,300 dairy farmers and their 350,000 cows are sacred. Supply management ensures Quebec’s dairy farmers can’t lose money without trying very hard to do so. On the other hand, despite the longstanding complaints of Westerners over major irritants like Quebec’s annual $13 billion equalization windfall have not made it onto the Liberals nation building agenda. Chalk up another win for La Belle Province.
It is not like political leaders on the prairies haven’t been pushing back.
Danielle Smith has taken a cover-all-the-bases approach. One of her tactics has been to exercise the degree of diplomatic finesse required to maximize the concessions she can wring out of Ottawa; short of separation.
Smith has also made it clear her government expects resolution of many of the West’s longstanding problems with Confederation like equalization and the emissions cap. Smith’s government has also given the people of Alberta the opportunity to air their concerns about the state of the Canadian union by facilitating a separation referendum. What more could a premier who wants her province to remain in Confederation do?
Compared to Alberta, Saskatchewan is a junior player when it comes to oil production, although the 2 billion in royalties (2023 figures) it earns annually from oil is nothing to sneeze at; especially for a province with just 1.2 million people. Nevertheless, Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government has taken a unique approach to resisting Ottawa’s assault on fossil fuel.
Saskatchewan relies on coal-fired power plants for around 40% of its electricity. It lacks the water resources suitable for significantly expanding hydro production. The province’s natural gas fields are nearly exhausted. And greater reliance on solar and wind is not feasible given the need to maintain base load service in a province subject to serious climate extremes. The province’s long-term aim is to eventually replace coal-fired power generation with nuclear power, but that will require time and investments in the tens of billions.
So what to do in the interim, given that Ottawa has ruled all coal-fired electrical power generation in Canada must end by 2030? The solution announced by Jeremy Harrison, minister responsible for SaskPower, Saskatchewan’s Crown-owned power utility, was to tell Ottawa to get stuffed.
The province will continue to make use of its ample coal resources. It will extend the life span of its generating stations until the transition to nuclear is well underway; which could be a couple decades or more down the road. It is a position that pleases the Town of Coronach and the City of Estevan along with the thousand plus people employed thanks to coal mining and the power plants.
Nothing embarrassing about that.
From the Canadian Energy Centre
New standards to build on rules already in place for other mining sectors
In what the former Chief of the Fort McKay First Nation calls “a critical step in the right direction,” the Alberta government is moving to accelerate reclamation of more than 1.3 trillion litres of water stored in oil sands tailings ponds.
On Sept. 5, the province announced it will expedite setting standards that allow for “mine water” to be treated and released into the environment, building on the rules that are already in place for other mining operations across Canada.
“We cannot ignore this challenge, we need to keep working together to find practical and effective solutions that protect Indigenous rights, people and the environment,” said Chief Jim Boucher, a member of Alberta’s Oil Sands Mine Water Steering Committee.
That committee is behind a suite of nine recommendations that Alberta is putting into action to improve mine water management and tailings pond reclamation.
The Mining Association of Canada (MAC) says decades of research give the industry confidence that mine water can be safely treated and released once regulations are in place.
But that will take the federal government moving faster too.
Both the federal and provincial governments play a role in potential regulations for the treatment and release of oil sands mine water.
“Alberta is proposing science-based parameters to ensure the safe return of treated water used in oil sands mining, just as other provincial governments do for their respective mining sectors,” MAC CEO Pierre Gratton said in a statement.
“We are hopeful that this will accelerate the development of federal regulations – which we requested almost 15 years ago – to be similarly advanced.”
Gratton said setting standards for safe mine water release could unlock “significant investments” in oil sands reclamation and water treatment.
What are tailings ponds?
Tailings are a byproduct of mining operations around the world.
Oil sands tailings ponds are engineered basins holding a mix of mine water, sand, silt, clay and residual bitumen generated during the extraction process. There are eight operating oil sands mines with tailings ponds in northern Alberta.
Recycling water held in these basins helps operators reduce the amount of fresh water withdrawn from the Athabasca River.
In 2023, 79 per cent of the water used for oil sands mining was recycled, according to the Alberta Energy Regulator.
What is oil sands mine water?
Oil sands mine water is water that comes into contact with the various stages of oil sands mining operations, including bitumen extraction and processing.
Tailings ponds in the oil sands also hold water from significant amounts of rain and snow collected in the decades since the first mines began operating.
While the oil sands mining sector has reduced the amount of fresh water it uses per barrel of oil produced by nearly one-third since 2013, the total volume of mine water in tailings storage has grown as production has increased.
What’s in oil sands mine water?
The constituents of oil sands mine water requiring treatment for safe release are both typical of water in other industrial processes and unique to the oil sands sector.
