Connect with us

Health

Police are charging parents with felonies for not placing infants who died in sleep on their backs

Published

18 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Dr. Brenda Baletti, The Defender

Pennsylvania authorities brought felony charges against the parents of two different babies after police said the infants died because the parents placed them in unsafe sleeping positions.

Parents of two different babies are being charged with felonies in Pennsylvania after police say their babies died because the parents placed them in unsafe sleeping positions,Ā SpotlightPA reported.

In both cases, police allege that the parents failed to follow guidance, including handouts given to them at doctor’s visits, stating that babies should be put to sleep on their backs.

GinaĀ andĀ David StrauseĀ of Lebanon County are accused of putting their 3-month-old infant son, Gavin, to sleep on his stomach and allowing him to sleep with stuffed animals in the crib.

They are charged with involuntary manslaughter, recklessly endangering another person, and endangering the welfare of children.

Natalee Rasmus of Luzerne County is accused of putting her 1-month-old daughter, Avaya Jade Rasmus-Alberto, to sleep on her stomach on aĀ boppy pillow, often used for nursing. She isĀ chargedĀ with third-degree murder, involuntary manslaughter, and endangering the welfare of children.

Rasmus was a 17-year-old mother when her daughter died in 2022. Court records show that she continues to be held at the Luzerne County Correctional Facility with bail set at $25,000 pending resolution of her case.

In both cases, autopsiesĀ concludedĀ the babies died of accidental death from asphyxiation. Law enforcement argued in both cases that parents should have known that putting the babies to sleep on their stomachs was unsafe, because they had received paperwork at wellness visits informing them of safe sleeping practices.

The law requires hospitals, birthing centers, and medical providers to give parents educational materials from the nationalĀ Safe to Sleep campaign, and ask them to certify that they received them.

Signing the statement is voluntary. The statement doesn’t indicate that parents can be charged with a criminal offense if they don’t follow the campaign advice.

Advocates from national organizations that educate parents about safe sleep practices found the charges shocking. Nancy Maruyama, the executive director ofĀ Sudden Infant Death Services of Illinois,Ā toldĀ Spotlight PA, ā€œTo charge them criminally is a crime, because they have already suffered the worst loss.ā€

Alison Jacobson, executive director ofĀ First Candle, a non-profit that also educates parents about safe sleep practices, toldĀ Pennlive,Ā ā€œThere is no law against placing a baby on his or her stomach to sleep. How they can charge this family with involuntary manslaughter is completely baffling to me.ā€

ResearcherĀ Neil Z. Miller, an expert on SIDS and the Safe to Sleep campaign, told The Defender, ā€œParents of a sleeping baby who dies in the middle of the night should never be charged with murder. That’s just cruel.ā€

Miller, author of ā€œVaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective?ā€ added:

Should parents be obligated to follow every ā€œrecommendationā€ made by their doctor or the Safe to Sleep campaign? Would we as a society prefer that doctors raise our babies instead of the parents? Have other possible causes of death been considered, such as vaccinations? As a society, we can, and must, do much better.

Does placing infants on their backs make a difference?Ā 

The handouts shared with new Pennsylvania parents are based on the National Institutes of Health ā€œSafe to Sleepā€ campaign, which institutionalized a program initiated by theĀ American Academy of PediatricsĀ (AAP) in 1992 to inform parents to put children to sleep on their backs rather than on their stomachs.

The campaign is based on the premise that babies who sleep on their backs or sides are less likely to die in their sleep. Until that time, it was common for babies to sleep on their stomachs.

The program was launched in the wake of a rising number of SIDS deaths – and growing concern among some parents that the deaths were linked to vaccination.

In a 2021 article in the peer-reviewed journalĀ Toxicology Reports, vaccine researcherĀ Neil Z. MillerĀ provides a history of the SIDS diagnosis, noting that the rise of SIDS coincided with the firstĀ mass immunization campaigns.

Between 1992, when the Safe to Sleep program launched, and 2001,Ā SIDS deaths reportedly declinedĀ a whopping 55 percent – aĀ number toutedĀ in articles celebrating the program, making it appear that babies sleeping on their stomachs was the cause of SIDS, not vaccines.

However, at the same time deaths from SIDS decreased, the rate of mortality from ā€œsuffocation in bed,ā€ ā€œsuffocation other,ā€ ā€œunknown and unspecified causes,ā€ and ā€œintent unknownā€ all increased significantly.

Why? The classification system had changed. SIDS deaths were being reclassified by medical certifiers, usually coroners, as one of the other similar categories, not SIDS.

