How are EU law and US law different?

The federal government is made up of more than just the 50 states that make up the U.S. It also includes the District of Columbia and a few overseas territories. The European Union consists of 27 European countries which came together to form the EU, an economic and political union that had never been done before. Even though the European Union (EU) is not a federal government, the way power is shared between the EU’s three governing institutions and its member states is very similar to how power is shared in a federal government. The United States of America has a written constitution, but the European Union does not. On the other hand, the EU Treaties are like a constitution because they spell out who has what power and how laws are made.

Most of the time, EU countries are still responsible for more policy areas than US states. Members of the EU can set health policies (with some help from the EU), but in the US, this is the job of both the federal and state governments. Since the countries that are part of the EU are sovereign, this makes sense.

Why is it important to know this? The EU, on the other hand, has both a central and a national level in charge of environmental policy. Cooperative federalism is one of the most important ideas in the U.S. The federal government’s rules and regulations set a standard for how strict state rules and regulations must be.

Primary VS Secondary Law

All of the other things that the EU does are based on treaties. In these legally binding agreements between EU member countries, the goals of the EU, the rules that EU institutions must follow, how decisions are made, and the relationship between the EU and its members are all explained. You can find examples and studies on this topic on the service Writix with free examples. Treaties are the basis for the laws of the European Union (EU). In the EU, they are called “basic law”.

Secondary law is a set of rules, directives, decisions, recommendations, and views that are made by the government. This set of rules is called ‘secondary law”, and it comes from the goals and ideas behind the treaties.

Legislative Versus Non-legislative Acts

Most legislative acts are passed by following one of the legislative procedures outlined in EU treaties (ordinary or special). Acts that aren’t part of the legislative process don’t have to follow these rules. Instead, EU institutions can pass them by following certain rules.

The European Union (EU) can only make laws in areas where its member states have given it explicit permission to do so through EU treaties.

What is the difference between laws, statutes, acts, and rules in the United States and the European Union?

The language used to talk about art in Europe and the United States can be different. Here are some things that need to be explained.

In the United States, both federal and state laws are about making sure people follow rules about how to act. Congress makes federal laws, statutes, and acts, while executive departments and agencies use a rulemaking process to make federal rules.

When it comes to enforcing the laws that are already on the books, federal rules are more specific than federal laws about how an agency should do this. If rules aren’t followed, penalties could be put in place.

Institutions of the European Union can make rules and directives by using either regular or special legislative processes. But how they are put into place is different.

As soon as European rules take effect, they are automatically put into place in all of the EU’s member states at the same time. No national translation is needed first. But the Member States still have to take care of some administrative tasks (for instance, designate the authorities responsible for implementation or to set out penalties for non-compliance).

Directives, on the other hand, can’t take effect until they are put into national law. However, Member States are free to implement European policies in any way they think is best. To put it simply, directives are a lot more flexible than rules because they only make you do something if you want to get a certain result.

Directives make up most of the EU’s environmental laws, but rules are becoming more common in areas like chemicals and product safety as the need for an integrated approach grows.

There is a big difference between how far US states can go and how far EU member states can go with their laws.

US vs EU regulations: States Can Go Further than Members

EU’s legislative institutions, like the EP and EU Council, use the legislative procedure to make rules. In the US, rules are made by the Executive Branch using the rulemaking process, which we’ve already talked about.

In the United States, regulations are made public as soon as new laws are passed. These regulations explain how the laws will be carried out and fill in any gaps or ambiguities that may arise. On the other hand, European regulations are longer pieces of law that can still be added to and changed by delegated and implementing actions of the Commission, as well as by national administrative rules.

In terms of environmental policy, federal laws and rules are the starting point, but each state in the U.S. is free to make laws that are more strict.

In European Union law, however, things are a bit different. If EU countries are encouraged to have more strict environmental laws than those set by EU directives, this won’t hurt the Single Market. To put it another way, they can’t affect how freely goods and services can move around the EU.

To make matters worse, European Union member states are less likely to put in place more strict rules in areas that are already covered by EU law (such as chemical approvals and trash shipping, to mention a few).

Todayville Content Team

www.todayville.com/

Todayville Content Team works with a wide variety of clients to develop compelling content solutions. Our experienced team develops strategic campaigns that use video and storytelling, digital advertising and social media to help our clients position and distinguish themselves in the market.

