Connect with us

Business

Three face federal charges for “domestic terrorism” after targeting Teslas

Published

3 minute read

MXM logo MxM News

Quick Hit:

Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Thursday that three individuals are facing severe federal charges for violent attacks against Tesla vehicles and charging stations. The suspects allegedly used Molotov cocktails and other incendiary devices in what Bondi labeled “domestic terrorism.” Each faces a minimum of five years in prison, with potential sentences of up to 20 years.

Key Details:

  • Bondi warned that the Justice Department would aggressively prosecute anyone engaging in attacks on Tesla properties, stating, “The days of committing crimes without consequence have ended.”

  • One suspect, armed with a suppressed AR-15 rifle, allegedly threw eight Molotov cocktails at a Tesla dealership in Salem, Oregon.

  • Bondi did not release the names of the suspects or specify the full list of charges but emphasized that these crimes will be met with severe legal consequences.

“The days of committing crimes without consequence have ended,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “Let this be a warning: if you join this wave of domestic terrorism against Tesla properties, the Department of Justice will put you behind bars.”

Diving Deeper:

On Thursday, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced charges against three individuals accused of violent attacks targeting Tesla properties in multiple states. The suspects allegedly used Molotov cocktails and other incendiary weapons to destroy Tesla vehicles and charging stations, prompting Bondi to classify the incidents as acts of “domestic terrorism.”

“The days of committing crimes without consequence have ended,” Bondi stated. “Let this be a warning: If you join this wave of domestic terrorism against Tesla properties, the Department of Justice will put you behind bars.”

The attacks spanned Oregon, Colorado, and South Carolina, according to DOJ officials. In Salem, Oregon, one suspect reportedly carried a suppressed AR-15 rifle while hurling Molotov cocktails at a Tesla dealership. In Loveland, Colorado, another suspect was apprehended after allegedly trying to set Tesla vehicles ablaze with similar incendiary devices. Authorities later found the individual in possession of additional materials capable of producing more firebombs.

A third suspect, operating in Charleston, South Carolina, allegedly defaced Tesla charging stations with anti-Trump graffiti before setting them on fire using Molotov cocktails.

While the Justice Department has not released the names of the suspects, each individual faces a minimum of five years in prison, with potential sentences reaching up to 20 years. Bondi reiterated that law enforcement is committed to stopping politically motivated destruction of private property, vowing aggressive prosecution for those responsible.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Business

Trump to impose 30% tariff on EU, Mexico

Published on

From The Center Square

President Donald Trump on Saturday said he will impose 30% tariffs on imported goods from the European Union and Mexico in his latest move to balance trade between the U.S. and other countries.

The tariffs are set to go into effect Aug. 1.

Saturday’s announcement comes a day after the U.S. Department of Treasury released a report Friday showing that tariff revenue helped revenue in the month of June exceed expenses by $27 billion.

“We have had years to discuss our Trading Relationship with The European Union, and we have concluded we must move away from these long-term, large, and persistent, Trade Deficits, engendered by your Tariff, and Non-Tariff, Policies, and Trade Barriers,” Trump wrote in the letter to the EU and posted on his Truth Social account. “Our relationship has been, unfortunately, far from Reciprocal.”

The 30% tariff on EU goods is higher than expected. EU trade ministers are scheduled to meet Monday and could agree to increase tariffs on U.S. goods as retaliation.

In his letter to Mexico, Trump said the U.S. neighbor to the south has helped stem the flow of illegal narcotics and people from entering the country but added that it needed to do more to prevent North America from being a “Narco-Trafficking Playground.”

Earlier in the week, Trump announced new tariffs on several other countries, including 20% tariffs on imports  from the Philippines; 25% on Brunei and Moldova; 30% on Algeria, Iraq and Libya; and 50% on Brazil.

All of the new tariffs announced this week are scheduled to go into effect Aug. 1.

• The Center Square reporters Therese Boudreaux and Andrew Rice contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Business

Prime minister can make good on campaign promise by reforming Canada Health Act

Published on

From the Fraser Institute

By Nadeem Esmail

While running for the job of leading the country, Prime Minister Carney promised to defend the Canada Health Act (CHA) and build a health-care system Canadians can be proud of. Unfortunately, to have any hope of accomplishing the latter promise, he must break the former and reform the CHA.

As long as Ottawa upholds and maintains the CHA in its current form, Canadians will not have a timely, accessible and high-quality universal health-care system they can be proud of.

Consider for a moment the remarkably poor state of health care in Canada today. According to international comparisons of universal health-care systems, Canadians endure some of the lowest access to physicians, medical technologies and hospital beds in the developed world, and wait in queues for health care that routinely rank among the longest in the developed world. This is all happening despite Canadians paying for one of the developed world’s most expensive universal-access health-care systems.

None of this is new. Canada’s poor ranking in the availability of services—despite high spending—reaches back at least two decades. And wait times for health care have nearly tripled since the early 1990s. Back then, in 1993, Canadians could expect to wait 9.3 weeks for medical treatment after GP referral compared to 30 weeks in 2024.

But fortunately, we can find the solutions to our health-care woes in other countries such as Germany, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Australia, which all provide more timely access to quality universal care. Every one of these countries requires patient cost-sharing for physician and hospital services, and allows private competition in the delivery of universally accessible services with money following patients to hospitals and surgical clinics. And all these countries allow private purchases of health care, as this reduces the burden on the publicly-funded system and creates a valuable pressure valve for it.

And this brings us back to the CHA, which contains the federal government’s requirements for provincial policymaking. To receive their full federal cash transfers for health care from Ottawa (totalling nearly $55 billion in 2025/26) provinces must abide by CHA rules and regulations.

And therein lies the rub—the CHA expressly disallows requiring patients to share the cost of treatment while the CHA’s often vaguely defined terms and conditions have been used by federal governments to discourage a larger role for the private sector in the delivery of health-care services.

Clearly, it’s time for Ottawa’s approach to reflect a more contemporary understanding of how to structure a truly world-class universal health-care system.

Prime Minister Carney can begin by learning from the federal government’s own welfare reforms in the 1990s, which reduced federal transfers and allowed provinces more flexibility with policymaking. The resulting period of provincial policy innovation reduced welfare dependency and government spending on social assistance (i.e. savings for taxpayers). When Ottawa stepped back and allowed the provinces to vary policy to their unique circumstances, Canadians got improved outcomes for fewer dollars.

We need that same approach for health care today, and it begins with the federal government reforming the CHA to expressly allow provinces the ability to explore alternate policy approaches, while maintaining the foundational principles of universality.

Next, the Carney government should either hold cash transfers for health care constant (in nominal terms), reduce them or eliminate them entirely with a concordant reduction in federal taxes. By reducing (or eliminating) the pool of cash tied to the strings of the CHA, provinces would have greater freedom to pursue reform policies they consider to be in the best interests of their residents without federal intervention.

After more than four decades of effectively mandating failing health policy, it’s high time to remove ambiguity and minimize uncertainty—and the potential for politically motivated interpretations—in the CHA. If Prime Minister Carney wants Canadians to finally have a world-class health-care system then can be proud of, he should allow the provinces to choose their own set of universal health-care policies. The first step is to fix, rather than defend, the 40-year-old legislation holding the provinces back.

Continue Reading

Trending

X