Research published in the journalĀ Pediatrics, the AAP’s flagship journal, concluded that deaths previously certified as SIDS were simply being certified as other non-SIDS causes, such as suffocation – but the deaths were still essentially SIDS deaths.

That change in classification accounted for more than 90 percent of the drop in SIDS rates.

TheĀ PediatricsĀ paper showed no decline in overall postneonatal mortality after the Safe to Sleep campaign was launched, despite the program’s – and the AAP’s – claims to the contrary.

Others verified theĀ PediatricsĀ paper’s findings, and the trend continued, as reported by multiple studiesĀ inĀ top journals. Miller reported that, for example, ā€œFrom 1999 through 2015, the U.S. SIDS rate declined 35.8% while infant deaths due to accidental suffocation increased 183.8%.ā€

Research shows that almostĀ 80 percent of SIDS deathsĀ reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) happen within seven days of vaccination.

Theories linking vaccines to SIDS suggest that, in some cases,Ā underdeveloped liver enzyme pathwaysĀ may make it harder for some infants to processĀ toxic ingredientsĀ in vaccines. Others argue that other,Ā multiple, complex factorsĀ can make some infants vulnerable to toxic ingredients inĀ vaccines.

Baby Gavin was ā€˜a dream come true’

On April 30, Gina and David Strause were charged with involuntary manslaughter, which carries a sentence of up to 10 years, and other lesser charges in the death of their son, Gavin.

According to theĀ police report, Gina found her son unresponsive, cold, and blue in his crib when she woke up to feed him on the morning of May 8, 2024. She immediately called 911 and performed CPR until the police arrived.

The baby was pronounced dead at the hospital. The autopsy report found the cause of death to be ā€œcomplications of asphyxia.ā€

Police said they observed loose items in the crib, ā€œsuch as blankets and stuffed animals.ā€

Gina said that after feeding her baby at about 11:30 p.m. the night before he died, she placed him in his crib on his belly, because he was a ā€œbelly sleeper,ā€ and covered him with a blanket. She said that she had received the recommendation that he should sleep on his back, but that he preferred to sleep on his stomach.

In anĀ interview with Pennlive, Gina said that she typically put Gavin to sleep on his back, but he had gotten into the daily habit of rolling onto his belly.

Davis Stause told police that when he left for work at 5:30 a.m., he checked on Gavin, who was sleeping on his stomach and moving around a little bit. David said he ā€œpatted his buttā€ to put him back to sleep.

The police reported that they also obtained medical records from birth through death that showed that on the discharge paperwork that the parents received information about safe sleep practices, which included putting the baby on its back, having it sleep in the same room as the parents, and keeping the crib clear of bumper pads and stuffed animals.

They said this paperwork explained how parents could create a safe sleeping environment for their babies to reduce the risk of SIDS.

Baby Gavin also went to the pediatrician for well-child visits on February 7 and 14, March 5, and April 9, a month before he died.

Gina told Pennlive that Gavin, who was born when she was almost 40, was ā€œa dream come true.ā€ She had taken 10 weeks of maternity leave and largely worked at home to spend as much time with him as possible. She said that after she gave birth, she was ā€œoverwhelmedā€ and didn’t remember receiving any paperwork or instructions about sleep.

Gina also said that at the hospital, police treated her and her husband with immediate suspicion, separating and questioning them. They were not allowed to see their baby again before he was taken by the coroner’s office.

The parents created aĀ GoFundMe page, where they shared a copy of the police report, to help cover their legal costs, because they said they do not qualify for a public defender.

The DefenderĀ attempted to contact the parents to inquire about the baby’s overall health, if he had any medical conditions, was born prematurely, or had recently received any vaccines, but the parents did not respond by deadline.

The district attorney’s office also did not respond to requests for comment.

ā€˜Tragic accident with no criminal intent to harm or kill the baby’

The forensic pathologist who performed the autopsy for Natalee Rasmus’ baby listed the cause of death as accidental. According to the report, the baby died from asphyxiation, theĀ Times LeaderĀ reported.

Rasmus discovered her baby had died on the morning of October 23, 2022, when she picked her up to get her ready for a doctor’s appointment.

Pennsylvania State Police in December charged Rasmus, alleging that she placed her baby face down to sleep against the recommendations of medical personnel and prenatal classes at Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center.