Follow Author

Freedom Convoy leader Chris Barber to learn in July whether or not he could face jail time

Also Interesting / 6 days ago

The Best US Hopes for Wimbledon 2025: Who Could Break the Curse at SW19?

Crime / 6 days ago

LA Mayor Karen Bass Makes New Demands Of Trump At Monday Night Press Conference

Also Interesting

Property Markets in Alberta and B.C. Show Strong Momentum

Published on June 12, 2025

Duane Rolheiser

Calgary and Edmonton have both seen a steady level of property sales in recent months.

People who want to buy homes have focused on the location of each property. In both cities, there are options in both new developments and established neighborhoods. Pricing has stayed stable compared to some Canadian markets. Buyers often look at access to schools, parks, and workplaces as they make their choices. New construction projects have brought more units onto the market in some areas.

Condos and single-family houses both see attention. Some buyers prefer newer houses on the outskirts, while others choose homes near central districts. Demand for rental units has risen in many areas of Alberta as well. In most markets in this province, there are properties at a range of different price points.

Strong Buyer Interest in British Columbia

In Vancouver and other large cities in British Columbia, property purchases have stayed at a high level. Buyers study the location, price range, and future changes in each community before making an offer. Areas close to public transit, work, and schools often get the most interest. The supply of homes for sale can be limited, especially for single-family houses near the city center.

Home builders in some parts of British Columbia continue to start new projects. Suburban towns near Vancouver have seen people move from central communities as they seek different price points and more space. Most sales activity comes from a mix of local people and those considering a move from other regions.

Comparing Regional Housing Trends

Markets in Alberta and British Columbia have shown strong sales volumes in both urban and suburban neighborhoods. Buyers in Calgary and Vancouver have sought properties for their location, price point, and plans for future development. In comparison, other cities like Montreal and Ottawa have seen less change in housing demand.

Toronto homes for sale draw buyers based on inventory, neighborhood perks, and pricing. Properties in these areas often attract people considering options across Canada, leading to more balanced market activity in each region.

Influences on Current Demand

The activity in Alberta and British Columbia is shaped by different factors. Economic stability, employment rates, and population growth all play a role. In Calgary, job growth and a reasonable cost of living make the city attractive for new arrivals. Many companies offer positions in energy, construction, and services. This consistent employment keeps more people interested in both renting and buying homes.

British Columbia sees demand for property due to its location near the Pacific, a large service economy, and its climate. Many buyers see homes close to workplaces and public amenities as valuable. The limited space in some Vancouver neighborhoods can lead to more competition for each listing. New government policies on housing and lending may also affect the way buyers choose their properties.

Supply Factors and Market Balance

Builders respond to demand with new projects in both provinces. In Alberta, building new single-family homes or townhouses is common, especially in the outskirts of cities. This can help stabilize prices and supply for buyers who want new properties. By contrast, British Columbia often sees apartment and condo developments due to limited land near city centers.

Inventory levels can still be tight in some parts of both provinces. A limited number of new listings can cause more competition and keep prices firm. In some suburbs, developers offer new construction, while some older core neighborhoods have homes that are renovated or improved. The mix of these options shapes buyer and seller choices week by week.

The Effect of Amenities and Community Features

People choose homes not just for size or price, but also for access to amenities. In Alberta, neighborhoods with nearby schools, healthcare clinics, and parks see steady sales. In British Columbia, walkability, transit options, and access to local shops are important to people buying properties.

Communities that blend these features with reasonable prices often see more interest. Safety, commuting time, and local services also play roles in how buyers look at each listing. Some buyers prefer new developments that offer updated services and features, while others seek established communities with a track record of maintenance and stability.

Urban and Suburban Patterns

Both Alberta and British Columbia show activity in city centers and outer areas. In Calgary and Edmonton, downtown condos appeal to people who want to live near work or entertainment venues. In outer districts, large homes and yards attract buyers who want space and quiet.

Vancouver shows a similar split. Central neighborhoods offer easy access to employment and culture, while areas further out often mean lower prices and larger lots. Over time, people may move from one type of neighborhood to another as their priorities change.

A Look at Pricing and Future Supply

Property prices in Alberta have not risen as quickly as in some other Canadian regions, making the market accessible for many first-time buyers. British Columbia sees higher average prices due to demand and restraints on new supply, especially for new houses in city centers.

Plans for more new units are in place in several Alberta and British Columbia cities. This includes condos, single-family houses, and mixed-use buildings that can serve a range of buyers. Future building projects may affect future prices and supply levels if they proceed as planned.