MAC says common materials are suspended solids like sand, silt and clay, as well as a range of metals. These can be treated by a wide range of proven technologies already in use in Canada and globally.
Unique to oil sands mine water are organic compounds such as naphthenic acids. According to MAC, operators have demonstrated and continue to invest in processes to treat these to levels safe for environmental release.
How does mine water impact reclamation?
At the end of an oil sands mine’s life, operators must remove all infrastructure and restore the land to features of a self-sustaining boreal forest similar to what was there before.
Addressing the challenge of tailings ponds and the mine water stored in them is critical to the overall success of oil sands mining reclamation.
Why is mine water release important?
MAC says the only way to remove mine water in tailings ponds is to treat it for safe release to the environment.
Strict regulations allow for this process across Canadian copper, nickel, gold, iron ore, and diamond mining operations. But it is prohibited in the oil sands.
The safe release of treated oil sands mine water into the environment can reduce the need to store it, minimize further land disturbance and help reclamation happen faster.
MAC says operators have shown they can treat mine water to safe release levels, using processes that include innovative technologies developed through Canada’s Oil Sands Innovation Alliance.
What is Alberta doing?
Alberta has accepted the Oil Sands Mine Water Steering Committee’s nine recommendations aimed at speeding up solutions for safe mine water release.
The province says the recommendations, developed with input from industry, technology providers, Indigenous communities and scientists, will now be evaluated to determine how they can be put into practice.
Business
Energy leaders send this letter urging Prime Minister Mark Carney to unlock Canada’s resources
An Open Letter to the Prime Minister of Canada
The CEOs of Canada’s largest energy companies, including Canadian Natural Resources, Cenovus, Suncor, Imperial Oil and many more, have issued a new “Build Canada Now” letter to Prime Minister Carney. They are calling for Ottawa to repeal the production cap, scrap the tanker ban, simplify regulations and shorten project approvals so Alberta’s energy sector can create jobs, attract investment and help Canada become a true global energy superpower.
September 15, 2025
The Rt. Hon. Mark Carney, PC, MP
Prime Minister of Canada
Dear Prime Minister Carney,
Six months have passed since the first “Build Canada Now” letter was sent to you and the leaders of Canada’s other political parties outlining an action plan to unlock Canada’s world class oil and natural gas resources to strengthen Canada’s economic sovereignty, resilience and prosperity. After the election, we followed up with a second letter expressing our support for our shared vision of Canada becoming an energy superpower, one that harnesses both conventional and clean energy resources. Since then, we have seen progress but it is insufficient to stimulate the investment and growth required to make this vision a reality.
Thank you for leading the positive change in tone from the Federal Government in terms of the importance of economic development, including expanded investments in conventional energy. The launch of the new Major Projects Office, Indigenous Advisory Council, the initial list of projects of national significance, and the announcement that it will begin work in support of Pathways Plus are critical steps in the right direction. We appreciate the progress the Federal Government has made in these areas.
However, Canada still lacks the clear, competitive and durable fiscal and regulatory policies required to achieve the so-called “Grand Bargain”. That bargain being significant emissions reductions, expanded market access and material upstream production growth. Achieving these three inter-related outcomes goes beyond progressing select major projects but rather includes a multitude of other projects and related investments. Consequently, we reiterate our call to work together to make the policy changes required for this to happen.
Our call to action is urgent, with persistent indicators that the Canadian economy is moving in the wrong direction. The need to improve productivity and create jobs requires swift and decisive action. Canada is blessed with an enviable abundance of oil and natural gas resources and has the expertise to develop them in a manner consistent with environmental responsibility, social values, and working with Indigenous groups for the benefit of Canada and Canadians. As leaders of this sector, we have consistently advocated for the changes required to unwind the past decade of increasing policy complexity and uncertainty that led to delayed investments, lost opportunities and a competitive disadvantage on the global energy stage.
Given your background, you understand that the private sector and public markets require clarity and certainty to make the long-term investments necessary to realizing this sector’s potential, in turn creating thousands of high-paying jobs and significantly strengthening Canada’s economy.
Making the changes expressed in the earlier Build Canada Now letters are necessary to send clear signals that Canada is open for business. To reiterate, we believe that your government must focus on the following:
- Significantly simplify regulations. The Federal Impact Assessment Act and West Coast tanker ban are impeding development and need to be overhauled and repealed, respectively. Existing processes are complex, unpredictable, subjective, and excessively long. Processes need to be clarified and simplified, and decisions must withstand judicial review.
- Shorten timelines for project approvals. The Federal Government needs to dramatically reduce regulatory timelines to approve all projects within months, not years, of application. This is required to restore investor confidence and once again attract capital to Canada. Clarity on provincial versus federal jurisdiction related to project approvals is also required and needs to be respected.