At a preliminary hearing on the case in February, a state trooper testified that Rasmus ignored safe sleeping practices because she had placed her baby face down in her bassinet with a Boppy pillow, which has a tag warning, ā€œDo not use for sleeping.ā€

The trooper, Caroline Rayeski, also testified that a search of Rasmus’ cell phone found that she had searched the internet to see whether it was ok to allow newborns to sleep on their stomachs. The trooper also seized literature from the prenatal classes stating it is ā€œrecommendedā€ to put newborns to sleep on their backs.

ā€œYeah, she wouldn’t sleep, she’ll just scream, so she has to be like propped up,ā€ Rasmus told the investigating officer, according toĀ Spotlight PA, which reported the story.

Assistant attorneys argued in a preliminary hearing that she disregarded safe sleeping practices, and a judge forwarded the criminal case to county court.

Rasmus is being represented by public defenders Joseph Yeager and Melissa Ann Sulima, who told theĀ Times LeaderĀ the baby’s death was ā€œa tragic accident with no criminal intent to harm or kill the baby.ā€

Yeager said the prenatal literature referring to newborn sleep positions are ā€œrecommendations,ā€ not mandates.

ā€œAs the death certificate says, it was an accident. Clearly, there was no malice in this accidental death,ā€ said Yeager, who also said the case should be dismissed.

Rasmus’ most serious charge, third-degree murder, is a homicide that involves killing someone without intent to kill, but with reckless disregard for human life. In Pennsylvania, it can carry a prison sentence ofĀ up to 40 years.

Court documents indicateĀ that Rasmus remains in jail with a $25,000 bail, pending the outcome of her case. Neither the district attorney nor Rasmus’ attorneys responded to The Defender’s request for comment.

How common is it to bring criminal charges against parents in infant deaths?

Attorney Daniel Nevins toldĀ SpotlightPAĀ it is extremely rare for parents to be criminally charged when infants die after sleeping on their stomachs, and that the burden of proof on the prosecutors will be high.

In 2014, Virginia resident Candice Christa Semidey, age 25, was charged with murder after she swaddled her baby and put it to sleep on its stomach,Ā theĀ Washington PostĀ reported. In that case, police similarly did not think that she intended for the baby to die.

SheĀ pleaded guiltyĀ to involuntary manslaughter and child neglect. She was ordered to serve three years of probation to avoid theĀ five-year prison termĀ she was sentenced to.

SomeĀ chargesĀ have also been brought againstĀ parentsĀ in deaths of infants sleeping with Boppy pillows. There have also been severalĀ casesĀ ofĀ parents chargedĀ for sleeping in theĀ same bedĀ as their child.

The Defender recently reported on three SIDS deaths that occurred shortly after vaccination. Police are still investigating the parents ofĀ 18-month-old twins who diedĀ together a week after receiving three vaccines. Authorities have not yet charged the parents, but initially said they were investigating the deaths as homicides.

Blessings Myrical Jean Simmons, age 6 months, receivedĀ six routine vaccines at a well-baby visit on January 13. The next morning, her parents found the baby dead in her bassinet. The autopsy lists SIDS as the infant’s cause of death, and no charges were filed against the parents.

This article was originally published byĀ The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please considerĀ subscribing to The DefenderĀ orĀ donating to Children’s Health Defense.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Alberta

Alberta puts pressure on the federal government’s euthanasia regime

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Jonathon Van Maren

Premier Danielle Smith is following through on a promise to address growing concerns with Canada’s euthanasia regime.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has sent a mandate letter to Justice Minister Mickey Amery directing him to draft and introduce new legislation on euthanasia to ensure better oversight of so-called ā€œmedical aid in dying,ā€ or ā€œMAiDā€ and to prohibit it for those suffering solely from mental illness.

In December of last year, Smith’s United Conservative government indicated that they would seek to address growing concerns with Canada’s euthanasia regime. Mainstream media outlets attacked the move, with the CBC actuallyĀ reporting that: ā€œSome are concerned new limitations could impact already vulnerable Albertans.ā€

Premier Smith has now followed through on that promise. TheĀ September 25 mandate letter, which lays out directives on a wide range of issues, calls for the justice minister to take steps to protect vulnerable Albertans suffering from mental illness:

As lead, work with relevant ministries to introduce legislation to provide greater oversight and appropriate safeguards for medical assistance in dying and prohibit medical assistance in dying where a person seeks this procedure based solely on a mental illness.

In an email to the CBC, Amery stated that while euthanasia law is under federal jurisdiction, healthcare falls under provincial jurisdiction. The CBC falsely claimed that mental illness ā€œhas never been an approved sole eligibility factor for MAID, though the government has considered permitting it.ā€ In fact, the Trudeau government passed Bill C-7, which legalized MAID for those struggling with mental illness, in 2021.