Summary

Property markets in Alberta and British Columbia continue their activity due to local demand, supply, and economic factors. Buyers in Calgary and Vancouver pay close attention to location, price, and development plans. Cities in Alberta and British Columbia offer a mix of options for people seeking different types of homes at various price points. Local amenities, market inventory, and employment opportunities all shape the activity in these property markets. As local conditions change, builders and buyers keep adjusting their decisions according to their most practical needs and preferences.

Also Interesting

The Best US Hopes for Wimbledon 2025: Who Could Break the Curse at SW19?

Published on June 10, 2025

Todayville Content Team

For American tennis fans, Wimbledon has turned into a tournament of nostalgia and heartbreak. The days of Pete Sampras being the biggest name on grass feel like a lifetime ago – and while Serena Williams has done well for the U.S., she’s now out of the picture. And in recent decades, the men’s title hasn’t been lifted by a US player since Sampras back in 2000 – a quarter of a century ago, no less.

But as we start gearing up for Wimbledon 2025, there’s hope in the air. There’s a whole new generation of American talent—both men and women… And it’s finally starting to break through. With some pretty strong grass-court performances over the past year, there’s actually a bit of hope that maybe the stars and stripes could do it again… finally.

So, let’s take a closer look at the top U.S. contenders for Wimbledon 2025.

Taylor Fritz

When it comes to the American men, Taylor Fritz has to be the most consistent threat. Currently ranked inside the ATP top 10 – at number 4 no less, he’s matured into a well-rounded player, with a game suited perfectly to grass courts. He has a powerful serve, a clean ball-strike, and super sharp net play… and he could be dangerous at Wimbledon.

Last year he made it to the quarters before going out in a five-setter – and this time around, he’ll want to get at least one step further. Obviously, it won’t be easy going against the likes of Carlos Alcaraz and Novak Djokovic—both of whom are the names dominating the Wimbledon betting odds—but if the draw opens up, he could enjoy a serious run.

Ben Shelton

Fritz might be the reliable American option, but then there’s Ben Shelton – very much a wildcard. The 22-year-old exploded onto the scene with a deep run in the US Open in 2023, and while grass isn’t necessarily his natural surface, he’s nothing if not adaptable. And with his huge serve and fearless playing style, he’s a complete nightmare to go against in best-of-five tennis.

Shelton showed plenty of promise in the 2024 grass court season – with strong showings at Queen’s Club and Halle. And if he gets hot, we wouldn’t be too surprised to see him crash the quarterfinals or beyond. If you’re looking for a dark horse, he could be your guy.

Sebastian Korda

Of all the American men, Sebastian Korda is arguably the best suited for a grass game. Tall, elegant, and technically impressive, it’s almost like he was built for Wimbledon. He managed to make it to the fourth round in 2021 but has struggled with injuries ever since. However, if he’s fit and healthy, his court coverage and touch could cause issues for even the best player.

If he is in top form going into Wimbledon 2025, he could surprise some of the higher seeds. He’s already beaten some of the top-10 players on grass, and he’s someone with the mentality to perform well even on the biggest stage.

Coco Gauff

Let’s look at the women… and here we have Coco Gauff, who is unquestionably our biggest Wimbledon hope. Still only 21 years of age, she already has years of Grand Slam experience under her belt—and she even has a US Open title to her name. Her big breakthrough came at Wimbledon back in 2019 when she famously beat the legendary Venus Williams… at just 15 years old. Since then, she’s just gotten even better, especially on faster surfaces.

Her serve is one of the best on the WTA Tour, and her athleticism makes her a tough contender out on grass. With the main competitors being Iga Świątek, who struggles on this surface, and Elena Rybakina, who lacks consistency, this could potentially be her year.

Madison Keys

And we really shouldn’t count out Madison Keys – the 29-year-old who still has the power game to do serious damage on grass. And she got all the way to the Wimbledon quarter finals as recently as 2023.

Her huge serve and flat groundstrokes always work well on grass… and with her experience, she could get a long way if the competition goes her way. Wimbledon is about fearless aggression… and Keys has that by the bucketloads. She may not be the favorite – but savvy fans know that, if the form and conditions are right, she could make it at least to the semis.

Will it be the year for the US at Wimbledon? It’s hard to say… and we’d definitely need a bit of luck on our side. But at Wimbledon, anything is possible!