- Commit to grow production, not limit it. The Federal Government’s unlegislated cap on emissions must be eliminated to allow the sector to grow and achieve its potential for the benefit of Canada and Canadians. The “production cap” creates uncertainty, is redundant, will result in production cuts, and stifles investment.
- Fiscal framework that attracts investment. The Federal carbon levy on large emitters is not globally cost competitive and should be repealed allowing provinces to set regulations. The Federal Government can lead cooperation across jurisdictions, protecting domestic and international competitiveness. Industry needs clear, competitive, and durable fiscal frameworks, including associated with carbon and overall taxation, to secure capital and incentivize investment.
- Incent Indigenous investment opportunities. The Federal Government needs to provide Indigenous loan guarantees at scale so industry can create ownership opportunities to increase prosperity and ensure Indigenous communities benefit from resource development.
As you have clearly stated, our country needs to move from “uncertainty to prosperity”. There needs to be tangible change to make this happen, and without clear and urgent action we risk missing a generational opportunity to capture the potential before Canada now.
As Parliament resumes for the Fall sitting, the energy industry remains committed to working with you, your cabinet, and the provinces on an urgent basis to achieve the energy sector’s potential for the good of Canada. Together, Canada can become the global energy superpower we all envision. We look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Original signatories
Brandon Anderson
President & CEO
NorthRiver Midstream Inc
Doug Bartole
President & CEO
InPlay Oil Corp.
Robert Broen
President & CEO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
Scott Burrows
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
Chris Carlsen
President & COO
Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
Brad W. Corson
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Imperial Oil Ltd.
N. Murray Edwards
Executive Chairman
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Darlene Gates
President and Chief Executive Officer
MEG Energy Corp.
Paul Hawksworth
President and Chief Executive Officer
Inter Pipeline Ltd.
Tyson Huska
President & CEO
Longshore Resources Ltd.
Mike Lawford
President & CEO
NuVista Energy Ltd.
Chris Mazerolle
President
Chevron Canada Resources
Nicholas McKenna
President
ConocoPhillips Canada
Paul Myers
President
Pacific Canbriam Energy Limited
François Poirier
President and Chief Executive Officer
TC Energy Corp.
Susan Riddell Rose
President & CEO
Rubellite Energy Corp.
Don Simmons
President & CEO
Hemisphere Energy Corporation
Adam Waterous
Executive Chairman, Board of Directors
Strathcona Resources Ltd.
Richard Wyman
President
Chance Oil and Gas Limited
Terry Anderson
President and Chief Executive Officer
ARC Resources Ltd.
Michael Binnion
President & CEO
Questerre Energy Corporation
Craig Bryksa
President and Chief Executive Officer
Veren Inc.
David J. Burton
President & CEO
Lycos Energy Inc.
Paul Colborne
President & CEO
Surge Energy Inc.
Greg Ebel
President and Chief Executive Officer
Enbridge Inc.
Grant Fagerheim
President and Chief Executive Officer
Whitecap Resources Inc.
Bryan Gould
Founder & CEO
Aspenleaf Energy Limited
Philip B. Hodge
President & CEO
Pine Cliff Energy Ltd.
Rich Kruger
President and Chief Executive Officer
Suncor Energy Inc.
Byron Lutes
President
Mancal Energy Inc.
Brendan McCracken
President & CEO
Ovintiv Canada ULC
Jon McKenzie
President and Chief Executive Officer
Cenovus Energy Inc.
Curtis Philippon
President & CEO
Gibson Energy
Mike Rose
President and Chief Executive Officer
Tourmaline Oil Corp.
Brian Schmidt
President & CEO
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.
David Spyker
President & CEO
Freehold Royalties Ltd.
Bevin Wirzba
President and Chief Executive Officer
South Bow Corp.
Vern Yu
President & Chief Executive Officer
AltaGas
Additional signatories
-
Business21 hours agoCarney Admits Deficit Will Top $61.9 Billion, Unveils New Housing Bureaucracy
-
Alberta18 hours agoAlberta first to add citizenship to licenses
-
Alberta17 hours agoBreak the Fences, Keep the Frontier
-
Business20 hours agoCarney’s Ethics Test: Opposition MP’s To Challenge Prime Minister’s Financial Ties to China
-
Business19 hours agoAttrition doesn’t go far enough, taxpayers need real cuts
-
Business2 days agoCanada’s ‘supply management’ system makes milk twice as expensive and favours affluent dairy farms
-
COVID-192 days agoFreedom Convoy leader Tamara Lich puts her ‘trust’ in Jesus while awaiting sentencing
-
Alberta16 hours agoNo Permission Required: Alberta Will Protect Its Daughters