That eligibility expansion has been delayed twice—in 2023 and 2024—and is now slated to come into effect in 2027. Despite those delays, Bill C-7 is still law. MP Tamara Jansen and MP Andrew Lawton areĀ currently championing Bill C-218, the ā€œRight to Recover Act,ā€Ā which would reverse this and make it illegal to offer or perpetrate euthanasia on someone struggling solely with mental illness.

The CBC’s coverage of this move was predictably repulsive. In addition to their disinformation on euthanasia for mental illness, theyĀ reportedĀ that ā€œSmith’s letter directing new provincial legislation on MAID comes almost a year after the government surveyed just under 20,000 Albertans on whether they think the province should step in. Nearly half of those surveyed disagreed with putting in more guardrails on MAID decisions.ā€

ā€œNearly halfā€ is an unbelievably deceitful way of reporting on those results. In fact, 62% were in favor of legislation for a dedicated agency monitoring euthanasia processes; 55% were in favor of a MAID dispute mechanism allowing families or eligible others to challenge decisions to protect vulnerable people, such as those with disabilities or mental health struggles; and 67% supported restricting euthanasia to those with physical illnesses rather than mental illnesses. The CBC did not report on a single one of those numbers.

Provincial legislation to protect people with mental illnesses is badly needed, although I pray that by the time Justice Minister Amery gets around to drafting it, the Right to Recover Act will be passed in Parliament, and provincial action will be unnecessary. In the meantime, it is increasingly clear that much of Canada’s mainstream press coverage of this issue actively threatens the lives of the suicidal and those struggling with mental illnesses. If their dishonesty and attempts and manufacturing consent were not so routine, they would be breathtaking.

Featured Image

Jonathon’s writings have been translated into more than six languages and in addition to LifeSiteNews, has been published in the National Post,Ā National Review,Ā First Things, The Federalist, The American Conservative, The Stream, theĀ Jewish Independent,Ā theĀ Hamilton Spectator,Ā Reformed Perspective Magazine, and LifeNews, among others. He is a contributing editor to The European Conservative.

Continue Reading

Agriculture

“We Made it”: Healthy Ostriches Still Alive in Canada

Published on


Looks like we made it. For another weekend at least. Until sanity settles down into the head into the head of the federal government that remains fixated on the killing of 399 healthy ostriches. As the clock wound down today, an announcement from the farm proclaimed, ā€œWe made it today,ā€ calling it another ā€œmiracle Friday.ā€

WATCH TODAY’S Miracle Friday Announcement

Earlier in the day,Ā Rebel News’ Drea Humphrey reported,Ā ā€œThere’s apparently a SWAT team up the road, I hope that doesn’t mean they’ve gotten bad news,ā€ wondering ā€œif the police were preparing to aid the CFIA in the cull.ā€

Dacey Media reported that the farm said that ā€œOstrich Huntersā€ were also spotted at Universal Ostrich Farms according to Katie Pasitney The ā€œkill penā€ is fully set up and CFIA have been luring ostriches into it.

But as of 5:30 ET, it seems the farm and the ostriches may have escaped to live another day as the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) did not hand down a decision to grant a further leave to the farm to prepare its case, or dismiss the case, allowing the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) to proceed with their ā€œcullā€ to kill 399 healthy ostriches.

The palpable, raw government over-reach that includes over 100 Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) that have occupied the farm highlights the mismanagement of the CFIA and may be one of the reasons that the SCC has hesitated in making a decision before the weekend.

Call to Dismantle the CFIA

On today’s Stand on Guard interview Katie Pastiney, spokeswoman for the Universal Ostrich Farms in British Columbia called for the dismantlement of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. She says that the CFIA:

ā€œNeeds to be dismantled and we need to rebuild this organization back up from the ground up and we need to have a new vision.

ā€œWe need to have a new mission and a brand-new face for Canadians that will give us hope that we will be protected not attacked.ā€

ā€œThe Canadian Food Inspection Agency continues to overuse their authority, overuse their excessive freedom that they’ve been given, and they have zero accountability for their actions.ā€

The farm has been embroiled in a dispute with the federal government and its CFIA agency for close to a year. The agency claims the flock of ostriches has the avian flu, but it refuses to test the farmers’ birds, even though they have been healthy for 258 days. At the same time the CFIA will not let the farmers pay for the tests themselves, saying they will charge them $250,000 per ostrich and put them in jail for 6 months.

