espionage
24 years later: Tucker Carlson releases interview with retired CIA agent claiming the CIA KNEW 9/11 was coming

Tucker Carlson has a new 9/11 series, and after a deep-dive investigation, he firmly believes he and his team have answered one of “the larger questions” surrounding that tragic event 24 years ago.
From The Vigilant Fox
“CIA knew the hijackers were here… to commit acts of terror against the United States.”
The fact that blew Tucker’s mind most is that insiders bet against (shorted) the stocks of airlines and banks tied to 9/11, made a fortune, and the US government has kept their identities secret for 24 years.
“Whoever made those trades clearly knew 9/11 was coming, and the government has protected the identity of those people for 24 years. And I just have to ask, what could possibly be the explanation for that?” Tucker objected.
Tucker, who once attacked people for questioning 9/11, now says the case that there was foreknowledge is “conclusive.”
“Did they know it and allow it unintentionally or intentionally, or did they stage it?” Tucker asked.
“I can’t answer those questions. But we conclusively answered the larger question, which is — oh yeah — there was foreknowledge of it.”’
From TuckerCarlson.com
A former FBI agent who was embedded in the CIA’s Bin Laden unit, Mark Rossini, claims the CIA was fully aware that the 9/11 hijackers were in the United States planning an attack.
Rather than inform the FBI, the CIA tried to recruit two of the hijackers for a “false-flag” operation, which quickly spiraled out of control. The failed mission raises urgent questions about government secrecy, intelligence failures, and what really happened before 9/11.
This is the first part of a 5 part series called The 9/11 Files. Episode 1 is free. Episodes 2 to 5 can be found at TuckerCarlson.com
This is the
espionage
Canada Under Siege: Sparking a National Dialogue on Security and Corruption

By Garry Clement, and Dean Baxendale
Authors, Parliamentarians and Security Experts Rally for Ottawa Conference.
Canada is under siege — and most Canadians don’t even know it. Foreign interference, organized crime, opaque money flows, and state-backed influence operations are not distant threats. They are here, in our communities, our financial system, and even our political processes. They are undermining our sovereignty, corroding trust in our institutions, and shaping policies in ways that put the interests of hostile states and criminal networks ahead of those of Canadians.
This is no longer speculation. It is documented. It is systemic. And it is happening in plain sight.
To bring these dangers into the open, we are launching a national conversation through a press conference and public platform hosted by the Macdonald-Laurier Institute. On October 8 in Ottawa, we will introduce these threats to the national agenda. The event coincides with the release of our new book, Canada Under Siege: How Prince Edward Island Became a Forward Operating Base for the PRC, co-authored by Michel Juneau-Katsuya, Dean Baxendale, and myself. The book traces how Canada’s smallest province became a beachhead for Chinese state-linked influence operations.
Through real estate acquisitions, immigration and investor programs, and targeted political donations, foreign state actors — particularly the People’s Republic of China — have leveraged PEI as a soft entry point to the Canadian political and economic system. The island has become, in effect, a forward operating base for Chinese threat actors — and Canada looked away as it happened.
For too long, Canada has been complacent — willfully blind to malign influence operations, hostile state actors, and the domestic enablers who profit from weak laws and lax enforcement. Our financial system remains a magnet for dirty money, with beneficial ownership hidden behind shell companies. Our sanctions regime is inconsistently enforced, allowing sanctioned individuals and entities to move assets into Canada with impunity. Our immigration system has been exploited by corrupt actors who see Canada not as a home, but as a safe haven for assets and influence.
Ordinary Canadians are paying the price — housing unaffordability as foreign funds inflate markets; national security risks as critical infrastructure and technology sectors are infiltrated or acquired; and erosion of trust as Canadians lose faith in institutions that fail to protect them.
This national conversation will be evidence-based and solutions-focused. At the event we will assemble a distinguished group of experts — including former Prince Edward Island MP Wayne Easter; Senator Leo Housakos, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate, who will address Canada’s lack of action on national-security threats; Kevin Vuong, former Member of Parliament; LGen (Ret’d) Christopher Coates; Dean Baxendale, President of Optimum Publishing and democracy advocate; and Garry Clement, former RCMP Superintendent — to map the threat landscape and chart a practical, actionable path forward to safeguard Canada’s sovereignty, democracy and economy.