The federal agency and the RCMP have seized and occupied the farm since September 22, 2025. they have conducted a campaign of harassment of the farm family and their flock of ostriches that included: arresting the farmers when they were told to go feed their birds; using lights and heavy equipment at night’; sending drones to chase the birds that resulted in pushing one bird over the fence so it hurt its leg, not treating the animals properly; and not feeding the ostriches full rations of food and water and not treating the birds the CFIA injured. These activities have continued as the CFIA continues to construct a ā€œkill boxā€ of hay bales that have been on fire four times while under the CFIA’s supervision and occupation.

Ostrich ā€œkill boxā€ continued to be built on the farm AFTER the Supreme Court of Canada ordered a legal ā€œstayā€

Running Out of Time

In a stunningĀ report on X October 2nd, however, before the Supreme Court of Canada had made decision, the CFIA has daily continued to move forward to kill the ostriches ignoring the SCC legal ā€œstay.ā€

Karen Esperson, Pasitney’s mother yesterday reported on X:

ā€œWe need to put CFIA in check.

ā€œThis organization feels they are greater than the Supreme Court of Canada. they are still positioning the birds and putting them in the position to be killed immediately. They are assuming they know the outcome of the Supreme Court oof Canada. Do they think they are better than the Supreme court? That they are going to for sure win?

ā€œThe Supreme Court has not decided.

ā€œWhat is happening?

ā€œWe are on a stay order and yet I just got a call that they have a whole bunch of birds herded in a little circle in the kill pen.

ā€œWaiting. This is animal cruelty.ā€

Karen Esperson

Efforts to Save the Ostriches

More and more Members of Parliament have been speaking up on behalf of the farmers including the local provincial representative, the local Member of Parliament Scott Anderson, who visited the farm trying to talk to the CFIA and also the Official Leader of the OppositionĀ Pierre PoilievreĀ spek out yesterday.

A secondĀ press conferenceĀ hosted byĀ John Catsimatidis,Ā a New York radio host, billionaire and friend of Donald Trump and Dr. Oz, was also held yesterday. The USA Trump administration representatives including Robert F. Kennedy say they want to either pay for the ostrich testing or help re-locate them to the United States for further research opportunities. This outreach has been ignored.

CFIA Has Staff Enough to Kill but NOT Enough Staff to Test?

In my interview today with Pastiney she explained how the CFIAĀ didĀ originally give their ostrich farm an exemption that was later rescinded because the CFIA told them they were ā€œunderstaffed and we’re not able to perform these tests.ā€

ā€œThere was an exemption packageĀ that was given to us on January 2nd. We have an email from Canadian Food Inspection Agency stating that we qualify for special rare genetics within our herd and that we could be exempt.

ā€œNow when we followed through with that because we needed to test them just to show their DNA and their genetics and show their lineage that between January 2nd and January 10th something happened.

ā€œNow we didn’t qualify we lost that right.

ā€œAnd on January 10th they said sorry you don’t qualify for special rare genetics because we are understaffed and we’re not able to perform these tests.ā€

Why does the CFIA have staff to occupy the farm for weeks and to kill 399 ostriches as well as requisition the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) over 40 cars and reportedly more than 100 police on the farm since September 22nd, and not have the money to test the birds for the exemption?

How much has this debacle and exercise into Carney Government overreach been charged to Canadian taxpayers?

More than the tests to see if the ostriches are healthy or if they qualify for the exemption?

Other Farmers May Join in Efforts to Disband the CFIA

Pastiney says:

ā€œI just did an interview with a farmer that this very same thing happened to them and it was based off a suspicion of tuberculosis outbreak on their farm.

ā€œThey [the farmers] had over 600 head of cattle, they had sheep, they had goats, they had pig or pigs, they had chickens.

ā€œThey [the CFIA] came in based off suspicion and off their own negligence they killed everything this beautiful older farm had to find out in the end that they tested after everything was deadĀ and there was no tuberculosis.ā€

ā€œI asked her a very important question, and I said could you trust this organization again? And she said, absolutely not.

ā€œSo, it became very clear to me after this about talking to two or three farmers that the Canadian Food Inspection Agency needs to be dismantled.ā€

ā€œIt is an organization that has lost the trust of Canadians.

 

CONCLUSION

 


WATCH Katie is Fighting For Everyone’s Freedom | Stand on Guard

www.kraydensrightnews.comĀ is a reader-supported publication.

To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Continue Reading

Trending

X