Canada must stop being a soft target. We must strengthen transparency laws to expose foreign funding, lobbying efforts, and beneficial ownership of Canadian assets; enforce sanctions and anti-money-laundering measures so dirty money cannot quietly flow into our economy; equip our intelligence and law enforcement agencies with the legal tools, resources, and political backing they need to disrupt and prosecute interference operations; and educate and engage Canadians so the public understands what is happening — and demands accountability from government and institutions.
The launch of Canada Under Siege and the Macdonald-Laurier Institute’s platform represent a turning point. This is our chance to move beyond whispers, beyond closed-door briefings, beyond the false comfort of “this could never happen here.” The threats to Canada’s democracy are real. They are here. And they are growing.
We believe Canadians deserve the truth — and a plan to confront it. This initiative will give them both. Canada has faced existential threats before, and we have always prevailed. But only when we recognized the danger, mobilized our citizens, and acted decisively.
The time to act is now.
The Bureau is a reader-supported publication.
To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
espionage
Inside Xi’s Fifth Column: How Beijing Uses Gangsters to Wage Political Warfare in Taiwan — and the West

A new Jamestown Foundation report details how China’s Ministry of State Security and allied triads have been used to subvert Taiwan’s democracy as part of Beijing’s united front.
Editor’s Note
The Bureau has previously reported on how Chinese state-linked crime networks have exploited Canada’s real estate market, casinos, and diaspora associations, often under the cover of united front work. One of these groups, the Chinese Freemasons, has been linked to meetings with Canadian politicians, as reported by The Globe and Mail ahead of the 2025 federal election. The Globe noted that the Toronto chapter explicitly advocates for the “peaceful reunification of Taiwan.” The Jamestown Foundation’s new findings on groups active in Taiwan — including the Chinese Freemasons, also known as the Hongmen, the related Bamboo Union triad, and the China Unification Promotion Party (CUPP) — show that Taiwan is the epicenter of a strategy also visible, though less intensively, across democracies including the United States. The parallels — from Vancouver to Sydney to New York to Taipei — should alert governments that the “fifth column” problem is international, and it is growing.
TAIPEI — At a banquet in Shenzhen more than two decades ago, Chang An-lo — the Bamboo Union boss known as “Big Brother Chang” or “White Wolf” — raised a glass to one of the Communist Party’s princelings. His guest, Hu Shiying, was the son of Mao Zedong’s propaganda chief. “Big Brother Chang,” Hu reportedly toasted him, an episode highlighted in a new report from the Jamestown Foundation.
Hu would later be described by Australian journalist John Garnaut as an “old associate of Xi Jinping.” That link — through Hu and other princelings Chang claimed to have met — placed the Bamboo Union leader within the orbit of Party elites. Garnaut also reported that the Ministry of State Security (MSS) had used the Bamboo Union to channel lucrative opportunities to Taiwanese politicians. According to Jamestown researcher Martin Purbrick, a former Royal Hong Kong Police intelligence officer, such episodes show how the CCP has systematically co-opted Taiwanese organized crime as part of its united front strategy.
“The long history of links between the CCP and organized crime groups in Taiwan,” Purbrick writes, “shows that United Front strategy has embedded itself deeply into Taiwan’s political life.”
Chang’s global influence is not a relic of the past. The Bureau reported, drawing on leaked 1990s Canadian immigration records, that intelligence indicated Chang’s triad had effectively “purchased” the state of Belize, on Mexico’s southern border, for use in smuggling illegal immigrants into the United States. But Chang is more relevant than ever as fears of Beijing invading Taiwan grow. In August 2025, seated in his Taipei office before a PRC flag, he appeared on a YouTube program to deny he led any “fifth column.” Instead, he insisted Taiwan must “embrace” Beijing and cast himself as a “bridge for cross-strait peace.”
His denial came just months after Taiwan’s Ministry of Justice accused CUPP of acting as a political front for organized crime and foreign interference. Police suspected more than 130 members of crimes ranging from homicide to drug trafficking. Prosecutors charged CUPP operatives with taking $2.3 million from the CCP to fund propaganda. In January, the Ministry of the Interior moved to dissolve the party outright, submitting the case to Taiwan’s Constitutional Court. By March, a Kaohsiung court sentenced CUPP deputy secretary-general Wen Lung and two retired military officers for recruiting Taiwanese personnel on behalf of the PRC. According to court filings, Wen had been introduced by Chang to the Zhuhai Taiwan Affairs Office, which in turn connected him to a PLA liaison officer.
President Lai Ching-te, in a March national security address, warned that Beijing was attempting to “divide, destroy, and subvert us from within.” Intelligence assessments in Taipei describe the Bamboo Union and CUPP as part of a potential “fifth column,” prepared to foment unrest and manipulate opinion in the event of an invasion.
The historical record shows why Taipei is so concerned. Chang’s name has shadowed some of Taiwan’s darkest chapters. In the 1980s, he was suspected of involvement in the assassination of dissident writer Henry Liu in California. He was later convicted of heroin smuggling in the United States, serving ten years in prison. After returning to Taiwan, he fled again in 1996 when authorities sought his arrest, spending 17 years in Shenzhen. During those years, he cultivated ties with influential Party families. At the Shenzhen banquet, Washington Post journalist John Pomfret wrote, Hu Shiying introduced him as “Big Brother Chang,” signaling acceptance in elite circles. Garnaut, writing over a decade later, noted that Hu was an “old associate of Xi Jinping” and that Chang had moved comfortably among other princelings, including sons of a former CCP general secretary and a top revolutionary general.
These connections translated into political capital. When Chang returned to Taiwan in 2013, he launched the China Unification Promotion Party — a pro-Beijing group openly advocating “one country, two systems.” He declared his mission was to “cultivate red voters.” CUPP cadres and Bamboo Union affiliates became visible in street politics, clashing with independence activists and disrupting rallies. During U.S. Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s 2021 visit, they staged counter-protests echoing Beijing’s line.
The ideological warfare runs even deeper. A Phoenix TV segment from 2011 recalled how a Bamboo Union elder declared in 1981 that he “would rather the CCP rule Taiwan than have Taiwan taken away by Taiwan independents.” Chang himself has echoed this sentiment for decades. In 2005, he launched a Guangzhou-based group called the Defending China Alliance, later rebranded in Taipei as CUPP. His activism has spanned disruptive protests, nationalist rallies, and propaganda campaigns amplified through China-linked media channels.
Purbrick situates these developments within a wider united front playbook. Taiwanese triads and Chinese Freemason associations are courted as grassroots mobilizers, intermediaries, and psychological enforcers. A recent report from the Washington Post has also linked the Chinese Freemasons to the powerful 14K Triad, a global network deeply implicated in Chinese underground banking networks accused of laundering fentanyl proceeds for Mexican cartels through the United States. The triad–Hongmen nexus complements other CCP efforts: online influence campaigns, cultural outreach, and intelligence recruitment inside Taiwan’s military.
The implications extend beyond Taiwan. In Canada, Australia, the United States, Southeast Asia, and beyond, intelligence agencies have documented how PRC-linked triads launder drug profits, fund political donations, and intimidate diaspora critics. These groups benefit from tacit state protection: their criminality overlooked so long as they advance Beijing’s strategic objectives. It is hybrid warfare by stealth — not soldiers storming beaches, but criminal syndicates reshaping politics from within.
For Taiwan, the Bamboo Union and CUPP remain immediate threats. For other democracies, they serve as case studies of how united front tactics adapt across borders. President Lai’s warning that Beijing seeks to “create the illusion that China is governing Taiwan” resonates internationally.
Before leaving journalism to establish an advisory firm, John Garnaut himself became entangled in the political fallout of his reporting. He was sued by a Chinese-Australian real estate developer from Shenzhen, who had funneled large donations to Australian political parties. The developer, later publicly implicated in the case by an Australian lawmaker under parliamentary privilege, successfully sued Garnaut for defamation in 2019. Subsequent disclosures confirmed the tycoon’s implication in an FBI indictment involving United Nations influence schemes and notorious Chinese operative Patrick Ho, later linked to a Chinese oil conglomerate accused of targeting the Biden family in influence operations. Together, these episodes highlight the global reach of united front networks.
-
Business2 days ago
Over $2B California Solar Plant Built To Last, Now Closing Over Inefficiency
-
Alberta2 days ago
Alberta’s Justice and Public Safety Ministers shoot down Ottawa’s firearm buyback failure
-
Business2 days ago
Google Admits Biden White House Pressured Content Removal, Promises to Restore Banned YouTube Accounts
-
National1 day ago
Statscan: Canada is getting Older, Poorer, and Smaller
-
Business2 days ago
The Leaked Conversation at the heart of the federal Gun Buyback Boondoggle
-
Business2 days ago
Google says Biden admin ‘pressed’ it to censor some COVID-19 content
-
espionage1 day ago
Canada Under Siege: Sparking a National Dialogue on Security and Corruption
-
Autism1 day ago
Secretary Kennedy’s Key Remark at Autism Press Conference